[1] |
Dance DR, Sechopoulos I. Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging. Phys Med Biol, 2016; 61, R271-304. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/19/R271 |
[2] |
Kelaranta A, Toroi P, Timonen M, et al. Conformance of mean glandular dose from phantom and patient data in mammography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2015; 164, 342-53. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncu261 |
[3] |
Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, et al. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys Med Biol, 2000; 45, 3225-40. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308 |
[4] |
Dance DR, Young KC, van Engen RE. Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys Med Biol, 2009; 54, 4361-72. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/002 |
[5] |
Dance DR. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. Phys Med Biol, 1990; 35, 1211-9. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/35/9/002 |
[6] |
Wang W, Qiu R, Ren L, et al. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model. Med Phys, 2017; 44, 2503-14. doi: 10.1002/mp.2017.44.issue-6 |
[7] |
Oduko JM, Young KC, Burch A. A Survey of Patient Doses from Digital Mammography Systems in the UK in 2007 to 2009. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010; 6136, 365-70. |
[8] |
Pasicz K, Fabiszewska E, Grabska I, et al. Mean glandular doses in mammography:a comparison of values displayed by a mammography unit with in-house values, both using he method proposed by Dance. J Radiol Prot, 2016; 36, 709-15. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/36/3/709 |
[9] |
Du X, Wang J, Yang CY, et al. Investigation of mean glandular dose in diagnostic mammography in China. Biomed Environ Sci, 2014; 27, 396-9. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=8b2ba5306fed672f6f477745df8e9d67&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn |
[10] |
Tsapaki V, Tsalafoutas IA, Poga V, et al. Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece. J Radiol Prot, 2008; 28, 337-46. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/28/3/004 |
[11] |
Matsunaga Y, Kawaguchi A, Kobayashi K, et al. PATIENT EXPOSURE DURING PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY AND MAMMOGRAPHY IN JAPAN IN 1974-2014. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2017; 176, 347-53. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncx017 |
[12] |
Sá DRC, Fartaria MJ, Garcia Alves JH, et al. PORTUGUESE STUDY OF MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE IN MAMMOGRAPHY AND COMPARISON WITH EUROPEAN REFERENCES. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2018; 179, 391-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncx300 |
[13] |
Asada Y, Suzuki S, Minami K, et al. Results of a 2011 national questionnaire for investigation of mean glandular dose from mammography in Japan. J Radiol Prot, 2014; 34, 125-32. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/34/1/125 |
[14] |
Asada Y, Suzuki S, Minami K, et al. Survey of patient exposure from general radiography and mammography in Japan in 2014. J Radiol Prot, 2016; 36, N8-18. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/36/2/N8 |
[15] |
Biegala M, Jakubowska T, Markowska K. Effect of anode/filter combination on average glandular dose in mammography. J Med Phys, 2015; 40, 45-51. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.152251 |