-
A total of 6,936 observations of children aged 6–17 years from 12 provinces and cities, comprising of 4,341 subjects and 298 communities, were examined in this study. The mean age was 11.0 ± 3.3 years, and the sex composition was consistent across all the survey years. The proportions of the children who participated in the survey once, twice, three times, four times, and five times were 59.0%, 26.1%, 11.2%, 3.5%, and 0.2%, respectively. Over the 11 years, a decrease of 1.7 years in the mean age of the children, an increase of 50 thousand yuan in annual family income, and an increase of 13.5 of the urbanization index of the community (P < 0.001) were observed. Furthermore, a significant increase in the proportion of children residing in the south was observed (P = 0.030; Table 1).
Table 1. Demographic characteristic of the participants
Variables CHNS year Statistics
(P value)2004 2006 2009 2011 2015 N 1,593 1,267 1,141 1,544 1,391 Sex (%)a Boys 854 (53.6) 677 (53.4) 644 (56.4) 791 (51.2) 728 (52.3) Z = −0.304
(Unilateral P = 0.381)Girls 739 (46.4) 590 (46.6) 497 (43.6) 753 (48.8) 663 (47.7) Age (years), mean ± SDd 11.9 ± 3.3 11.3 ± 3.4 11.0 ± 3.2 10.8 ± 3.3 10.2 ± 3.1 F = 64.5 (P < 0.001) Ethnicity (%)b Han 1,374 (86.3) 1,065 (84.1) 957 (83.9) 1,353 (87.6) 1,212 (87.1) Z = −0.458
(Unilateral P = 0.323)Minority 219 (13.7) 202 (15.9) 182 (16.0) 189 (12.3) 169 (12.2) Unknown 0 0 2 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 10 (0.7) Annual family income (thousands), mean ± SDd 0.4 ± 0.9 0.7 ± 1.2 1.2 ± 3.0 2.1 ± 3.9 5.4 ± 20.8 F = 44.0 (P < 0.001) Paternal educational level (%)c Low (primary or below) 204 (12.8) 198 (15.6) 153 (13.4) 225 (14.6) 195 (14.0) Χ2 = 0.000 (P = 0.995) Middle (secondary completed) 1,203 (75.5) 938 (74.0) 871 (76.3) 1,122 (72.6) 1,041 (74.8) High (college or higher) 186 (11.7) 131 (10.4) 117 (10.3) 197 (12.8) 155 (11.2) Maternal educational level (%)c Low (primary or below) 307 (19.3) 271 (21.4) 225 (19.7) 315 (20.4) 283 (20.4) Χ2 = 0.002 (P = 0.966) Middle (secondary completed) 1,102 (69.2) 870 (68.6) 805 (70.6) 1,040 (67.4) 960 (69.0) High (college or higher) 184 (11.6) 126 (9.9) 111 (9.7) 189 (12.2) 148 (10.6) Urbanization index (SD)d 58.6 (19.9) 61.7 (20.1) 64.6 (18.9) 70.5(19.6) 72.1 (17.3) F = 110.8 (P < 0.001) Residential areas (%)a Urban 444 (27.9) 370 (29.2) 308 (27.0) 583 (37.8) 486 (34.9) Z = 1.540
(Unilateral P = 0.062)Rural 1,149 (72.1) 897 (70.8) 833 (73.0) 961 (62.2) 905 (65.1) Region (%)a North 679 (42.6) 500 (39.5) 402 (35.2) 494 (32.0) 446 (32.1) Z = −1.88
(Unilateral P = 0.03)South 914 (57.4) 767 (60.5) 739 (64.8) 1,050 (68.0) 945 (67.9) Note. aUsing the Cochran-Armitage trend test. bUsing the Fisher exact test. cUsing the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test. dUsing the multiple linear model to test the trends after adjusting for other sociodemographic characteristics. CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey. -
The proportion of children with low PA levels (i.e., physical inactivity) increased from 76.0% in 2004 to 81.5% in 2015 (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.19–1.90; P < 0.001), whereas that of children with high PA levels decreased from 9.0% in 2004 to 5.8% in 2015 (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.84; P < 0.001). The random-effects ordinal regression model showed a significant difference in PA level among the communities (P = 0.042), but no significant difference was observed in the trends of the PA levels among the communities over time. The sex stratification analysis revealed that the prevalence of physical inactivity among boys increased from 70.0% to 80.0% (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.30–2.34; P < 0.001), whereas that of boys with high PA levels decreased from 12.0% to 7.0% (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43–0.77; P < 0.001) from 2004 to 2015. No significant differences were observed among girls. In 2015, the prevalence of physical inactivity among girls was 83.3%, and the proportion of girls with high PA levels was 4.3% (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Trends of physical activity levels among Chinese children from 2004 to 2015. The random-effects ordinal regression model was conducted to examine the trends in PA levels across CHNS survey years, controlling for the random effect of communities and adjusting for socio-demographic factors including gender, age, ethnicity, paternal education level, maternal education level, annual family income, urbanization index of community, residential area and region. CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey.
-
From 2004 to 2015, we found no evidence of a change in the mean time spent in PA per day, but the average time spent in MVPA per day declined by 26.9%, from 47.2 ± 2.3 min/d to 34.5 ± 2.1 min/d (F = 9.29, P < 0.001). Over the 11-year period, the mean weekly PA volume declined by 13.9%, from 41.7 ± 1.6 MET-hr/week to 35.9 ± 1.7 MET-hr/week (F = 5.16, P < 0.001). Of the four types of PA, active leisure contributed the largest proportion of the PA volume. In-school PA declined by 39.7%, from 11.6 ± 0.6 MET-hr/week in 2004 to 7.0 ± 0.5 MET-hr/week in 2015 (F = 25.04, P < 0.001). More profound decreases in PA were observed between 2011 and 2015, with the time spent in PA decreased by 15.3% (P = 0.004), MVPA decreased by 24.8% (P < 0.001), and PA volume decreased by 17.5% (P = 0.002). In addition, the volumes of in-school PA, active travel PA, and domestic PA decreased by 42.1%, 10.3%, and 44.4% (P < 0.001), respectively (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Trends of physical activity among Chinese children from 2004 to 2015. Repeated measures mixed effect models were conducted to examine the trends of PA across CHNS survey years, controlling for the random effect of communities and adjusting for socio-demographic factors including gender, age, ethnicity, paternal education level, maternal education level, annual family income, urbanization index of community, residential area and region. “−−” indicates a significant decrease in the overall trend (P < 0.001). PA: Physical Activity; MVPA: Moderate- to Vigorous-intensity Physical Activity; CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey.
-
The time spent in sedentary behaviors among the children increased by 7.5%, from 23.9 ± 0.6 hr/week in 2004 to 25.7 ± 0.6 hr/week in 2015 (F = 15.17, P < 0.001). The education and screen-based entertainment categories were the predominant contributors to sedentary behaviors. Over the 11 years, the time spent in activities under the screen-based entertainment and transportation categories increased by 2.9 h/week (F = 20.37, P < 0.001) and 1.3 h/week (F = 5.45, P < 0.001), respectively, while the time spent in recreational activities decreased by 0.4 hr/week (F = 8.83, P = 0.024) and educational sedentary behaviors remained stable. Among the activities under the screen-based entertainment category, the Internet and games subcategories showed more profound increases in the times spent in these activities, with increases of 2.5 h/week (F = 50.69, P < 0.001) and 1.3 hr/week (F = 25.37, P < 0.001), respectively, from 2004 to 2015. By contrast, the time spent in activities under the TV subcategory decreased by 0.8 hr/week (F = 8.23, P < 0.001) over the 11-year period (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Trends of sedentary behaviors among Chinese children from 2004 to 2015. Repeated measures mixed effect models were conducted to examine the trends of sedentary behaviors across CHNS survey years, controlling for the random effect of communities and adjusting for socio-demographic factors including gender, age, ethnicity, paternal education level, maternal education level, annual family income, urbanization index of community, residential area and region. “++” indicates a significant increase in the overall trend (P < 0.001); “+” indicates an increase in the overall trend (P < 0.05); “−−” indicates a significant decrease in the overall trend (P < 0.001). CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey.
-
As shown in Table 2, the repeated-measures mixed-effects model analysis revealed that the variations among communities and observations accounted for 2.6% and 97.4% of the total variation in PA volume among children, respectively. In each survey year, the PA volume differed among the communities (P < 0.001). Likewise, the changes in PA volume over time differed among the communities (P < 0.001). The PA volume was 5.7 MET-hr/week lower in 2015 than in 2004 (P = 0.003), but no significant differences in PA volume were observed between 2004 and the other survey years. Regarding the results of the quantile regression analyses, the PA volume in 2006 was 1.3 MET-hr/week lower than that in 2004 at the 25th quartile (P = 0.048); the PA volumes in 2011 were 3.6 MET-hr/week (P = 0.001) and 4.3 MET-hr/week (P = 0.029) higher than those in 2004 at the 50th and 75th quartiles; and the PA volume of PA in 2015 was 5.4 to 6.5 MET-hr/week higher than that in 2004 at all quartiles (P ≤ 0.018).
Table 2. Results of the repeated-measures mixed-effects model and quantile regression model analyses of the factors associated with the volume of physical activity among Chinese children from 2004 to 2015
Variables Repeated-measures
mixed-effects modelsQuantile regression models 25th quantile 50th quantile 75th quantile Trend tests
(P value)β value (SE) P value β value
(95% CI)P value β value
(95% CI)P value β value
(95% CI)P value CHNS year 2015 −5.7 (1.9) 0.003 −5.4
(−6.6, −4.2)< 0.001 −6.5
(−8.6, −4.4)< 0.001 −5.8
(−10.6, −1)0.018 < 0.001 2011 2.1 (1.8) 0.245 0.4
(−0.9, 1.8)0.531 3.6
(1.4, 5.8)0.001 4.3
(0.4, 8.2)0.029 2009 1.4 (1.9) 0.467 0.1
(−1.4, 1.7)0.869 1.2
(−0.9, 3.2)0.279 1.2
(−2.7, 5.1)0.547 2006 −1.2 (1.8) 0.514 −1.3
(−2.6, 0)0.048 −0.8
(−2.9, 1.3)0.476 −2.4
(−6.4, 1.6)0.233 2004 0 0 0 0 Sex Boys 9.1 (1) < 0.001 0.1
(−0.8, 1)0.777 4.0
(2.6, 5.5)< 0.001 12.8
(10.1, 15.6)< 0.001 < 0.001 Girls 0 0 0 0 Age (years) 6–11 −16.9 (1) < 0.001 −5.9
(−7.2, −4.5)< 0.001 −14.2
(−16.2, −12.3)< 0.001 −22.3
(−25.3, −19.3)< 0.001 < 0.001 12–17 0 0 0 0 Ethnicity Han −6.9 (1.9) < 0.001 −2.4
(−3.6, −1.1)< 0.001 −3.6
(−5.9, −1.2)0.003 −11.3
(−15.9, −6.8)< 0.001 < 0.001 Minority 0 0 0 0 Family income level (yuan) Low
(≤ 50,000)−5.6 (1.8) 0.002 −1.1
(−3, 0.8)0.256 −1.9
(−4.8, 0.9)0.181 −11.0
(−18.3, −3.7)0.003 0.014 High
(> 50,000)0 0 0 0 Paternal educational level Low
(primary or
below)4.1 (7.8) 0.599 −0.6
(−3, 1.7)0.598 1.1
(−10.3, 12.5)0.848 −4.7
(−12.5, 3.1)0.239 0.702 Middle
(secondary
completed)6.1 (7.5) 0.415 −0.4
(−1.9, 1.1)0.642 2.6
(−8.4, 13.6)0.647 −0.3
(−4.7, 4.1)0.906 High (college or higher) 0 0 0 0 Maternal educational level Low (primary or below) −4.7 (7.9) 0.548 0.1
(−2.2, 2.3)0.957 −1.9
(−13.3, 9.6)0.747 3.3
(−4.7, 11.4)0.421 0.611 Middle (secondary completed) −5.4 (7.6) 0.478 0.2
(−1.6, 1.9)0.845 −2.3
(−13.5, 8.9)0.689 −0.6
(−6.6, 5.4)0.848 High (college or higher) 0 0 0 0 Urbanization level of the community Low −2.7 (1.9) 0.145 −1.8
(−3.1, −0.5)0.006 −2.4
(−4.3, −0.5)0.013 −3.2
(−6.8, 0.5)0.092 0.413 Middle −0.8 (1.7) 0.633 −0.8
(−1.9, 0.4)0.203 −2.1
(−3.9, −0.3)0.023 −2
(−5.5, 1.6)0.275 High 0 0 0 0 Residential area Urban 6.1 (1.7) < 0.001 0.4
(−0.7, 1.5)0.434 3.6
(1.6, 5.5)< 0.001 11
(7.4, 14.6)< 0.001 < 0.001 Rural 0 0 0 0 Region North −4.5 (1.4) 0.002 −4.0
(−4.8, −3.1)< 0.001 −6.7
(−8.0, −5.3)< 0.001 −7.4
(−10.2, −4.7)< 0.001 < 0.001 South 0 0 0 0 Random effects* σ2μ0 (intercept) 39.0 (12.9) 0.001 σ2μ01 (covariance) 102.4 (18.1) < 0.001 σ2μ1 1469.5 (27.0) < 0.001 Note. *These were the random effects of the communities in the repeated-measures mixed-effects models on the volume of physical activity. Interclass variance: 39.0/(39.0 + 1469.5) × 100% = 2.6%. Intraclass variance: 100.0% – 2.6% = 97.4%. CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey; CI: Confidence interval. The results of the repeated-measures mixed-effects model and quantile regression models indicated that age, ethnicity, and region affected the PA volume (P ≤ 0.003), and differences were observed across the quartiles (P < 0.001). The PA volumes of the children aged 6–11 years were 5.9 to 22.3 MET-hr/week lower than those of the children aged 12–17 years (P < 0.001); the PA volumes of the Han Chinese children were 2.4 to 11.3 MET-hr/week lower than those of the children from ethnic minorities (P < 0.001); the PA volumes of those from the north region were 4.0 to 7.4 MET-hr/week lower than those from the south region (P < 0.001). As the quartile increased, the differences became larger. The repeated-measures mixed-effects model further showed that the PA volumes of the male and urban children were 9.1 and 6.1 MET-hr/week higher than those of the female and rural children, respectively (P < 0.001). The effects of sex and region were significant at the 50th and 75th quartiles of PA volumes, with greater differences observed at the 75th quartile (P < 0.001), but no statistical significance was found in the 25th quartile. With regard to family income, the children in low-income families had 5.6 MET-hr/week lower PA volume than those in high-income families (P < 0.001). The quantile regression analyses revealed that the effect of income was only significant at the 75th quartile (P = 0.003). No significant effects were observed for either parental or maternal educational levels. Considering the aggregation effect of community, the impact of the urbanization level of the community on PA volume was not statistically significant. However, the quantile regression analyses revealed that the effect of the urbanization level of the community was significant at the 25th and 50th quartiles of PA volumes, in which children residing in areas with low urbanization level had 1.8 MET-hr/week (P = 0.006) and 2.4 MET-hr/week (P = 0.013) lower PA volumes than those residing in areas with high urbanization levels.
-
As shown in Table 3, the repeated-measures mixed-effects model analysis revealed that the variation among the communities and observations accounted for 3.6% and 96.4% of the total variation in sedentary time among the children, respectively. In each survey year, the sedentary time significantly differed among the communities (P < 0.001). Likewise, the changes in sedentary time over time differed significantly among the communities (P < 0.001). Compared with that in 2004, the sedentary times of the children in the other survey years were significantly higher (P < 0.001). The results of the quantile regression analyses suggest that in each survey year, the increase in sedentary time was greater in the higher quartiles than in the lower quartiles. At each quartile level, the sedentary time increased significantly between 2004 and the other survey years (P < 0.001), except in 2015, which was only observed in the 75th quartile (P < 0.001).
Table 3. Results of the repeated-measures mixed-effects model and quantile regression model analyses of factors associated with the time spent in sedentary behaviors among Chinese children from 2004 to 2015
Variables Repeated-measures
mixed-effect modelsQuantile regression models 25th quantile 50th quantile 75th quantile Trend tests
(P value)β value (SE) P value β value
(95% CI)P value β value
(95% CI)P value β value
(95% CI)P value CHNS year 2015 1.9 (0.6) 0.003 −0.4
(−1.5, 0.6)0.432 1.1 (−0.2, 2.4) 0.088 4 (2.4, 5.6) < 0.001 < 0.001 2011 4.1 (0.6) < 0.001 3.8 (3, 4.7) < 0.001 4.2 (3.1, 5.3) < 0.001 4.6 (3.4, 5.8) < 0.001 2009 3.2 (0.6) < 0.001 2.9 (1.9, 3.9) < 0.001 3.5 (2.5, 4.6) < 0.001 3.5 (2.3, 4.6) < 0.001 2006 3 (0.6) < 0.001 2.5 (1.6, 3.4) < 0.001 2.9 (1.9, 4) < 0.001 3.1 (2.1, 4.2) < 0.001 2004 0 0 0 0 Sex Boys 0.5 (0.3) 0.098 −0.2
(−0.8, 0.4)0.592 −0.3 (−1,0.4) 0.413 0.5
(−0.2, 1.3)0.170 0.060 Girls 0 0 0 0 Age (years) 6–11 −1.2 (0.3) < 0.001 −0.1
(−0.8, 0.6)0.812 −1.1
(−1.9, −0.3)0.007 −2.6
(−3.5, −1.8)< 0.001 < 0.001 12–17 0 0 0 0 Ethnicity Han −0.9 (0.6) 0.157 −0.6
(−1.4, 0.2)0.153 −1.2
(−2.4, 0)0.041 −2.3
(−3.4, −1.3)< 0.001 0.007 Minority 0 0 0 0 Family income level (yuan) Low
(≤ 50,000)−1.7 (0.6) 0.004 −1.3
(−2.8, 0.3)0.119 −2.9
(−4.4, −1.4)< 0.001 −3.7
(−5.7, −1.7)< 0.001 0.040 High
(> 50,000)0 0 0 0 Paternal educational level Low (primary or below) −0.9 (2.5) 0.737 −4.9
(−9.7, −0.1)0.045 −0.9
(−4.3, 2.5)0.590 0.5
(−1.6, 2.6)0.643 0.285 Middle (secondary
completed)0.2 (2.4) 0.920 −3.9
(−8.4, 0.6)0.092 −0.4
(−3.3, 2.6)0.797 1.0 (0, 2.0) 0.043 High (college or higher) 0 0 0 Maternal educational level Low (primary or below) −0.5 (2.6) 0.854 3.6
(−1.2, 8.4)0.137 −1.4
(−4.8, 2)0.425 −2
(−4.1, 0.1)0.058 0.049 Middle (secondary
completed)−1 (2.5) 0.682 2.7
(−1.9, 7.3)0.245 −0.8
(−3.9, 2.3)0.607 −1.8
(−3.2, −0.3)0.016 High (college or higher) 0 0 0 0 Urbanization level of the community Low −1.3 (0.6) 0.050 −2.6
(−3.4, −1.8)< 0.001 −1.4
(−2.4, −0.4)0.005 −1.5
(−2.5, −0.5)0.003 0.038 Middle −0.3 (0.6) 0.628 −1.1
(−1.9, −0.2)0.013 0.1 (−0.9, 1) 0.914 −0.2
(−1.2, 0.8)0.674 High 0 0 0 0 Residential area Urban 3.2 (0.6) < 0.001 2.6 (1.8, 3.3) < 0.001 3.3 (2.5, 4.2) < 0.001 3.6 (2.6, 4.6) < 0.001 0.100 Rural 0 0 0 0 Region North −0.3 (0.5) 0.538 −0.8
(−1.4, −0.1)0.031 −0.4
(−1.1, 0.4)0.346 0.4
(−0.5, 1.3)0.403 0.058 South 0 0 0 0 Random effects* σ2μ0 (intercept) 5.7 (1.4) 0.001 σ2μ01 (covariance) 13.1 (2.0) < 0.001 σ2μ1 153.3 (2.8) < 0.001 Note. *These were the random effects of the communities in the repeated-measures mixed-effects models on the time spent in sedentary behaviors. Interclass variance: 5.7/(5.7 + 153.3) × 100% = 3.6%. Intraclass variance: 100.0% – 3.6% = 96.4%. CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey; CI: Confidence interval. The results of the repeated-measures mixed-effects model and quantile regression models indicate that the sedentary times of the urban children were 2.6 to 3.6 hr/week higher than those of the rural children (P < 0.001), and those residing in areas with high urbanization levels reported 1.3 to 2.6 hr/week higher sedentary times than those residing in areas with low urbanization levels (P ≤ 0.050). As the quartile increased, the effect of residential area increased. The repeated-measures mixed-effects model analysis revealed that the effects of ethnicity, parental educational level, and region on sedentary time were not statistically significant. However, significant effects were observed in the quantile regression analyses. At the 75th quartile, the sedentary time of the children from ethnic minorities was 2.3 hr/week higher than that of the Han Chinese children (P < 0.001). Children with fathers educated up to a middle educational level reported 1.0 hr/week higher sedentary time than those with fathers educated up to a high educational level (P = 0.043). The children with mothers educated up to a middle educational level reported 1.8 hr/week lower sedentary time than those with mothers educated up to a high educational level (P = 0.016). In the 25th quartile, the sedentary time of the children residing in the south was 0.8 hr/week higher than that of the children residing in the north (P = 0.031). The children with fathers educated up to a high educational level reported 4.9 hr/week higher sedentary time than those with fathers educated up to a low educational level (P = 0.045). Sex was not a significant factor in any of the models.
doi: 10.3967/bes2021.059
Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors among Chinese Children: Recent Trends and Correlates
-
Abstract:
Objective This study was aimed at examining the trends and correlates of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors among Chinese children. Methods A total of 4,341 subjects (6,936 observations) aged 6–17 years who participated in the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2004–2015) were included. Of the subjects, 41% participated in the survey twice or more. Random-effects ordinal regression models and repeated-measures mixed-effects models were used to examine the PA trends. Quantile regression models were applied to examine the factors influencing PA and sedentary behaviors. Results From 2004 to 2015, the prevalence of physical inactivity among Chinese children aged 6–17 years increased by 5.5% [odds ratio (OR), 1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19–1.90; P < 0.001]. The PA volume declined by 5.8 metabolic equivalent of task-hr/week (P < 0.001), and the time spent in sedentary behaviors increased by 1.8 hr/week (P < 0.001). Age, ethnicity, and region showed significant effects on the PA volume across the quartiles (P < 0.001). Across the quartiles, sedentary time was significantly higher in the children residing in urban areas (P < 0.001) or areas with high urbanization levels (P ≤ 0.005) than in their counterparts. Conclusions A declining PA trend among Chinese children aged 6–17 years was observed from 2004 to 2015, and certain subgroups and geographical areas are at higher risk of physical inactivity. -
Key words:
- Physical activity /
- Sedentary behaviors /
- Trends /
- Correlates /
- China /
- Children
-
Figure 1. Trends of physical activity levels among Chinese children from 2004 to 2015. The random-effects ordinal regression model was conducted to examine the trends in PA levels across CHNS survey years, controlling for the random effect of communities and adjusting for socio-demographic factors including gender, age, ethnicity, paternal education level, maternal education level, annual family income, urbanization index of community, residential area and region. CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey.
Figure 2. Trends of physical activity among Chinese children from 2004 to 2015. Repeated measures mixed effect models were conducted to examine the trends of PA across CHNS survey years, controlling for the random effect of communities and adjusting for socio-demographic factors including gender, age, ethnicity, paternal education level, maternal education level, annual family income, urbanization index of community, residential area and region. “−−” indicates a significant decrease in the overall trend (P < 0.001). PA: Physical Activity; MVPA: Moderate- to Vigorous-intensity Physical Activity; CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey.
Figure 3. Trends of sedentary behaviors among Chinese children from 2004 to 2015. Repeated measures mixed effect models were conducted to examine the trends of sedentary behaviors across CHNS survey years, controlling for the random effect of communities and adjusting for socio-demographic factors including gender, age, ethnicity, paternal education level, maternal education level, annual family income, urbanization index of community, residential area and region. “++” indicates a significant increase in the overall trend (P < 0.001); “+” indicates an increase in the overall trend (P < 0.05); “−−” indicates a significant decrease in the overall trend (P < 0.001). CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey.
Table 1. Demographic characteristic of the participants
Variables CHNS year Statistics
(P value)2004 2006 2009 2011 2015 N 1,593 1,267 1,141 1,544 1,391 Sex (%)a Boys 854 (53.6) 677 (53.4) 644 (56.4) 791 (51.2) 728 (52.3) Z = −0.304
(Unilateral P = 0.381)Girls 739 (46.4) 590 (46.6) 497 (43.6) 753 (48.8) 663 (47.7) Age (years), mean ± SDd 11.9 ± 3.3 11.3 ± 3.4 11.0 ± 3.2 10.8 ± 3.3 10.2 ± 3.1 F = 64.5 (P < 0.001) Ethnicity (%)b Han 1,374 (86.3) 1,065 (84.1) 957 (83.9) 1,353 (87.6) 1,212 (87.1) Z = −0.458
(Unilateral P = 0.323)Minority 219 (13.7) 202 (15.9) 182 (16.0) 189 (12.3) 169 (12.2) Unknown 0 0 2 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 10 (0.7) Annual family income (thousands), mean ± SDd 0.4 ± 0.9 0.7 ± 1.2 1.2 ± 3.0 2.1 ± 3.9 5.4 ± 20.8 F = 44.0 (P < 0.001) Paternal educational level (%)c Low (primary or below) 204 (12.8) 198 (15.6) 153 (13.4) 225 (14.6) 195 (14.0) Χ2 = 0.000 (P = 0.995) Middle (secondary completed) 1,203 (75.5) 938 (74.0) 871 (76.3) 1,122 (72.6) 1,041 (74.8) High (college or higher) 186 (11.7) 131 (10.4) 117 (10.3) 197 (12.8) 155 (11.2) Maternal educational level (%)c Low (primary or below) 307 (19.3) 271 (21.4) 225 (19.7) 315 (20.4) 283 (20.4) Χ2 = 0.002 (P = 0.966) Middle (secondary completed) 1,102 (69.2) 870 (68.6) 805 (70.6) 1,040 (67.4) 960 (69.0) High (college or higher) 184 (11.6) 126 (9.9) 111 (9.7) 189 (12.2) 148 (10.6) Urbanization index (SD)d 58.6 (19.9) 61.7 (20.1) 64.6 (18.9) 70.5(19.6) 72.1 (17.3) F = 110.8 (P < 0.001) Residential areas (%)a Urban 444 (27.9) 370 (29.2) 308 (27.0) 583 (37.8) 486 (34.9) Z = 1.540
(Unilateral P = 0.062)Rural 1,149 (72.1) 897 (70.8) 833 (73.0) 961 (62.2) 905 (65.1) Region (%)a North 679 (42.6) 500 (39.5) 402 (35.2) 494 (32.0) 446 (32.1) Z = −1.88
(Unilateral P = 0.03)South 914 (57.4) 767 (60.5) 739 (64.8) 1,050 (68.0) 945 (67.9) Note. aUsing the Cochran-Armitage trend test. bUsing the Fisher exact test. cUsing the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test. dUsing the multiple linear model to test the trends after adjusting for other sociodemographic characteristics. CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey. Table 2. Results of the repeated-measures mixed-effects model and quantile regression model analyses of the factors associated with the volume of physical activity among Chinese children from 2004 to 2015
Variables Repeated-measures
mixed-effects modelsQuantile regression models 25th quantile 50th quantile 75th quantile Trend tests
(P value)β value (SE) P value β value
(95% CI)P value β value
(95% CI)P value β value
(95% CI)P value CHNS year 2015 −5.7 (1.9) 0.003 −5.4
(−6.6, −4.2)< 0.001 −6.5
(−8.6, −4.4)< 0.001 −5.8
(−10.6, −1)0.018 < 0.001 2011 2.1 (1.8) 0.245 0.4
(−0.9, 1.8)0.531 3.6
(1.4, 5.8)0.001 4.3
(0.4, 8.2)0.029 2009 1.4 (1.9) 0.467 0.1
(−1.4, 1.7)0.869 1.2
(−0.9, 3.2)0.279 1.2
(−2.7, 5.1)0.547 2006 −1.2 (1.8) 0.514 −1.3
(−2.6, 0)0.048 −0.8
(−2.9, 1.3)0.476 −2.4
(−6.4, 1.6)0.233 2004 0 0 0 0 Sex Boys 9.1 (1) < 0.001 0.1
(−0.8, 1)0.777 4.0
(2.6, 5.5)< 0.001 12.8
(10.1, 15.6)< 0.001 < 0.001 Girls 0 0 0 0 Age (years) 6–11 −16.9 (1) < 0.001 −5.9
(−7.2, −4.5)< 0.001 −14.2
(−16.2, −12.3)< 0.001 −22.3
(−25.3, −19.3)< 0.001 < 0.001 12–17 0 0 0 0 Ethnicity Han −6.9 (1.9) < 0.001 −2.4
(−3.6, −1.1)< 0.001 −3.6
(−5.9, −1.2)0.003 −11.3
(−15.9, −6.8)< 0.001 < 0.001 Minority 0 0 0 0 Family income level (yuan) Low
(≤ 50,000)−5.6 (1.8) 0.002 −1.1
(−3, 0.8)0.256 −1.9
(−4.8, 0.9)0.181 −11.0
(−18.3, −3.7)0.003 0.014 High
(> 50,000)0 0 0 0 Paternal educational level Low
(primary or
below)4.1 (7.8) 0.599 −0.6
(−3, 1.7)0.598 1.1
(−10.3, 12.5)0.848 −4.7
(−12.5, 3.1)0.239 0.702 Middle
(secondary
completed)6.1 (7.5) 0.415 −0.4
(−1.9, 1.1)0.642 2.6
(−8.4, 13.6)0.647 −0.3
(−4.7, 4.1)0.906 High (college or higher) 0 0 0 0 Maternal educational level Low (primary or below) −4.7 (7.9) 0.548 0.1
(−2.2, 2.3)0.957 −1.9
(−13.3, 9.6)0.747 3.3
(−4.7, 11.4)0.421 0.611 Middle (secondary completed) −5.4 (7.6) 0.478 0.2
(−1.6, 1.9)0.845 −2.3
(−13.5, 8.9)0.689 −0.6
(−6.6, 5.4)0.848 High (college or higher) 0 0 0 0 Urbanization level of the community Low −2.7 (1.9) 0.145 −1.8
(−3.1, −0.5)0.006 −2.4
(−4.3, −0.5)0.013 −3.2
(−6.8, 0.5)0.092 0.413 Middle −0.8 (1.7) 0.633 −0.8
(−1.9, 0.4)0.203 −2.1
(−3.9, −0.3)0.023 −2
(−5.5, 1.6)0.275 High 0 0 0 0 Residential area Urban 6.1 (1.7) < 0.001 0.4
(−0.7, 1.5)0.434 3.6
(1.6, 5.5)< 0.001 11
(7.4, 14.6)< 0.001 < 0.001 Rural 0 0 0 0 Region North −4.5 (1.4) 0.002 −4.0
(−4.8, −3.1)< 0.001 −6.7
(−8.0, −5.3)< 0.001 −7.4
(−10.2, −4.7)< 0.001 < 0.001 South 0 0 0 0 Random effects* σ2μ0 (intercept) 39.0 (12.9) 0.001 σ2μ01 (covariance) 102.4 (18.1) < 0.001 σ2μ1 1469.5 (27.0) < 0.001 Note. *These were the random effects of the communities in the repeated-measures mixed-effects models on the volume of physical activity. Interclass variance: 39.0/(39.0 + 1469.5) × 100% = 2.6%. Intraclass variance: 100.0% – 2.6% = 97.4%. CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey; CI: Confidence interval. Table 3. Results of the repeated-measures mixed-effects model and quantile regression model analyses of factors associated with the time spent in sedentary behaviors among Chinese children from 2004 to 2015
Variables Repeated-measures
mixed-effect modelsQuantile regression models 25th quantile 50th quantile 75th quantile Trend tests
(P value)β value (SE) P value β value
(95% CI)P value β value
(95% CI)P value β value
(95% CI)P value CHNS year 2015 1.9 (0.6) 0.003 −0.4
(−1.5, 0.6)0.432 1.1 (−0.2, 2.4) 0.088 4 (2.4, 5.6) < 0.001 < 0.001 2011 4.1 (0.6) < 0.001 3.8 (3, 4.7) < 0.001 4.2 (3.1, 5.3) < 0.001 4.6 (3.4, 5.8) < 0.001 2009 3.2 (0.6) < 0.001 2.9 (1.9, 3.9) < 0.001 3.5 (2.5, 4.6) < 0.001 3.5 (2.3, 4.6) < 0.001 2006 3 (0.6) < 0.001 2.5 (1.6, 3.4) < 0.001 2.9 (1.9, 4) < 0.001 3.1 (2.1, 4.2) < 0.001 2004 0 0 0 0 Sex Boys 0.5 (0.3) 0.098 −0.2
(−0.8, 0.4)0.592 −0.3 (−1,0.4) 0.413 0.5
(−0.2, 1.3)0.170 0.060 Girls 0 0 0 0 Age (years) 6–11 −1.2 (0.3) < 0.001 −0.1
(−0.8, 0.6)0.812 −1.1
(−1.9, −0.3)0.007 −2.6
(−3.5, −1.8)< 0.001 < 0.001 12–17 0 0 0 0 Ethnicity Han −0.9 (0.6) 0.157 −0.6
(−1.4, 0.2)0.153 −1.2
(−2.4, 0)0.041 −2.3
(−3.4, −1.3)< 0.001 0.007 Minority 0 0 0 0 Family income level (yuan) Low
(≤ 50,000)−1.7 (0.6) 0.004 −1.3
(−2.8, 0.3)0.119 −2.9
(−4.4, −1.4)< 0.001 −3.7
(−5.7, −1.7)< 0.001 0.040 High
(> 50,000)0 0 0 0 Paternal educational level Low (primary or below) −0.9 (2.5) 0.737 −4.9
(−9.7, −0.1)0.045 −0.9
(−4.3, 2.5)0.590 0.5
(−1.6, 2.6)0.643 0.285 Middle (secondary
completed)0.2 (2.4) 0.920 −3.9
(−8.4, 0.6)0.092 −0.4
(−3.3, 2.6)0.797 1.0 (0, 2.0) 0.043 High (college or higher) 0 0 0 Maternal educational level Low (primary or below) −0.5 (2.6) 0.854 3.6
(−1.2, 8.4)0.137 −1.4
(−4.8, 2)0.425 −2
(−4.1, 0.1)0.058 0.049 Middle (secondary
completed)−1 (2.5) 0.682 2.7
(−1.9, 7.3)0.245 −0.8
(−3.9, 2.3)0.607 −1.8
(−3.2, −0.3)0.016 High (college or higher) 0 0 0 0 Urbanization level of the community Low −1.3 (0.6) 0.050 −2.6
(−3.4, −1.8)< 0.001 −1.4
(−2.4, −0.4)0.005 −1.5
(−2.5, −0.5)0.003 0.038 Middle −0.3 (0.6) 0.628 −1.1
(−1.9, −0.2)0.013 0.1 (−0.9, 1) 0.914 −0.2
(−1.2, 0.8)0.674 High 0 0 0 0 Residential area Urban 3.2 (0.6) < 0.001 2.6 (1.8, 3.3) < 0.001 3.3 (2.5, 4.2) < 0.001 3.6 (2.6, 4.6) < 0.001 0.100 Rural 0 0 0 0 Region North −0.3 (0.5) 0.538 −0.8
(−1.4, −0.1)0.031 −0.4
(−1.1, 0.4)0.346 0.4
(−0.5, 1.3)0.403 0.058 South 0 0 0 0 Random effects* σ2μ0 (intercept) 5.7 (1.4) 0.001 σ2μ01 (covariance) 13.1 (2.0) < 0.001 σ2μ1 153.3 (2.8) < 0.001 Note. *These were the random effects of the communities in the repeated-measures mixed-effects models on the time spent in sedentary behaviors. Interclass variance: 5.7/(5.7 + 153.3) × 100% = 3.6%. Intraclass variance: 100.0% – 3.6% = 96.4%. CHNS: China Health and Nutrition Survey; CI: Confidence interval. -
[1] Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Borghese MM, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2016; 41, S197−239. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663 [2] Gómez-Bruton A, Matute-Llorente Á, González-Agüero A, et al. Plyometric exercise and bone health in children and adolescents: a systematic review. World J Pediatr, 2017; 13, 112−21. doi: 10.1007/s12519-016-0076-0 [3] Li FZ, Mao LJ, Chen PJ. Physical activity and prevention of chronic disease in Chinese youth: a public health approach. J Sport Health Sci, 2019; 8, 512−5. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.06.008 [4] Dimitri P, Joshi K, Jones N. Moving more: physical activity and its positive effects on long term conditions in children and young people. Arch Dis Child, 2020; 105, 1035−40. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318017 [5] Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, et al. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1•6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 2020; 4, 23−35. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2 [6] Aubert S, Barnes JD, Abdeta C, et al. Global matrix 3.0 physical activity report card grades for children and youth: results and analysis from 49 countries. J Phys Act Health, 2018; 15, S251−73. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0472 [7] World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018-2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018. [8] Hallal PC, Martins RC, Ramírez A. The Lancet physical activity observatory: promoting physical activity worldwide. Lancet, 2014; 384, 471−2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61321-0 [9] Kohl III HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet, 2012; 380, 294−305. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60898-8 [10] The Lancet. Ready, set, go for physical activity. Lancet, 2013; 381, 1960. [11] Okely AD, Tremblay MS, Reilly JJ, et al. Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep: movement behaviours in early life. Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 2018; 2, 233−5. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30070-1 [12] Ding D. Surveillance of global physical activity: progress, evidence, and future directions. Lancet Glob Health, 2018; 6, E1046−7. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30381-4 [13] Cui ZH, Hardy LL, Dibley MJ, et al. Temporal trends and recent correlates in sedentary behaviours in Chinese children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2011; 8, 93. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-93 [14] Dearth-Wesley T, Howard AG, Wang HJ, et al. Trends in domain-specific physical activity and sedentary behaviors among Chinese school children, 2004-2011. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2017; 14, 141. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0598-4 [15] Das P, Horton R. Physical activity—time to take it seriously and regularly. Lancet, 2016; 388, 1254−5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31070-4 [16] Zhang B, Zhai FY, Du SF, et al. The China health and nutrition survey, 1989-2011. Obes Rev, 2014; 15, 2−7. [17] China Health and Nutrition Survey. A UNC carolina population center project. https://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/china. [2020-02-10]. [18] Butte N, Watson K, Ridley K, et al. A youth compendium of physical activities: activity codes and metabolic intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2018; 50, 246−56. [19] Zhang YT, Ma SX, Chen C, et al. Physical activity guidelines for Chinese children. Chin J Evid Based Pediatr, 2017; 12, 401−9. [20] Jones-Smith JC, Popkin BM. Understanding community context and adult health changes in China: development of an urbanicity scale. Soc Sci Med, 2010; 71, 1436−46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.027 [21] Koenker R, Bassett Jr G. Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 1978; 46, 33−50. doi: 10.2307/1913643 [22] Knuth AG, Hallal PC. Temporal trends in physical activity: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health, 2009; 6, 548−59. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.5.548 [23] Bucksch J, Sigmundova D, Hamrik Z, et al. International trends in adolescent screen-time behaviors from 2002 to 2010. J Adolesc Health, 2016; 58, 417−25. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.11.014 [24] Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet, 2012; 380, 258−71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1 [25] Wang C, Chen PJ, Zhuang J. A national survey of physical activity and sedentary behavior of Chinese city children and youth using accelerometers. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2013; 84, S12−28. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2013.850993 [26] Lu CC, Stolk RP, Sauer PJJ, et al. Factors of physical activity among Chinese children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2017; 14, 36. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0486-y [27] Song C, Gong WY, Ding CC, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behavior among Chinese children aged 6-17 years: a cross-sectional analysis of 2010-2012 China National Nutrition and health survey. BMC Public Health, 2019; 19, 936. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7259-2