Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Yang Shen, Boji Wu, Zhen Liu, Yuanqi Yang, Chun Li, Siming Gong, Shizhu Bian, Xi Liu, Chen Zhang, Jihang Zhang, Chuan Liu, Zhexue Qin. Low Cardiac Output Augmentation During Exercise Stress Echocardiography at Low Altitude Predicts High Risk of Acute Mountain Sickness[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2026.014
Citation: Yang Shen, Boji Wu, Zhen Liu, Yuanqi Yang, Chun Li, Siming Gong, Shizhu Bian, Xi Liu, Chen Zhang, Jihang Zhang, Chuan Liu, Zhexue Qin. Low Cardiac Output Augmentation During Exercise Stress Echocardiography at Low Altitude Predicts High Risk of Acute Mountain Sickness[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2026.014

Low Cardiac Output Augmentation During Exercise Stress Echocardiography at Low Altitude Predicts High Risk of Acute Mountain Sickness

doi: 10.3967/bes2026.014
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Yang Shen, PhD, candidate majoring in high-altitude cardiovascular diseases, early warning, and treatment, Tel: 15223051271, E-mail: 987536533@qq.com

    Boji Wu, PhD, candidate majoring in hypoxia-related cardiovascular diseases, occurrence, and development, Tel: 18223753220, E-mail: wbj_0830@163.com

  • Corresponding author: Chuan Liu, MD& PhD, Tel: 18696690189, E-mail: liuchuan19821207@163.com; Zhexue Qin, MD & PhD, Tel: 15823810730, E-mail: zhexueqin@126.com
  • Received Date: 2025-07-16
  • Accepted Date: 2025-11-03
  •   Objective  Stress-induced changes in echocardiographic parameters reflect cardiac reserve function. This study aimed to identify predictors of acute mountain sickness (AMS) using exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) before ascent.  Methods  In this prospective cohort study, 104 healthy adults were enrolled and treated using ESE using a mechanically braked bicycle ergometer at a low altitude (LA) (500 m). Physiological data and echocardiographic parameters were collected before and during exercise. An ascent from 500 m to 4,100 m was completed by the bus within two days. AMS was identified using the Lake Louise Questionnaire.  Results  Among the 104 participants, 49 developed AMS at 4,100 m. Compared with individuals without AMS, those with AMS had a higher low-altitude (500 m) heart rate (HR) but lower stroke volume (SV) at rest, lower cardiac output (CO) and SV during exercise, and lower rates of change in CO, SV, and HR. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 3.17, P = 0.039) and the rate of change in CO during exercise (OR = 0.98, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for AMS. Participants with the lowest CO change rate after ESE presented the highest AMS risk.  Conclusion  ESE could serve as an effective screening tool for AMS susceptibility, and blunted CO augmentation during exercise is an independent predictive marker for AMS risk.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Roach RC, Hackett PH, Oelz O, et al. The 2018 lake Louise acute mountain sickness score. High Alt Med Biol, 2018; 19, 4−6. doi:  10.1089/ham.2017.0164
    [2] Gonggalanzi, Labasangzhu, Nafstad P, et al. Acute mountain sickness among tourists visiting the high-altitude city of Lhasa at 3658 m above sea level: a cross-sectional study. Arch Public Health, 2016; 74, 23.
    [3] Bärtsch P, Swenson ER. Acute high-altitude illnesses. N Engl J Med, 2013; 368, 2294−302. doi:  10.1056/NEJMcp1214870
    [4] Meier D, Collet TH, Locatelli I, et al. Does this patient have acute mountain sickness? The rational clinical examination systematic review. JAMA, 2017; 318, 1810−9.
    [5] Luks AM, Swenson ER, Bärtsch P. Acute high-altitude sickness. Eur Respir Rev, 2017; 26, 160096.
    [6] Richalet JP, Hermand E, Lhuissier FJ. Cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology at high altitude. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2024; 21, 75−88.
    [7] West JB. Physiological effects of chronic hypoxia. N Engl J Med, 2017; 376, 1965−71.
    [8] Bärtsch P, Gibbs JSR. Effect of altitude on the heart and the lungs. Circulation, 2007; 116, 2191−202.
    [9] Ebihara T, Shimizu K, Mitsuyama Y, et al. Association between high cardiac output at altitude and acute mountain sickness: preliminary study on Mt. Fuji. J Physiol Anthropol, 2023; 42, 6.
    [10] Pugliese NR, De Biase N, Conte L, et al. Cardiac reserve and exercise capacity: insights from combined cardiopulmonary and exercise echocardiography stress testing. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2021; 34, 38−50.
    [11] Yoshii T, Amano M, Moriuchi K, et al. Usefulness of exercise stress echocardiography for predicting cardiovascular events and atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiol, 2025; 85, 321−8.
    [12] Zeder K, Banfi C, Steinrisser-Allex G, et al. Diagnostic, prognostic and differential-diagnostic relevance of pulmonary haemodynamic parameters during exercise: a systematic review. Eur Respir J, 2022; 60, 2103181.
    [13] Larson K, Omar M, Sorimachi H, et al. Clinical phenogroup diversity and multiplicity: impact on mechanisms of exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail, 2024; 26, 564−77.
    [14] Gargani L, Pugliese NR, De Biase N, et al. Exercise stress echocardiography of the right ventricle and pulmonary circulation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2023; 82, 1973−85.
    [15] Grünig E, Mereles D, Hildebrandt W, et al. Stress Doppler echocardiography for identification of susceptibility to high altitude pulmonary edema. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35, 980−7.
    [16] Picano E, Pierard L, Peteiro J, et al. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in chronic coronary syndromes and beyond coronary artery disease: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the ESC. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2024; 25, e65−90.
    [17] Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the American society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2019; 32, 1−64.
    [18] Yang YQ, Liu C, Yu SY, et al. Pulmonary function tests at low altitude predict pulmonary pressure response to short-term high altitude exposure. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2020; 282, 103534.
    [19] Pratali L, Allemann Y, Rimoldi SF, et al. RV contractility and exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in chronic mountain sickness: a stress echocardiographic and tissue doppler imaging study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013; 6, 1287−97.
    [20] Shibata S, Wakeham DJ, Thomas JD, et al. Cardiac effects of long-duration space flight. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2023; 82, 674−84.
    [21] Chung CS, Afonso L. Heart rate is an important consideration for cardiac imaging of diastolic function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016; 9, 756−8.
    [22] Mourot L. Limitation of maximal heart rate in hypoxia: mechanisms and clinical importance. Front Physiol, 2018; 9, 972.
    [23] Boos CJ, Vincent E, Mellor A, et al. The effect of sex on heart rate variability at high altitude. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2017; 49, 2562−9.
    [24] Sareban M, Perz T, Macholz F, et al. Impairment of left atrial mechanics does not contribute to the reduction in stroke volume after active ascent to 4559 m. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2018; 29, 223−31.
    [25] Stembridge M, Ainslie PN, Shave R. Mechanisms underlying reductions in stroke volume at rest and during exercise at high altitude. Eur J Sport Sci, 2016; 16, 577−84.
    [26] Kammerer T, Faihs V, Hulde N, et al. Changes of hemodynamic and cerebral oxygenation after exercise in normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia: associations with acute mountain sickness. Ann Occup Environ Med, 2018; 30, 66.
    [27] Hansen J, Sander M. Sympathetic neural overactivity in healthy humans after prolonged exposure to hypobaric hypoxia. J Physiol, 2003; 546, 921−9.
    [28] Murray J, Bennett H, Bezak E, et al. The effect of exercise on left ventricular global longitudinal strain. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2022; 122, 1397−408.
    [29] Richalet JP, Larmignat P, Poitrine E, et al. Physiological risk factors for severe high-altitude illness: a prospective cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2012; 185, 192−8.
    [30] Wang Y, Zhang QF, Wang K, et al. Supine bicycle stress echocardiography at low altitude for identification of susceptibility to acute mountain sickness. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2025; 38, 262−72.
    [31] Corrieri N, Del Torto A, Vignati C, et al. Cardiac output changes during exercise in heart failure patients: focus on mid‐exercise. ESC Heart Fail, 2021; 8, 55−62.
    [32] Wu YF, Zhang N, Wu YF, et al. Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine and dobutamine on gastric mucosal pH of septic shock patients. Exp Ther Med, 2016; 12, 975−8.
    [33] Pape HC, Moore EE, McKinley T, et al. Pathophysiology in patients with polytrauma. Injury, 2022; 53, 2400−12.
    [34] Bentley RF, Jones JH, Hirai DM, et al. Submaximal exercise cardiac output is increased by 4 weeks of sprint interval training in young healthy males with low initial -O2: importance of cardiac response phenotype. PLoS One, 2019; 14, e0195458.
    [35] Hoiland RL, Howe CA, Carter HH, et al. UBC‐Nepal expedition: phenotypical evidence for evolutionary adaptation in the control of cerebral blood flow and oxygen delivery at high altitude. J Physiol, 2019; 597, 2993−3008.
    [36] Zhou ZN, Zhuang JG, Wu XF, et al. Tibetans retained innate ability resistance to acute hypoxia after long period of residing at sea level. J Physiol Sci, 2008; 58, 167−72.
    [37] Hou YP, Wu JL, Tan C, et al. Sex-based differences in the prevalence of acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis. Mil Med Res, 2019; 6, 38.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(3)  / Tables(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(14) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Low Cardiac Output Augmentation During Exercise Stress Echocardiography at Low Altitude Predicts High Risk of Acute Mountain Sickness

doi: 10.3967/bes2026.014

Abstract:   Objective  Stress-induced changes in echocardiographic parameters reflect cardiac reserve function. This study aimed to identify predictors of acute mountain sickness (AMS) using exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) before ascent.  Methods  In this prospective cohort study, 104 healthy adults were enrolled and treated using ESE using a mechanically braked bicycle ergometer at a low altitude (LA) (500 m). Physiological data and echocardiographic parameters were collected before and during exercise. An ascent from 500 m to 4,100 m was completed by the bus within two days. AMS was identified using the Lake Louise Questionnaire.  Results  Among the 104 participants, 49 developed AMS at 4,100 m. Compared with individuals without AMS, those with AMS had a higher low-altitude (500 m) heart rate (HR) but lower stroke volume (SV) at rest, lower cardiac output (CO) and SV during exercise, and lower rates of change in CO, SV, and HR. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 3.17, P = 0.039) and the rate of change in CO during exercise (OR = 0.98, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for AMS. Participants with the lowest CO change rate after ESE presented the highest AMS risk.  Conclusion  ESE could serve as an effective screening tool for AMS susceptibility, and blunted CO augmentation during exercise is an independent predictive marker for AMS risk.

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFA1104204), Chongqing Youth High-End Talent Project (to Z.Q.), and Special Project for Talent Cultivation of Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University (2024XKRC001).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University (Approval No. 2019-Research-075-01). The study protocol was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR1900025728). All participants were fully informed of the trial procedures and provided written informed consent before the start of the study.
Conceptualization and study design: Yang Shen, Boji Wu, Chuan Liu, and Zhexue Qin; field experiments and data collection: Yang Shen, Boji Wu, Zhen Liu, Yuanqi Yang, Shizhu Bian, and Xi Liu; ultrasound scanning: Chun Li and Siming Gong; ultrasound data analysis: Chen Zhang and Jihang Zhang; statistical analyses and manuscript writing: Yang Shen and Boji Wu; supervision, manuscript review, and funding acquisition: Chuan Liu and Zhexue Qin.
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The supplementary materials will be available in www.besjournal.com.
&These authors contributed equally to this work.
Yang Shen, Boji Wu, Zhen Liu, Yuanqi Yang, Chun Li, Siming Gong, Shizhu Bian, Xi Liu, Chen Zhang, Jihang Zhang, Chuan Liu, Zhexue Qin. Low Cardiac Output Augmentation During Exercise Stress Echocardiography at Low Altitude Predicts High Risk of Acute Mountain Sickness[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2026.014
Citation: Yang Shen, Boji Wu, Zhen Liu, Yuanqi Yang, Chun Li, Siming Gong, Shizhu Bian, Xi Liu, Chen Zhang, Jihang Zhang, Chuan Liu, Zhexue Qin. Low Cardiac Output Augmentation During Exercise Stress Echocardiography at Low Altitude Predicts High Risk of Acute Mountain Sickness[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2026.014
    • Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a clinical syndrome that occurs upon rapid ascent to high altitudes (HAs) above 2,500 m, and is characterized by a series of nonspecific symptoms, including headache, dizziness, gastrointestinal symptoms, and fatigue[1]. It is typically self-limiting; however, without timely intervention, it may progress to life-threatening conditions such as high-altitude cerebral edema (HACE) or high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE)[2]. Epidemiological data reveal that AMS incidence varies from 10–85% at moderate altitudes (2,500–5,500 m)[3]. More than half of individuals suffer from AMS during ascent above 6,000 m[4]. The incidence and severity of AMS depend on altitude, ascent rate, and individual susceptibility[5]. Therefore, screening for susceptible individuals before their ascent is important to prevent AMS development.

      As the major physiological stressor at HAs, hypobaric hypoxia may rapidly stimulate the adrenergic system and trigger a series of cardiovascular adaptive responses[6,7]. Upon acute HAs exposure, an increase in cardiac output (CO), secondary to an increase in heart rate (HR), compensates for the reduced arterial oxygen saturation. The association between CO and AMS has been widely studied as a core indicator of biventricular function and a key determinant of tissue oxygen delivery[6,8,9]. However, most studies have focused on CO upon HAs exposure or baseline CO at low altitudes (LAs), and the predictive and screening values are limited. Because elevated CO during stress reflects improved pumping capacity and could serve as an indicator of cardiac reserve, it is unknown whether CO combined with physical stress can better predict AMS.

      Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) can be used to dynamically evaluate cardiac reserve and reveal hidden subclinical limitations in pump function that are undetectable at rest[10]. In clinical populations, exercise-induced hemodynamic changes related to CO have a strong prognostic value[11]. For example, the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP)–CO ratio after exercise independently predicts the outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension[12]. Moreover, in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a blunted increase in CO during exercise is correlated with a greater risk of hospitalization for heart failure or death[13]. Existing evidence indicates that HAPE-susceptible healthy individuals exhibit impaired pulmonary vascular responses to ESE, which is valuable for assessing cardiac contractile reserve function and pre-ascent screening[14,15]. Exercise-induced changes in CO levels may reflect fundamental cardiovascular stress responses under hypoxic conditions[16]. However, whether changes in CO levels after ESE in healthy individuals are associated with AMS remains unclear.

      In the current prospective cohort study, ESE testing was conducted in healthy participants at the LA before they ascended, and its association with the occurrence of AMS after HA exposure was evaluated. These results revealed impaired cardiac responses in patients with AMS, and that ESE could be a tool to identify individuals susceptible to AMS before ascent.

    • This prospective cohort study was performed in Chengdu (Sichuan, China; 500 m above sea level, ASL) and Litang (Sichuan, China, 4,100 m asl) in June 2019. Demographic data were collected, and ESE was performed in Chengdu uniformly on the same day, seven days before ascent, to ensure that ESE measurements were obtained under the same conditions. All participants ascended from Chengdu to Litang in a single group on the same day by bus, and the journey was completed within two days (Figure 1).

      Figure 1.  Outline of the study. AMS: acute mountain sickness.

    • The inclusion criteria were healthy Chinese Han adults who were born and permanently residing in LA (≤ 500 m, asl). In total, 111 unrelated volunteers were recruited from Chongqing and underwent physical examinations at Xinqiao Hospital. The exclusion criteria were a history of AMS, a history of high-altitude sojourn (≥ 2,500 m, asl) in the past 6 months, migraine, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, neurological diseases, hematologic diseases, cerebral vascular diseases, cancer, liver or kidney dysfunction, or long-term usage of any medications for chronic diseases and drugs for preventing AMS. Patients with incomplete data were excluded.

    • Echocardiographic examinations were conducted by two sonographers using a CX50 ultrasound system (Philips Ultrasound System, Andover, MA, US) with the participants in the left lateral decubitus position. Dynamic echocardiographic images were stored digitally for offline analysis using QLAB 10.5 (Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, United States). During the data collection and analysis phases, the operators were blinded to the participants’ AMS status. The values of each echocardiographic parameter were averaged from measurements of three consecutive cardiac cycles. All examinations and measurements were performed in accordance with the American Society of Echocardiography[17]. The end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) of the left ventricle (LV) were measured to determine the stroke volume (SV = EDV - ESV), CO = (SV * HR), and LV ejection fraction [LVEF = (EDV - ESV) / EDV * 100] as previously described[18]. Diastolic function was measured using mitral or tricuspid pulse-wave Doppler inflow, recording the early (E) and late (A) peak diastolic velocities. Tissue Doppler imaging was used to measure myocardial velocity, including early diastolic velocity (E’). Left atrial pressure (LAP) was estimated as follows: LAP = 1.9 + 1.24 * E / E’. Right ventricular (RV) systolic function was quantified by end-systolic area (ESA) and end-diastolic area (EDA) measurements from an RV-focused apical view, with fractional area change (FAC) calculated as FAC = (EDA - ESA) / EDA * 100. Pulmonary hemodynamics were assessed using pulsed-wave Doppler of the pulmonary artery to measure acceleration time (AT). The mPAP was calculated using validated formulas: mPAP = 79 - (0.45 * AT) for AT > 120 ms, and mPAP = 90 - (0.62 * AT) for AT ≤ 120 ms. Additionally, the systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP) was derived from the peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (TRV) via the modified Bernoulli equation (TRV in m/s): SPAP = 4 * TRV2 + 5. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) was measured using M-mode echocardiography by tracking the peak excursion of the lateral tricuspid annulus. Speckle-tracking echocardiography was used to accurately determine LV and RV global longitudinal strains (GLSs).

    • A semi-supine bicycle ergometer (Ergoline 900EL, Ergoline Company, Germany), set with an approximate 30° leftward rotation, was used to perform the ESE[19]. The protocol was as follows: first, baseline echocardiography was performed with the participant in the left lateral decubitus position; second, the participant performed exercise on a semi-supine bicycle ergometer; third, to ensure optimal image quality, the participant moved from the bicycle to the examination table and assumed the left lateral decubitus position within 60 s after exercise for the immediate acquisition of the post-exercise echocardiography. The exercise session consisted of a 3-min warm-up period with no resistance, a 3-min initial exercise phase at a 25 W workload, and a 3-min maintenance exercise phase at a 50 W workload. Echocardiographic images, blood pressure (BP), and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded before and within 60 seconds after exercise. The BP and SpO2 were recorded using an electronic sphygmomanometer (Omron HEM-6200, Japan) and a pulse oximeter (Nonin ONYX OR9500, USA), respectively. The average of the 3 measurements was used for data analysis. Echocardiographic images were analyzed by two cardiologists who were blinded to the AMS status after the completion of the study.

    • AMS was assessed using the latest Lake Louise Questionnaire score (LLQS) within 6–8 hours after arrival at 4,100 m. The questionnaires were completed with the assistance of experienced doctors to minimize interference from subjective factors. Four AMS symptoms were assessed: headache, dizziness, light-headedness, gastrointestinal symptoms, and fatigue. Each item’s score ranged from 0–3, with 0 indicating no symptoms and 1–3 indicating mild, moderate, and severe symptoms. When the LLQS was ≥ 3 and headache was present as a core symptom, the participants were diagnosed with AMS. The severity of AMS was graded as mild (score 3–5), moderate (score 6–9), or severe (score 10–12).

    • SPSS 27.0 (Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform the statistical analyses. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or median (25th–75th percentiles) according to the normality results following the Kolmogorov‒Smirnov test. Categorical variables are expressed as counts and percentages. The characteristics between the AMS and non-AMS groups were compared using Student’s t-test, Welch’s test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate potential factors associated with AMS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted (variables with P values < 0.1 in univariable logistic regression for entry), and the lambda method was used for stepwise backward analysis to identify independent risk factors for AMS. One-way ANOVA was used to compare whether significant differences existed among the groups divided by the quartiles of the change rate of CO during exercise and the severity of AMS. The P for the trend was determined using logistic regression analysis to assess the predictive value of the change rate of CO after exercise across the four groups. A two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    • Overall, 111 healthy adult individuals were invited to participate; five changed their ascent plans owing to conflicting work arrangements and failed to arrive at the pre-planned altitude, and two had incomplete data owing to poor-quality echocardiography images (Figure 2). Among the 104 participants included in the final data analysis, 49 (47.1%) were diagnosed with AMS according to the LLQS (Table 1). None of the patients developed HACE or HAPE. Participants with and without AMS were comparable in terms of age and BMI; however, the AMS group had a significantly greater proportion of females (P < 0.001) and a lower percentage of smokers (P = 0.002).

      Figure 2.  Flowchart of the study.

      Variables Baseline Exercise Change rate
      AMS group non-AMS group P value AMS group non-AMS group P value AMS group non-AMS group P value
      Age, y 25
      (22 to 29)
      25
      (21 to 29)
      0.699 The same as baseline
      Females, n (%) 23
      (46.94)
      9
      (16.36)
      < 0.001
      BMI, kg/m2 21.93 ± 2.72 22.53 ± 2.23 0.222
      Smokers, n (%) 11
      (22.45)
      29
      (52.73)
      0.002
      HR, beats/
      min
      76.92 ± 10.85 69.49 ± 10.27 < 0.001 100
      (95 to 109)
      97
      (91 to 105)
      0.243 33.40 ± 18.88 44.97 ± 19.64 0.003
      SpO2, % 98
      (96 to 98)
      97
      (96 to 98)
      0.206 97
      (96 to 98)
      97
      (96 to 98)
      0.166 −1.01
      (−1.53 to 1.03)
      1.02
      (−1.02 to 1.05)
      0.033
      SBP, mmHg 115
      (107 to 125)
      120
      (109 to 128)
      0.250 123.65 ± 12.21 124.13 ± 12.85 0.848 7.14 ± 13.03 5.27 ± 12.71 0.460
      DBP, mmHg 74.29 ± 12.00 73.38 ± 11.05 0.688 75.47 ± 11.20 73.55 ± 12.14 0.405 3.69 ± 20.20 1.82 ± 18.39 0.622
      CO, mL/min 3.47 ± 0.67 3.37 ± 0.69 0.479 4.27 ± 0.71 4.94 ± 0.93 < 0.001 26.47 ± 27.07 51.05 ± 37.20 < 0.001
      SV, mL 45.27 ± 7.09 49.03 ± 9.66 0.027 42.71 ± 7.76 49.94 ± 9.00 < 0.001 −4.91 ± 14.40 3.60 ± 18.65 0.011
      LAP, mmHg 10.05 ± 1.60 10.11 ± 1.66 0.850 9.92 ± 1.93 10.00 ± 2.16 0.835 −1.32
      (−11.58 to 8.78)
      0.54
      (−13.79 to 9.38)
      0.837
      LVEF, % 55.48 ± 4.87 55.90 ± 4.74 0.657 53.73 ± 5.93 55.73 ± 4.61 0.057 −2.74 ± 11.44 0.31 ± 11.11 0.172
      MV E/A 1.73
      (1.43 to 2.20)
      1.69
      (1.56 to 2.14)
      0.529 1.73 ± 0.53 1.76 ± 0.43 0.708 −3.08 ± 22.67 −3.06 ± 20.78 0.558
      MV E/E' 6.57 ± 1.29 6.62 ± 1.34 0.850 6.47 ± 1.55 6.53 ± 1.74 0.835 −1.80
      (−14.03 to 11.19)
      0.66
      (−16.94 to 11.78)
      0.822
      LVGLS, % 20.53 ± 1.74 20.94 ± 1.72 0.227 19.92 ± 2.33 20.71 ± 1.92 0.063 −4.09
      (−9.48 to 3.70)
      −0.79
      (−5.39 to 5.63)
      0.196
      FAC, % 46.32 ± 4.68 46.74 ± 6.34 0.697 44.39 ± 4.82 43.73 ± 5.59 0.524 −4.38
      (−11.44 to −0.64)
      −6.47
      (−12.94 to −2.10)
      0.203
      TV E/A 1.79 ± 0.55 1.96 ± 0.59 0.131 1.88 ± 0.52 1.89 ± 0.46 0.950 8.85 ± 28.07 1.07 ± 24.85 0.137
      TV E/E' 4.75 ± 0.95 5.08 ± 1.75 0.236 4.91 ± 1.08 5.07 ± 1.12 0.452 5.29 ± 28.58 6.64 ± 39.74 0.842
      TAPSE, mm 25.34 ± 3.46 26.60 ± 4.81 0.131 25.00
      (24.19 to 27.06)
      25.45
      (23.33 to 27.92)
      0.899 3.59 ± 17.17 −0.74 ± 15.87 0.185
      RVGLS, % 22.07 ± 3.61 21.54 ± 3.45 0.440 22.97
      (20.55 to 24.64)
      21.75
      (20.57 to 24.30)
      0.236 4.41
      (−6.26 to 15.06)
      1.27
      (−9.58 to 13.07)
      0.517
      mPAP, mmHg 15.19
      (8.72 to 18.21)
      15.18
      (8.30 to 18.68)
      0.971 16.40 ± 7.31 15.87 ± 6.75 0.702 20.98
      (−13.88 to 68.21)
      14.75
      (−12.10 to 35.10)
      0.513
      SPAP, mmHg 13.80 ± 6.54 15.75 ± 7.70 0.170 12.81
      (7.94 to 19.13)
      14.86
      (8.98 to 20.59)
      0.298 0.00
      (−9.31 to 12.98)
      0.00
      (−12.25 to 11.29)
      0.940
      TRV, m/s 1.54
      (0.93 to 1.84)
      1.57
      (1.02 to 2.10)
      0.230 1.40
      (0.86 to 1.88)
      1.57
      (1.00 to 1.97)
      0.298 0.00
      (−8.38 to 11.37)
      0.00
      (8.91 to 9.04)
      0.951
      PAAT, ms 142.55 ± 15.29 142.08 ± 16.05 0.880 135.62
      (117.22 to 150.64)
      138.48
      (120.03 to 152.23)
      0.662 −5.13 ± 15.58 −3.59 ± 13.59 0.592
        Note. Continuous data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (25th, 75th percentile), and categorical data are represented as counts and percentages. AMS: acute mountain sickness, BMI: body mass index, HR: heart rate, SpO2: pulse oxygen saturation, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, CO: cardiac output, SV: stroke volume, LAP: left atrial pressure, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, MV: mitral valve, E: peak flow velocity of the early filling wave, A: peak flow velocity of late filling wave, E’: early diastolic velocity at the mitral or tricuspid annular, LVGLS: left ventricle global longitudinal strain, FAC: right ventricular fractional area of change, TV: tricuspid valve, TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, RVGLS: right ventricle global longitudinal strain, mPAP: mean pulmonary artery pressure, SPAP: systolic pulmonary artery pressure, TRV: peak systolic velocity of tricuspid regurgitation flow, PAAT: pulmonary artery acceleration time.

      Table 1.  Demographic, physiological, and stress echocardiography parameters among participants

    • No significant differences were observed in SpO2, BP, or any other echocardiographic parameters between the two groups (P > 0.05), except for a lower SV (P = 0.027) and a higher HR (P < 0.001; Table 1) at baseline in the AMS group.

    • During exercise, although the absolute values did not differ between the two groups, the rates of change in HR (P = 0.003, Table 1, Figure 3A) and SpO2 (P = 0.003) were significantly attenuated in the AMS group. Both the absolute value of SV (42.71 ± 7.76 mL vs. 49.94 ± 9.00 mL, P < 0.001) at rest and its change rate (-4.91% ± 14.40% vs. 3.60% ± 18.65%, P = 0.011) (Table 1, Figure 3B) during exercise were lower in the AMS group. Similarly, both the absolute value of CO (4.27 ± 0.71 mL/min vs. 4.94 ± 0.93 mL/min, P < 0.001) and its change rate (26.47% ± 27.07% vs. 51.05% ± 37.20%, P < 0.001) during exercise were significantly lower in the AMS group (Table 1, Figure 3C). No significant differences were observed in any other echocardiographic parameters between the two groups (P > 0.05, Table 1).

      Figure 3.  The change rates of HR, SV, and CO in AMS and non-AMS groups. HR: heart rate, SV: stroke volume, CO: cardiac output, AMS: acute mountain sickness.

    • Univariate analysis revealed that female sex (OR = 4.52, 95% CI 1.82–12.21, P = 0.001), smoking status (OR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.61, P = 0.002), and the change rates of HR (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.99, P = 0.005), CO (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.96–0.99, P < 0.001) and SV (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.94–0.99, P = 0.015) during exercise were associated with the risk of AMS. Multivariate regression revealed that female sex (OR = 3.17, 95% CI 1.06–9.48, P = 0.039) and the rate of change in CO during exercise at the LA (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.96–0.99, P = 0.001) were independent factors associated with AMS incidence after HA exposure (Table 2).

      VariablesUnivariate analysesMultivariate analyses
      OR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P value
      Age, y1.02 (0.97–1.07)0.540Not selected
      Females, n (%)4.52 (1.82–12.21)0.0013.17 (1.06–9.48)0.039
      BMI, kg/m20.91 (0.77–1.06)0.221Not selected
      Smokers, n (%)0.26 (0.11–0.61)0.002
      HR, beats/min0.97 (0.95–0.99)0.005Not selected
      SpO2, %0.85 (0.70–1.04)0.107Not selected
      SBP, mmHg1.01 (0.98–1.04)0.457Not selected
      DBP, mmHg1.01 (0.99–1.03)0.619Not selected
      CO, mL/min0.98 (0.96–0.99)< 0.0010.98 (0.96–0.99)0.001
      SV, mL0.97 (0.94–0.99)0.015Not selected
      LAP, mmHg1.00 (0.99–1.02)0.725Not selected
      LVEF, %0.98 (0.94–1.01)0.173Not selected
      MV E/A1.00 (0.98–1.02)0.996Not selected
      MV E/E'1.00 (0.99–1.02)0.676Not selected
      LVGLS, %0.99 (0.96–1.02)0.405Not selected
      FAC, %1.01 (0.98–1.05)0.430Not selected
      TV E/A1.01 (1.00–1.03)0.138Not selected
      TV E/E'1.00 (0.99–1.01)0.843Not selected
      TAPSE, mm1.02 (0.99–1.04)0.185Not selected
      RVGLS, %1.00 (0.98–1.02)0.997Not selected
      TRV, m/s1.00 (0.99–1.02)0.984Not selected
      mPAP, mmHg1.00 (1.00–1.01)0.430Not selected
      SPAP, mmHg1.00 (0.99–1.01)0.999Not selected
      PAAT, ms0.99 (0.97–1.02)0.589Not selected
        Note. OR: odds ratio, 95% CI: 95% confidence interval. Abbreviations are presented in Table 1.

      Table 2.  Univariate and multivariate regression analyses for the change rates during exercise associated with AMS

    • The participants were divided into four groups according to the quartiles of the rate of change in CO during exercise for logistic regression. Group 4 served as the reference group and presented the greatest percentage change in CO during the exercise. According to the unadjusted model, participants in Group 1 were more prone to develop AMS (OR = 6.11, 95% CI 1.84–20.32, P for trend = 0.019). Further analysis revealed that, compared with that in Group 4, the AMS incidence was greater in Group 1 after adjusting for Model 1 (OR = 7.04, 95% CI 1.89–26.18, P for trend = 0.024), Model 2 (OR = 7.04, 95% CI 1.89–26.18, P for trend = 0.024) and Model 3 (OR = 9.73, 95% CI 2.43–39.00, P for trend = 0.011) (Table 3).

      Variables Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 P for trend
      AMS (%) 69.23 53.85 38.46 26.92
      Median (%) −2.11 27.71 53.33 77.29
      Model 0 6.11 (1.84–20.32) 3.17 (0.99–10.10) 1.70 (0.53–5.48) 1 (reference) 0.019
      Model 1 7.04 (1.89–26.18) 4.80 (1.30–17.80) 3.00 (0.80–11.23) 1 (reference) 0.024
      Model 2 7.04 (1.89–26.18) 4.80 (1.30–17.80) 3.00 (0.80–11.23) 1 (reference) 0.024
      Model 3 9.73 (2.43–39.00) 4.36 (1.19–16.00) 2.17 (0.59–8.07) 1 (reference) 0.011
        Note. Model 0: unadjusted; Model 1: adjusted by age, gender, BMI, smoking status; Model 2: adjusted by Model 1 plus change rates of SBP, DBP, and SpO2; Model 3: adjusted by Model 2 plus change rates of LVEF, MV E/E’, LVGLS, RVGLS, and TAPSE. Abbreviations are presented in Table 1.

      Table 3.  The incidence of AMS according to the change rate of CO during exercise

      No patients with severe AMS were diagnosed in this study. A clinically relevant trend was found: the moderate AMS group demonstrated the lowest CO augmentation after exercise, followed by the mild AMS group, whereas the non-AMS group showed the highest rate of change. However, the difference between these groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.132; Table 4).

      VariableNon-AMSMild AMSModerate AMSP value
      Change rate of CO, %43.94 ± 35.5437.51 ± 34.3514.61 ± 24.560.132
        Note. AMS: acute mountain sickness, CO: cardiac output.

      Table 4.  The change rates of CO during exercise according to the severity of AMS

      Although the change rate of CO during exercise did not show a statistically significant association with headache, dizziness/light-headedness, or fatigue, it was significantly lower in participants with gastrointestinal symptoms than in those without (20.86% ± 36.52% vs. 44.18% ± 33.09%, P = 0.006, Table 5).

      Variable Headache Dizziness/Light-headedness Gastrointestinal Symptoms Fatigue
      Yes No P value Yes No P value Yes No P value Yes No P value
      Change rate
      of CO, %
      39.33 ±
      36.78
      39.74 ±
      31.24
      0.956 38.30 ±
      35.62
      40.83 ±
      34.39
      0.715 20.86 ±
      36.52
      44.18 ±
      33.09
      0.006 36.96 ±
      35.64
      45.11 ±
      33.08
      0.274
        Note. AMS: acute mountain sickness, CO: cardiac output.

      Table 5.  Association between the change rate of CO and AMS-related symptoms

    • As shown in Supplementary Table S1, compared to males, females were younger, had lower BMI, and a smaller proportion of smokers (P < 0.001 for all). Moreover, females consistently demonstrated significantly higher levels of SpO2, LVEF, MV E/A, LVGLS, RVGLS, and PAAT and lower SBP and mPAP at rest (P < 0.05). This pattern persisted during exercise, with the addition of a higher TV E/A in females (P = 0.001). No significant difference was found in the change rates during exercise between males and females (P > 0.05).

    • In this prospective cohort study, 104 participants underwent ESE at the LA before HA exposure. Following ascent, 49 participants developed AMS. Baseline analysis revealed that the participants with AMS exhibited a higher HR and lower SV than the non-AMS participants. During exercise, participants with AMS demonstrated attenuated augmentation rates of HR, CO, and SV, along with a more pronounced decrease in SpO2. Multivariate analysis revealed that female sex and reduced CO augmentation rates during exercise at the LA were independent risk factors for AMS. Notably, participants in the lowest quartile of CO augmentation rate had significantly greater AMS susceptibility than those in the highest quartile. These findings suggest that impaired CO augmentation at the LA during exercise may serve as a predictive marker of AMS risk.

    • Individuals without AMS exhibit increased HR and SV during exercise, enabling CO to closely match metabolic demands. This response reflects integrated cardiovascular adaptations, including preload, contractility, afterload, and cardiopulmonary coupling. First, enhanced venous return from skeletal muscle contraction elevates ventricular preload, increasing EDV, and augmenting SV via the Frank-Starling mechanism[20]. Simultaneously, sympathetic activation triggers catecholamine release, accelerates the HR, and enhances myocardial contractility[20]. Our data confirmed these adaptations, with participants without AMS showing greater CO, HR, and SV elevations during exercise. Moreover, exercise-induced vasodilation induced by adenosine and nitric oxide release decreases peripheral arterial tone and reduces ventricular afterload[12]. Healthy individuals maintain normal cardiopulmonary coupling and reduce pulmonary vascular resistance during exercise[14].

      In contrast, participants with AMS displayed blunted CO augmentation during exercise at the LA. Changes in the HR and SV during exercise may explain the impaired CO response. Participants with AMS displayed a higher baseline HR, but the inadequate HR increased during exercise. Due to the shortening of the diastolic period, participants with a higher baseline HR had lower ventricular filling at sea level, as described previously[21]. Hypoxia further attenuated the maximal HR or HR reserve, explaining why participants with a higher baseline HR showed less increase in HR during exercise than those with a lower baseline HR[22]. Moreover, individuals with lower HR at the LA typically exhibit greater heart rate variability, which may enable better autonomic regulation to buffer the stress of HAs exposure[23]. Consistent with previous studies, our data demonstrated that a higher baseline HR and lower HR during exercise may contribute to an attenuated CO increase, further leading to greater susceptibility to AMS.

      In the present study, compared to individuals without AMS, participants with AMS presented with lower SV both at rest and during exercise. These findings align with those of a previous study reporting that healthy volunteers experienced significant SV decreases after a rapid ascent to 4,559 m[24]. Although the mechanisms underlying SV reduction after HAs exposure require further investigation, the primary drivers are hemodynamic remodeling caused by a reduction in LV passive filling and an increase in PAP induced by hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction[24,25]. Moreover, diminished SV may compromise cerebral oxygen delivery, potentially triggering AMS symptoms such as headache and fatigue. Previous studies support this hypothesis, demonstrating that post-exercise SV and cerebral oxygenation reduction can predict AMS risk[26]. Consistent with these observations, our data suggest that lower baseline SV and attenuated SV change rates contribute to blunted CO augmentation during exercise, thereby increasing the susceptibility to AMS.

    • Acute HAs exposure triggers sympathetic activation, leading to a marked increase in HR and CO during rest and submaximal exercise[6,27]. This compensatory increase in CO is crucial for mitigating the reduced arterial oxygen content. However, SV may exhibit a slight decrease, primarily attributable to impaired left ventricular filling secondary to increased right ventricular afterload from hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction[28], which leads to a significant and rapid elevation in PAP[29]. The integrated cardiopulmonary response to acute HAs exposure aims to preserve the systemic oxygen delivery. The inability of the cardiovascular system to effectively meet tissue oxygen demand is considered a key link in the pathogenesis of AMS. Exercise testing effectively simulates the physiological stress encountered in HAs, revealing a cardiovascular insufficiency that may remain undetectable at rest.

      ESE may serve as a novel tool for assessing AMS risk. Yi et al. conducted ESE in 20 AMS-susceptible individuals and 20 control participants before their ascent and found an association of RV, pulmonary pressure, and the central venous system with AMS vulnerability[30]. This study enrolled a larger sample size, comprising 104 participants, and focused on the association between the CO response during ESE and AMS. CO during exercise may increase up to five-fold in untrained individuals and eight-fold in professional athletes[31], demonstrating remarkable cardiac reserve function. In contrast, impaired CO responses to exercise have been found in patients with HFpEF[13], which are predominantly related to a reduction in peak maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). Our data revealed a significant association between attenuated exercise-induced CO augmentation at the LA and an increased AMS incidence and AMS-related gastrointestinal symptoms. The gastrointestinal mucosa is highly vascularized and extremely sensitive to ischemia and hypoxia[32]. In HA environments, to ensure blood supply to core organs such as the heart and brain, the body reduces perfusion in the gastrointestinal tract[33]. Individuals with an insufficient increase in CO levels may have impaired cardiovascular compensatory capacity that fails to meet the body's elevated demand for oxygen delivery, thereby leading to more pronounced gastrointestinal symptoms. Although the association between CO augmentation and AMS severity was not statistically significant, this trend supports a graded relationship between AMS severity and a blunted cardiac response. These findings need to be verified in a larger cohort study.

      In particular, participants in the lowest quartile of the rate of change in CO exhibited the greatest susceptibility to AMS (69.23% vs. 26.92%). These findings suggest that an attenuated CO response to exercise in healthy lowlanders reflects a diminished cardiac reserve capacity. This functional limitation not only constrains VO2max during exertion, but also compromises HAs acclimatization efficiency[34]. This interpretation is further supported by comparative physiological studies between Han and Tibetan populations[35]. At extreme altitudes over 5,600 m, Tibetans present significantly greater VO2max values and more stable SV values, indicating enhanced cardiac and oxygen reserve capacities[36]. Tibetans may have acquired superior cardiac contractile reserves and oxygen transport efficiency through genetic or developmental adaptations. Taken together, these findings support the concept that attenuated CO augmentation during exercise may serve as a functional biomarker of impaired HAs acclimatization, although further validation in larger cohorts is warranted.

    • Consistent with previous findings, the female sex was independently associated with an increased risk of AMS. In addition to the direct effects of hormones[37], SV and CO were also found to be significantly lower in women than in men, with a significant decrease in the estimated left ventricular filling pressure and inadequate HR compensation in female participants[23]. However, in this study, at rest and during exercise, the absolute values and change rates of HR, SV, and CO were comparable between females and males. Female sex and the rate of change in CO during exercise still showed an independent predictive value after adjusting for other characteristics, which may be related to AMS risk.

    • The present study had several limitations. First, the participants were mostly young (19–59 years old) and healthy, and whether the findings are applicable to older populations or to those with preexisting cardiopulmonary conditions is unknown. Second, because echocardiographic examination requires participants to maintain a resting supine position, measurements during the last step of exercise may underestimate the true hemodynamic responses. Third, the exercise intensity was set to be mild, and the association needs to be examined at moderate and submaximal exercise levels. Fourth, although significant correlations were observed between cardiovascular responsiveness and AMS incidence, the potential mediating roles of hypoxia-inducible factors require further investigation via concurrent blood biomarker analysis.

      The time point chosen for assessing AMS is another potential limitation of this study. It is well established that AMS occurs within the first 1–5 d after ascent. According to the 2018 Lake Louise Acute Mountain Sickness Score system, the AMS score should be assessed after 6 h to avoid confusing AMS with confounding symptoms from travel or responses to acute hypoxia. Different time points of completion of the AMS self-report questionnaires may explain the discrepancies in AMS incidence. Although our chosen time point is methodologically standard for defining incident AMS, we recognize that it may not capture the entire spectrum of AMS incidence, particularly in cases with very late onset. Future studies incorporating repeated assessments over the first 48–72 hours at HAs would provide a more accurate incidence of AMS.

    • For the first time, we demonstrated that blunted CO augmentation during exercise at the LA can be used to evaluate cardiac reserve function and predict the risk of AMS following acute HA exposure. ESE could serve as an effective screening tool for AMS susceptibility because of its value in revealing latent functional deficits that are undetectable under resting sea level conditions. These findings provide novel insights into the mechanisms underlying AMS development and new non-invasive predictive markers for AMS risk assessment and pre-acclimatization screening.

    Funds:  This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFA1104204), Chongqing Youth High-End Talent Project (to Z.Q.), and Special Project for Talent Cultivation of Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University (2024XKRC001).
    Funding   This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFA1104204), Chongqing Youth High-End Talent Project (to Z.Q.), and Special Project for Talent Cultivation of Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University (2024XKRC001).
    Competing Interests   The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
    Ethics   The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University (Approval No. 2019-Research-075-01). The study protocol was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR1900025728). All participants were fully informed of the trial procedures and provided written informed consent before the start of the study.
    Authors’ Contributions   Conceptualization and study design: Yang Shen, Boji Wu, Chuan Liu, and Zhexue Qin; field experiments and data collection: Yang Shen, Boji Wu, Zhen Liu, Yuanqi Yang, Shizhu Bian, and Xi Liu; ultrasound scanning: Chun Li and Siming Gong; ultrasound data analysis: Chen Zhang and Jihang Zhang; statistical analyses and manuscript writing: Yang Shen and Boji Wu; supervision, manuscript review, and funding acquisition: Chuan Liu and Zhexue Qin.
    Data sharing   The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The supplementary materials will be available in www.besjournal.com.
    &These authors contributed equally to this work.
Reference (37)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return