Stopping Transmission of COVID-19 in Public Facilities and Workplaces: Experience from China

WANG Jiao YANG Wen Jing TANG Song PAN Li Jun SHEN Jin John S. Ji WANG Xian Liang LI Li YING Bo ZHAO Kang Feng ZHANG Liu Bo WANG Lin SHI Xiao Ming

WANG Jiao, YANG Wen Jing, TANG Song, PAN Li Jun, SHEN Jin, John S. Ji, WANG Xian Liang, LI Li, YING Bo, ZHAO Kang Feng, ZHANG Liu Bo, WANG Lin, SHI Xiao Ming. Stopping Transmission of COVID-19 in Public Facilities and Workplaces: Experience from China[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(3): 259-262. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.036
Citation: WANG Jiao, YANG Wen Jing, TANG Song, PAN Li Jun, SHEN Jin, John S. Ji, WANG Xian Liang, LI Li, YING Bo, ZHAO Kang Feng, ZHANG Liu Bo, WANG Lin, SHI Xiao Ming. Stopping Transmission of COVID-19 in Public Facilities and Workplaces: Experience from China[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(3): 259-262. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.036

doi: 10.3967/bes2022.036

Stopping Transmission of COVID-19 in Public Facilities and Workplaces: Experience from China

More Information
    Author Bio:

    WANG Jiao, female, born in 1988, Associate Professor, majoring in environmental health, climate change health impact assessment; YANG Wen Jing, female, born in 1984, Associate Professor, majoring in environmental health, health protection, environmental engineering

    Corresponding author: SHI Xiao Ming, E-mail: shixm@chinacdc.cn
  • &These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • &These authors contributed equally to this work.
    注释:
  • Figure  1.  SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (0.0–3.0) in eight categories of public places and workplaces: healthcare facilities and waste services (A), cold-chain food facilities (B), long-term care and detention facilities (C), catering and accommodation facilities (D), transport vehicles and stations (E), sports, culture, and entertainment venues (F), facilities providing essential services (G), and education places and workspace (H).

    S1.   The risk level of public places and workplaces

    No.TypesRisk scorePlacesFavorable environment for SARS-CoV-2 survivalSARS-CoV-2 existenceConfined environmentCongregated environmentHigh population flowPopulation vulnerability
    1Healthcare facilities and waste services13.00Hospitals$\otimes $
    Centralized quarantine/isolation places$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Medical waste treatment plants$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    2Places involved cold-chain food12.34Supermarkets and retail stores$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Meat/seafood manufacturing plants$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Cold storage warehouses$\otimes $$\otimes $
    3Long term care and detention places12.00Nursing homes$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Orphanages$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Prisons$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    4Catering and accommodation places11.33Restaurants and coffee shops$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Hotels$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Bars and nightclubs$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    5Transportation vehicles and stations11.00Airports, train stations, and intercity bus stations$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Subway stations$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Cruise$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Bus stations$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    6Sports, culture and entertainment places10.71Shopping malls$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Large venues (casinos, theatre, cinema, sporty venues, etc.)$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Gyms and fitness centers$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Museums, library, gallery, and exhibitions$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Places of worships$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Flea markets and fairs$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Parks, play grounds, and tourism sites$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    7Daily life service places10.50Hair salons and beauty salons$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Banks$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    8Education places and workspace10.00Kindergarten$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Primary schools, middle schools, and universities$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Offices$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
      Note.$\otimes $”indicates low risk level (risk score of 1); “” indicates moderate risk level (risk score of 2); “●” indicates high risk level (risk score of 3).
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Tang S, Mao Y, Jones RM, et al. Aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Evidence, prevention and control. Environ Int, 2020; 144, 106039.
    [2] Dong ES, Du HR, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis, 2020; 20, 533-4.
    [3] Lan FY, Suharlim C, Kales SN, et al. Association between SARS-CoV-2 infection, exposure risk and mental health among a cohort of essential retail workers in the USA. Occup Environ Med, 2021; 78, 237-43.
    [4] Wang J, Pan LJ, Tang S, et al. Mask use during COVID-19: A risk adjusted strategy. Environ Pollut, 2020; 266, 115099.
    [5] Öcal A, Cvetković VM, Baytiyeh H, et al. Public reactions to the disaster COVID-19: a comparative study in Italy, Lebanon, Portugal, and Serbia. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk, 2020; 11, 1864-85.
    [6] Tan WQ, Hao FY, McIntyre RS, et al. Is returning to work during the COVID-19 pandemic stressful? A study on immediate mental health status and psychoneuroimmunity prevention measures of Chinese workforce. Brain Behav Immun, 2020; 87, 84-92.
    [7] Wang C, Chudzicka-Czupała A, Grabowski D, et al. The association between physical and mental health and face mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of two countries with different views and practices. Front Psychiatry, 2020; 11, 569981.
    [8] Tran BX, Nguyen HT, Le HT, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on economic well-being and quality of life of the vietnamese during the national social distancing. Front Psychol, 2020; 11, 565153.
    [9] Wang J, Yang WJ, Pan LJ, et al. Prevention and control of COVID-19 in nursing homes, orphanages, and prisons. Environ Pollut, 2020; 266, 115161.
    [10] De Vos J. The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect, 2020; 5, 100121.
  • [1] YANG Man Li, WANG Jing Ya, ZONG Xing Yu, GUAN Li, LI Hui Zhen, XIONG Yi Bai, LIU Yu Qin, LI Ting, JI Xin Yu, SHANG Xi Yu, ZHANG Hui Fang, GUO Yang, GONG Zhao Yuan, ZHANG Lei, TONG Lin, CHEN Ren Bo, FAN Yi Pin, QIN Jin, WANG Fang, LIN Gang, SHI Nan Nan, WANG Yan Ping, MA Yan.  Treatment Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients with Brucellosis: Case Series in Heilongjiang and Systematic Review of Literature . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(10): 930-939. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.035
    [2] WANG Yao, LI Xing Ming.  Impact of the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Smoking Cessation in Beijing . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(5): 452-457. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.054
    [3] Abolfazl Zendehdel, Saeidreza Jamalimoghadamsiahkal, Maedeh Arshadi, Forough Godarzi, Shokouh SHahrousvand, Hamidreza Hekmat, Ehsan Sekhavatimoghadam, Seyedeh Zahra Badrkhahan, Mina Riahi, Isa Akbarzadeh, Mohammad Bidkhori.  Survival Analysis of COVID-19 Patients Based on Different Levels of D-dimer and Coagulation Factors . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(10): 957-961. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.122
    [4] LU Yan Hui, DOU Zi Yan, ZHAO Kai Ping, YAN Dong, CHEN Shuo, CHENG Jun Xia, Glen M. BLAKE, Karen HIND, ZHANG Jing Bo, CHENG Xiao Guang, WU Jing.  Comparison of Obesity Prevalence among Middle and High School Graduates before and after the COVID-19 Lockdown . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 1145-1149. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.145
    [5] WANG Jing Ya, ZONG Xing Yu, WU Gui Hui, QI Yuan Lin, LI Hui Zhen, JI Xin Yu, TONG Lin, ZHANG Lei, YANG Ming Bo, YANG Pu Ye, LI Ji Ke, XIAO Fu Rong, ZHANG Lin Song, HU Yun Hong, LIU Hong De, XU Shou Fang, SUN Sheng, WU Wei, MAO Ya, LI Min Qing, HOU Hao Hua, GONG Zhao Yuan, GUO Yang, JIAO Li Wen, QIN Jin, WANG Ding Yi, WANG Fang, GUAN Li, LIN Gang, MA Yan, WANG Yan Ping, SHI Nan Nan.  3- to 24-month Follow-up on COVID-19 with Pulmonary Tuberculosis Survivors after Discharge: Results from a Prospective, Multicenter Study . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 1091-1099. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.126
    [6] WU Jie Wen, JIAO Xiao Kang, DU Xin Hui, JIAO Zeng Tao, LIANG Zuo Ru, PANG Ming Fan, JI Han Ran, CHENG Zhi Da, CAI Kang Ning, QI Xiao Peng.  Assessment of the Benefits of Targeted Interventions for Pandemic Control in China Based on Machine Learning Method and Web Service for COVID-19 Policy Simulation . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(5): 412-418. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.057
    [7] LI Yan Yan, DING Wen Hao, BAI Yi Chun, WANG Lei, WANG Yong Bin.  Estimating the Effects of the COVID-19 Outbreak on the Decreasing Number of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Cases and Epidemiological Trends in China . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(2): 141-145. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.019
    [8] LIANG Dan, WANG Tao, LI Jiao Jiao, GUAN Da Wei, ZHANG Guan Ting, LIANG Yu Feng, LI An An, HONG Wen Shan, WANG Li, CHEN Meng Lin, DENG Xiao Ling, CHEN Feng Juan, PAN Xing Fei, JIA Hong Ling, LEI Chun Liang, KE Chang Wen.  Genomic Epidemiology of Imported Cases of COVID-19 in Guangdong Province, China, October 2020 – May 2021 . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(5): 393-401. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.055
    [9] ZHOU Xian Long, DING Guo Yong, YANG Lu Yu, LIU Rui Ning, HOU Hai Feng, WANG Ping, MA Min, HU Zhuan Zhuan, HUANG Lei, XU Xi Zhu, HU Quan, ZHAO Yan, XING Wei Jia, ZHAO Zhi Gang.  The Effectiveness of Antiviral Treatment in Severe COVID-19 Patients in Wuhan, China: A Multicenter Study . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(1): 58-63. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.007
    [10] Farogh Kazembeigi, Parvin Ahmadinejad, Mohammad Reza Aryaeefar, Mehrdad Ghasemi, Ghasem Hassani, Giti Kashi.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Urban Litter . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(10): 954-956. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.121
    [11] XIONG Yi Bai, TIAN Ya Xin, MA Yan, YANG Wei, LIU Bin, RUAN Lian Guo, LU Cheng, HUANG Lu Qi.  Factors Defining the Development of Severe Illness in Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Study . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(12): 984-991. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.117
    [12] LIU Di, TIAN Qiu Yue, ZHANG Jie, HOU Hai Feng, LI Yuan, WANG Wei, MENG Qun, WANG You Xin.  Association between 25 Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations and the Risk of COVID-19: A Mendelian Randomization Study . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(9): 750-754. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.104
    [13] LI Ling Hua, TU Hong Wei, LIANG Dan, WEN Chun Yan, LI An An, LIN Wei Yin, HU Ke Qi, HONG Wen Shan, LI Yue Ping, SU Juan, ZHAO San Tao, LI Wei, YUAN Run Yu, ZHOU Ping Ping, HU Feng Yu, TANG Xiao Ping, KE Chang Wen, KE Bi Xia, CAI Wei Ping.  Kinetic Characteristics of Neutralizing Antibody Responses Vary among Patients with COVID-19 . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(12): 976-983. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.133
    [14] CHEN Cao, SHI Qi, DONG Xiao Ping.  Analyses of the Duration and Dynamics of the COVID-19 Epidemic in 11 Severely Affected Countries . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(9): 739-742. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.066
    [15] LIU Si Hong, MA Yan, SHI Nan Nan, TONG Lin, ZHANG Lei, CHEN Ren Bo, FAN Yi Pin, JI Xin Yu, GE You Wen, ZHANG Hua Min, WANG Yan Ping, WANG Yong Yan.  Qingfei Paidu Decoction for COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(9): 755-760. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.105
    [16] JI Ye Long, WU Yang, QIU Zhen, MING Hao, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Ai Ning, LENG Yan, XIA Zhong Yuan.  The Pathogenesis and Treatment of COVID-19: A System Review . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(1): 50-60. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.007
    [17] HAN Mei, ZOU Jing Bo, LI Huan, WEI Xiao Yu, YANG Song, ZHANG Hui Zheng, WANG Peng Sen, QIU Qian, WANG Le Le, CHEN Yao Kai, PAN Pin Liang.  Fecal Nucleic Acid Test as a Complementary Standard for Cured COVID-19 Patients . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(12): 935-939. doi: 10.3967/bes2020.128
    [18] LI Yu Hua, YU Ke Wen, SUN Neng Jun, JIN Xiao Dong, LUO Xin, YANG Jing, HE Bing, LI Bo.  Pulmonary Nodules Developed Rapidly in Staffs in the Isolation Ward of a Chinese Hospital during the COVID-19 Epidemic . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(12): 930-934. doi: 10.3967/bes2020.127
    [19] MA Yan, ZHU Dong Shan, CHEN Ren Bo, SHI Nan Nan, LIU Si Hong, FAN Yi Pin, WU Gui Hui, YANG Pu Ye, BAI Jiang Feng, CHEN Hong, CHEN Li Ying, FENG Qiao, GUO Tuan Mao, HOU Yong, HU Gui Fen, HU Xiao Mei, HU Yun Hong, HUANG Jin, HUANG Qiu Hua, HUANG Shao Zhen, JI Liang, JIN Hai Hao, LEI Xiao, LI Chun Yan, LI Min Qing, LI Qun Tang, LI Xian Yong, LIU Hong De, LIU Jin Ping, LIU Zhang, MA Yu Ting, MAO Ya, MO Liu Fen, NA Hui, WANG Jing Wei, SONG Fang Li, SUN Sheng, WANG Dong Ting, WANG Ming Xuan, WANG Xiao Yan, WANG Yin Zhen, WANG Yu Dong, WU Wei, WU Lan Ping, XIAO Yan Hua, XIE Hai Jun, XU Hong Ming, XU Shou Fang, XUE Rui Xia, YANG Chun, YANG Kai Jun, YUAN Sheng Li, ZHANG Gong Qi, ZHANG Jin Bo, ZHANG Lin Song, ZHAO Shu Sen, ZHAO Wan Ying, ZHENG Kai, ZHOU Ying Chun, ZHU Jun Teng, ZHU Tian Qing, ZHANG Hua Min, WANG Yan Ping, WANG Yong Yan, on behalf of 'Lung cleansing & detoxifying decoction' Emergency Project Expert Group for COVID-19.  Association of Overlapped and Un-overlapped Comorbidities with COVID-19 Severity and Treatment Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Nine Provinces in China . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(12): 893-905. doi: 10.3967/bes2020.123
    [20] SUN Cheng Xi, HE Bin, MU Di, LI Pei Long, ZHAO Hong Ting, LI Zhi Li, ZHANG Mu Li, FENG Lu Zhao, ZHENG Jian Dong, CHENG Ying, CUI Ying, LI Zhong Jie.  Public Awareness and Mask Usage during the COVID-19 Epidemic: A Survey by China CDC New Media . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(8): 639-645. doi: 10.3967/bes2020.085
  • 21324Supplementary Materials.pdf
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表ll (1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  559
  • HTML全文浏览量:  180
  • PDF下载量:  36
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-08-18
  • 录用日期:  2021-12-22
  • 刊出日期:  2022-03-22

Stopping Transmission of COVID-19 in Public Facilities and Workplaces: Experience from China

doi: 10.3967/bes2022.036
    作者简介:

    WANG Jiao, female, born in 1988, Associate Professor, majoring in environmental health, climate change health impact assessment; YANG Wen Jing, female, born in 1984, Associate Professor, majoring in environmental health, health protection, environmental engineering

    通讯作者: SHI Xiao Ming, E-mail: shixm@chinacdc.cn
注释:

English Abstract

WANG Jiao, YANG Wen Jing, TANG Song, PAN Li Jun, SHEN Jin, John S. Ji, WANG Xian Liang, LI Li, YING Bo, ZHAO Kang Feng, ZHANG Liu Bo, WANG Lin, SHI Xiao Ming. Stopping Transmission of COVID-19 in Public Facilities and Workplaces: Experience from China[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(3): 259-262. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.036
Citation: WANG Jiao, YANG Wen Jing, TANG Song, PAN Li Jun, SHEN Jin, John S. Ji, WANG Xian Liang, LI Li, YING Bo, ZHAO Kang Feng, ZHANG Liu Bo, WANG Lin, SHI Xiao Ming. Stopping Transmission of COVID-19 in Public Facilities and Workplaces: Experience from China[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(3): 259-262. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.036
  • The main transmission routes of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) include droplet and contact transmission. Airborne transmission may be possible in specific circumstances and settings in which aerosol-generating procedures are performed[1]. In 2020, more than 83.4 million confirmed cases of COVID-19, including more than 1.8 million deaths, were reported; in contrast, the numbers of cumulative confirmed cases and deaths in China were only 96,673 and 4,788, respectively[2]. Low temperatures might favor the spread of the disease in some countries and regions[3]. In France, the United Kingdom, Turkey, Italy, Spain, and Germany, COVID-19 spread was inhibited during the summer season, but the sudden increase after October implied that the pandemic rebounded in these areas. In addition, New Year’s day, Christmas day, and the Spring Festival in winter are associated with mass gatherings and frequent social activities, such as parliamentary meetings, receptions, and commemorative activities. These gatherings and activities in public places and workplaces can increase the risk of infection with the causative agent of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2[4]; therefore, more rigorous precautions may be necessary. However, among women and parents, psychological reactions, stress, and overall emotional reactions have been reported to increase with age[5]. Thus, risk-based precautions in public places and workplaces must be focused on to maintain uninterrupted businesses operation, and to limit economic losses and adverse mental effects.

    Because of high population density and personal mobility, and abundant contact opportunities, public places and workplaces favor the spread of COVID-19, because of the strong contagiousness and persistence of SARS-CoV-2. To develop a risk-based prevention and control strategy, public places and workplaces reported to be vulnerable to COVID-19 were classified into eight categories according to the Chinese national standards of the Regulations on the Administration of Public Health in Public Places: healthcare facilities and waste services; cold-chain food facilities; long-term care or detention facilities; catering and accommodation facilities; transport vehicles and stations; sports, culture, and entertainment venues; facilities providing essential services; and education places and workspaces (Supplementary Table S1, available in www.besjournal.com). The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in each location was evaluated according to the environmental perspectives of viral survival favorability, the existence of the virus (or confirmed cases), population confinement, population congregation, high population flow, and population vulnerability. According to the Delphi method, values of 1, 2, and 3 indicated low risk, moderate risk, and high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, respectively. The SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in eight categories of public places and workplaces are shown in Figure 1.

    Figure 1.  SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (0.0–3.0) in eight categories of public places and workplaces: healthcare facilities and waste services (A), cold-chain food facilities (B), long-term care and detention facilities (C), catering and accommodation facilities (D), transport vehicles and stations (E), sports, culture, and entertainment venues (F), facilities providing essential services (G), and education places and workspace (H).

    Table S1.  The risk level of public places and workplaces

    No.TypesRisk scorePlacesFavorable environment for SARS-CoV-2 survivalSARS-CoV-2 existenceConfined environmentCongregated environmentHigh population flowPopulation vulnerability
    1Healthcare facilities and waste services13.00Hospitals$\otimes $
    Centralized quarantine/isolation places$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Medical waste treatment plants$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    2Places involved cold-chain food12.34Supermarkets and retail stores$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Meat/seafood manufacturing plants$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Cold storage warehouses$\otimes $$\otimes $
    3Long term care and detention places12.00Nursing homes$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Orphanages$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Prisons$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    4Catering and accommodation places11.33Restaurants and coffee shops$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Hotels$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Bars and nightclubs$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    5Transportation vehicles and stations11.00Airports, train stations, and intercity bus stations$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Subway stations$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Cruise$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Bus stations$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    6Sports, culture and entertainment places10.71Shopping malls$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Large venues (casinos, theatre, cinema, sporty venues, etc.)$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Gyms and fitness centers$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Museums, library, gallery, and exhibitions$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Places of worships$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Flea markets and fairs$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Parks, play grounds, and tourism sites$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    7Daily life service places10.50Hair salons and beauty salons$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Banks$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    8Education places and workspace10.00Kindergarten$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Primary schools, middle schools, and universities$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
    Offices$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $$\otimes $
      Note. “$\otimes $”indicates low risk level (risk score of 1); “” indicates moderate risk level (risk score of 2); “●” indicates high risk level (risk score of 3).

    Transmission of COVID-19 in public places and workplaces can be avoided through administrative management and personal health protection[6]. Precautions via mobile application QR codes for tracking mobility have been suggested according to risk levels. For administrative management, establishing an emergency response plan, and reserving adequate personal protection equipment and disinfection supplies are crucial. To improve compliance, dissemination of health knowledge could be strengthened through posters and bulletin boards. After any COVID-19 cases are confirmed in public places or workplaces, terminal disinfection must be performed under the guidance of the local CDC. For personal health protection, mass gatherings should be avoided. As alternatives, telework, online or telephone reservations, self-check-ins, and mobile payments are recommended. In confined places where people congregate, individuals are encouraged to wear masks, follow social distancing, and develop good personal hygiene habits. However, because unnecessary facemask use and social distancing requirements might lead to adverse mental health effects, specific precautions should be proposed for each category of public places and workplaces [7, 8]. The average risk levels of individual categories, ranked from highest to the lowest, are as follows: healthcare facilities and waste services (2.17); cold-chain food facilities (2.06); long-term care or detention facilities (2.00); catering and accommodation facilities (1.89); transport vehicles and stations (1.83); sports, culture, and entertainment venues (1.79); facilities providing essential services (1.75), and education places and workspaces (1.67). In addition, the characteristics of the risk levels according to different perspectives should be considered in determining the specific precautions for a variety of places.

    The precautions in healthcare facilities should be strengthened because the elevated risk of COVID-19 due to the confined environment, high population flow, close contact, and presence of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases. The body temperature of entrants should be monitored at the entrance, and people with fever should be sent directly to the fever clinic. Online registration and medical appointments are recommended to limit gatherings. All staff in healthcare facilities should be well trained, equipped, and capable of prevention and control practices. Each visitor, admitted patient, doctor, and nurse should wear a mask at all times. Furthermore, more attention should be paid to the management of medical waste, which should be removed and transported in a timely manner.

    Cold-chain food workers are as much as five times more likely than the general population to be infected by COVID-19 because a low-temperature environment favors viral transmission. Therefore, a health monitoring system must be established, and the health status of employees should be recorded on a daily basis. All employees must be required to wear masks and gloves while working. More strict disinfection measures should be applied to transportation (including vehicles, vessels, and containers) and storage areas. Regular nucleic acid testing should be provided to employees for early detection of infections. Although vaccine research and development still has the potential for further improvement, vaccination of employees as soon as possible could still be considered an effective protective measure.

    Nursing homes, prisons, and orphanages are also key facilities for the prevention and control of COVID-19. Older people, inmates, and children in proximity in these settings are likely to be more vulnerable to COVID-19 than the general population[9]. Therefore, emergency work plans must be developed, and employee training must be improved. Strict visitation policies should be implemented, and the body temperatures of all visitors should be monitored before they enter these facilities. The body temperatures and respiratory symptoms of all residents should be monitored daily. Although fewer social interactions and activities are conducive to decreasing COVID-19 transmission risks in these settings, these measures might increase stress and anxiety levels. To compensate, provision of emotional and psychological support should be considered to maintain the mental health of both residents and employees.

    Restaurants, coffee shops, and bars are places where catering is provided, thus, increasing COVID-19 exposure risk. Therefore, special attention should be paid to the prevention and control of COVID-19 in these places. Employees who are sick or exhibiting symptoms of COVID-19 should stay home. Cash registers, elevators, restrooms, and other public facilities should be cleaned and disinfected regularly. Adequate hand sanitizer or sanitizing wipes should be provided to customers. In addition, digital menus that customers can view on personal electronic devices can help prevent disease transmission. In high-risk areas, business hours might be shortened, and pick-up and delivery services are encouraged. For hotels, contact-less room service is essential in addition to the regular precautions.

    Travel increases the chance of COVID-19 spread. All forms of transport are affected, including public transport in cities, as well as buses, trains, and airplanes both nationally and internationally[10]. The body temperatures of passengers should be verified at the entrances to transportation stations or terminals, and the number of passengers should be controlled according to the local risk level. To prevent COVID-19 spread via contact, seat covers and other textiles must be cleaned through regular washing and disinfection. In addition, strict implementation of precautions such as strengthened supervision of overseas transportation and port quarantines is necessary. In particular, passengers on cruises are at high risk of exposure to COVID-19 because of their proximity within a confined environment. Thus, wearing a mask in public spaces is strongly recommended. Moreover, sick passengers are suggested to remain in the cabin and to notify the on-board medical center immediately.

    In sports, culture, and entertainment venues, guests are usually in close contact with one another in a confined environment for a prolonged period, thus facilitating COVID-19 transmission. Therefore, all employees should monitor their health status on a daily basis. All employees and guests in proximity to others are strongly encouraged to wear masks, practice hand hygiene, and maintain a proper social distance (> 1 m). The ventilation system should be operated properly, and circulation of outdoor air should be increased by opening windows or using air conditioning systems with fresh air.

    Facilities providing essential services might open normally even in high-risk areas to satisfy the basic life requirements of residents; thus, precautions must be enhanced to avoid SARS-CoV-2 infection. Access to areas where employees are likely to congregate should be closed or limited. In addition, employers should be allowed flexible sick leave policies, and should be encouraged for telework or staying home when feeling ill. Shared workspaces should be cleaned after each use. In high-risk areas, the number of customers should be restricted, and waiting areas should be closed to further limit gathering.

    Education places and workspace have higher population densities; thus, ventilation, cleaning and disinfection, personal protection, and social distancing are essential precaution measures. Ensuring that ventilation systems are operating properly and increasing the circulation of outdoor air as much as possible are crucial. In classrooms and offices, reduced or staggered use of objects, and regular cleaning and disinfection of frequently touched surfaces can aid in inhibiting viral spread. Visits from external personnel, groups, or organizations, particularly visitors from moderate- to high-risk areas, should be restricted. Staggered shifts, mask use and hand hygiene during commuting could decrease the possibility of infection among students, faculty, staff, and employees. In high-risk areas, students and teachers may consider participating in online classes and events. Simultaneously, employers may consider implementing remote work and constructing an online work environment for employees.

    The general and specific strategies proposed in this study would be beneficial to reduce COVID-19 spread and protect the health of people in public places and workplaces. The risk levels in different public places and workplaces in this study are qualitatively estimated. To further improve the targeted precautions in specific places, quantitative risk assessment systems should be established. Precautions could be further improved through close cooperation of multiple departments and interdisciplinary studies, flexible local prevention and control strategies, and compliance among the general public.

    Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.

参考文献 (10)
补充材料:
21324Supplementary Materials.pdf

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回