[1] Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA. Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg, 2020; 49, 499−517.
[2] Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar pedicle screws in spondylolytic vertebrae: comparison of fixation strength between the traditional trajectory and a cortical bone trajectory. J Neurosurg Spine, 2016; 24, 910−5. doi:  10.3171/2015.11.SPINE15926
[3] Hockley A, Ge D, Vasquez-Montes D, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery: an analysis of opioids, nonopioid analgesics, and perioperative characteristics. Global Spine J, 2019; 9, 624−9. doi:  10.1177/2192568218822320
[4] Qin R, Liu B, Zhou P, et al. Minimally invasive versus traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-level spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg, 2019; 122, 180−9. doi:  10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.202
[5] Vazan M, Gempt J, Meyer B, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2017; 159, 1137−46. doi:  10.1007/s00701-017-3078-3
[6] Wang YP, An JL, Sun YP, et al. Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion in obese patients with lumbar disk prolapse. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2017; 13, 87−94. doi:  10.2147/TCRM.S117063
[7] Imada AO, Huynh TR, Drazin D. Minimally invasive versus open laminectomy/discectomy, transforaminal lumbar, and posterior lumbar interbody fusions: a systematic review. Cureus, 2017; 9, e1488.
[8] Mizuno M, Kuraishi K, Umeda Y, et al. Midline lumbar fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2014; 54, 716−21. doi:  10.2176/nmc.st.2013-0395
[9] Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J, 2009; 9, 366−73. doi:  10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.008
[10] Li HM, Zhang RJ, Gao H, et al. Biomechanical fixation properties of the cortical bone trajectory in the osteoporotic lumbar spine. World Neurosurg, 2018; 119, e717−27. doi:  10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.253
[11] Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Kato T, et al. In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014; 39, E240−5. doi:  10.1097/BRS.0000000000000116
[12] Bohl MA, Hlubek RJ, Kakarla UK, et al. Divergent bilateral posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical screw fixation: description of new trajectory for interbody technique from midline exposure. World Neurosurg, 2018; 113, e480−5. doi:  10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.060
[13] Tortolani PJ, Stroh DA. Cortical bone trajectory technique for posterior spinal instrumentation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2016; 24, 755−61. doi:  10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00597
[14] Malcolm JG, Moore MK, Choksh FH, et al. Comparing cortical trajectory transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions against pedicle trajectory transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions and posterolateral fusions: a retrospective cohort study of 90-day outcomes. Neurosurgery, 2018; 83, 1234−40. doi:  10.1093/neuros/nyx619
[15] Hoffman H, Verhave B, Jalal MS, et al. Comparison of cortical bone trajectory screw placement using the midline lumbar fusion technique to traditional pedicle screws: a case-control study. Int J Spine Surg, 2019; 13, 33−8. doi:  10.14444/6005
[16] Sakaura H, Miwa T, Yamashita T, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study. J Neurosurg Spine, 2016; 25, 591−5. doi:  10.3171/2016.3.SPINE151525
[17] Marengo N, Ajello M, Pecoraro MF, et al. Cortical bone trajectory screws in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive surgery for maximal muscle sparing-a prospective comparative study with the traditional open technique. Biomed Res Int, 2018; 7424568.
[18] Kasukawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, et al. Short-term results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using pedicle screw with cortical bone trajectory compared with conventional trajectory. Asian Spine J, 2015; 9, 440−8. doi:  10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.440
[19] Elmekaty M, Kotani Y, Mehy EE, et al. Clinical and radiological comparison between three different minimally invasive surgical fusion techniques for single-level lumbar isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis: minimally invasive surgical posterolateral fusion versus minimally invasive surgical transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus midline lumbar fusion. Asian Spine J, 2018; 12, 870−9. doi:  10.31616/asj.2018.12.5.870
[20] Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW, et al. Anterior fresh frozen allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if com- bined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects? Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1995; 20, 1410−8.
[21] Delgado-Fernández J, Rivas PP, Gil-Simoes R, et al. How I do it? Lumbar cortical bone trajectory fixation with image-guided neuronavigation. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2019; 161, 2423−8. doi:  10.1007/s00701-019-04067-0
[22] Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Nemoto O, et al. Morphometric measurement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw insertion using computed tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2013; 26, E248−53. doi:  10.1097/BSD.0b013e318288ac39
[23] Peretz AM, Hipp JA, Heggeness MH. The internal bony architecture of the sacrum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998; 23, 971−4. doi:  10.1097/00007632-199805010-00001
[24] Sakaura H, Miwa T, Yamashita T, et al. Fixation strength of caudal pedicle screws after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the modified cortical bone trajectory screw method. Asian Spine J, 2016; 10, 639−45. doi:  10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.639
[25] Delgado-Fernandez J, García-Pallero MA, Blasco G, et al. Review of cortical bone trajectory: Evidence of a new technique. Asian Spine J, 2017; 11, 817−83. doi:  10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.817
[26] Matsukawa K, Yato Y. Lumbar pedicle screw fixation with cortical bone trajectory: A review from anatomical and biomechanical standpoints. Spine Surg Relat Res, 2017; 1, 164−73. doi:  10.22603/ssrr.1.2017-0006
[27] Lee HJ, Kim JS, Ryu KS. Minimally invasive TLIF using unilateral approach and single cage at single level in patients over 65. Biomed Res Int, 2016; 4679865.
[28] Sclafani JA, Kim CW. Complications associated with the initial learning curve of minimally invasive spine surgery: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014; 472, 1711−7. doi:  10.1007/s11999-014-3495-z