Volume 23 Issue 3
Jun.  2010
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

CHEN WANG, XU-HONG HOU, MING-LIANG ZHANG, YU-QIAN BAO, YU-HUA ZOU, WEN-HONG ZHONG, KUN-SAN XIANG, WEI-PING JIA. Comparison of Body Mass Index with Body Fat Percentage in the Evaluation of Obesity in Chinese[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 23(3): 173-179.
Citation: CHEN WANG, XU-HONG HOU, MING-LIANG ZHANG, YU-QIAN BAO, YU-HUA ZOU, WEN-HONG ZHONG, KUN-SAN XIANG, WEI-PING JIA. Comparison of Body Mass Index with Body Fat Percentage in the Evaluation of Obesity in Chinese[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 23(3): 173-179.

Comparison of Body Mass Index with Body Fat Percentage in the Evaluation of Obesity in Chinese

Funds:  the Major Program of Shanghai Municipality for Basic Research(08dj1400601)%the Shanghai Pujiang Program(OTpj 14062)%Projent for Shanghai key Laboratlry of Diabetes Mellitus(08DZ2230200)
  • Objective To evaluate the present Chinese body mass index (BMI) criteria with body fat percentage (BF%) in determining obesity in Chinese population. Methods A total of 4 907 subjects (age: 20-90 yrs) were enrolled in the baseline survey of a longitudinal epidemiological study, and 2 638 of them were reevaluated in 5.5 years later. The Chinese BMI and WHO BF% were used to define obesity, respectively. Results The diagnostic agreement between the Chinese BMI and WHO BF% definitions for obesity was poor for both men (kappa: 0.210, 95% CI: 0.179-0.241) and women (kappa: 0.327, 95% CI: 0.296-0.358). However, BMI had a good correlation with BF% both in men (r: 0.785, P<0.01) and women (r: 0.864, P<0.01). The age and sex-adjusted relative risks (RR) for incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) were significantly higher in subjects with intermediate BF% (BF%:20.1%-25% for men, 30.1%-35% for women) (RR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.23-4.48) and high BF%(BF%>25% for men and >35% for women)(RR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.43-5.81), or in subjects with high BMI (BMI≥28 kg/m2) (RR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.31-4.63) when compared to those with low BF% (BF%≤20% for men and≤30% for women) or low BMI (BMI<24 kg/m2) respectively. No difference in risk could be found in those with intermediate BMI (BMI: 24-27.9 kg/m2) (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.86-2.40), as compared to those with low BMI (BMI<24 kg/m2), whose BF% ranged widely from 7.8 to 50.3%. Conclusion BMI was correlated with BF%. Both BMI and BF% were associated with high risk for T2DM. However, BMI had its limitations in the interpretation of subjects with BMI between 24 and 27.9 kg/m2.
  • 加载中
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(1277) PDF downloads(40) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Comparison of Body Mass Index with Body Fat Percentage in the Evaluation of Obesity in Chinese

Funds:  the Major Program of Shanghai Municipality for Basic Research(08dj1400601)%the Shanghai Pujiang Program(OTpj 14062)%Projent for Shanghai key Laboratlry of Diabetes Mellitus(08DZ2230200)

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the present Chinese body mass index (BMI) criteria with body fat percentage (BF%) in determining obesity in Chinese population. Methods A total of 4 907 subjects (age: 20-90 yrs) were enrolled in the baseline survey of a longitudinal epidemiological study, and 2 638 of them were reevaluated in 5.5 years later. The Chinese BMI and WHO BF% were used to define obesity, respectively. Results The diagnostic agreement between the Chinese BMI and WHO BF% definitions for obesity was poor for both men (kappa: 0.210, 95% CI: 0.179-0.241) and women (kappa: 0.327, 95% CI: 0.296-0.358). However, BMI had a good correlation with BF% both in men (r: 0.785, P<0.01) and women (r: 0.864, P<0.01). The age and sex-adjusted relative risks (RR) for incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) were significantly higher in subjects with intermediate BF% (BF%:20.1%-25% for men, 30.1%-35% for women) (RR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.23-4.48) and high BF%(BF%>25% for men and >35% for women)(RR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.43-5.81), or in subjects with high BMI (BMI≥28 kg/m2) (RR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.31-4.63) when compared to those with low BF% (BF%≤20% for men and≤30% for women) or low BMI (BMI<24 kg/m2) respectively. No difference in risk could be found in those with intermediate BMI (BMI: 24-27.9 kg/m2) (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.86-2.40), as compared to those with low BMI (BMI<24 kg/m2), whose BF% ranged widely from 7.8 to 50.3%. Conclusion BMI was correlated with BF%. Both BMI and BF% were associated with high risk for T2DM. However, BMI had its limitations in the interpretation of subjects with BMI between 24 and 27.9 kg/m2.

CHEN WANG, XU-HONG HOU, MING-LIANG ZHANG, YU-QIAN BAO, YU-HUA ZOU, WEN-HONG ZHONG, KUN-SAN XIANG, WEI-PING JIA. Comparison of Body Mass Index with Body Fat Percentage in the Evaluation of Obesity in Chinese[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 23(3): 173-179.
Citation: CHEN WANG, XU-HONG HOU, MING-LIANG ZHANG, YU-QIAN BAO, YU-HUA ZOU, WEN-HONG ZHONG, KUN-SAN XIANG, WEI-PING JIA. Comparison of Body Mass Index with Body Fat Percentage in the Evaluation of Obesity in Chinese[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 23(3): 173-179.

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return