Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Follow-up of Neutralizing Antibody Levels

CUI Shu Juan ZHANG Yi GAO Wen Jing WANG Xiao Li YANG Peng WANG Quan Yi PANG Xing Huo ZENG Xiao Peng LI Li Ming

CUI Shu Juan, ZHANG Yi, GAO Wen Jing, WANG Xiao Li, YANG Peng, WANG Quan Yi, PANG Xing Huo, ZENG Xiao Peng, LI Li Ming. Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Follow-up of Neutralizing Antibody Levels[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 1100-1105. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.139
Citation: CUI Shu Juan, ZHANG Yi, GAO Wen Jing, WANG Xiao Li, YANG Peng, WANG Quan Yi, PANG Xing Huo, ZENG Xiao Peng, LI Li Ming. Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Follow-up of Neutralizing Antibody Levels[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 1100-1105. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.139

doi: 10.3967/bes2022.139

Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Follow-up of Neutralizing Antibody Levels

Funds: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [82041027]; National Key R&D Program of China [2021ZD0114100, 2021ZD0114103]; The Capital Health Development and Research of Special [2022-1G-3014]; Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project of Beijing Science and Technology Commission [Z211100002521015, Z211100002521019]; and Cooperation project [2022-jk-cd-009]
More Information
    Author Bio:

    CUI Shu Juan, born in 1978, female, Doctor’s Degree, majoring in pathogenic biology

    Corresponding author: WANG Quan Yi, PhD, Tel: 86-10-64407128, E-mail: bjcdcxm@126.comLI Li Ming, PhD, Tel: 86-10-82801528, E-mail: lmlee@vip.163.com
  • CUI Shu Juan designed the study, performed the serological assays, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. ZHANG Yi collected the samples, analyzed, and interpreted the data. GAO Wen Jing designed the study and analyzed the data. WANG Xiao Li collected the samples and interpreted the data. YANG Peng designed the study. WANG Quan Yi designed the study, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. PANG Xing Huo and ZENG Xiao Peng designed this study. LI Li Ming designed the study, interpreted the data, advised the manuscript, and funded the research. All authors have reviewed the manuscript.
  • The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
    • 关键词:
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  
    CUI Shu Juan designed the study, performed the serological assays, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. ZHANG Yi collected the samples, analyzed, and interpreted the data. GAO Wen Jing designed the study and analyzed the data. WANG Xiao Li collected the samples and interpreted the data. YANG Peng designed the study. WANG Quan Yi designed the study, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. PANG Xing Huo and ZENG Xiao Peng designed this study. LI Li Ming designed the study, interpreted the data, advised the manuscript, and funded the research. All authors have reviewed the manuscript.
    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
    注释:
    1) AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS: 2) CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
  • Figure  1.  SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers at three different time points (Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05). (A) 3, 6, and 10 months post-PCR confirmation for symptomatic patients. (B) 1, 2, and 6 months post-PCR confirmation for asymptomatic patients.

    S1.   Studies on testing SARS-CoV-2 in populations containing asymptomatic individuals

    PopulationsTotal testedAsymptomatic positive/total positive, n (%)Asymptomatic positive/total tested (%)Reference
    Iceland residents13,08043/100 (43)0.3Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the Icelandic Population
    Italy Vo’ residents5,15542/102 (41.2)0.8Suppression of a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in the Italian municipality of Vo’
    Ethiopia residents61,5991,935/2,617 (73.9)3.1Clinical features and risk factors associated with morbidity and mortality among patients with COVID-19 in northern Ethiopia
    Japan Diamond Princess cruise3,711328/634 (51.7)8.8Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond
    Argentine cruise217104/128 (81.3)47.9COVID-19: in the footsteps of Ernest Shackleton
    New York obstetrical patients21529/33 (87.9)13.5Universal Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in Women Admitted for Delivery
    Spain obstetrical patients11,728174/279 (62.4)1.5Obstetric Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Asymptomatic Pregnant Women
    West French Guiana obstetrical patients50787/137 (63.5)17.2Maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes of large series of SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnancies in peripartum period: A single-center prospective comparative study
    Flight back to Greece from United Kingdom, Spain, and Turkey78335/40 (87.5)4.5High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in repatriation flights to Greece from three
    International Entrants to China from 90 countries19,398,384 1,612/3,103 (51.9)0.008Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among Persons Entering China From April 16 to October 12, 2020
    Washington Nursing Facility7627/48 (56.3)35.5Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Transmission in a Skilled Nursing Facility
    7613/23 (56.5)17.1Asymptomatic and Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in residents of a long-term care skilled
    Chicago Nursing Facility20450/172 (29.1)24.5Management and outcomes of a COVID-19 outbreak in a nursing home with predominantly Black residents
    France nursing home45614/161 (8.7)3.1Atypical symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 test results and immunisation rates in 456 residents from eight nursing homes facing a COVID-19 outbreak
    Long-term care facilities residents11610/111 (9)8.6Clinical Presentation, Course, and Risk Factors Associated with Mortality in a Severe Outbreak of COVID-19 in Rhode Island, USA, April–June 2020
    New Jersey hospital and university employees82927/41 (65.9)3.3Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in previously undiagnosed health care workers at the onset of the U.S. COVID-19 epidemic
    Italy healthcare workers1,57317/139 (12.2)1.1Characteristics of 1573 healthcare workers who underwent nasopharyngeal swab testing for SARS-CoV-2 in Milan, Lombardy, Italy
    New York city jail system97858/568 (10.2)5.9COVID-19 in the New York City Jail System: Epidemiology and Health Care Response, March–April 2020
    Boston homeless shelter408129/147 (87.8)31.6Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in residents of a large homelss shelter in boston
    India military quarantine facilities2625/25 (100)96.2Spread of COVID-19 by asymptomatic cases: evidence from military quarantine facilities
    Pediatric patients (< 18 years old)2,13594/728 (12.9)4.4Epidemiology of COVID-19 among children China
    Children patients in Wuhan (1day-15 years old)1,39127/171 (15.8)1.9SARS-CoV-2 infection in children
    US sailors4,085146/736 (19.8)3.6Symptom Characterization and Outcomes of Sailors in Isolation After a COVID-19 Outbreak on a US Aircraft Carrier
    Close contact of 314 Spain patients753240/449 (53.5)31.9Transmission of COVID-19 in 282 clusters in Catalonia, Spain: a cohort study
    下载: 导出CSV

    S2.   Studies on characterizing SARS-CoV-2 positive patients containing asymptomatic individuals

    PopulationsTotal of
    Positive
    Asymptomatic positive/total positive,
    n (%)
    ReferenceNote
    Kuwait residents1,096473/1,096 (43.2)Characteristics, risk factors and outcomes among the first consecutive 1,096 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Kuwait35 presymptomatic
    UK rehabilitation facility4515/45 (33.3)Asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in a rehabilitation facility
    Patients in Beijing26213/262 (4.9)Characteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing
    Patients in Shanghai32813/328 (4.0)Follow-up of asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Residents in South Korea19953/199 (26.6)Asymptomatic infection and atypical manifestations of COVID-19: Comparison of viral shedding duration
    Patients in People’s Hospital of Daofu county8318/83 (21.7)A considerable proportion of individuals with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in Tibetan population
    Children in Zhejiang
    (1–16 years old)
    3610/36 (28)Clinical and epidemiological features of 36 children with coronavirus disease 2019
    Children in Kuwait13491/134 (67.9)Clinical characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Kuwait3 presymptomatic
    Bahrain patients and their contacts320 index cases
    1,289 positive contacts
    160/320 (50)
    1,127/1,289 (87.4)
    The high prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection reveals the silent spread of COVID-19
    Air passengers to Brunei13816/138 (11.6)High proportion of asymptomatic and presymptomatic
    COVID-19 infections in air passengers to Brunei
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  1.   Meta-analysis studies on asymptomatic COVID-19 cases

    Total number of studies included% of asymptomatic
    individuals
    NoteReferencePublication time
    624.2 (SD, 22.06)34 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 17 studies (13 case reports and 4 case series) for meta-analysis contained CT or lab test results. Individuals with normal radiology results were significantly younger (19.59 ± 17.17 years) than patients with abnormal radiology results (39.14 ± 26.70 years). Data from 6 case series were used to calculate the percentage of asymptomatic individualsRef [4]June 17, 2020
    4115.6 (95% CI: 10.1–23.0)180 asymptomatic individuals reported from 10 studies included 48.9% pre-symptomatic individuals. 24: all ages, 9% 11: children, 27.7% 3: older adults, 28.3% 4: pregnant women, 49.9%Ref [36]July 21, 2020
    7920 (95% CI: 17–25)7 studies screening all potentially exposed people in the defined populations and followed-up after testing, 31% (59% CI: 26%–37%) remained asymptomaticRef [38]July 28, 2020
    1317 (95 CI : 14–20)4% in Korea to 40% in Vo, Italy, and in an aged care facility in the United States Non-aged care, 16% and aged care, 21%.Ref [37]September 13, 2020
    1648.2 (95% CI: 30.0–67.0)
    with significant heterogeneity
    noted among studies. Actual
    proportion of asymptomatic
    cases, 31.1%
    8 studies with age subgroup analysis, children, 49.6%; adults, 30.3%; and older adults, 16.9%. 39% prevalence of true asymptomatic cases versus 15.3% of pre-symptomatic cases in 10 studiesRef [41]January 20, 2021
    2825 (95% CI: 16–38)Ref [39]March 23, 2021
    39035.1 (95% CI: 30.7–39.9)42.8% of cases without symptoms at the time of testing. Children: 46.7% Older adults: 19.7% Comorbidities had significantly lower asymptomaticity compared with cases without underlying medical conditions.Ref [40]August 10, 2021
      Note. SD, standard deviation; CI , confidence interval; CT, computed tomography.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature, 2020; 579, 270−3. doi:  10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7
    [2] Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, et al. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2021; 19, 141−54. doi:  10.1038/s41579-020-00459-7
    [3] Huang DZ, Lian XJ, Song FE, et al. Clinical features of severe patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med, 2020; 8, 576. doi:  10.21037/atm-20-2124
    [4] Kronbichler A, Kresse D, Yoon S, et al. Asymptomatic patients as a source of COVID-19 infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis, 2020; 98, 180−6. doi:  10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.052
    [5] Nikolai LA, Meyer CG, Kremsner PG, et al. Asymptomatic SARS Coronavirus 2 infection: Invisible yet invincible. Int J Infect Dis, 2020; 100, 112−6. doi:  10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.076
    [6] Gudbjartsson DF, Helgason A, Jonsson H, et al. Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the Icelandic population. N Engl J Med, 2020; 382, 2302−15. doi:  10.1056/NEJMoa2006100
    [7] Lavezzo E, Franchin E, Ciavarella C, et al. Suppression of a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in the Italian municipality of Vo'. Nature, 2020; 584, 425−9. doi:  10.1038/s41586-020-2488-1
    [8] Abraha HE, Gessesse Z, Gebrecherkos T, et al. Clinical features and risk factors associated with morbidity and mortality among patients with COVID-19 in northern Ethiopia. Int J Infect Dis, 2021; 105, 776−83. doi:  10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.037
    [9] Ing AJ, Cocks C, Green JP. COVID-19: in the footsteps of Ernest Shackleton. Thorax, 2020; 75, 693−4. doi:  10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215091
    [10] Mizumoto K, Kagaya K, Zarebski A, et al. Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020. Euro Surveill, 2020; 25, 2000180.
    [11] Sutton D, Fuchs K, D'Alton M, et al. Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery. N Engl J Med, 2020; 382, 2163−4. doi:  10.1056/NEJMc2009316
    [12] Cruz-Lemini M, Perez EF, De La Cruz Conty ML, et al. Obstetric outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic pregnant women. Viruses, 2021; 13, 112. doi:  10.3390/v13010112
    [13] Hcini N, Maamri F, Picone O, et al. Maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes of large series of SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnancies in peripartum period: A single-center prospective comparative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2021; 257, 11−8. doi:  10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.068
    [14] Wong J, Abdul Aziz ABZ, Chaw L, et al. High proportion of asymptomatic and presymptomatic COVID-19 infections in air passengers to Brunei. J Travel Med, 2020; 27, taaa066. doi:  10.1093/jtm/taaa066
    [15] Lytras T, Dellis G, Flountzi A, et al. High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in repatriation flights to Greece from three European countries. J Travel Med, 2020; 27, taaa054. doi:  10.1093/jtm/taaa054
    [16] Ren RQ, Zhang YP, Li Q, et al. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections among persons entering China from April 16 to October 12, 2020. JAMA, 2021; 325, 489−92. doi:  10.1001/jama.2020.23942
    [17] Arons MM, Hatfield KM, Reddy SC, et al. Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and transmission in a skilled nursing facility. N Engl J Med, 2020; 382, 2081−90. doi:  10.1056/NEJMoa2008457
    [18] Kimball A, Hatfield KM, Arons M, et al. Asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in residents of a long-term care skilled nursing facility - King County, Washington, March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2020; 69, 377−81. doi:  10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e1
    [19] Beiting KJ, Huisingh-Scheetz M, Walker J, et al. Management and outcomes of a COVID-19 outbreak in a nursing home with predominantly Black residents. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2021; 69, 1155−65. doi:  10.1111/jgs.17126
    [20] Blain H, Gamon L, Tuaillon E, et al. Atypical symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 test results and immunisation rates in 456 residents from eight nursing homes facing a COVID-19 outbreak. Age Ageing, 2021; 50, 641−8. doi:  10.1093/ageing/afab050
    [21] Atalla E, Zhang RN, Shehadeh F, et al. Clinical presentation, course, and risk factors associated with mortality in a severe outbreak of COVID-19 in Rhode Island, USA, April-June 2020. Pathogens, 2020; 10, 8. doi:  10.3390/pathogens10010008
    [22] Baggett TP, Keyes H, Sporn N, et al. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in residents of a large homeless shelter in Boston. JAMA, 2020; 323, 2191−2. doi:  10.1001/jama.2020.6887
    [23] Harris BHL, Zuhair M, Di Giovannantonio M, et al. Asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in a rehabilitation facility: evolution of the presence of nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 and serological antibody responses. J Infect Dis, 2021; 223, 192−6. doi:  10.1093/infdis/jiaa610
    [24] Oran DP, Topol EJ. Prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ann Intern Med, 2021; 174, 286−7. doi:  10.7326/L20-1280
    [25] Almadhi MA, Abdulrahman A, Sharaf SA, et al. The high prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection reveals the silent spread of COVID-19. Int J Infect Dis, 2021; 105, 656−61. doi:  10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.100
    [26] Marks M, Millat-Martinez P, Ouchi D, et al. Transmission of COVID-19 in 282 clusters in Catalonia, Spain: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis, 2021; 21, 629−36. doi:  10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30985-3
    [27] Stout RL, Rigatti SJ. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the US adult asymptomatic population as of September 30, 2020. JAMA Netw Open, 2021; 4, e211552. doi:  10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1552
    [28] Lei Q, Li Y, Hou HY, et al. Antibody dynamics to SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic COVID-19 infections. Allergy, 2021; 76, 551−61. doi:  10.1111/all.14622
    [29] Matusali G, Colavita F, Lapa D, et al. SARS-CoV-2 serum neutralization assay: a traditional tool for a brand-new virus. Viruses, 2021; 13, 655. doi:  10.3390/v13040655
    [30] Manenti A, Maggetti M, Casa E, et al. Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies using a CPE-based colorimetric live virus micro-neutralization assay in human serum samples. J Med Virol, 2020; 92, 2096−104. doi:  10.1002/jmv.25986
    [31] Wang PF, Liu LH, Nair MS, et al. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody responses are more robust in patients with severe disease. Emerg Microbes Infect, 2020; 9, 2091−3. doi:  10.1080/22221751.2020.1823890
    [32] Choe PG, Kim KH, Kang CK, et al. Antibody responses 8 months after asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerg Infect Dis, 2021; 27, 928−31. doi:  10.3201/eid2703.204543
    [33] Choe PG, Kang CK, Suh HJ, et al. Waning antibody responses in asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerg Infect Dis, 2021; 27, 327−9. doi:  10.3201/eid2701.203515
    [34] Milani GP, Dioni L, Favero C, et al. Serological follow-up of SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic subjects. Sci Rep, 2020; 10, 20048. doi:  10.1038/s41598-020-77125-8
    [35] Kato Y, Bloom NI, Sun PF, et al. Memory B-cell development after asymptomatic or mild symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Infect Dis, 2022.
    [36] He JJ, Guo YF, Mao RC, et al. Proportion of asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol, 2021; 93, 820−30. doi:  10.1002/jmv.26326
    [37] Byambasuren O, Cardona M, Bell K, et al. Estimating the extent of asymptomatic COVID-19 and its potential for community transmission: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Off J Association of Med Microbiol Infect Dis Canada, 2020; 5, 223−34.
    [38] Buitrago-Garcia D, Egli-Gany D, Counotte MJ, et al. Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: A living systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med, 2020; 17, e1003346. doi:  10.1371/journal.pmed.1003346
    [39] Alene M, Yismaw L, Assemie MA, et al. Magnitude of asymptomatic COVID-19 cases throughout the course of infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2021; 16, e0249090. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0249090
    [40] Sah P, Fitzpatrick MC, Zimmer CF, et al. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2021; 118, e2109229118. doi:  10.1073/pnas.2109229118
    [41] Syangtan G, Bista S, Dawadi P, et al. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health, 2021; 8, 587374.
  • [1] WANG Dan Dan, WANG An Xin, ZHANG Xiao Li, WEI Wen Bin, WU Shou Ling, ZHAO Xing Quan.  Relationship of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Retinal Vessel Calibers with Cognitive Impairment in the Asymptomatic Polyvascular Abnormalities Population . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 37(2): 196-203. doi: 10.3967/bes2024.020
    [2] WANG Pei Qin, WANG Xiao Hang, WANG Jian, SHI Zhi Wen, CHU Dong Mei, WANG Zhi Fei, ZHANG Mu Bai, LIU Wei, ZHOU Zi Jie, XIE Wei Fen.  Reinfection and Risk Factors of SARS-CoV-2 during an Omicron Wave 2022 in Shanghai . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 37(2): 204-209. doi: 10.3967/bes2024.021
    [3] YAN Ai Xia, ZHOU Gui Lan, GAO Peng, KANG Ying, LI Shou Fei, WANG Yuan Yuan, WANG Feng Shuang, WANG Hai Rui, LI Ying, ZHANG Mao Jun.  A Campylobacteriosis Outbreak Caused by One Asymptomatic Food Handler Carrier . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(8): 779-782. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.105
    [4] ZHANG Jiao Jiao, SHEN Ying, SUN Ying, LI Jia, MA Jia Xin, ZHANG Dai Tao, WANG Quan Yi, YANG Peng.  SARS-CoV-2 Infection Risk Factors in Beijing during November 2022: A Case Control Study . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(11): 1100-1104. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.141
    [5] CHEN Hao, HOU Zhi Yuan, CHEN Die, LI Ting, WANG Yi Ming, DE LIMA Marcelo Andrade, YANG Ying, GUO Zhen Zhong.  Highly Sensitive Poly-N-isopropylacrylamide Microgel-based Electrochemical Biosensor for the Detection of SARS-COV-2 Spike Protein . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(3): 269-278. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.029
    [6] ZHANG Ying, QU Jiang Wen, ZHENG Min Na, DING Ya Xing, CHEN Wei, YE Shao Dong, LI Xiao Yan, LI Yan Kun, LIU Ying, ZHU Di, JIN Can Rui, WANG LIN, YANG Jin Ye, ZHAI Yu, WANG Er Qiang, MENG Xing.  Neutralizing Antibody Responses against Five SARS-CoV-2 Variants and T Lymphocyte Change after Vaccine Breakthrough Infections from the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 Variant in Tianjin, China: A Prospective Study . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(7): 614-624. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.047
    [7] DONG Mei, SUN Jing Yi, XIE Hui, LIU Jie, WANG Yi Ting, FU Yin, DONG Jian Ping, HUANG Fang.  Application of Oral Fluid in Measles IgG Antibody Detection for Medical Staff . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(1): 64-68. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.008
    [8] ZHANG Jun Nan, MENG Ya Juan, BAI Yun Hua, LI Yu Feng, YANG Li Qing, SHI Nian Min, HAN Hui Xia, GAO Jian, ZHU Li Juan, LI Shu Ping, ZHANG Jing, ZHAO Qin Hua, WANG Xiu Qin, WEI Jing Shuang, REN Le Min, CAO Chen Hua, CHEN Chen, ZHAO Wei, LI Li.  Rabies Virus Neutralizing Activity, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Recombinant Human Rabies Antibody Compared with Human Rabies Immunoglobulin in Healthy Adults . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(9): 782-791. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.103
    [9] Tahir Yaqub, Muhammad Nawaz, Muhammad Z. Shabbir, Muhammad A. Ali, Imran Altaf, Sohail Raza, Muhammad A. B. Shabbir, Muhammad A. Ashraf, Syed Z. Aziz, Sohail Q. Cheema, Muhammad B. Shah, Saira Rafique, Sohail Hassan, Nageen Sardar, Adnan Mehmood, Muhammad W. Aziz, Sehar Fazal, Nadir Hussain, Muhammad T. Khan, Muhammad M. Atique, Ali Asif, Muhammad Anwar, Nabeel A. Awan, Muhammad U. Younis, Muhammad A. Bhattee, Zarfishan Tahir, Nadia Mukhtar, Huda Sarwar, Maaz S. Rana, Omair Farooq.  A Longitudinal Survey for Genome-based Identification of SARS-CoV-2 in Sewage Water in Selected Lockdown Areas of Lahore City, Pakistan: A Potential Approach for Future Smart Lockdown Strategy . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(9): 729-733. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.101
    [10] NIU Pei Hua, ZHAO Xiang, LU Rou Jian, ZHAO Li, HUANG Bao Ying, YE Fei, WANG Da Yan, TAN Wen Jie.  Full-Length Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 Directly from Clinical and Environmental Samples Based on the Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Method . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(9): 725-728. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.100
    [11] SOLANES Aleix, LAREDO Carlos, GUASP Mar, FULLANA Miquel Angel, FORTEA Lydia, GARCIA-OLIVÉ Ignasi, SOLMI Marco, SHIN Jae Il, URRA Xabier, RADUA Joaquim.  No Effects of Meteorological Factors on the SARS-CoV-2 Infection Fatality Rate . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(11): 871-880. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.120
    [12] LING Rui Jie, YU Yi Han, HE Jia Yu, ZHANG Ji Xian, XU Sha, SUN Ren Rong, ZHU Wang Cai, CHEN Ming Feng, LI Tao, JI Hong Long, WANG Huan Qiang.  Seroprevalence of IgM and IgG Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in Asymptomatic People in Wuhan: Data from a General Hospital Near South China Seafood Wholesale Market during March to April in 2020 . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(9): 743-749. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.103
    [13] LI Ling Hua, TU Hong Wei, LIANG Dan, WEN Chun Yan, LI An An, LIN Wei Yin, HU Ke Qi, HONG Wen Shan, LI Yue Ping, SU Juan, ZHAO San Tao, LI Wei, YUAN Run Yu, ZHOU Ping Ping, HU Feng Yu, TANG Xiao Ping, KE Chang Wen, KE Bi Xia, CAI Wei Ping.  Kinetic Characteristics of Neutralizing Antibody Responses Vary among Patients with COVID-19 . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(12): 976-983. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.133
    [14] Sahar Gholipour, Mahnaz Nikaeen, Reza Mohammadi Manesh, Shima Aboutalebian, Zahra Shamsizadeh, Elahe Nasri, Hossein Mirhendi.  Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Contamination of High-touch Surfaces in Field Settings . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(12): 925-929. doi: 10.3967/bes2020.126
    [15] XU Xiao Gang, WANG Huan, WANG San Ying, ZHANG Jing, SUN Chuan, WEI Ming Xiang, YAN Jing, MAO Gen Xiang.  Predictive Analysis of Susceptibility of Different Species to SARS-CoV-2 based on ACE2 Receptors . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(11): 877-881. doi: 10.3967/bes2020.120
    [16] CHEN Guo Min, JI Jia Jia, JIANG Shuai, XIAO Ya Qi, ZHANG Ren Li, HUANG Da Na, LIU Hui, YU Shu Yuan.  Detecting Environmental Contamination of Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Isolation Wards and Fever Clinics . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(12): 943-947. doi: 10.3967/bes2020.130
    [17] LIANG Pu, YI Yao, SU Qiu Dong, QIU Feng, FAN Xue Ting, LU Xue Xin, BI Sheng Li.  Efficient Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses Induced by a Chimeric Virus-like Particle Displaying the Epitope of EV71 without Adjuvant . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(5): 343-350. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.045
    [18] YANG Ren, ZHU Ying, MA Jing, HAO Yan Zhe, WANG Xuan, HOU Mei Ling, LIU Li Peng, FAN Li Yun, CAO Yu Xi, ZHANG Xiao Guang, LI Xiao Jing.  Neutralizing Antibody Titer Test of Ebola Recombinant Protein Vaccine and Gene Vector Vaccine pVR-GP-FC . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(10): 721-728. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.097
    [19] ZHANG Xuan, WANG Qiang, YU Zhong, Sergei A. Eremin, YU Chun Fai, LIU Jin, SUN Yuan Ming, LEI Hong Tao.  Antibody Production for a Rapid Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay of Estrone . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 27(1): 52-55. doi: 10.3967/bes2014.015
    [20] WANG YONG-CHENG, GUO ZHEN-QUAN, LI Yuan-zong, CHANG Wen-bao.  Production and Characterization of Anti-estrone Monoclonal Antibody . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2002, 15(2): 103-112.
  • 22241Supplementary Materials.pdf
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表ll (3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  490
  • HTML全文浏览量:  166
  • PDF下载量:  48
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-07-16
  • 录用日期:  2022-10-08
  • 刊出日期:  2022-12-20

Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Follow-up of Neutralizing Antibody Levels

doi: 10.3967/bes2022.139
    基金项目:  This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [82041027]; National Key R&D Program of China [2021ZD0114100, 2021ZD0114103]; The Capital Health Development and Research of Special [2022-1G-3014]; Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project of Beijing Science and Technology Commission [Z211100002521015, Z211100002521019]; and Cooperation project [2022-jk-cd-009]
    作者简介:

    CUI Shu Juan, born in 1978, female, Doctor’s Degree, majoring in pathogenic biology

    通讯作者: WANG Quan Yi, PhD, Tel: 86-10-64407128, E-mail: bjcdcxm@126.comLI Li Ming, PhD, Tel: 86-10-82801528, E-mail: lmlee@vip.163.com
注释:
1) AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS: 2) CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:

English Abstract

CUI Shu Juan, ZHANG Yi, GAO Wen Jing, WANG Xiao Li, YANG Peng, WANG Quan Yi, PANG Xing Huo, ZENG Xiao Peng, LI Li Ming. Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Follow-up of Neutralizing Antibody Levels[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 1100-1105. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.139
Citation: CUI Shu Juan, ZHANG Yi, GAO Wen Jing, WANG Xiao Li, YANG Peng, WANG Quan Yi, PANG Xing Huo, ZENG Xiao Peng, LI Li Ming. Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Follow-up of Neutralizing Antibody Levels[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 1100-1105. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.139
    • Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a single-stranded, positive-sense, non-segmented enveloped RNA virus belonging to the genus Betacoronavirus of the family Coronaviridae. It causes the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) in humans. Identified in December 2019 [1], COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic beginning from March 2020. As per the report by the World Health Organization (WHO), there are 599.8 million confirmed cases of COVID-19, and 6.4 million confirmed deaths globally as of September 1, 2022 (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019). The symptoms of COVID-19 include dry cough, fever, sore throat, and loss of taste and smell, and serious complications such as septic shock, severe pneumonia, renal failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and presentations may range from asymptomatic to pneumonia and ARDS [2, 3]. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is through contact, droplets, fomites, or airborne or fecal-oral routes.

      In general, symptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive patients are detected when they seek medical attention; however, without imperative testing, asymptomatic carriers can be missed and contribute to the spread of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, for any region where testing is not required for all individuals, asymptomatic cases can compromise the control programs implemented. Therefore, asymptomatic carriers are believed to be the main drivers of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [4, 5]. Many studies have reported the detection of SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals among different populations, including healthcare workers, children, pregnant patients, cruise ship passengers and staff, airplane passengers, close contacts of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, and individuals from homeless shelters, nursing facilities, military quarantine facilities, rehabilitation facilities, and jails[6-26] (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2, available in www.besjournal.com). Several factors, including the total number of testing populations and conflation of true asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic individuals, affect the percentage of SARS-CoV-2-positive asymptomatic individuals in the defined populations.

      Table S1.  Studies on testing SARS-CoV-2 in populations containing asymptomatic individuals

      PopulationsTotal testedAsymptomatic positive/total positive, n (%)Asymptomatic positive/total tested (%)Reference
      Iceland residents13,08043/100 (43)0.3Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the Icelandic Population
      Italy Vo’ residents5,15542/102 (41.2)0.8Suppression of a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in the Italian municipality of Vo’
      Ethiopia residents61,5991,935/2,617 (73.9)3.1Clinical features and risk factors associated with morbidity and mortality among patients with COVID-19 in northern Ethiopia
      Japan Diamond Princess cruise3,711328/634 (51.7)8.8Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond
      Argentine cruise217104/128 (81.3)47.9COVID-19: in the footsteps of Ernest Shackleton
      New York obstetrical patients21529/33 (87.9)13.5Universal Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in Women Admitted for Delivery
      Spain obstetrical patients11,728174/279 (62.4)1.5Obstetric Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Asymptomatic Pregnant Women
      West French Guiana obstetrical patients50787/137 (63.5)17.2Maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes of large series of SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnancies in peripartum period: A single-center prospective comparative study
      Flight back to Greece from United Kingdom, Spain, and Turkey78335/40 (87.5)4.5High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in repatriation flights to Greece from three
      International Entrants to China from 90 countries19,398,384 1,612/3,103 (51.9)0.008Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among Persons Entering China From April 16 to October 12, 2020
      Washington Nursing Facility7627/48 (56.3)35.5Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Transmission in a Skilled Nursing Facility
      7613/23 (56.5)17.1Asymptomatic and Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in residents of a long-term care skilled
      Chicago Nursing Facility20450/172 (29.1)24.5Management and outcomes of a COVID-19 outbreak in a nursing home with predominantly Black residents
      France nursing home45614/161 (8.7)3.1Atypical symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 test results and immunisation rates in 456 residents from eight nursing homes facing a COVID-19 outbreak
      Long-term care facilities residents11610/111 (9)8.6Clinical Presentation, Course, and Risk Factors Associated with Mortality in a Severe Outbreak of COVID-19 in Rhode Island, USA, April–June 2020
      New Jersey hospital and university employees82927/41 (65.9)3.3Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in previously undiagnosed health care workers at the onset of the U.S. COVID-19 epidemic
      Italy healthcare workers1,57317/139 (12.2)1.1Characteristics of 1573 healthcare workers who underwent nasopharyngeal swab testing for SARS-CoV-2 in Milan, Lombardy, Italy
      New York city jail system97858/568 (10.2)5.9COVID-19 in the New York City Jail System: Epidemiology and Health Care Response, March–April 2020
      Boston homeless shelter408129/147 (87.8)31.6Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in residents of a large homelss shelter in boston
      India military quarantine facilities2625/25 (100)96.2Spread of COVID-19 by asymptomatic cases: evidence from military quarantine facilities
      Pediatric patients (< 18 years old)2,13594/728 (12.9)4.4Epidemiology of COVID-19 among children China
      Children patients in Wuhan (1day-15 years old)1,39127/171 (15.8)1.9SARS-CoV-2 infection in children
      US sailors4,085146/736 (19.8)3.6Symptom Characterization and Outcomes of Sailors in Isolation After a COVID-19 Outbreak on a US Aircraft Carrier
      Close contact of 314 Spain patients753240/449 (53.5)31.9Transmission of COVID-19 in 282 clusters in Catalonia, Spain: a cohort study

      Table S2.  Studies on characterizing SARS-CoV-2 positive patients containing asymptomatic individuals

      PopulationsTotal of
      Positive
      Asymptomatic positive/total positive,
      n (%)
      ReferenceNote
      Kuwait residents1,096473/1,096 (43.2)Characteristics, risk factors and outcomes among the first consecutive 1,096 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Kuwait35 presymptomatic
      UK rehabilitation facility4515/45 (33.3)Asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in a rehabilitation facility
      Patients in Beijing26213/262 (4.9)Characteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing
      Patients in Shanghai32813/328 (4.0)Follow-up of asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection
      Residents in South Korea19953/199 (26.6)Asymptomatic infection and atypical manifestations of COVID-19: Comparison of viral shedding duration
      Patients in People’s Hospital of Daofu county8318/83 (21.7)A considerable proportion of individuals with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in Tibetan population
      Children in Zhejiang
      (1–16 years old)
      3610/36 (28)Clinical and epidemiological features of 36 children with coronavirus disease 2019
      Children in Kuwait13491/134 (67.9)Clinical characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Kuwait3 presymptomatic
      Bahrain patients and their contacts320 index cases
      1,289 positive contacts
      160/320 (50)
      1,127/1,289 (87.4)
      The high prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection reveals the silent spread of COVID-19
      Air passengers to Brunei13816/138 (11.6)High proportion of asymptomatic and presymptomatic
      COVID-19 infections in air passengers to Brunei

      Although many studies have reported the detection of SARS-CoV-2-positive asymptomatic populations in different countries, immune responses in asymptomatic individuals are understudied, and data have been inconsistent. In addition, the durability of the protective immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear. A seroprevalence study from the United States using an immunoassay to detect antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein showed that 6.6% (4,094 of 61,910) of asymptomatic population was seropositive [27]. A study from China reported that of 63 asymptomatic individuals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 utilizing both molecular tests and immunoglobulin (Ig) M- and IgG-based serological tests, 39 (61.9%) produced low titers of neutralizing antibodies, which started as early as 7 days post-exposure, peaked between 10 and 25 days post-exposure, and subsequently dropped rapidly. In contrast, 45 of 51 patients with mild symptoms produced higher neutralizing antibodies, which peaked around 22 days post-symptom onset and were maintained for at least 65 days [28].

      In the present study, we measured the neutralizing antibodies of asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals with COVID-19 at three time points post-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmation and summarized meta-analysis studies on asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    • In this study, 69 symptomatic [42 males and 27 females, average age of 43.4 years (standard deviation = 16.5)] and 27 asymptomatic [13 males and 14 females, average age of 35.8 years (standard deviation = 13.9)] patients were confirmed SARS-CoV-2-positive by a PCR assay targeting the ORF1ab and N genes. These individuals were infected during the outbreak period from June to December 2020, and their serum samples were collected at different time points from June 2020 to October 2021 in Beijing. The symptomatic patients were hospitalized with no previous medical history and characteristic chest computed tomography (CT) findings of COVID-19 pneumonia. These symptomatic patients had respiratory symptoms and pneumonia on CT and were SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive, whereas the asymptomatic patients were only PCR-positive without the respiratory symptoms or pneumonia. Blood samples were collected from symptomatic patients at 3, 6, and 10 months post-PCR confirmation and from asymptomatic patients at 1, 2, and 6 months post-PCR confirmation. This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2020026). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

    • A SARS-CoV-2 microneutralization assay was performed using Vero cells as previously described [29, 30]. Serum samples were heat-inactivated at 56 ℃ for 30 min. The serum samples were subsequently serially diluted two fold and equally added to 100 µL of cell medium containing 100 cell culture infectious dose. The serum-virus mixture was incubated for 2 h at 37 ℃ with 5% CO2. Subsequently, 96-well cell culture plates with semi-confluent Vero cell monolayers were inoculated with 100 µL of the mixture at each dilution, in duplicate. The plates were incubated for 5 days at 37 ℃ and subsequently examined for cytopathic effects. The highest serum dilution that inhibited at least 50% of the cytopathic effects was considered as the neutralization titer.

      Virus antibody mix was subsequently added to cells in 96-well plates, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C with microscopic examination for cytopathic effects after 5-day incubation.

    • SPSS software (version 19.0) was used for statistical analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the neutralizing antibody titers of the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups at different time points after PCR confirmation. Statistical significance was set at a P value < 0.05.

    • All symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals were confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2 positive by PCR. Neutralizing antibodies of 69 symptomatic patients peaked (83.3 ± 105.9) at 3 months post-PCR confirmation and significantly dropped at 6 (22.9 ± 22.6) and 10 months (7.7 ± 10.1) post-confirmation (Figure 1). Neutralizing antibodies in 27 asymptomatic patients showed a similar trend with relatively higher levels at 1 month post-confirmation (103.1 ± 64.8), lower levels at 2 months post-confirmation (81.2 ± 64.1), and significantly lower levels at 6 months post-confirmation (19.6 ± 10.3) (Figure 1). Compared with the symptomatic group, the asymptomatic group had relatively lower levels of neutralizing antibodies at 2 and 6 months post-confirmation.

      Figure 1.  SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers at three different time points (Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05). (A) 3, 6, and 10 months post-PCR confirmation for symptomatic patients. (B) 1, 2, and 6 months post-PCR confirmation for asymptomatic patients.

      Overall, our data showed that neutralizing antibodies gradually dropped to lower levels in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19, and symptomatic patients had relatively higher levels of neutralizing antibodies at 6 months post-confirmation, consistent with the previous findings that the levels of neutralizing antibodies were correlated with disease severity [31]. A study from South Korea analyzed antibody status in seven asymptomatic individuals and 11 patients with pneumonia at 2 and 5 months after symptom onset [30]. This study showed that both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients had neutralizing antibodies at 2 and 5 months after infection, and antibody levels decreased from 219.4 at 2 months post-infection to 143.7 at 5 months post-infection. At 8 months post-infection, 4 of 7 asymptomatic individuals were still positive for neutralizing antibodies [32, 33]. In the aforementioned study, neutralizing antibody titers decreased more in symptomatic than in asymptomatic patients [30], which differs from our finding that neutralizing antibody titers of asymptomatic patients decreased in a similar trend as those of symptomatic patients. A follow-up study of 31 asymptomatic patients with COVID-19 showed that 74% of the patients did not have circulating immunoglobulins against SARS-CoV-2 at 8 weeks post-testing. Over 40% of these patients had no detectable immunoglobulin at either time point with an 8-week interval [34].

      In the present study, we observed that the neutralization titers of both asymptomatic and symptomatic groups dropped to very low levels at 6 months post-PCR confirmation. This indicates that higher levels of neutralizing antibodies elicited through one-time infection of SARS-CoV-2 only persist for less than half a year. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 immunization would be still required for protection against future infection.

      The data of the present study were obtained from SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in Beijing, China. The present study has a few limitations. First, our study was not prospectively controlled, and patient demographic factors, such as drug history and radiology findings in the symptomatic group, were not evaluated. Second, the evaluation periods post-PCR confirmation for the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were different, which made data analysis between the groups difficult. Third, the sample sizes of the groups (n = 27 and n = 69) were not sufficiently large. Fourth, the study could not include data related to the immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants.

      In contrast to the limited number of studies on immune responses of asymptomatic patients with COVID-19, there are several studies on the prevalence of asymptomatic infection[35]. There have been seven meta-analyses on the prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 infection. These seven studies analyzed the data from 6–390 published studies, and reported the percentage of asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 to be 15.6% (41 studies) [36], 17% (13 studies) [37], 20% (79 studies) [38], 24.2% (6 studies) [4], 25% (28 studies) [39], 35.1% (390 studies) [40], and 48.2% (16 studies) [41] (Table 1). Among these, the meta-analysis with 16 studies indicated a significant heterogeneity among the studies, and the actual proportion of asymptomatic COVID-19 cases was reported to be 31.1% [41]. Subgroup analysis of different age groups showed similar percentages of asymptomatic COVID-19 cases in children (27.7%) and older adults (28.3%) in one study [36]; however, this was significantly higher in children than in older adults in two studies (46.7% vs. 19.7%, and 49.6% vs. 16.9%) [40, 41]. In addition, one study analyzed the radiology results in patients with COVID-19 and revealed that individuals with normal radiology results were significantly younger 19.59 ± 17.17 years than those with abnormal radiology results 39.14 ± 26.70 years [4]. Overall, these studies suggested that asymptomatic individuals accounted for 15.6%–35.1% of the total number of SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals.

      Table 1.  Meta-analysis studies on asymptomatic COVID-19 cases

      Total number of studies included% of asymptomatic
      individuals
      NoteReferencePublication time
      624.2 (SD, 22.06)34 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 17 studies (13 case reports and 4 case series) for meta-analysis contained CT or lab test results. Individuals with normal radiology results were significantly younger (19.59 ± 17.17 years) than patients with abnormal radiology results (39.14 ± 26.70 years). Data from 6 case series were used to calculate the percentage of asymptomatic individualsRef [4]June 17, 2020
      4115.6 (95% CI: 10.1–23.0)180 asymptomatic individuals reported from 10 studies included 48.9% pre-symptomatic individuals. 24: all ages, 9% 11: children, 27.7% 3: older adults, 28.3% 4: pregnant women, 49.9%Ref [36]July 21, 2020
      7920 (95% CI: 17–25)7 studies screening all potentially exposed people in the defined populations and followed-up after testing, 31% (59% CI: 26%–37%) remained asymptomaticRef [38]July 28, 2020
      1317 (95 CI : 14–20)4% in Korea to 40% in Vo, Italy, and in an aged care facility in the United States Non-aged care, 16% and aged care, 21%.Ref [37]September 13, 2020
      1648.2 (95% CI: 30.0–67.0)
      with significant heterogeneity
      noted among studies. Actual
      proportion of asymptomatic
      cases, 31.1%
      8 studies with age subgroup analysis, children, 49.6%; adults, 30.3%; and older adults, 16.9%. 39% prevalence of true asymptomatic cases versus 15.3% of pre-symptomatic cases in 10 studiesRef [41]January 20, 2021
      2825 (95% CI: 16–38)Ref [39]March 23, 2021
      39035.1 (95% CI: 30.7–39.9)42.8% of cases without symptoms at the time of testing. Children: 46.7% Older adults: 19.7% Comorbidities had significantly lower asymptomaticity compared with cases without underlying medical conditions.Ref [40]August 10, 2021
        Note. SD, standard deviation; CI , confidence interval; CT, computed tomography.

      Two of the three above-mentioned meta-analysis studies showed that children had a higher percentage of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection than older adults [40, 41]. The asymptomatic group of children could be a main concern as they may spread the virus to classmates and family members if no active testing and quarantine program is in place. Data used in the present and previous studies were collected from the pre-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination period. With more people immunized with SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccines since late 2020, the number of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals will be higher. These asymptomatic individuals can be either vaccinated or non-vaccinated. Therefore, continued monitoring of asymptomatic groups is essential for controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in humans.

    • Neutralizing antibodies in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups with COVID-19 dropped significantly to lower levels at 6 months post-PCR confirmation, and continued monitoring of both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals will be vital in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

    • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).

参考文献 (41)
补充材料:
22241Supplementary Materials.pdf

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回