-
Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the participants stratified according to quartiles of NLR. The proportion of men, current smokers, and current drinkers increased with increased NLR quartiles (P < 0.05). With the increment of NLR, participants tended to be with lower levels of LDL-c, HDL-c, TC, and higher levels of waist circumference, SBP, and DBP (all P < 0.05; Table 1). Moreover, the baseline prevalence of baPWV and albuminuria increased with NLR quartiles. There was no significant difference between NLR levels and the proportion of participants in high school or above and those doing moderate to vigorous physical activity (both P > 0.05; Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics according to quartiles of NLR (n = 6,430)
CharacteristicsNLR Quartiles Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P value N (%) 1,566 (24.4) 1,620 (25.2) 1,623 (25.2) 1,621 (25.2) Age (years) 58.10 ± 8.14 57.77 ± 8.39 57.84 ± 8.97 58.39 ± 9.37 0.16 Male sex, n (%) 453 (28.9) 530 (32.7) 628 (38.7) 738 (45.5) < 0.0001 ≥ 9 years of Education, n (%) 997 (63.9) 1,051 (65.2) 1,055 (65.3) 1,027 (63.7) 0.93 Current drinking, n (%) 119 (7.8) 142 (9.0) 179 (11.4) 184 (11.8) < 0.0001 Current smoking, n (%) 229 (15.1) 296 (19.0) 334 (21.3) 386 (24.7) < 0.0001 Ideal physical activity, n (%) 1,136 (72.5) 1,150 (71.0) 1,160 (71.5) 1,156 (71.3) 0.53 BMI (kg/m2) 25.06 ± 3.25 25.41 ± 3.34 25.32 ± 3.26 25.10 ± 3.15 0.01 Waist circumference (cm) 87.22 ± 6.13 87.73 ± 6.15 88.14 ± 6.04 88.11 ± 6.08 < 0.0001 SBP (mmHg) 140.09 ± 18.93 141.52 ± 19.99 141.68 ± 19.79 142.40 ± 20.46 0.01 DBP (mmHg) 82.36 ± 10.14 82.84 ± 10.23 83.23 ± 10.18 83.77 ± 10.60 0.001 HbA1c (%) 5.82 ± 0.84 5.84 ± 0.93 5.84 ± 0.91 5.85 ± 0.99 0.74 Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.40 (0.98–1.91) 1.41 (1.00–2.02) 1.39 (1.02–2.00) 1.33 (0.95–1.89) 0.01 LDL-c (mmol/L) 3.34 ± 0.89 3.25 ± 0.86 3.19 ± 0.86 3.07 ± 0.83 < 0.0001 HDL-c (mmol/L) 1.36 ± 0.32 1.33 ± 0.31 1.30 ± 0.32 1.31 ± 0.32 < 0.0001 TC (mmol/L) 5.51 ± 1.01 5.43 ± 1.06 5.32 ± 0.97 5.20 ± 0.96 < 0.0001 Baseline abnormal ABI, n (%) 101 (6.6) 99 (6.3) 112 (7.1) 120 (7.6) 0.19 Baseline elevated baPWV, n (%) 318 (21.1) 335 (21.5) 373 (24.1) 426 (27.3) < 0.0001 Baseline albuminuria, n (%) 76 (4.9) 108 (6.7) 117 (7.2) 116 (7.2) 0.007 Note. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or n (%). NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; ABI, ankle-brachial index; baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; SD, standard deviation. -
Table 2 shows the risk of new-onset abnormal ABI, elevated baPWV, or albuminuria according to baseline NLR quartiles. On Poisson regression analysis, NLR was significantly associated with increased risk of new-onset abnormal ABI, elevated baPWV, and albuminuria. The incidence of abnormal ABI was 1.4%, 1.5%, 1.9%, and 3.1%, the incidence of elevated baPWV was 14.8%, 15.3%, 17.1%, and 17.2%, and the incidence of albuminuria was 7.8%, 8.1%, 8.5%, and 9.8% from the lowest to highest NLR quartiles. After full adjustment for age, sex, educational attainment, physical activity, smoking status, drinking status, and metabolic risk factors, the RRs and related 95% CIs for quartile 2 to quartile 4 compared with the lowest quartile for abnormal ABI analysis were 1.07 (95% CI 0.57–2.01), 1.35 (95% CI 0.75–2.44) and 2.05 (95% CI 1.17–3.57), respectively (Table 2). Similarly, participants in the highest NLR quartile presented an increased risk of new-onset albuminuria (RR: 1.37; 95% CI 1.06–1.77). Furthermore, compared with the lowest quartile of NLR, quartiles 3 and 4 presented a significantly higher risk of new-onset elevated baPWV (RR: 1.25; 95% CI 1.01–1.54 for quartile 3; RR: 1.25; 95% CI 1.01–1.55 for quartile 4). In addition, the multivariable-adjusted RR per SD increment of NLR was 1.32 (95% CI 1.15–1.50) for new-onset abnormal ABI, 1.11 (95% CI 1.03–1.19) for new-onset elevated baPWV, and 1.13 (95% CI 1.04–1.23) for new-onset albuminuria.
Table 2. Association of NLR with subclinical macrovascular and microvascular diseases
NLR
No. of participants
Cases, n (%)RR (95% CI) Model 1 Model 2 Abnormal ABI Quartile 1 1,389 20 (1.4) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) Quartile 2 1,366 20 (1.5) 1.07 (0.57−2.01) 1.07 (0.57−2.01) Quartile 3 1,415 27 (1.9) 1.38 (0.76−2.48) 1.35 (0.75−2.44) Quartile 4 1,370 43 (3.1) 2.02 (1.16−3.51) 2.05 (1.17−3.57) Per SD increase 1.31 (1.15−1.50) 1.32 (1.15−1.50) Elevated baPWV Quartile 1 1,162 172 (14.8) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) Quartile 2 1,160 178 (15.3) 1.07 (0.86−1.33) 1.04 (0.84−1.29) Quartile 3 1,149 196 (17.1) 1.26 (1.02−1.56) 1.25 (1.01−1.54) Quartile 4 1,162 200 (17.2) 1.28 (1.03−1.58) 1.25 (1.01−1.55) Per SD increase 1.10 (1.03−1.18) 1.11 (1.03−1.19) Albuminuria Quartile 1 1,471 114 (7.8) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) Quartile 2 1,493 121 (8.1) 1.11 (0.86−1.44) 1.09 (0.84−1.41) Quartile 3 1,468 124 (8.5) 1.15 (0.88−1.49) 1.13 (0.87−1.47) Quartile 4 1,474 144 (9.8) 1.38 (1.07−1.78) 1.37 (1.06−1.77) Per SD increase 1.13 (1.04−1.22) 1.13 (1.04−1.23) Note. Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, educational attainment, physical activity, smoking status, and drinking status. Model 2: Further adjusted for metabolic risk factors (HbA1c, SBP, DBP, LDL-c, HDL-c, and triglycerides, BMI) based on model 1. NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; ABI, ankle-brachial index; baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; SD, standard deviation BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval. -
We further conducted a stratified analysis to see the association between NLR and new-onset abnormal ABI, elevated baPWV, and albuminuria according to BMI categories (BMI < 24 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2). Figure 2 shows the incidence of each outcome according to quartiles of NLR by BMI category. In particular, in participants with normal weight, the incidence of abnormal ABI, elevated baPWV, and albuminuria increased gradually with NLR level, compared to that in those with a BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2. After fully adjusting covariates and using the Poisson regression model, we found that the association between NLR and subclinical vascular abnormalities was much stronger in participants with normal weight. The increased risk of new-onset abnormal ABI, elevated baPWV, and albuminuria per SD increment of NLR was 57% (RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.28–1.91), 17% (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.05–1.30), and 26% (RR 1.26; 95% CI 1.10–1.44), respectively (Figure 3). However, no significant association was found among participants with BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2. Furthermore, we found an interaction between the NLR and BMI on the risk of new-onset abnormal ABI (P for interaction = 0.01) and a borderline significant interaction on new-onset albuminuria (P for interaction = 0.08).
Figure 2. Incidence of each outcome by NLR/BMI category. Incidence of (A) abnormal ABI, (B) elevated baPWV, and (C) albuminuria. NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; ABI, ankle-brachial index; baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity.
Figure 3. Association of NLR quartiles with subclinical macrovascular and microvascular diseases by BMI categories. NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; BMI, body mass index; ABI, ankle-brachial index; baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; SD, standard deviation; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.
In addition, we explored the association between NLR and new-onset abnormal ABI, elevated baPWV, and albuminuria on the basis of the waist circumference categories (Supplementary Table S1 available in www.besjournal.com). We also found a statistically significant relationship between NLR and subclinical atherosclerosis abnormalities in participants with normal waist circumference. A higher NLR quartile was associated with a higher incidence of abnormal ABI (RR 2.31; 95% CI 1.10–3.00) and albuminuria (RR 1.70; 95% CI 1.13–3.11). However, we did not find the modified effect of waist circumference on such relationships.
Table S1. Association of NLR quartiles with subclinical macrovascular and microvascular diseases by waist circumference categories
NLR Abnormal ABI Elevated baPWV Albuminuria Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 WC < 90 cm (men)/80 cm (women) (n = 3,428) Quartile 1 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) Quartile 2 0.74 (0.28−1.32) 0.75 (0.29−1.33) 0.91 (0.65−1.91) 0.89 (0.63−1.88) 1.42 (0.93−2.53) 1.45 (0.94−2.57) Quartile 3 0.90 (0.37−1.45) 0.91 (0.38−1.46) 1.39 (1.04−2.82) 1.32 (0.97−2.65) 1.28 (0.84−2.31) 1.24 (0.81−2.24) Quartile 4 2.27 (1.09−2.98) 2.31 (1.10−3.00) 1.29 (0.95−2.59) 1.21 (0.89−2.44) 1.72 (1.16−3.17) 1.70 (1.13−3.11) Per SD increase 1.35 (1.14−3.13) 1.36 (1.15−3.15) 1.13 (1.03−2.81) 1.11 (1.01−2.75) 1.19 (1.07−2.91) 1.19 (1.07−2.91) WC ≥ 90 cm (men)/80 cm (women) (n = 3,002) Quartile 1 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) Quartile 2 1.43 (0.61−1.84) 1.46 (0.62−1.87) 1.17 (0.88−2.41) 1.13 (0.85−2.33) 0.93 (0.67−1.95) 0.92 (0.66−1.93) Quartile 3 2.03 (0.90−2.46) 2.01 (0.89−2.43) 1.12 (0.83−2.29) 1.15 (0.84−2.33) 1.09 (0.78−2.19) 1.09 (0.78−2.18) Quartile 4 1.57 (0.66−1.93) 1.58 (0.66−1.93) 1.27 (0.94−2.55) 1.27 (0.94−2.55) 1.20 (0.86−2.36) 1.17 (0.84−2.32) Per SD increase 1.24 (1.01−2.74) 1.24 (1.00−2.71) 1.08 (0.98−2.66) 1.10 (0.99−2.70) 1.08 (0.96−2.62) 1.08 (0.96−2.60) P for interactiona 0.52 0.68 0.27 Note. Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, education attainment, physical activity, smoking status and drinking status. Model 2: Further adjusted for metabolic risk factors (HbA1c, SBP, DBP, LDL-c, HDL-c, and triglycerides) based on model 1. aThe interactions of WC category with NLR (per SD increase) on risks of diseases was examined by including respective multiplicative interaction term in the final model 2. NLR, neutrophil-to lymphocyte ratio; ABI, ankle brachial index; baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; SD, standard deviation BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL-c, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-c, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; WC, waist circumference.
doi: 10.3967/bes2022.002
Association between the Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio and New-onset Subclinical Macrovascular and Microvascular Diseases in the Chinese Population
-
Abstract:
Objective The association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with subclinical macrovascular and microvascular diseases has been less investigated. We sought to examine the association between NLR and new-onset subclinical macrovascular and microvascular abnormalities in the Chinese population. Methods From a community cohort, we included 6,430 adults aged ≥ 40 years without subclinical macrovascular and microvascular diseases at baseline. We measured subclinical macrovascular and microvascular abnormalities separately using the ankle-brachial index (ABI), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), and albuminuria. Results During a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, 110 participants developed incident abnormal ABI, 746 participants developed incident elevated baPWV, and 503 participants developed incident albuminuria. Poisson regression analysis indicated that NLR was significantly associated with an increased risk of new-onset abnormal ABI, elevated baPWV, and albuminuria. Compared to overweight/obese participants, we found a much stronger association between NLR and subclinical vascular abnormalities in participants with normal weight. Furthermore, we found an interaction between the NLR and body mass index (BMI) on the risk of new-onset abnormal ABI (P for interaction: 0.01). Conclusion NLR was associated with subclinical macrovascular and microvascular diseases in the Chinese population. Furthermore, in participants with normal weight, the association between NLR and subclinical vascular abnormalities was much stronger. -
Key words:
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio /
- Subclinical macrovascular and microvascular diseases /
- Body mass index /
- Prospective cohort study
注释: -
Figure 3. Association of NLR quartiles with subclinical macrovascular and microvascular diseases by BMI categories. NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; BMI, body mass index; ABI, ankle-brachial index; baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; SD, standard deviation; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics according to quartiles of NLR (n = 6,430)
CharacteristicsNLR Quartiles Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P value N (%) 1,566 (24.4) 1,620 (25.2) 1,623 (25.2) 1,621 (25.2) Age (years) 58.10 ± 8.14 57.77 ± 8.39 57.84 ± 8.97 58.39 ± 9.37 0.16 Male sex, n (%) 453 (28.9) 530 (32.7) 628 (38.7) 738 (45.5) < 0.0001 ≥ 9 years of Education, n (%) 997 (63.9) 1,051 (65.2) 1,055 (65.3) 1,027 (63.7) 0.93 Current drinking, n (%) 119 (7.8) 142 (9.0) 179 (11.4) 184 (11.8) < 0.0001 Current smoking, n (%) 229 (15.1) 296 (19.0) 334 (21.3) 386 (24.7) < 0.0001 Ideal physical activity, n (%) 1,136 (72.5) 1,150 (71.0) 1,160 (71.5) 1,156 (71.3) 0.53 BMI (kg/m2) 25.06 ± 3.25 25.41 ± 3.34 25.32 ± 3.26 25.10 ± 3.15 0.01 Waist circumference (cm) 87.22 ± 6.13 87.73 ± 6.15 88.14 ± 6.04 88.11 ± 6.08 < 0.0001 SBP (mmHg) 140.09 ± 18.93 141.52 ± 19.99 141.68 ± 19.79 142.40 ± 20.46 0.01 DBP (mmHg) 82.36 ± 10.14 82.84 ± 10.23 83.23 ± 10.18 83.77 ± 10.60 0.001 HbA1c (%) 5.82 ± 0.84 5.84 ± 0.93 5.84 ± 0.91 5.85 ± 0.99 0.74 Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.40 (0.98–1.91) 1.41 (1.00–2.02) 1.39 (1.02–2.00) 1.33 (0.95–1.89) 0.01 LDL-c (mmol/L) 3.34 ± 0.89 3.25 ± 0.86 3.19 ± 0.86 3.07 ± 0.83 < 0.0001 HDL-c (mmol/L) 1.36 ± 0.32 1.33 ± 0.31 1.30 ± 0.32 1.31 ± 0.32 < 0.0001 TC (mmol/L) 5.51 ± 1.01 5.43 ± 1.06 5.32 ± 0.97 5.20 ± 0.96 < 0.0001 Baseline abnormal ABI, n (%) 101 (6.6) 99 (6.3) 112 (7.1) 120 (7.6) 0.19 Baseline elevated baPWV, n (%) 318 (21.1) 335 (21.5) 373 (24.1) 426 (27.3) < 0.0001 Baseline albuminuria, n (%) 76 (4.9) 108 (6.7) 117 (7.2) 116 (7.2) 0.007 Note. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or n (%). NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; ABI, ankle-brachial index; baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; SD, standard deviation. Table 2. Association of NLR with subclinical macrovascular and microvascular diseases
NLR
No. of participants
Cases, n (%)RR (95% CI) Model 1 Model 2 Abnormal ABI Quartile 1 1,389 20 (1.4) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) Quartile 2 1,366 20 (1.5) 1.07 (0.57−2.01) 1.07 (0.57−2.01) Quartile 3 1,415 27 (1.9) 1.38 (0.76−2.48) 1.35 (0.75−2.44) Quartile 4 1,370 43 (3.1) 2.02 (1.16−3.51) 2.05 (1.17−3.57) Per SD increase 1.31 (1.15−1.50) 1.32 (1.15−1.50) Elevated baPWV Quartile 1 1,162 172 (14.8) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) Quartile 2 1,160 178 (15.3) 1.07 (0.86−1.33) 1.04 (0.84−1.29) Quartile 3 1,149 196 (17.1) 1.26 (1.02−1.56) 1.25 (1.01−1.54) Quartile 4 1,162 200 (17.2) 1.28 (1.03−1.58) 1.25 (1.01−1.55) Per SD increase 1.10 (1.03−1.18) 1.11 (1.03−1.19) Albuminuria Quartile 1 1,471 114 (7.8) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) Quartile 2 1,493 121 (8.1) 1.11 (0.86−1.44) 1.09 (0.84−1.41) Quartile 3 1,468 124 (8.5) 1.15 (0.88−1.49) 1.13 (0.87−1.47) Quartile 4 1,474 144 (9.8) 1.38 (1.07−1.78) 1.37 (1.06−1.77) Per SD increase 1.13 (1.04−1.22) 1.13 (1.04−1.23) Note. Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, educational attainment, physical activity, smoking status, and drinking status. Model 2: Further adjusted for metabolic risk factors (HbA1c, SBP, DBP, LDL-c, HDL-c, and triglycerides, BMI) based on model 1. NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; ABI, ankle-brachial index; baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; SD, standard deviation BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval. S1. Association of NLR quartiles with subclinical macrovascular and microvascular diseases by waist circumference categories
NLR Abnormal ABI Elevated baPWV Albuminuria Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 WC < 90 cm (men)/80 cm (women) (n = 3,428) Quartile 1 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) Quartile 2 0.74 (0.28−1.32) 0.75 (0.29−1.33) 0.91 (0.65−1.91) 0.89 (0.63−1.88) 1.42 (0.93−2.53) 1.45 (0.94−2.57) Quartile 3 0.90 (0.37−1.45) 0.91 (0.38−1.46) 1.39 (1.04−2.82) 1.32 (0.97−2.65) 1.28 (0.84−2.31) 1.24 (0.81−2.24) Quartile 4 2.27 (1.09−2.98) 2.31 (1.10−3.00) 1.29 (0.95−2.59) 1.21 (0.89−2.44) 1.72 (1.16−3.17) 1.70 (1.13−3.11) Per SD increase 1.35 (1.14−3.13) 1.36 (1.15−3.15) 1.13 (1.03−2.81) 1.11 (1.01−2.75) 1.19 (1.07−2.91) 1.19 (1.07−2.91) WC ≥ 90 cm (men)/80 cm (women) (n = 3,002) Quartile 1 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) Quartile 2 1.43 (0.61−1.84) 1.46 (0.62−1.87) 1.17 (0.88−2.41) 1.13 (0.85−2.33) 0.93 (0.67−1.95) 0.92 (0.66−1.93) Quartile 3 2.03 (0.90−2.46) 2.01 (0.89−2.43) 1.12 (0.83−2.29) 1.15 (0.84−2.33) 1.09 (0.78−2.19) 1.09 (0.78−2.18) Quartile 4 1.57 (0.66−1.93) 1.58 (0.66−1.93) 1.27 (0.94−2.55) 1.27 (0.94−2.55) 1.20 (0.86−2.36) 1.17 (0.84−2.32) Per SD increase 1.24 (1.01−2.74) 1.24 (1.00−2.71) 1.08 (0.98−2.66) 1.10 (0.99−2.70) 1.08 (0.96−2.62) 1.08 (0.96−2.60) P for interactiona 0.52 0.68 0.27 Note. Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, education attainment, physical activity, smoking status and drinking status. Model 2: Further adjusted for metabolic risk factors (HbA1c, SBP, DBP, LDL-c, HDL-c, and triglycerides) based on model 1. aThe interactions of WC category with NLR (per SD increase) on risks of diseases was examined by including respective multiplicative interaction term in the final model 2. NLR, neutrophil-to lymphocyte ratio; ABI, ankle brachial index; baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; SD, standard deviation BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL-c, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-c, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; WC, waist circumference. -
[1] Song PG, Fang Z, Wang HY, et al. Global and regional prevalence, burden, and risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling study. Lancet Glob Health, 2020; 8, e721−9. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30117-0 [2] Ankle Brachial Index Collaboration. Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham risk score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA, 2008; 300, 197−208. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.2.197 [3] Ohkuma T, Ninomiya T, Tomiyama H, et al. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and the risk prediction of cardiovascular disease: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Hypertension, 2017; 69, 1045−52. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09097 [4] Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet, 2010; 375, 2073−81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60674-5 [5] Lloyd-Jones DM. Short-term versus long-term risk for coronary artery disease: implications for lipid guidelines. Curr Opin Lipidol, 2006; 17, 619−25. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3280108740 [6] Vita JA, Keaney JF Jr, Larson MG, et al. Brachial artery vasodilator function and systemic inflammation in the Framingham offspring study. Circulation, 2004; 110, 3604−9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148821.97162.5E [7] Vlachopoulos C, Dima I, Aznaouridis K, et al. Acute systemic inflammation increases arterial stiffness and decreases wave reflections in healthy individuals. Circulation, 2005; 112, 2193−200. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.535435 [8] Scurt FG, Menne J, Brandt S, et al. Systemic inflammation precedes microalbuminuria in diabetes. Kidney Int Rep, 2019; 4, 1373−86. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.06.005 [9] Kaplan RC, Frishman WH. Systemic inflammation as a cardiovascular disease risk factor and as a potential target for drug therapy. Heart Dis, 2001; 3, 326−32. [10] Wang XD, Zhang GY, Jiang XH, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in relation to risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events among patients undergoing angiography or cardiac revascularization: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Atherosclerosis, 2014; 234, 206−13. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.03.003 [11] Faria SS, Fernandes PC Jr, Silva MJB, et al. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: a narrative review. Ecancermedicalscience, 2016; 10, 702. [12] McMillan DC. Systemic inflammation, nutritional status and survival in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 2009; 12, 223−6. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32832a7902 [13] Mallappa S, Sinha A, Gupta S, et al. Preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >5 is a prognostic factor for recurrent colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis, 2013; 15, 323−8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12008 [14] An X, Ding PR, Li YH, et al. Elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Biomarkers, 2010; 15, 516−22. doi: 10.3109/1354750X.2010.491557 [15] Cho H, Hur HW, Kim SW, et al. Pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is elevated in epithelial ovarian cancer and predicts survival after treatment. Cancer Immunol, Immunother, 2009; 58, 15−23. doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0516-3 [16] Ohno Y, Nakashima J, Ohori M, et al. Clinical variables for predicting metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who might not benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and performance status. Int J Clin Oncol, 2014; 19, 139−45. doi: 10.1007/s10147-012-0514-5 [17] Afari ME, Bhat T. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and cardiovascular diseases: an update. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther, 2016; 14, 573−7. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2016.1154788 [18] Wang H, Hu YH, Geng YT, et al. The relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and artery stiffness in subtypes of hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 2017; 19, 780−5. doi: 10.1111/jch.13002 [19] Kawamoto R, Ninomiya D, Kikuchi A, et al. Association of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with early renal dysfunction and albuminuria among diabetic patients. Int Urol Nephrol, 2019; 51, 483−90. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-02065-2 [20] Li M, Xu Y, Xu M, et al. Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and osteoporotic fracture in middle-aged and elderly Chinese. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2012; 97, 2033−8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3010 [21] Wang B, Zhao ZY, Liu SS, et al. Impact of diabetes on subclinical atherosclerosis and major cardiovascular events in individuals with and without non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2021; 177, 108873. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108873 [22] Jin LN, Huang Y, Bi YF, et al. Association between alcohol consumption and metabolic syndrome in 19, 215 middle-aged and elderly Chinese. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2011; 92, 386−92. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.02.033 [23] Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, et al. Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2011; 8, 115. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-115 [24] He W, Li QQ, Yang M, et al. Lower BMI cutoffs to define overweight and obesity in China. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2015; 23, 684−91. doi: 10.1002/oby.20995 [25] Xu BH, Dai M, Li M, et al. Low-grade albuminuria is associated with peripheral artery disease in Chinese diabetic patients. Atherosclerosis, 2014; 232, 285−8. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.11.046 [26] Lin L, Zhang J, Jiang L, et al. Transition of metabolic phenotypes and risk of subclinical atherosclerosis according to BMI: a prospective study. Diabetologia, 2020; 63, 1312−23. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05116-5 [27] Resnick HE, Lindsay RS, McDermott MM, et al. Relationship of high and low ankle brachial index to all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: the strong heart study. Circulation, 2004; 109, 733−9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000112642.63927.54 [28] Stevens PE, Levin A. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med, 2013; 158, 825−30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00007 [29] American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with peripheral artery disease (updating the 2005 guideline). Vasc Med, 2011; 16, 452−76. doi: 10.1177/1358863X11424312 [30] Ouriel K. Peripheral arterial disease. Lancet, 2001; 358, 1257−64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06351-6 [31] Liu NN, Sheng JL, Pan TR, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio are associated with lower extremity vascular lesions in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Lab, 2019; 65, 325−30. [32] Demirdal T, Sen P. The significance of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in predicting peripheral arterial disease, peripheral neuropathy, osteomyelitis and amputation in diabetic foot infection. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2018; 144, 118−25. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.08.009 [33] Bath J, Smith JB, Kruse RL, et al. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts disease severity and outcome after lower extremity procedures. J Vasc Surg, 2020; 72, 622−31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.094 [34] Mozos I, Malainer C, Horbańczuk J, et al. Inflammatory markers for arterial stiffness in cardiovascular diseases. Front Immunol, 2017; 8, 1058. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01058 [35] Yi YH, Zhou LY, Zuo SR, et al. Gender-specific association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and arterial stiffness in an apparently healthy population undergoing a health examination. Vascular, 2019; 27, 668−76. doi: 10.1177/1708538119840557 [36] Tomiyama H. Arterial stiffness: is this a marker for the current status or future?. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2016; 23, 1026−7. doi: 10.5551/jat.ED042 [37] Tanindi A, Erkan AF, Alhan A, et al. Arterial stiffness and central arterial wave reflection are associated with serum uric acid, total bilirubin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with coronary artery disease. Anatol J Cardiol, 2015; 15, 396−403. doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5447 [38] Wang RT, Zhang JR, Li Y, et al. Neutrophil-Lymphocyte ratio is associated with arterial stiffness in diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications, 2015; 29, 245−9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.11.006 [39] Gul CB, Yildiz A, Ersoy A, et al. Correlation between arterial stiffness and inflammatory markers in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients with preserved renal function. Int Urol Nephrol, 2015; 47, 1187−94. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-1022-0 [40] Kahraman C, Kahraman NK, Aras B, et al. The relationship between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and albuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients: a pilot study. Arch Med Sci, 2016; 12, 571−5. [41] Chmelar J, Chung KJ, Chavakis T. The role of innate immune cells in obese adipose tissue inflammation and development of insulin resistance. Thromb Haemost, 2013; 109, 399−406. doi: 10.1160/TH12-09-0703 [42] Li Z, Guo XF, Liu YM, et al. Metabolism rather than obesity is associated with ischemic stroke: a cross-sectional study in rural Northeastern China. SpringerPlus, 2016; 5, 1419. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3088-2 [43] Millán-Núñez J, Mantilla-MoratóT, Toro R, et al. Cardiometabolic risk related to the association of hypertriglyceridemia-Low HDLc. Curr Pharm Des, 2016; 22, 365−71. [44] Sanja S, Marina DI, Stevan I, et al. The significance of adiponectin as a biomarker in metabolic syndrome and/or coronary artery disease. Vojnosanit Pregl, 2015; 72, 779−84. doi: 10.2298/VSP140531067S [45] Turker Y, Baltaci D, Turker Y, et al. Investigation of relationship of visceral body fat and inflammatory markers with metabolic syndrome and its components among apparently healthy individuals. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015; 8, 13067−77. -
Supplementary Materials21126.pdf