Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Mamoud Alieu Jalloh, Yuxin Liu, Qi Xi, Jing Wei, Cong Liu, Hong Lv, Tao Jiang, Rui Qin, Xin Xu, Yuanyan Dou, Yue Jiang, Bo Xu, Jiaping Chen, Hongxia Ma, Jiong Li, Zhibin Hu, Yuan Lin, Jiangbo Du. Associations of Maternal Phthalate Exposure in the First Trimester with Preterm Birth: A Prospective Birth Cohort Study[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2026.078
Citation: Mamoud Alieu Jalloh, Yuxin Liu, Qi Xi, Jing Wei, Cong Liu, Hong Lv, Tao Jiang, Rui Qin, Xin Xu, Yuanyan Dou, Yue Jiang, Bo Xu, Jiaping Chen, Hongxia Ma, Jiong Li, Zhibin Hu, Yuan Lin, Jiangbo Du. Associations of Maternal Phthalate Exposure in the First Trimester with Preterm Birth: A Prospective Birth Cohort Study[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2026.078

Associations of Maternal Phthalate Exposure in the First Trimester with Preterm Birth: A Prospective Birth Cohort Study

doi: 10.3967/bes2026.078
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Mamoud Alieu Jalloh, MSc, majoring in epidemiology and health statistics, environmental epidemiology, reproductive health, Email: mamoudalieujalloh1993@gmail.com

    Yuxin Liu, PhD, majoring in preterm birth, environmental epidemiology, reproductive health, E-mail: yuxinliu@stu.njmu.edu.cn

    Qi Xi, PhD, majoring in clinical medicine, focusing on high-risk pregnancy, preterm birth, and reproductive health, E-mail: xiqi_nju@hotmail.com

  • 加载中
  • [1] Deng K, Liang J, Mu Y, et al. Preterm births in China between 2012 and 2018: an observational study of more than 9 million women. Lancet Global Health, 2021; 9, e1226−41. doi:  10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00298-9
    [2] Giuliani A, Zuccarini M, Cichelli A, et al. Critical review on the presence of phthalates in food and evidence of their biological impact. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020; 17, 5655. doi:  10.3390/ijerph17165655
    [3] Ferguson KK, Mcelrath TF, Meeker JD. Environmental phthalate exposure and preterm birth. JAMA Pediatr, 2014; 168, 61−7. doi:  10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3699
    [4] Whyatt RM, Adibi JJ, Calafat AM, et al. Prenatal di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate exposure and length of gestation among an inner-city cohort. Pediatrics, 2009; 124, e1213−20. doi:  10.1542/peds.2009-0325
    [5] Hornung RW, Reed LD. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Environ Hyg, 1990; 5, 46−51. doi:  10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389587
    [6] Textor J, Hardt J, Knüppel S. DAGitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams. Epidemiology, 2011; 22, 745.
    [7] Siwakoti RC, Iyer G, Banker M, et al. Metabolomic alterations associated with phthalate exposures among pregnant women in Puerto Rico. Environ Sci Technol, 2024; 58, 18076−87. doi:  10.1021/acs.est.4c03006
    [8] Grindler NM, Vanderlinden L, Karthikraj R, et al. Exposure to phthalate, an endocrine disrupting chemical, alters the first trimester placental methylome and transcriptome in women. Sci Rep, 2018; 8, 6086. doi:  10.1038/s41598-018-24505-w
    [9] Ferguson KK, Cantonwine DE, Rivera-González LO, et al. Urinary phthalate metabolite associations with biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress across pregnancy in Puerto Rico. Environ Sci Technol, 2014; 48, 7018−25. doi:  10.1021/es502076j
    [10] Peck JD, Sweeney AM, Symanski E, et al. Intra- and inter-individual variability of urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations in Hmong women of reproductive age. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 2010; 20, 90−100. doi:  10.1038/jes.2009.4
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(1)  / Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(7) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Associations of Maternal Phthalate Exposure in the First Trimester with Preterm Birth: A Prospective Birth Cohort Study

doi: 10.3967/bes2026.078
  • Author Bio:

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2022YFC3702702, 2021YFC2700600, and 2021YFC2700705), National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2024ZD0532103), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82574115, 82373581, and 82103854).
The authors declare no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Medical University (NJMUIRB [2014>]248).
Conceived and supervised the study: Jiangbo Du and Zhibin Hu. Performed the initial analyses and revised the manuscript: Mamoud Alieu Jalloh, Yuxin Liu, and Qi Xi. Contributed to study design, data collection, and follow-up: Jing Wei, Cong Liu, Hong Lv, Xin Xu, Yuanyan Dou, Rui Qin, Bo Xu, Yue Jiang, and Jiaping Chen. Proofread the manuscript: Hongxia Ma, Tao Jiang, Jiong Li, and Yuan Lin. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
The data used in this study are confidential.
Mamoud Alieu Jalloh, Yuxin Liu, Qi Xi, Jing Wei, Cong Liu, Hong Lv, Tao Jiang, Rui Qin, Xin Xu, Yuanyan Dou, Yue Jiang, Bo Xu, Jiaping Chen, Hongxia Ma, Jiong Li, Zhibin Hu, Yuan Lin, Jiangbo Du. Associations of Maternal Phthalate Exposure in the First Trimester with Preterm Birth: A Prospective Birth Cohort Study[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2026.078
Citation: Mamoud Alieu Jalloh, Yuxin Liu, Qi Xi, Jing Wei, Cong Liu, Hong Lv, Tao Jiang, Rui Qin, Xin Xu, Yuanyan Dou, Yue Jiang, Bo Xu, Jiaping Chen, Hongxia Ma, Jiong Li, Zhibin Hu, Yuan Lin, Jiangbo Du. Associations of Maternal Phthalate Exposure in the First Trimester with Preterm Birth: A Prospective Birth Cohort Study[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2026.078
  • Preterm birth (PTB) is a leading cause of neonatal mortality worldwide and remains a major public health concern in China[1]. Phthalates are widely used in plastics, personal care products, and food packaging; human exposure occurs through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact, and these compounds can cross the placenta, potentially affecting fetal development[2].

    Evidence linking prenatal phthalate exposure to PTB remains inconsistent. Although several studies have examined exposure during mid-to-late pregnancy, data on first-trimester exposure remain limited, particularly in Asian populations[3,4]. Because the first trimester is a critical period for placental and fetal development and may be especially sensitive to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and given the widespread environmental contamination in China, we conducted this prospective cohort study to investigate the association between first-trimester phthalate exposure and PTB risk.

    We included 1,098 mothers with spontaneous conception from the Jiangsu Birth Cohort (2014–2019) who provided first-trimester urine samples and delivered singleton infants. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and all participants provided written informed consent. Urine samples were analyzed for 17 phthalate metabolites and 3 di-isononyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH) metabolites using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Briefly, 1 mL samples were spiked with a 13C-labeled internal standard, deconjugated with β-glucuronidase at 37°C for at least 2 h, extracted by solid-phase extraction, and eluted with acetonitrile and ethyl acetate. Limits of detection (LODs) ranged from 0.01–0.13 μg/L. Each analytical batch included blanks, quality controls, and 17 study samples. Metabolites were quantified using a 12-point calibration curve ranging from 0.01–500 ng/mL, with R2 values > 0.99. Concentrations below the LOD were imputed as LOD/√2[5], adjusted for specific gravity (SG) using the formula Pc = P × [(1.0184–1)/(SG–1)] (median SG = 1.0184), and natural log-transformed. For parent compounds with multiple metabolites, molar sums were calculated as follows: ∑DEHP = MEHP + MECPP + MEHHP + MEOHP + MCMHP; ∑DnBP = MnBP + MHBP; ∑DiBP = MiBP + MHiBP; ∑DINP = MiNP + oh-MiNP + oxo-MiNP + cx-MiNP; and ∑DINCH = oh-MINCH + oxo-MINCH + cx-MINCH. PTB was defined as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, and gestational age (GA) was confirmed by ultrasound. Covariates, including maternal age, body mass index (BMI), education, income, parity, residence, and smoking, were selected using a directed acyclic graph[6]. (Supplementary Figure S1). Multivariable linear/logistic regression models were used to assess individual metabolites, while Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) and weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression were applied to evaluate mixture effects. All analyses were performed using R version 4.3.3.

    Table 1 presents the characteristics of the 1,098 participants. The mean maternal age was 30.3 years (SD, 3.8), and the mean pre-pregnancy BMI was 21.2 kg/m2 (SD, 2.9). Most participants were nulliparous (78.6%) and had at least a high school education (89.5%). Participants were recruited from two centers: the Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (62.4%) and Suzhou Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (37.6%). Most lived in urban areas (68.8%). Smoking and alcohol use were uncommon, reported by 0.6% and 3.9% of participants, respectively. The cumulative incidence of PTB was 2.8% (n = 31).

    Characteristics, No. (%) All births (n = 1,098) Term births (n = 1,067) PTB (n = 31)
    Age, years
    mean ± SD 30.32 (3.8) 30.30 (3.8) 30.83 (3.9)
    < 25 39 (3.6) 38 (3.6) 1 (3.2)
    25–30 555 (50.5) 542 (50.8) 13 (41.9)
    30–35 367 (33.4) 355 (33.3) 12 (38.7)
    > 35 137 (12.5) 132 (12.4) 5 (16.1)
    Study center
    Nanjing 685 (62.4) 667 (62.5) 18 (58.1)
    Suzhou 413 (37.6) 400 (37.5) 13 (41.9)
    Area of residence
    Rural 343 (31.2) 331 (31.0) 12 (38.7)
    Urban/sub-urban 755 (68.8) 736 (69.0) 19 (61.3)
    Household income, CNY
    < 50,000 79 (7.2) 77 (7.2) 2 (6.5)
    50,000–200,000 769 (70.1) 747 (70.1) 22 (71.0)
    > 200,000 249 (22.7) 242 (22.7) 7 (22.6)
    BMI, kg/m2
    mean ± SD 21.16 (2.9) 21.17 (2.9) 20.90 (2.4)
    < 18.5 164 (14.9) 161 (15.1) 3 (9.7)
    18.5–23.9 774 (70.6) 750 (70.4) 24 (77.4)
    24–27.9 126 (11.5) 122 (11.4) 4 (12.9)
    > 28 33 (3.0) 33 (3.1) 0 (0.0)
    Education, year
    ≤ 12 115 (10.5) 111 (10.4) 4 (12.9)
    > 12 983 (89.5) 956 (89.6) 27 (87.1)
    Diabetes in pregnancy
    No 810 (73.8) 792 (74.2) 18 (58.1)
    Yes 288 (26.2) 275 (25.8) 13 (41.9)
    Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy
    No 1060 (96.6) 1032 (96.8) 28 (90.3)
    Yes 37 (3.4) 34 (3.2) 3 (9.7)
    Tobacco use
    No 1091 (99.4) 1060 (99.3) 31 (100.0)
    Yes 7 (0.6) 7 (0.7) 0 (0.0)
    Passive smoking
    No 940 (92.1) 914 (92.0) 26 (92.9)
    Yes 81 (7.9) 79 (8.0) 2 (7.1)
    Alcohol intake
    No 1055 (96.1) 1024 (96.0) 31 (100.0)
    Yes 43 (3.9) 43 (4.0) 0 (0.0)
    Parity
    Nulliparous 863 (78.7) 840 (78.8) 23 (74.2)
    Multiparous 234 (21.3) 226 (21.2) 8 (25.8)
      Note. SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; CNY, Chinese Yuan. a, Diabetes in pregnancy includes chronic and gestational diabetes; b, Hypertension disorders in pregnancy include chronic, gestational, and pre-eclampsia; c, The cutoff point to distinguish preterm and term children was 37 gestational weeks.

    Table 1.  Characteristics of mothers enrolled in the Jiangsu prospective birth cohort study conducted from 2014–2019, stratified by preterm birth status.

    SG-adjusted concentrations of the 20 phthalate metabolites and 5 parent compounds are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The limit of detection (LOD) ranged from 0.01–0.13 µg/L across metabolites. Most metabolites were detected in nearly all samples, with the proportion of concentrations below the LOD ranging from 0–31.0%. Mono(hydroxybutyl) phthalate (MHBP) had a relatively higher proportion of samples below the LOD (31.0%), with a median concentration of 5.96 µg/L (IQR: 0.04, 13.07). Overall, the urinary concentration distribution indicated widespread exposure to multiple phthalate metabolites in the study population, with particularly high concentrations of MnBP (79.26 µg/L; IQR: 36.31–171.03) and MiBP (33.65 µg/L; IQR: 18.71–60.16).

    Pearson correlation coefficients for maternal urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.05 (oxo_MINCH and MHIBP) to 0.99 (MEOHP and MEHHP). Several metabolites were strongly correlated (r ≥ 0.6), and distinct clusters were observed among phthalate ester metabolites, particularly those derived from the same parent compounds.

    In multivariable linear regression models using molar sums for parent compounds, continuous log-transformed concentrations of mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP) and diisononyl phthalate (DINP) were significantly associated with shorter GA (MEP: β = −0.07, 95% CI: −0.14, −0.00; DINP: β = −0.09, 95% CI: −0.16, −0.01) (Table 2). These associations remained significant in sensitivity analyses (Supplementary Table S2).

    Phthalates Exposure Gestational age Preterm birth
    β (95% CI)a P value P for trend OR (95% CI)a P value P for trend
    MMP Mid VS. Low 0.013 (−0.18, 0.20) 0.890 0.247 4.66 (1.07, 20.33) 0.041 0.113
    High VS. Low −0.121 (−0.34, 0.10) 0.280 4.34 (0.91, 20.84) 0.066
    MEP Mid VS. Low −0.009 (−0.20, 0.18) 0.929 0.040 1.38 (0.48, 3.97) 0.549 0.148
    High VS. Low −0.217 (−0.44, 0.00) 0.053 2.16 (0.71, 6.56) 0.172
    MnBP Mid VS. Low −0.059 (−0.25, 0.13) 0.543 0.477 1.19 (0.50, 2.81) 0.698 0.222
    High VS. Low 0.080 (−0.14, 0.30) 0.471 0.39 (0.10, 1.49) 0.167
    MiBP Mid VS. Low −0.132 (−0.32, 0.06) 0.177 0.534 1.42 (0.55, 3.68) 0.473 0.718
    High VS. Low −0.069 (−0.29, 0.15) 0.539 0.78 (0.23, 2.63) 0.687
    MHBP Mid VS. Low −0.045 (−0.23, 0.14) 0.641 0.723 1.75 (0.68, 4.48) 0.242 0.452
    High VS. Low 0.039 (−0.18, 0.26) 0.724 0.51 (0.13, 2.08) 0.349
    MHiBP Mid VS. Low −0.223 (−0.41, −0.03) 0.022 0.427 1.41 (0.54, 3.67) 0.481 0.896
    High VS. Low −0.105 (−0.32, 0.11) 0.342 0.96 (0.30, 3.04) 0.943
    MCPP Mid VS. Low 0.041 (−0.15, 0.23) 0.669 0.315 1.01 (0.42, 2.45) 0.978 0.469
    High VS. Low 0.111 (−0.11, 0.33) 0.320 0.65 (0.21, 2.05) 0.464
    MBzP Mid VS. Low −0.117 (−0.31, 0.07) 0.230 0.639 0.99 (0.39, 2.49) 0.975 0.950
    High VS. Low −0.052 (−0.27, 0.17) 0.646 1.04 (0.35, 3.04) 0.949
    MEHP Mid VS. Low 0.027 (−0.16, 0.22) 0.777 0.523 0.53 (0.21, 1.34) 0.182 0.924
    High VS. Low −0.078 (−0.30, 0.14) 0.487 1.00 (0.39, 2.59) 0.996
    MECPP Mid VS. Low 0.058 (−0.13, 0.25) 0.550 0.692 0.51 (0.21, 1.25) 0.140 0.672
    High VS. Low 0.044 (−0.18, 0.26) 0.693 0.83 (0.32, 2.19) 0.713
    MEHHP Mid VS. Low 0.061 (−0.13, 0.25) 0.530 0.492 0.67 (0.28, 1.62) 0.375 0.616
    High VS. Low −0.084 (−0.30, 0.14) 0.452 0.80 (0.29, 2.21) 0.667
    MEOHP Mid VS. Low 0.066 (−0.12, 0.26) 0.492 0.759 0.62 (0.25, 1.53) 0.298 0.843
    High VS. Low −0.039 (−0.26, 0.18) 0.726 0.94 (0.35, 2.50) 0.896
    MCMHP Mid VS. Low 0.046 (−0.14, 0.24) 0.632 0.617 0.79 (0.33, 1.87) 0.589 0.296
    High VS. Low 0.057 (−0.16, 0.28) 0.610 0.55 (0.18, 1.69) 0.299
    oh_MINCH Mid VS. Low 0.038 (−0.15, 0.23) 0.698 0.381 0.91 (0.37, 2.21) 0.828 0.680
    High VS. Low 0.097 (−0.12, 0.32) 0.387 0.80 (0.27, 2.34) 0.678
    oxo_MINCH Mid VS. Low 0.056 (−0.13, 0.25) 0.562 0.474 0.98 (0.38, 2.51) 0.968 0.646
    High VS. Low 0.083 (−0.14, 0.30) 0.458 1.25 (0.44, 3.51) 0.678
    cx_MINCH Mid VS. Low 0.120 (−0.07, 0.31) 0.215 0.309 0.57 (0.24, 1.37) 0.207 0.546
    High VS. Low 0.123 (−0.10, 0.34) 0.272 0.72 (0.27, 1.94) 0.519
    MiNP Mid VS. Low 0.107 (−0.08, 0.30) 0.271 0.230 0.43 (0.18, 1.05) 0.064 0.236
    High VS. Low 0.128 (−0.09, 0.35) 0.251 0.65 (0.24, 1.71) 0.380
    oh_MiNP Mid VS. Low −0.107 (−0.30, 0.08) 0.271 0.760 1.27 (0.48, 3.33) 0.632 0.727
    High VS. Low −0.042 (−0.26, 0.18) 0.706 1.24 (0.41, 3.76) 0.708
    oxo_MiNP Mid VS. Low −0.076 (−0.26, 0.11) 0.432 0.863 1.09 (0.44, 2.72) 0.854 0.928
    High VS. Low −0.023 (−0.24, 0.20) 0.835 0.95 (0.31, 2.90) 0.928
    cx_MiNP Mid VS. Low 0.041 (−0.15, 0.23) 0.671 0.234 1.13 (0.46, 2.80) 0.793 0.606
    High VS. Low 0.132 (−0.09, 0.35) 0.240 0.73 (0.23, 2.37) 0.605
    DEHP Mid VS. Low −0.008 (−0.20, 0.18) 0.936 0.093 1.15 (0.43, 3.09) 0.784 0.158
    High VS. Low 0.173 (−0.05, 0.39) 0.125 0.32 (0.06, 1.61) 0.166
    DnBP Mid VS. Low −0.022 (−0.22, 0.17) 0.828 0.292 0.41 (0.14, 1.26) 0.119 0.722
    High VS. Low −0.123 (−0.35, 0.10) 0.287 1.23 (0.43, 3.54) 0.695
    DiBP Mid VS. Low −0.184 (−0.38, 0.01) 0.064 0.387 3.76 (0.83, 17.00) 0.085 0.171
    High VS. Low −0.105 (−0.33, 0.12) 0.360 3.44 (0.68, 17.39) 0.135
    DINCH Mid VS. Low −0.088 (−0.28, 0.11) 0.373 0.065 3.38 (0.74, 15.38) 0.114 0.105
    High VS. Low −0.208 (−0.43, 0.01) 0.066 3.92 (0.80, 19.25) 0.093
    DINP Mid VS. Low −0.087 (−0.28, 0.11) 0.381 0.192 0.88 (0.30, 2.54) 0.811 0.805
    High VS. Low −0.151 (−0.37, 0.07) 0.187 1.14 (0.36, 3.63) 0.825
      Note. Bold indicates statistical significance. a, adjusted for maternal age, maternal BMI, household income, maternal education, parity, residence, and maternal smoking status. OR, Odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; MMP, mono-methyl phthalate; MEP, mono-ethyl phthalate; MiBP, mono-isobutyl phthalate; MHiBP, mono hydroxyisobutyl phthalate; MnBP, mono-n-butyl phthalate; MHBP, mono-hydroxybutyl phthalate; MCPP, mono-3-carboxypropyl phthalate; MBzP, mono-benzyl phthalate; MEHP, mono-2 ethylhexyl phthalate; MEHHP, mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate; MEOHP, mono-2 ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate; MECPP, mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate; MCMHP, mono[2- (carboxymethyl)hexyl] phthalate; MiNP, mono-isononyl phthalate; cx_MiNP, mono carboxyisooctyl phthalate; oxo_MiNP, mono-carboxyisononyl phthalate; oh_MiNP, mono hydroxyisononyl phthalate; oh_MINCH, cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono hydroxy isononyl ester; oxo_MINCH, cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono-carboxy isononyl ester; cx_MINCH, cyclohexane1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono-carboxy isooctyl ester; DINCH, diisononyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate; DINP, diisononyl phthalate.

    Table 2.  Exposure effects of maternal urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations across tertiles on gestational age and preterm birth.

    Tertile analyses provided additional insight (Table 2). Higher MEP exposure showed a trend toward shorter GA (P-trend = 0.040). However, direct comparisons between the highest and lowest tertiles (High vs Low: β = −0.22, 95% CI: −0.44, 0.00) and between the middle and lowest tertiles (Mid vs Low: β = −0.01, 95% CI: −0.20, 0.18) did not reach statistical significance. A significant reduction in GA was also observed for the middle tertile of mono-hydroxyisobutyl phthalate (MHiBP) exposure (β = −0.22, 95% CI: −0.41, −0.03).

    We then assessed the association between phthalate exposure and PTB (Table 2). The most notable association was observed for mono-methyl phthalate (MMP): women in the middle tertile had higher odds of PTB than those in the lowest tertile (adjusted OR = 4.66; 95% CI: 1.07, 20.33). DiBP showed a suggestive but non-significant association with PTB (OR for the middle tertile = 2.89; 95% CI: 0.92, 9.08). Metabolites associated with shorter GA in linear models, including MEP and DINP, generally showed elevated but non-significant odds of PTB.

    BKMR and WQS regression were used to evaluate the joint effects of the phthalate mixture. In the BKMR model, no significant overall mixture effect on PTB risk was observed when all metabolites were increased from the 50th to the 75th percentile (Supplementary Figure S3). Posterior inclusion probabilities (PIPs) identified MEP (PIP = 0.528), mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate (MECPP; PIP = 0.499), and MiNP, a ∑DINP metabolite (PIP = 0.549), as the most influential metabolites in the mixture (Supplementary Table S4). Univariate exposure–response functions revealed potential non-linear patterns for some phthalates; however, all credible intervals included the null value (Figure 1).

    Figure 1.  Univariate dose-response functions for phthalate metabolites and preterm birth risk, holding other biomarkers at median concentrations (adjusted for age, BMI, income, education, parity, residence, and smoking).

    Consistent with the BKMR findings, WQS analysis showed no significant overall effect of the phthalate mixture on PTB (OR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.50, 1.15) or GA (β = −0.03; 95% CI: −0.10, 0.04). WQS weights indicated that MBzP and DEHP metabolites contributed most to the PTB index, whereas MEHP was the largest contributor to the GA index (Supplementary Figure S4 and S5). Differences in the leading contributors identified by BKMR and WQS highlight the influence of model choice on mixture analyses. Furthermore, the BKMR analysis did not reveal any stable pairwise interactions among phthalate metabolites (Supplementary Figure S6).

    The most notable finding of this study was the non-linear association between MMP exposure and PTB risk, suggesting a possible threshold effect. Emerging mechanistic evidence indicates that low-molecular-weight phthalates may impair trophoblast invasion and alter placental gene expression related to inflammation and angiogenesis[7]. For DiBP metabolites, previous evidence suggests disruption of progesterone and estrogen synthesis, as well as epigenetic modifications in placental tissue[8]. For DINP, experimental studies have reported oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in placental cells[9].

    BKMR and WQS analyses did not show a significant mixture effect on PTB or GA (Figure 1, Supplementary Figure S3–S6). PIPs identified MEP (0.528), MiNP (0.549), and MECPP (0.499) as the most influential metabolites (Supplementary Table S3). In addition to limited statistical power due to the small number of PTB cases (n = 31), several factors may explain the null mixture findings: opposing biological pathways that produce antagonistic interactions, dominance of a small number of compounds, high multicollinearity among metabolites (r > 0.8), and non-linear threshold effects that may not be fully captured by linear models.

    This study has several strengths, including its prospective design, first-trimester exposure assessment, and application of advanced mixture methods. However, this study has some limitations, including reliance on single-spot urine samples, although intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.3–0.6 support moderate reproducibility[10]; the small number of PTB cases, which provided 80% power to detect only relatively large effects (OR ≥ 3.0); and limited generalizability. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings and further characterize mixture effects during early pregnancy.

    In conclusion, maternal exposure to MMP, MEP, MHiBP, and DINP was associated with shorter GA and increased PTB risk. Reducing phthalate exposure during early pregnancy may help prevent adverse birth outcomes.

Funds:  This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2022YFC3702702, 2021YFC2700600, and 2021YFC2700705), National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2024ZD0532103), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82574115, 82373581, and 82103854).
Funding   This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2022YFC3702702, 2021YFC2700600, and 2021YFC2700705), National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2024ZD0532103), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82574115, 82373581, and 82103854).
Competing Interest   The authors declare no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics   Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Medical University (NJMUIRB [2014>]248).
Author’S Contribution   Conceived and supervised the study: Jiangbo Du and Zhibin Hu. Performed the initial analyses and revised the manuscript: Mamoud Alieu Jalloh, Yuxin Liu, and Qi Xi. Contributed to study design, data collection, and follow-up: Jing Wei, Cong Liu, Hong Lv, Xin Xu, Yuanyan Dou, Rui Qin, Bo Xu, Yue Jiang, and Jiaping Chen. Proofread the manuscript: Hongxia Ma, Tao Jiang, Jiong Li, and Yuan Lin. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Data Sharing   The data used in this study are confidential.
Reference (10)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return