-
Table 1 summarizes the statistics for the variables examined, including changes in individual, household, and community characteristics associated with WC status. The PA level and energy intake decreased gradually from 1993 to 2015. Average age, percentage of energy from dietary fat, BMI, per capita income, and education increased gradually, and the difference in the urbanization index between quartile 1 (Q1) and quartile 3 (Q3) increased.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study participantsa
Wave 1993 1997 2000 2004 2006 2009 2011 2015 Pb Sample size (n) 458 801 1,073 1,308 1,446 1,609 1,989 1,409 Age (years) 69.7
(66.9, 74.5)71.0
(68.0, 75.7)71.3
(67.8, 75.5)71.5
(68.1, 76.2)71.9
(68.6, 76.6)72.2
(68.5, 76.6)72.3
(68.5, 77.0)74.9
(71.6, 78.9)< 0.0001 Male, n (%) 221 (48.3) 391 (48.8) 509 (47.4) 602 (46.0) 644 (44.5) 751 (46.7) 918 (46.2) 647 (46.0) 0.6241 Education
(years)0.0
(0.0, 13.0)0.0
(0.0, 14.0)0.0
(0.0, 15.0)13.0
(0.0, 16.0)12.0
(0.0, 16.0)13.0
(0.0, 21.0)15.0
(0.0, 23.0)16.0
(11.0, 23.0)< 0.0001 Income
(1,000 yuan per year)2.5
(1.4, 4.7)3.0
(1.6, 5.0)4.0
(1.7, 7.2)5.4
(2.7, 10.2)5.7
(2.5, 11.4)9.0
(4.1, 17.0)11.7
(5.2, 21.9)15.4
(5.7, 27.9)< 0.0001 Physical activity
(100 MET h/w)2.3
(1.0, 3.4)0.5
(0.1, 2.5)0.4
(0.1, 1.7)0.4
(0.2, 1.0)0.4
(0.2, 0.9)0.3
(0.1, 0.9)0.4
(0.1, 0.9)0.2
(0.0, 0.5)< 0.0001 Energy intake
(1,000 kcal/d)2.1
(1.7, 2.5)2.0
(1.6, 2.4)1.9
(1.6, 2.4)1.9
(1.5, 2.5)1.9
(1.5, 2.4)1.8
(1.5, 2.3)1.7
(1.4, 2.2)1.7
(1.3, 2.1)< 0.0001 Percentage of energy
from fat (%)25.4
(16.9, 34.4)27.1
(19.1, 35.3)31.1
(23.7, 39.0)29.1
(20.2, 37.3)31.6
(23.4, 39.6)32.1
(24.5, 39.9)34.3
(26.6, 43.2)34.8
(27.3, 42.8)< 0.0001 Urbanization index 50.9
(35.9, 65.4)61.3
(41.9, 72.8)70.5
(48.3, 77.6)73.2
(46.7, 85.0)73.6
(50.7, 85.8)69.2
(51.4, 89.1)74.4
(54.5, 88.3)77.1
(58.1, 90.2)< 0.0001 BMI (kg/m2) 21.4
(19.3, 23.9)21.7
(19.6, 24.1)22.2
(19.9, 24.9)22.5
(20.1, 25.2)22.5
(20.1, 25.2)22.7
(20.4, 25.4)23.2
(20.8, 25.7)23.5
(21.0, 25.9)< 0.0001 WC (cm) 78.0
(71.0, 86.0)79.0
(72.0, 87.0)81.0
(74.0, 90.0)82.0
(74.0, 90.0)82.4
(75.0, 91.0)84.0
(76.4, 91.5)85.0
(77.1, 92.0)86.0
(79.0, 94.0)< 0.0001 Note. aValues are medians (Q1, Q3). bP < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables, chi-square test for categorical variables. Table 1 shows that the PA level and energy intake gradually decreased from 1993 to 2015. Average age, energy supply ratio of dietary fat, BMI, per capita income, and years of education gradually increased, and the community urbanization index fluctuation increased. -
Figure 1 shows the changes in the WC distributions among men and women in 1993, 2004, and 2015. The WC distribution curves widened, shifted to the right, and the peaks decreased from 1993 to 2015. The overall WC level increased, the distributions became wider, and the proportion of participants with a high WC increased. In addition, the curve shifts to the right were larger from 1993 to 2004 than from 2004 to 2015 in both genders. The women’s curve shifted farther to the right and was wider than the men’s, indicating that the increase in WC was larger among women than men.
-
Figure 2 shows the WC percentile curves for the years 1993, 2004, and 2015 by gender and age. The 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of gender in men and women trended upward in all age groups, and the increases were the same in the three percentiles. The increases among women were generally higher in all age groups than those among men. The WC distribution slowly increased until the age of 70-years in women and 72-years in men and then declined. The decline accelerated significantly after the age of 80-years in women and 82-years in men. This finding suggests that the WCs of elderly women and men peaked at the ages of 70 and 72-years, respectively, and then declined.
-
Table 2 shows the yearly changes in the WC percentiles among women and men based on the longitudinal QR. The results from model 1 suggest a significant increase from the 10th percentile to the 90th percentile for men. The increases were greater in the upper percentiles than in the lower percentiles. For example, the WC increased 0.273 cm at the 75th percentile [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.151, 0.395], whereas the increase was 0.134 cm at the 25th percentile (95% CI: 0.041, 0.228). However, the increases for women were greater in the lower and upper percentiles than in the middle percentiles. The WC increased 0.272 cm (95% CI: 0.141, 0.403) and 0.295 cm in the 10th and 75th percentiles (95% CI: 0.214, 0.376), respectively, whereas the increase was 0.263 cm in the 50th percentile (95% CI: 0.196, 0.330).
Table 2. Quantile regression results for percentiles based on yearly coefficients (95% CI)
Models Coefficients (95% CI) 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th Women Intercept 79.126
(65.853, 92.399)a85.132
(76.201, 94.063)a92.303
(81.690, 102.915)a93.470
(82.633, 104.307)a97.798
(88.238, 107.359)aModel 1 0.272 (0.141, 0.403)a 0.270 (0.187, 0.353)a 0.263 (0.196, 0.330)a 0.295 (0.214, 0.376)a 0.268 (0.171, 0.366)a Model 2 0.204 (0.102, 0.307)a 0.218 (0.164, 0.273)a 0.290 (0.218, 0.361)a 0.328 (0.260, 0.396)a 0.264 (0.148, 0.381)a Model 3 0.193 (0.108, 0.279)a 0.206 (0.138, 0.274)a 0.274 (0.214, 0.334)a 0.325 (0.263, 0.388)a 0.273 (0.163, 0.384)a Men Intercept 96.475
(82.054, 110.896)a82.385
(68.469, 96.302)a94.974
(84.457, 105.491)a85.091
(74.401, 95.781)a89.697
(76.401, 102.994)aModel 1 0.075 (−0.062, 0.212) 0.134 (0.041, 0.228)a 0.196 (0.127, 0.266)a 0.273 (0.151, 0.395)a 0.241 (0.114, 0.368)a Model 2 0.127 (−0.002, 0.256) 0.094 (0.003, 0.185)a 0.164 (0.090, 0.238)a 0.228 (0.137, 0.320)a 0.236 (0.119, 0.354)a Model 3 0.093 (0.002, 0.184)a 0.093 (0.013, 0.173)a 0.144 (0.080, 0.209)a 0.205 (0.128, 0.281)a 0.229 (0.110, 0.347)a Note. Model 1 includes the year only. Model 2 includes the year plus education, income, PA, BMI, and diet. Model 3 includes all of the components in model 2 plus the urbanization index. aP < 0.05. After controlling for individual-level characteristics in model 2 and urbanicity in model 3, the time effect decreased in men but increased at the higher percentiles in women. Compared with the regression coefficient of model 1, the regression coefficient of model 2 had a larger change amplitude than that of model 3 for males and females, indicating that community urbanicity was less correlated with the temporal trend in the WC distribution than the individual characteristics.
-
Table 3 shows the regression coefficients and 95% CIs for the individual characteristics and community urbanicity for the WCs of elderly women and men in the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles. Among the individual-level characteristics, age was positively correlated in the high percentiles (75th and 90th) of the WC distributions of men and women, and the results were significant. For example, WC increased by 0.128 cm (95% CI: 0.068, 0.188) in women and 0.095 cm (95% CI: 0.022, 0.168) in men when age was increased by 1 year in the 75th percentile. The negative correlation with the PA level was significant in the 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles. These correlations increased with the percentile of the WC distribution, suggesting that PA has greater potential to decrease the WCs of people with larger WCs. BMI was positively correlated with the WC distribution and had a stronger correlation with the 50th percentile than with the others. Furthermore, education level was positively correlated with the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the men’s WC distribution. The WC of men in the 50th percentile increased by 0.080 cm (95% CI: 0.036, 0.123) for each additional year of education.
Table 3. Regression coefficients and 95% CIs of the individual characteristics and urbanicity
Variables Coefficients (95% CI) 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th Quantile regression model 3 results for women’s percentiles Intercept 28.964
(21.257, 36.672)a25.251
(20.423, 30.080)a26.498
(21.341, 31.655)a25.574
(19.599, 31.550)a27.321
(18.843, 35.800)aAge in 2015 −0.011 (-0.081, 0.058) 0.056 (−0.007, 0.119) 0.062 (0.009, 0.115)a 0.128 (0.068, 0.188)a 0.177 (0.087, 0.268)a Education (years) −0.005 (−0.090, 0.080) −0.006 (−0.036, 0.024) −0.013 (−0.052, 0.027) −0.011 (−0.048, 0.025) 0.034 (−0.055, 0.124) Income
(1,000 yuan per year)0.013 (−0.034, 0.060) −0.008 (−0.028, 0.013) −0.014 (−0.042, 0.013) −0.004 (−0.032, 0.024) −0.012 (−0.057, 0.034) Physical activity
(100 MET h/w)−0.113
(−0.392, 0.166)−0.069
(−0.296, 0.159)−0.233
(−0.394, −0.072)a−0.326
(−0.514, −0.138)a−0.447
(−0.774, −0.120)aEnergy intake
(1,000 kcal/d)−0.353 (−0.870, 0.163) −0.089 (−0.495, 0.317) 0.130 (−0.252, 0.512) 0.120 (−0.360, 0.601) −0.212 (−1.056, 0.633) Percentage of energy
from fat (%)−0.014 (−0.047, 0.018) −0.002 (−0.017, 0.014) −0.004 (−0.023, 0.016) −0.010 (−0.034, 0.014) 0.026 (−0.015, 0.067) BMI (kg/m2) 1.963 (1.832, 2.094)a 1.994 (1.905, 2.083)a 2.125 (2.040, 2.210)a 2.075 (1.939, 2.211)a 1.937 (1.805, 2.070)a Urbanization index 0.010 (−0.021, 0.041) 0.012 (−0.006, 0.031) −0.020 (−0.040, 0.001) −0.015 (−0.037, 0.008) −0.006 (−0.044, 0.032) Quantile regression model 3 results for men’s percentiles Intercept 37.249
(24.149, 50.350)a28.872
(19.389, 38.354)a23.497
(15.084, 31.910)a27.856
(18.588, 37.124)a32.678
(23.203, 42.153)aAge in 2015 −0.031 (−0.120, 0.058) −0.009 (−0.086, 0.069) 0.055 (−0.005, 0.116) 0.095 (0.022, 0.168)a 0.118 (0.032, 0.203)a Education (years) 0.049 (−0.047, 0.145) 0.053 (0.022, 0.084)a 0.080 (0.036, 0.123)a 0.062 (0.021, 0.103)a 0.029 (−0.064, 0.123) Income
(1,000 yuan per year)0.020 (−0.025, 0.065) 0.006 (−0.020, 0.031) 0.007 (−0.020, 0.035) 0.005 (−0.024, 0.034) 0.009 (−0.026, 0.043) Physical activity
(100 MET h/w)−0.233
(−0.565, 0.099)−0.150
(−0.348, 0.049)−0.232
(−0.403, −0.060)a−0.282
(−0.491, −0.073)a−0.290
(−0.544, −0.037)aEnergy intake
(1,000 kcal/d)0.164 (−0.488, 0.816) 0.104 (−0.239, 0.446) 0.217 (−0.120, 0.553) −0.006 (−0.427, 0.414) 0.074 (−0.458, 0.606) Percentage of energy
from fat (%)0.021 (−0.009, 0.052) 0.019 (−0.008, 0.047) 0.003 (−0.020, 0.026) 0.010 (−0.018, 0.039) 0.040 (0.003, 0.077)a BMI (kg/m2) 1.700 (1.342, 2.058)a 2.086 (1.909, 2.263)a 2.246 (2.060, 2.433)a 2.073 (1.937, 2.209)a 1.888 (1.713, 2.063)a Urbanization index 0.019 (−0.018, 0.057) 0.030 (0.008, 0.053)a 0.018 (0.000, 0.037) 0.019 (−0.007, 0.044) 0.010 (−0.014, 0.033) Note. aP < 0.05 Table 3 shows the regression coefficients and 95% CIs of the individual and community factors for the WCs of elderly people of different genders (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th). Community urbanization was positively correlated with the WC distribution of men but was only significant at the 25th percentile. For every 1-point increase in the urbanization index, the WC of men in the 25th percentile increased by 0.030 cm (95% CI: 0.008, 0.053).
doi: 10.3967/bes2022.080
Waist Circumference of the Elderly over 65 Years Old in China Increased Gradually from 1993 to 2015: A Cohort Study
-
Abstract:
Objective This study aimed to analyze the temporal trends and characteristics associated with waist circumference (WC) among elderly Chinese people. Methods We used data from 3,096 adults ≥ 65 years who participated in the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS), an ongoing cohort study, between 1993 and 2015. We used longitudinal quantile regression models to explore the temporal trends and characteristics associated with WC. Results WC increased gradually among the elderly Chinese population during the survey. The WC curves shifted to the right with wider distributions and lower peaks in men and women. All WC percentile curves shifted upward with similar growth rates in the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles. The WC means increased from 78 cm to 86 cm during the 22 years of our study. WC significantly increased with age and body mass index and decreased with physical activity (PA). These associations were stronger in the higher percentiles than in the lower percentiles. Conclusions WC is rising among Chinese adults ≥ 65 years. Factors affecting WC in elderly people may have different effects on different percentiles of the WC distribution, and PA was the most important protective factor in the higher percentiles of the WC distribution. Thus, different interventional strategies are needed. -
Key words:
- Waist circumference /
- Trends /
- Aging /
- China
注释: -
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study participantsa
Wave 1993 1997 2000 2004 2006 2009 2011 2015 Pb Sample size (n) 458 801 1,073 1,308 1,446 1,609 1,989 1,409 Age (years) 69.7
(66.9, 74.5)71.0
(68.0, 75.7)71.3
(67.8, 75.5)71.5
(68.1, 76.2)71.9
(68.6, 76.6)72.2
(68.5, 76.6)72.3
(68.5, 77.0)74.9
(71.6, 78.9)< 0.0001 Male, n (%) 221 (48.3) 391 (48.8) 509 (47.4) 602 (46.0) 644 (44.5) 751 (46.7) 918 (46.2) 647 (46.0) 0.6241 Education
(years)0.0
(0.0, 13.0)0.0
(0.0, 14.0)0.0
(0.0, 15.0)13.0
(0.0, 16.0)12.0
(0.0, 16.0)13.0
(0.0, 21.0)15.0
(0.0, 23.0)16.0
(11.0, 23.0)< 0.0001 Income
(1,000 yuan per year)2.5
(1.4, 4.7)3.0
(1.6, 5.0)4.0
(1.7, 7.2)5.4
(2.7, 10.2)5.7
(2.5, 11.4)9.0
(4.1, 17.0)11.7
(5.2, 21.9)15.4
(5.7, 27.9)< 0.0001 Physical activity
(100 MET h/w)2.3
(1.0, 3.4)0.5
(0.1, 2.5)0.4
(0.1, 1.7)0.4
(0.2, 1.0)0.4
(0.2, 0.9)0.3
(0.1, 0.9)0.4
(0.1, 0.9)0.2
(0.0, 0.5)< 0.0001 Energy intake
(1,000 kcal/d)2.1
(1.7, 2.5)2.0
(1.6, 2.4)1.9
(1.6, 2.4)1.9
(1.5, 2.5)1.9
(1.5, 2.4)1.8
(1.5, 2.3)1.7
(1.4, 2.2)1.7
(1.3, 2.1)< 0.0001 Percentage of energy
from fat (%)25.4
(16.9, 34.4)27.1
(19.1, 35.3)31.1
(23.7, 39.0)29.1
(20.2, 37.3)31.6
(23.4, 39.6)32.1
(24.5, 39.9)34.3
(26.6, 43.2)34.8
(27.3, 42.8)< 0.0001 Urbanization index 50.9
(35.9, 65.4)61.3
(41.9, 72.8)70.5
(48.3, 77.6)73.2
(46.7, 85.0)73.6
(50.7, 85.8)69.2
(51.4, 89.1)74.4
(54.5, 88.3)77.1
(58.1, 90.2)< 0.0001 BMI (kg/m2) 21.4
(19.3, 23.9)21.7
(19.6, 24.1)22.2
(19.9, 24.9)22.5
(20.1, 25.2)22.5
(20.1, 25.2)22.7
(20.4, 25.4)23.2
(20.8, 25.7)23.5
(21.0, 25.9)< 0.0001 WC (cm) 78.0
(71.0, 86.0)79.0
(72.0, 87.0)81.0
(74.0, 90.0)82.0
(74.0, 90.0)82.4
(75.0, 91.0)84.0
(76.4, 91.5)85.0
(77.1, 92.0)86.0
(79.0, 94.0)< 0.0001 Note. aValues are medians (Q1, Q3). bP < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables, chi-square test for categorical variables. Table 1 shows that the PA level and energy intake gradually decreased from 1993 to 2015. Average age, energy supply ratio of dietary fat, BMI, per capita income, and years of education gradually increased, and the community urbanization index fluctuation increased. Table 2. Quantile regression results for percentiles based on yearly coefficients (95% CI)
Models Coefficients (95% CI) 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th Women Intercept 79.126
(65.853, 92.399)a85.132
(76.201, 94.063)a92.303
(81.690, 102.915)a93.470
(82.633, 104.307)a97.798
(88.238, 107.359)aModel 1 0.272 (0.141, 0.403)a 0.270 (0.187, 0.353)a 0.263 (0.196, 0.330)a 0.295 (0.214, 0.376)a 0.268 (0.171, 0.366)a Model 2 0.204 (0.102, 0.307)a 0.218 (0.164, 0.273)a 0.290 (0.218, 0.361)a 0.328 (0.260, 0.396)a 0.264 (0.148, 0.381)a Model 3 0.193 (0.108, 0.279)a 0.206 (0.138, 0.274)a 0.274 (0.214, 0.334)a 0.325 (0.263, 0.388)a 0.273 (0.163, 0.384)a Men Intercept 96.475
(82.054, 110.896)a82.385
(68.469, 96.302)a94.974
(84.457, 105.491)a85.091
(74.401, 95.781)a89.697
(76.401, 102.994)aModel 1 0.075 (−0.062, 0.212) 0.134 (0.041, 0.228)a 0.196 (0.127, 0.266)a 0.273 (0.151, 0.395)a 0.241 (0.114, 0.368)a Model 2 0.127 (−0.002, 0.256) 0.094 (0.003, 0.185)a 0.164 (0.090, 0.238)a 0.228 (0.137, 0.320)a 0.236 (0.119, 0.354)a Model 3 0.093 (0.002, 0.184)a 0.093 (0.013, 0.173)a 0.144 (0.080, 0.209)a 0.205 (0.128, 0.281)a 0.229 (0.110, 0.347)a Note. Model 1 includes the year only. Model 2 includes the year plus education, income, PA, BMI, and diet. Model 3 includes all of the components in model 2 plus the urbanization index. aP < 0.05. Table 3. Regression coefficients and 95% CIs of the individual characteristics and urbanicity
Variables Coefficients (95% CI) 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th Quantile regression model 3 results for women’s percentiles Intercept 28.964
(21.257, 36.672)a25.251
(20.423, 30.080)a26.498
(21.341, 31.655)a25.574
(19.599, 31.550)a27.321
(18.843, 35.800)aAge in 2015 −0.011 (-0.081, 0.058) 0.056 (−0.007, 0.119) 0.062 (0.009, 0.115)a 0.128 (0.068, 0.188)a 0.177 (0.087, 0.268)a Education (years) −0.005 (−0.090, 0.080) −0.006 (−0.036, 0.024) −0.013 (−0.052, 0.027) −0.011 (−0.048, 0.025) 0.034 (−0.055, 0.124) Income
(1,000 yuan per year)0.013 (−0.034, 0.060) −0.008 (−0.028, 0.013) −0.014 (−0.042, 0.013) −0.004 (−0.032, 0.024) −0.012 (−0.057, 0.034) Physical activity
(100 MET h/w)−0.113
(−0.392, 0.166)−0.069
(−0.296, 0.159)−0.233
(−0.394, −0.072)a−0.326
(−0.514, −0.138)a−0.447
(−0.774, −0.120)aEnergy intake
(1,000 kcal/d)−0.353 (−0.870, 0.163) −0.089 (−0.495, 0.317) 0.130 (−0.252, 0.512) 0.120 (−0.360, 0.601) −0.212 (−1.056, 0.633) Percentage of energy
from fat (%)−0.014 (−0.047, 0.018) −0.002 (−0.017, 0.014) −0.004 (−0.023, 0.016) −0.010 (−0.034, 0.014) 0.026 (−0.015, 0.067) BMI (kg/m2) 1.963 (1.832, 2.094)a 1.994 (1.905, 2.083)a 2.125 (2.040, 2.210)a 2.075 (1.939, 2.211)a 1.937 (1.805, 2.070)a Urbanization index 0.010 (−0.021, 0.041) 0.012 (−0.006, 0.031) −0.020 (−0.040, 0.001) −0.015 (−0.037, 0.008) −0.006 (−0.044, 0.032) Quantile regression model 3 results for men’s percentiles Intercept 37.249
(24.149, 50.350)a28.872
(19.389, 38.354)a23.497
(15.084, 31.910)a27.856
(18.588, 37.124)a32.678
(23.203, 42.153)aAge in 2015 −0.031 (−0.120, 0.058) −0.009 (−0.086, 0.069) 0.055 (−0.005, 0.116) 0.095 (0.022, 0.168)a 0.118 (0.032, 0.203)a Education (years) 0.049 (−0.047, 0.145) 0.053 (0.022, 0.084)a 0.080 (0.036, 0.123)a 0.062 (0.021, 0.103)a 0.029 (−0.064, 0.123) Income
(1,000 yuan per year)0.020 (−0.025, 0.065) 0.006 (−0.020, 0.031) 0.007 (−0.020, 0.035) 0.005 (−0.024, 0.034) 0.009 (−0.026, 0.043) Physical activity
(100 MET h/w)−0.233
(−0.565, 0.099)−0.150
(−0.348, 0.049)−0.232
(−0.403, −0.060)a−0.282
(−0.491, −0.073)a−0.290
(−0.544, −0.037)aEnergy intake
(1,000 kcal/d)0.164 (−0.488, 0.816) 0.104 (−0.239, 0.446) 0.217 (−0.120, 0.553) −0.006 (−0.427, 0.414) 0.074 (−0.458, 0.606) Percentage of energy
from fat (%)0.021 (−0.009, 0.052) 0.019 (−0.008, 0.047) 0.003 (−0.020, 0.026) 0.010 (−0.018, 0.039) 0.040 (0.003, 0.077)a BMI (kg/m2) 1.700 (1.342, 2.058)a 2.086 (1.909, 2.263)a 2.246 (2.060, 2.433)a 2.073 (1.937, 2.209)a 1.888 (1.713, 2.063)a Urbanization index 0.019 (−0.018, 0.057) 0.030 (0.008, 0.053)a 0.018 (0.000, 0.037) 0.019 (−0.007, 0.044) 0.010 (−0.014, 0.033) Note. aP < 0.05 Table 3 shows the regression coefficients and 95% CIs of the individual and community factors for the WCs of elderly people of different genders (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th). -
[1] Weinbrenner T, Schröder H, Escurriol V, et al. Circulating oxidized LDL is associated with increased waist circumference independent of body mass index in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr, 2006; 83, 30−5. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.1.30 [2] Ding YS, Li Y, Zhang XH, et al. The improved lipid accumulation product is an accurate index for predicting metabolic syndrome in the Xinjiang population. Biomed Environ Sci, 2021; 34, 503−7. [3] Yoshida D, Toyomura K, Fukumoto J, et al. Waist circumference and cardiovascular risk factors in Japanese men and women. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2009; 16, 431−41. doi: 10.5551/jat.No539 [4] Tian JY, Qiu MY, Li YY, et al. Contribution of birth weight and adult waist circumference to cardiovascular disease risk in a longitudinal study. Sci Rep, 2017; 7, 9768. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10176-6 [5] Hu G, Tuomilehto J, Silventoinen K, et al. Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio on the risk of total and type-specific stroke. Arch Intern Med, 2007; 167, 1420−7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1420 [6] Wei JX, Liu X, Xue H, et al. Comparisons of visceral adiposity index, body shape index, body mass index and waist circumference and their associations with diabetes mellitus in adults. Nutrients, 2019; 11, 1580. doi: 10.3390/nu11071580 [7] Jacobs EJ, Newton CC, Wang YT, et al. Waist circumference and all-cause mortality in a large US cohort. Arch Intern Med, 2010; 170, 1293−301. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.201 [8] Sakakura K, Hoshide S, Ishikawa J, et al. Association of body mass index with cognitive function in elderly hypertensive Japanese. Am J Hypertens, 2008; 21, 627−32. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.157 [9] West NA, Lirette ST, Cannon VA, et al. Adiposity, change in adiposity, and cognitive decline in mid- and late life. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2017; 65, 1282−8. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14786 [10] Felson DT, Zhang YQ, Hannan MT, et al. Effects of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: the Framingham study. J Bone Miner Res, 1993; 8, 567−73. [11] Hubbard RE, Lang IA, Llewellyn DJ, et al. Frailty, body mass index, and abdominal obesity in older people. J Gerontol Ser A, 2010; 65, 377−81. [12] Zhai Y, Ren ZP, Zhang M, et al. Abdominal obesity and its attribution to all-cause mortality in the general population with 14 years follow-up: findings from Shanxi Cohort in China. Biomed Environ Sci, 2020; 33, 227−37. [13] Zhai Y, Fang HY, Yu WT, et al. Changes in waist circumference and abdominal obesity among Chinese adults over a Ten-year period. Biomed Environ Sci, 2017; 30, 315−22. [14] Ford ES, Maynard LM, Li CY. Trends in mean waist circumference and abdominal obesity among US adults, 1999-2012. JAMA, 2014; 312, 1151−3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.8362 [15] Tanamas SK, Shaw JE, Backholer K, et al. Twelve-year weight change, waist circumference change and incident obesity: the Australian diabetes, obesity and lifestyle study. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2014; 22, 1538−45. doi: 10.1002/oby.20704 [16] Howel D. Waist circumference and abdominal obesity among older adults: patterns, prevalence and trends. PLoS One, 2012; 7, e48528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048528 [17] Pradeepa R, Anjana RM, Joshi SR, et al. Prevalence of generalized & abdominal obesity in urban & rural India-the ICMR-INDIAB Study (Phase-I) [ICMR- NDIAB-3]. Indian J Med Res, 2015; 142, 139−50. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.164234 [18] Hajian-Tilaki KO, Heidari B. Prevalence of obesity, central obesity and the associated factors in urban population aged 20-70 years, in the north of Iran: a population-based study and regression approach. Obes Rev, 2007; 8, 3−10. [19] Czernichow S, Bertrais S, Preziosi P, et al. Indicators of abdominal adiposity in middle-aged participants of the SU. VI. MAX study:relationships with educational level, smoking status and physical inactivity. Diabetes Metab, 2004; 30, 153−9. [20] Zhao PP, Gu XL, Qian DF, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in abdominal obesity over the life course in China. Int J Equity Health, 2018; 17, 96. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0809-x [21] Donato GB, Fuchs SC, Oppermann K, et al. Association between menopause status and central adiposity measured at different cutoffs of waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio. Menopause, 2006; 13, 280−5. doi: 10.1097/01.gme.0000177907.32634.ae [22] Qian XW, Su C, Zhang B, et al. Changes in distributions of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio over an 18-year period among Chinese adults: a longitudinal study using quantile regression. BMC Public Health, 2019; 19, 700. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6927-6 [23] Zhai Y, Fang HY, Yu WT, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of waist circumference and abdominal obesity among Chinese adults in 2010-2012. Chin J Prev Med, 2017; 51, 506−12. (In Chinese [24] Popkin BM, Du SF, Zhai FY, et al. Cohort profile: the China Health and nutrition survey-monitoring and understanding socio-economic and health change in China, 1989-2011. Int J Epidemiol, 2010; 39, 1435−40. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp322 [25] Zhang B, Wang HJ, Du WW. Progress of cohort study and its inspiration to China health and nutrition survey. Chin J Prev Med, 2011; 45, 295−8. (In Chinese [26] Du SF, Mroz TA, Zhai FY, et al. Rapid income growth adversely affects diet quality in China-particularly for the poor! Soc Sci Med, 2004; 59, 1505-15. [27] Popkin BM. The nutrition transition: an overview of world patterns of change. Nutr Rev, 2004; 62, S140−3. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2004.tb00084.x [28] Cui ZH, Dibley MJ. Trends in dietary energy, fat, carbohydrate and protein intake in Chinese children and adolescents from 1991 to 2009. Br J Nutr, 2012; 108, 1292−9. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511006891 [29] Monda KL, Gordon-Larsen P, Stevens J, et al. China's transition: the effect of rapid urbanization on adult occupational physical activity. Soc Sci Med, 2007; 64, 858−70. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.10.019 [30] Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med, 1992; 11, 1305−19. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111005 [31] Geraci M, Bottai M. Quantile regression for longitudinal data using the asymmetric Laplace distribution. Biostatistics, 2007; 8, 140−54. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj039 [32] Chen YJ, Peng Q, Yang Y, et al. The prevalence and increasing trends of overweight, general obesity, and abdominal obesity among Chinese adults: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 2019; 19, 1293. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7633-0 [33] Comitato R, Saba A, Turrini A, et al. Sex hormones and macronutrient metabolism. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2015; 55, 227−41. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2011.651177 [34] Traissac P, Pradeilles R, El Ati J, et al. Abdominal vs. overall obesity among women in a nutrition transition context: geographic and socio-economic patterns of abdominal-only obesity in Tunisia. Popul Health Metr, 2015; 13, 1. [35] Cárdenas Fuentes G, Bawaked RA, Martínez González MÁ, et al. Association of physical activity with body mass index, waist circumference and incidence of obesity in older adults. Eur J Public Health, 2018; 28, 944−50. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky030 [36] López-Sobaler AM, Rodríguez-Rodríguez E, Aranceta-Bartrina J, et al. General and abdominal obesity is related to physical activity, smoking and sleeping behaviours and mediated by the educational level: findings from the ANIBES study in Spain. PLoS One, 2016; 11, e0169027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169027 [37] McPhee JS, French DP, Jackson D, et al. Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology, 2016; 17, 567−80. doi: 10.1007/s10522-016-9641-0 [38] Bashkireva AS, Bogdanova DY, Bilyk AY, et al. Quality of life and physical activity among elderly and old people. Adv Gerontol, 2018; 31, 743-50. (In Russian) [39] Forouhi NG, Sharp SJ, Du HD, et al. Dietary fat intake and subsequent weight change in adults: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohorts. Am J Clin Nutr, 2009; 90, 1632−41. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27828 [40] Xu XY, Hall J, Byles J, et al. Dietary pattern is associated with obesity in older people in China: data from China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). Nutrients, 2015; 7, 8170−88. doi: 10.3390/nu7095386 [41] Lindsay-Smith G, Eime R, O'Sullivan G, et al. A mixed-methods case study exploring the impact of participation in community activity groups for older adults on physical activity, health and wellbeing. BMC Geriatr, 2019; 19, 243. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1245-5 [42] Yuan SC, Weng SC, Chou MC, et al. How family support affects physical activity (PA) among middle-aged and elderly people before and after they suffer from chronic diseases. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2011; 53, 274−7. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.11.029