-
A total of 7,346 participants were included in this study (3,387 men, 3,959 women). The mean age (standardized deviation, SD) of all participants was 58.91 (9.16) years (Table 1). The participants with higher SUA levels were more likely to be older, of the male gender, hypertensive, smokers, and drinkers. Table 2 depicts the baseline characteristics of the participants in accordance with the kidney function decline status. Those with kidney function decline were more likely to be older, of the male gender, hypertensive, diabetic, and smokers. In addition, they had a higher average eGFR and triglycerides.
Characteristics Overall Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 P Participants, n (%) 7,346 (100.00) 1,528 (20.06) 1,610 (20.02) 1,521 (19.96) 1,411 (20.02) 1,276 (19.95) – Age (years, SD) 58.91 (9.16) 56.37 (8.79) 58.74 (8.85) 58.85 (9.07) 59.16 (8.82) 61.44 (9.56) < 0.001 Sex < 0.001 Men 3,387 (47.26) 280 (23.21) 494 (35.89) 674 (47.58) 856 (58.80) 1,083 (70.98) GDP per capita < 0.001 Low 2,814 (34.43) 488 (29.38) 605 (34.35) 564 (33.35) 550 (35.63) 607 (39.44) Middle 2,150 (27.02) 569 (33.58) 510 (30.39) 441 (28.41) 381 (24.96) 249 (17.71) High 2,382 (38.56) 471 (37.04) 495 (35.26) 516 (38.24) 480 (39.41) 420 (42.85) eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2, SD) 92.31 (14.51) 100.09 (10.49) 95.15 (12.37) 93.01 (13.64) 90.05 (13.89) 83.18 (15.92) < 0.001 Hypertension, n (%) 3,195 (43.60) 535 (33.55) 587 (40.99) 609 (41.19) 674 (47.91) 790 (54.39) < 0.001 Diabetes, n (%) 1,146 (15.69) 228 (13.27) 211 (16.13) 206 (13.96) 236 (14.81) 265 (20.27) < 0.001 Smoking < 0.001 Current/former 2,855 (38.79) 315 (25.11) 447 (32.75) 564 (39.75) 682 (45.61) 847 (50.79) Drinking < 0.001 Current/former 2,782 (38.65) 328 (26.70) 449 (31.76) 536 (38.64) 666 (44.60) 803 (51.62) BMI (kg/m2), n (%) < 0.001 Underweight 419 (5.27) 105 (7.46) 94 (6.17) 83 (4.93) 65 (3.44) 72 (4.33) Normal 3,760 (50.00) 818 (56.00) 774 (53.21) 771 (52.45) 705 (45.73) 692 (45.52) Overweight 2,198 (32.15) 393 (27.48) 432 (31.36) 435 (30.33) 485 (36.30) 453 (35.33) Obesity 929 (12.58) 145 (9.06) 164 (9.26) 174 (12.28) 202 (14.53) 244 (32.15) Systolic blood pressure (mmHg, SD) 130.62
(21.28)127.98
(20.00)129.26
(21.33)129.14
(20.83)132.78
(22.45)134.15
(21.17)< 0.001 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg, SD) 79.30
(52.72)76.25
(34.07)80.30
(63.69)78.68
(54.10)80.06
(43.28)81.37
(62.58)0.116 HbA1c (%, SD) 5.26 (0.81) 5.32 (1.02) 5.22 (0.81) 5.22 (0.74) 5.25 (0.72) 5.27 (0.72) 0.006 Triglycerides (mg/dL, SD) 136.95
(109.57)119.70
(83.88)123.54
(86.50)131.58
(91.28)140.45
(112.50)169.62
(151.69)< 0.001 LDL cholesterol (mg/dL, SD) 115.20
(34.56)114.83
(32.95)116.30
(32.83)115.05
(33.14)116.44
(35.33)113.37
(38.23)0.104 HDL cholesterol (mg/dL, SD) 49.64 (15.24) 51.84 (14.35) 51.29 (13.73) 50.38 (15.86) 48.27 (14.97) 48.38 (16.50) < 0.001 C-reactive protein (mg/L, SD) 2.58 (6.71) 2.08 (5.78) 2.25 (5.74) 2.52 (7.28) 2.99 (7.58) 3.05 (6.89) < 0.001 Note. Q1: 0 to 3.39 mg/dL, Q2: 3.39 to 3.97 mg/dL, Q3: 3.97 to 4.57 mg/dL, Q4: 4.57 to 5.36 mg/dL, Q5: ≥ 5.36 mg/dL. There were 20, 25, 25, 26, 40, 894, 872, 46, and 13 individuals with missing information in hypertension, diabetes, smoking, drinking, BMI, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, HbA1c and LDL-c, respectively. The inverse probability weighting method was applied in calculating the SDs, proportions and P values. SUA, serum uric acid; SD, standard deviation; GDP, gross domestic product; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein. Table 1. Participants characteristics at baseline, by SUA levels
Characteristics Kidney function decline P No Yes Participants, n (%) 6,342 (86.33) 1,004 (13.67) – Age (years, SD) 58.75 (9.12) 59.93 (9.35) < 0.001 Sex, n (%) < 0.001 Men 2,893 (47.02) 494 (48.82) GDP per capita < 0.001 Low 2,354 (33.29) 460 (41.61) Middle 1,910 (27.90) 240 (21.43) High 2,078 (38.81) 304 (36.96) eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2, SD) 91.89 (14.24) 94.96 (15.83) < 0.001 Hypertension, n (%) 2,718 (42.77) 477 (48.80) < 0.001 Diabetes, n (%) 978 (15.38) 168 (17.60) < 0.001 Smoking < 0.001 Current/former 2,434 (38.53) 421 (40.41) Drinking < 0.001 Current/former 2,388 (38.78) 394 (37.85) BMI (kg/m2) < 0.001 Underweight 353 (5.12) 66 (6.22) Normal 3,231 (50.07) 529 (49.55) Overweight 1,910 (31.95) 288 (33.43) Obesity 815 (12.86) 114 (10.80) Systolic blood pressure (mmHg, SD) 129.97 (20.57) 134.52 (24.76) < 0.001 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg, SD) 79.05 (52.52) 80.83 (53.90) 0.341 SUA (mg/dL, SD) 4.52 (1.32) 4.57 (1.27) 0.219 HbA1c (%, SD) 5.25 (0.80) 5.30 (0.88) 0.076 Triglycerides (mg/dL, SD) 135.32 (98.94) 147.23 (160.85) 0.001 LDL cholesterol (mg/dL, SD) 115.79 (34.33) 111.46 (35.80) < 0.001 HDL cholesterol (mg/dL, SD) 49.61 (15.01) 49.83 (16.64) 0.668 C-reactive protein (mg/L, SD) 2.59 (7.00) 2.49 (4.39) 0.664 Note. There were 20, 25, 25, 26, 40, 894, 872, 46, and 13 individuals with missing information in hypertension, diabetes, smoking, drinking, BMI, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, HbA1c and LDL cholesterol, respectively. SD, standard deviation; GDP, gross domestic product; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; BMI, body mass index; SUA, serum uric acid; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein. Table 2. Baseline characteristics of individuals without or with kidney function decline
-
A total of 1,004 individuals (13.67%) developed a kidney function decline during the follow-up of 4 years. After adjusting for all potential covariates (such as age, sex, GDP per capita, baseline eGFR, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, drinking, BMI, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and C-reactive protein), for every additional 1 mg/dL SUA, the risk of kidney function decline increased by 14% (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03–1.27), with a significant dose-response relation (Table 3). After adjusting for all potential covariates, the ORs for the second, third, fourth, and fifth versus the first quintile of SUA were 1.23 (95% CI 0.94–1.62), 1.41 (95% CI 1.06–1.87), 1.72 (95% CI 1.02–2.89), and 1.71 (95% CI 1.18–2.47), respectively. The restricted cubic spline analysis with 2 mg/dL SUA as the reference indicated that SUA > 5 mg/dL (which corresponds to the median of the fourth quintile) was associated with a significantly higher risk of kidney function decline (Figure 1).
SUA level Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Q1 Ref Ref Ref Q2 1.27 (0.96–1.67) 1.24 (0.95–1.63) 1.23 (0.94–1.62) Q3 1.41 (1.06–1.88)* 1.39 (1.05–1.84)* 1.41 (1.06–1.87)* Q4 1.80 (1.04–3.10)* 1.72 (1.03–2.89)* 1.72 (1.02–2.89)* Q5 1.80 (1.24–2.60)** 1.70 (1.18–2.43)** 1.71 (1.18–2.47)** 1 mg/dL increase 1.14 (1.02–1.28)* 1.13 (1.02–1.26)* 1.14 (1.03–1.27)* Note. Q1: 0– < 3.39 mg/dL, Q2: 3.39– < 3.97 mg/dL, Q3: 3.97– < 4.57 mg/dL, Q4: 4.57– < 5.36 mg/dL, Q5: ≥ 5.36 mg/dL. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, GDP per capita and baseline eGFR. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for hypertension and diabetes. In Model 3, adjustment further included smoking, drinking, BMI, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and C-reactive protein. SUA, serum uric acid; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GDP, gross domestic product; BMI, body mass index; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein. Table 3. Odds ratios and 95% CIs for the association of SUA level with kidney function decline
Figure 1. Restricted cubic splines analysis of the association between the SUA level and kidney function decline The red solid line represents age-adjusted odds ratios. The gray dashed lines represent 95% confidence intervals. The serum uric acid level was modeled by both-tail restricted cubic spline in a multivariable logistic regression model. The reference value is 2 mg/dL. SUA, serum uric acid.
-
After repeating the logistic model adjusted for all potential covariates among males and females, respectively, a significant positive dose-response relation was noted between the SUA and kidney function decline for women (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03–1.45). Although the dose-response relation was not recorded in men (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.97–1.23), the high level of baseline SUA was found to be related to the kidney function decline (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.05–3.17) (Table 4). In different age groups, only those aged < 60 years saw a significant positive dose-response relation between the SUA and kidney function decline (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05–1.42). Subgroup analyses by hypertension and diabetes status indicated a positive dose–response relation between SUA and kidney function decline only among those without hypertension and without diabetes, with an OR of 1.22 (95% CI 1.06–1.41). Subgroup analyses by hypertension status (not considering the diabetes status) revealed a positive dose-response relation only among those without hypertension (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07–1.39). For those without diabetes (not considering the hypertension status), a positive dose-response relation (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.28) was noted, which was not detected among those with diabetes. The relationship between the SUA level and the risk of kidney function decline may depend on sex, age, or hypertension and diabetes status (All P for interaction < 0.001).
Subgroup Number Serum uric
acid levelOR Men 3,387 Q1 – Q2 1.38 (0.79–2.41) Q3 1.64 (0.95–2.83) Q4 1.33 (0.77–2.30) Q5 1.83 (1.05–3.17)* 1 mg/dL
increase1.09 (0.97–1.23) Women 3,959 Q1 – Q2 1.16 (0.84–1.59) Q3 1.21 (0.85–1.71) Q4 2.31 (1.13–4.72)* Q5 1.38 (0.75–2.50) 1 mg/dL
increase1.22 (1.03–1.45)* < 60 years 4,026 Q1 – Q2 1.19 (0.82–1.74) Q3 1.43 (0.97–2.12) Q4 2.13 (1.05–4.33)* Q5 2.00 (1.18–3.39)* 1 mg/dL
increase1.22 (1.05–1.42)* 60 to < 70 years 2,323 Q1 – Q2 1.28 (0.80–2.05) Q3 1.41 (0.88–2.27) Q4 1.16 (0.71–1.89) Q5 1.36 (0.77–2.39) 1 mg/dL
increase1.14 (0.99–1.31) ≥ 70 years 997 Q1 – Q2 1.25 (0.63–2.51) Q3 1.20 (0.58–2.45) Q4 1.48 (0.70–3.10) Q5 1.62 (0.72–3.63) 1 mg/dL
increase1.04 (0.85–1.26) Without hypertension &
without diabetes3,664 Q1 – Q2 1.60 (1.08–2.39)* Q3 1.75 (1.18–2.60)** Q4 1.87 (1.22–2.88)** Q5 2.77 (1.71–4.50)*** 1 mg/dL
increase1.22 (1.06–1.41)** With hypertension &
without diabetes2,511 Q1 – Q2 0.77 (0.50–1.17) Q3 0.88 (0.54–1.41) Q4 1.16 (0.48–2.82) Q5 0.78 (0.42–1.43) 1 mg/dL
increase1.02 (0.86–1.22) With diabetes &
without hypertension464 Q1 – Q2 2.52 (0.91–6.95) Q3 3.47 (1.32–9.14)* Q4 2.14 (0.66–6.96) Q5 2.75 (0.77–9.80) 1 mg/dL
increase1.21 (0.91–1.62) With hypertension &
diabetes679 Q1 – Q2 0.82 (0.34–1.99) Q3 1.24 (0.50–3.10) Q4 1.92 (0.80–4.56) Q5 1.43 (0.58–3.52) 1 mg/dL
increase1.12 (0.90–1.40) Note. Q1: 0 to 3.39 mg/dL, Q2: 3.39 to 3.97 mg/dL, Q3: 3.97 to 4.57 mg/dL, Q4: 4.57 to 5.36 mg/dL, Q5: ≥ 5.36 mg/dL. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. The covariates were age, sex, GDP per capita, baseline eGFR, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, drinking, BMI, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and C-reactive protein. There were 28 individuals with missing information on hypertension (20 individuals) or diabetes (25 individuals). SUA, serum uric acid; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; OR, odds ratio; GDP, gross domestic product; BMI, body mass index; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein. Table 4. Subgroup analyses for dose-response association between SUA and kidney function decline
Association between Serum Uric Acid and the Early Marker of Kidney Function Decline among Chinese Middle-Aged and Older Population: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study
doi: 10.3967/bes2023.026
- Received Date: 2022-04-26
- Accepted Date: 2022-11-17
-
Key words:
- Uric acid /
- Glomerular filtration rate /
- Kidney function decline
Abstract:
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Citation: | TANG Xu, XU Lu, MENG Ruo Gu, DU Yi Qing, LIU Shi Jun, ZHAN Si Yan, XU Tao. Association between Serum Uric Acid and the Early Marker of Kidney Function Decline among Chinese Middle-Aged and Older Population: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(3): 231-240. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.026 |