-
The characteristics of the participants by followed up status and sex are listed in Table 1. No significant difference was observed between the subjects who were followed up and those who were lost, except that those who were lost to follow-up had fewer years of education and a slightly higher GDS score. Among the followed up subjects, compared with female participants, male participants were more likely to be educated, married, and wealthy, and usually reported a high prevalence of smoking and tea drinking, more social activities, and a lower prevalence of hypertension, sleep disturbance, and living alone.
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants by psychological resilience status
Characteristics Total Followed up Lost Male Female P-value No. of subjects 1,459 605 854 514 Age (years), mean (SD) 70.94 (4.24) 71.27 (4.31) 70.70 (4.17) 0.01 71.10 Education years* 0 202 (13.85) 42 (6.94) 160 (18.74) < 0.001 99 (19.26) 1–6 478 (32.76) 185 (30.58) 293 (34.31) 166 (32.30) > 6 779 (53.39) 378 (62.48) 401 (46.96) 249 (48.44) Married 1,118 (76.63) 553 (91.40) 565 (66.16) < 0.001 382 (74.32) Living alone 214 (14.67) 47 (7.77) 167 (19.56) < 0.001 85 (16.54) High income 513 (35.16) 240 (39.67) 273 (31.97) 0.002 164 (31.91) Smoking 190 (13.02) 187 (30.91) 3 (0.35) < 0.001 79 (15.37) Tea drinking 219 (15.01) 147 (24.30) 72 (8.43) < 0.001 61 (11.87) Exercise 1,043 (71.49) 434 (71.74) 609 (71.31) 0.86 372 (72.37) Social activities 1,334 (91.43) 567 (93.72) 767 (89.81) 0.009 465 (90.47) Hypertension 611 (41.88) 221 (36.53) 390 (45.67) 0.0005 203 (39.49) Diabetes 258 (17.68) 101 (16.69) 157 (18.38) 0.40 97 (18.87) Sleep disturbance 772 (52.91) 280 (46.28) 492 (57.61) < 0.001 264 (51.36) General obesity Underweight 30 (2.06) 11 (1.82) 19 (2.22) 0.66 19 (3.70) Normal weight 479 (32.83) 196 (32.40) 283 (33.14) 0.49 172 (33.46) Overweight 650 (44.55) 280 (46.28) 370 (43.33) 215 (41.83) Obesity 300 (20.56) 118 (19.50) 182 (21.31) 108 (21.01) Abdominal obesity 791 (54.22) 323 (53.39) 468 (54.80) 0.59 281 (54.67) Baseline scores GDS* 2 (1, 4) 2 (1, 4) 2 (1, 5) 0.22 3 (1, 5) GDA 0 (0, 1) 0 (0, 1) 0 (0, 2) 0.005 0 (0, 2) LS 1 (1, 1) 1 (1, 1) 1 (1, 1) 0.31 1 (1, 1) W 0 (0, 1) 0 (0, 1) 0 (0, 1) 0.15 1 (0, 1) Follow-up scores GDS 3 (2, 5) 3 (2, 5) 3 (2, 5) 0.34 − GDA 1(0, 2) 1 (0, 2) 1 (0, 2) 0.08 − LS 1 (1.1) 1 (1, 1) 1 (1, 1) 0.40 − W 1 (0.1) 1 (0, 1) 1 (0, 1) 0.60 − Note. Data were shown as n (%) for categorical variables and as x (s) for continuous variables. *The difference between the subjects who were followed up and those lost to follow-up was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The GDS, GDA, LS, and W scores were shown as M (IQR). GDS, geriatric depression scale; GDA, general depressive affect; LS, life satisfaction; W, withdrawal. Compared with the group of normal weight, those obesity subjects were significantly more likely to have “worsening depressive symptoms,” with OR (95% CI) of 1.42 (1.02–1.98); among those depression-free participants at baseline, the risk of incident depression at follow-up was also significantly increased, with OR (95% CI) of 1.65 (1.10–2.47). However, abdominal obesity was not statistically associated with the worsening of depressive symptoms or the incidence of depression (Table 2).
Table 2. Association of obesity with worsen depressive symptom and incident depression
Obesity status Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Worsen depressive symptoms (n = 1,429) General obesity Normal weight 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Overweight 1.00 (0.76, 1.30) 0.98 (0.75, 1.29) 0.97 (0.74, 1.29) Obesity 1.53 (1.13, 2.12)** 1.43 (1.03, 1.97)* 1.42 (1.02, 1.98)* Abdominal obesity No 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Yes 1.13 (0.86, 1.47) 1.08 (0.83, 1.42) 1.10 (0.83, 1.44) Incident depression (n = 1,085) General obesity Normal weight 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Overweight 1.09 (0.78, 1.51) 1.06 (0.76, 1.49) 1.05 (0.75, 1.48) Obesity 1.80 (1.23, 2.63)** 1.68 (1.14, 2.47)** 1.65 (1.10, 2.47)** Abdominal obesity No 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Yes 1.05 (0.76, 1.45) 0.99 (0.71, 1.38) 0.99 (0.71, 1.39) Note. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Model 1: adjusted for baseline GDS score alone; Model 2: additionally adjusted for age, sex, education level, marital status, living alone, and home income; and Model 3: further adjusted for smoking, exercise, tea drinking, social activities, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep disturbance. We further conducted analyses among male and female subjects separately and observed that the association of general obesity with worsening depressive symptoms and incident depression existed in male participants alone, with OR (95% CI) of 2.08 (1.27–3.42) and 2.12 (1.20–3.74), respectively. However, abdominal obesity was not significantly associated with depression in either sex (Table 3).
Table 3. Association of obesity with worsening depressive symptoms and incident depression among male and female participants
Obesity status Male Female Model 1 Full model Model 1 Full model Worsening depressive symptoms General obesity Normal weight 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Overweight 1.38 (0.92, 2.08) 1.42 (0.93, 2.19) 0.78 (0.55, 1.10) 0.73 (0.51, 1.06) Obesity 2.08 (1.27, 3.42)** 2.12 (1.25, 3.58)* 1.24 (0.82, 1.89) 1.05 (0.67, 1.64) Abdominal obesity No 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Yes 1.10 (0.74, 1.63) 1.08 (0.72, 1.63) 1.14 (0.80, 1.63) 1.11 (0.76, 1.62) Incident depression General obesity Normal weight 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Overweight 1.05 (0.64, 1.74) 1.07 (0.63, 1.81) 1.11 (0.72, 1.72) 1.04 (0.66, 1.65) Obesity 2.12 (1.20, 3.74)** 2.24 (1.22,4.11)** 1.56 (0.93, 2.61) 1.24 (0.71, 2.15) Abdominal obesity No 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Yes 1.01 (0.63, 1.62) 1.01 (0.62, 1.67) 1.09 (0.70, 1.70) 1.02 (0.64, 1.63) Note. Data were presented as OR (95% CI). Model 1: adjusted for baseline GDS score alone; Full model: additionally adjusted for age, sex, education level, marital status, living alone, home income, smoking, exercise, tea drinking, social activities, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep disturbances. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Analysis revealed that general obesity was associated with high level of CRP (Linear trend, P < 0.001), with OR (95% CI) of 2.58 (1.75–3.81) in all the followed up subjects, and among the participants free of depression at baseline, the results were consistent, with OR (95% CI) of 3.15 (1.97–5.04) (Figure 1).
The results revealed that the baseline CRP levels were not significantly associated with the GDS score at follow-up (P > 0.05) or with the score difference between baseline and follow-up (P > 0.05). However, it was significantly positively related with LS score (P < 0.05), specific dimension of depression, with β (95% CI) of was 0.015 (0.001, 0.03) and 0.018 (0.002, 0.03) among all participants and subjects free of depression at baseline, respectively, for score at follow-up; and for score difference between baseline and follow-up, the β was 0.04. No significant associations were observed between the CRP levels and GDA or W (Table 4).
Table 4. Associations of baseline CRP levels with scores of GDS and its dimensions
GDS and
dimensionsScore at follow-up Difference between baseline and follow-up All followed up Free of depression at baseline All followed up Free of depression at baseline GDS 0.003 (−0.02,0.03) 0.001 (−0.03, 0.03) −0.012 (−0.16, 0.13) −0.010 (−0.16, 0.14) GDA −0.002 (−0.03, 0.03) −0.005 (−0.04, 0.03) 0.039 (−0.003, 0.08) 0.034 (−0.009, 0.08) LS 0.015 (0.001, 0.03)* 0.018 (0.002, 0.03)* 0.038 (0.006, 0.07)* 0.039 (0.005, 0.07)* W −0.016 (−0.04, 0.01) −0.022 (-0.05, 0.01) −0.028 (−0.07, 0.02) −0.036 (−0.08, 0.01) Note. GDS, geriatric depression scale; GDA, general depressive affect; LS, life satisfaction; W, withdrawal. Data were shown as β (95% CI). In the linear regression models, CRP level were transformed to log (X) and included as independent variable; and GDS, GDA, LS, and W scores were transformed into log (1+Y) values and included as dependent variable, when scores at follow-up were investigated. *P < 0.05.
doi: 10.3967/bes2023.059
Obesity is positively Associated with Depression in Older Adults: Role of Systemic Inflammation
-
Abstract:
Objective We aimed to explore the association between obesity and depression and the role of systemic inflammation in older adults. Methods Adults ≥ 65 years old (n = 1,973) were interviewed at baseline in 2018 and 1,459 were followed up in 2021. General and abdominal obesity were assessed, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured at baseline. Depression status was assessed at baseline and at follow-up. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between obesity and the incidence of depression and worsening of depressive symptoms, as well as the relationship between obesity and CRP levels. The associations of CRP levels with the geriatric depression scale, as well as with its three dimensions, were investigated using multiple linear regressions. Results General obesity was associated with worsening depression symptoms and incident depression, with an odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 1.53 (1.13–2.12) and 1.80 (1.23–2.63), especially among old male subjects, with OR (95% CI) of 2.12 (1.25–3.58) and 2.24 (1.22–4.11), respectively; however, no significant relationship was observed between abdominal obesity and depression. In addition, general obesity was associated with high levels of CRP, with OR (95% CI) of 2.58 (1.75–3.81), especially in subjects free of depression at baseline, with OR (95% CI) of 3.15 (1.97–5.04), and CRP levels were positively correlated with a score of specific dimension (life satisfaction) of depression, P < 0.05. Conclusion General obesity, rather than abdominal obesity, was associated with worsening depressive symptoms and incident depression, which can be partly explained by the systemic inflammatory response, and the impact of obesity on depression should be taken more seriously in the older male population. -
Key words:
- Depression /
- Obesity /
- Older adults /
- Body mass index /
- Inflammatory reaction
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
注释:1) AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS: 2) CONFLICT OF INTEREST: -
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants by psychological resilience status
Characteristics Total Followed up Lost Male Female P-value No. of subjects 1,459 605 854 514 Age (years), mean (SD) 70.94 (4.24) 71.27 (4.31) 70.70 (4.17) 0.01 71.10 Education years* 0 202 (13.85) 42 (6.94) 160 (18.74) < 0.001 99 (19.26) 1–6 478 (32.76) 185 (30.58) 293 (34.31) 166 (32.30) > 6 779 (53.39) 378 (62.48) 401 (46.96) 249 (48.44) Married 1,118 (76.63) 553 (91.40) 565 (66.16) < 0.001 382 (74.32) Living alone 214 (14.67) 47 (7.77) 167 (19.56) < 0.001 85 (16.54) High income 513 (35.16) 240 (39.67) 273 (31.97) 0.002 164 (31.91) Smoking 190 (13.02) 187 (30.91) 3 (0.35) < 0.001 79 (15.37) Tea drinking 219 (15.01) 147 (24.30) 72 (8.43) < 0.001 61 (11.87) Exercise 1,043 (71.49) 434 (71.74) 609 (71.31) 0.86 372 (72.37) Social activities 1,334 (91.43) 567 (93.72) 767 (89.81) 0.009 465 (90.47) Hypertension 611 (41.88) 221 (36.53) 390 (45.67) 0.0005 203 (39.49) Diabetes 258 (17.68) 101 (16.69) 157 (18.38) 0.40 97 (18.87) Sleep disturbance 772 (52.91) 280 (46.28) 492 (57.61) < 0.001 264 (51.36) General obesity Underweight 30 (2.06) 11 (1.82) 19 (2.22) 0.66 19 (3.70) Normal weight 479 (32.83) 196 (32.40) 283 (33.14) 0.49 172 (33.46) Overweight 650 (44.55) 280 (46.28) 370 (43.33) 215 (41.83) Obesity 300 (20.56) 118 (19.50) 182 (21.31) 108 (21.01) Abdominal obesity 791 (54.22) 323 (53.39) 468 (54.80) 0.59 281 (54.67) Baseline scores GDS* 2 (1, 4) 2 (1, 4) 2 (1, 5) 0.22 3 (1, 5) GDA 0 (0, 1) 0 (0, 1) 0 (0, 2) 0.005 0 (0, 2) LS 1 (1, 1) 1 (1, 1) 1 (1, 1) 0.31 1 (1, 1) W 0 (0, 1) 0 (0, 1) 0 (0, 1) 0.15 1 (0, 1) Follow-up scores GDS 3 (2, 5) 3 (2, 5) 3 (2, 5) 0.34 − GDA 1(0, 2) 1 (0, 2) 1 (0, 2) 0.08 − LS 1 (1.1) 1 (1, 1) 1 (1, 1) 0.40 − W 1 (0.1) 1 (0, 1) 1 (0, 1) 0.60 − Note. Data were shown as n (%) for categorical variables and as x (s) for continuous variables. *The difference between the subjects who were followed up and those lost to follow-up was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The GDS, GDA, LS, and W scores were shown as M (IQR). GDS, geriatric depression scale; GDA, general depressive affect; LS, life satisfaction; W, withdrawal. Table 2. Association of obesity with worsen depressive symptom and incident depression
Obesity status Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Worsen depressive symptoms (n = 1,429) General obesity Normal weight 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Overweight 1.00 (0.76, 1.30) 0.98 (0.75, 1.29) 0.97 (0.74, 1.29) Obesity 1.53 (1.13, 2.12)** 1.43 (1.03, 1.97)* 1.42 (1.02, 1.98)* Abdominal obesity No 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Yes 1.13 (0.86, 1.47) 1.08 (0.83, 1.42) 1.10 (0.83, 1.44) Incident depression (n = 1,085) General obesity Normal weight 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Overweight 1.09 (0.78, 1.51) 1.06 (0.76, 1.49) 1.05 (0.75, 1.48) Obesity 1.80 (1.23, 2.63)** 1.68 (1.14, 2.47)** 1.65 (1.10, 2.47)** Abdominal obesity No 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Yes 1.05 (0.76, 1.45) 0.99 (0.71, 1.38) 0.99 (0.71, 1.39) Note. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Model 1: adjusted for baseline GDS score alone; Model 2: additionally adjusted for age, sex, education level, marital status, living alone, and home income; and Model 3: further adjusted for smoking, exercise, tea drinking, social activities, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep disturbance. Table 3. Association of obesity with worsening depressive symptoms and incident depression among male and female participants
Obesity status Male Female Model 1 Full model Model 1 Full model Worsening depressive symptoms General obesity Normal weight 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Overweight 1.38 (0.92, 2.08) 1.42 (0.93, 2.19) 0.78 (0.55, 1.10) 0.73 (0.51, 1.06) Obesity 2.08 (1.27, 3.42)** 2.12 (1.25, 3.58)* 1.24 (0.82, 1.89) 1.05 (0.67, 1.64) Abdominal obesity No 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Yes 1.10 (0.74, 1.63) 1.08 (0.72, 1.63) 1.14 (0.80, 1.63) 1.11 (0.76, 1.62) Incident depression General obesity Normal weight 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Overweight 1.05 (0.64, 1.74) 1.07 (0.63, 1.81) 1.11 (0.72, 1.72) 1.04 (0.66, 1.65) Obesity 2.12 (1.20, 3.74)** 2.24 (1.22,4.11)** 1.56 (0.93, 2.61) 1.24 (0.71, 2.15) Abdominal obesity No 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) Yes 1.01 (0.63, 1.62) 1.01 (0.62, 1.67) 1.09 (0.70, 1.70) 1.02 (0.64, 1.63) Note. Data were presented as OR (95% CI). Model 1: adjusted for baseline GDS score alone; Full model: additionally adjusted for age, sex, education level, marital status, living alone, home income, smoking, exercise, tea drinking, social activities, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep disturbances. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Table 4. Associations of baseline CRP levels with scores of GDS and its dimensions
GDS and
dimensionsScore at follow-up Difference between baseline and follow-up All followed up Free of depression at baseline All followed up Free of depression at baseline GDS 0.003 (−0.02,0.03) 0.001 (−0.03, 0.03) −0.012 (−0.16, 0.13) −0.010 (−0.16, 0.14) GDA −0.002 (−0.03, 0.03) −0.005 (−0.04, 0.03) 0.039 (−0.003, 0.08) 0.034 (−0.009, 0.08) LS 0.015 (0.001, 0.03)* 0.018 (0.002, 0.03)* 0.038 (0.006, 0.07)* 0.039 (0.005, 0.07)* W −0.016 (−0.04, 0.01) −0.022 (-0.05, 0.01) −0.028 (−0.07, 0.02) −0.036 (−0.08, 0.01) Note. GDS, geriatric depression scale; GDA, general depressive affect; LS, life satisfaction; W, withdrawal. Data were shown as β (95% CI). In the linear regression models, CRP level were transformed to log (X) and included as independent variable; and GDS, GDA, LS, and W scores were transformed into log (1+Y) values and included as dependent variable, when scores at follow-up were investigated. *P < 0.05. -
[1] World Health Organization. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/depression-global-health-estimates, (accessed on 2017). [2023-1-7]. [2] Maes M. Effects of age and gender on the classification and phenomenology of unipolar depression. Acta Neuropsychiatr, 2002; 14, 29−35. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-5215.2002.140104.x [3] Ferrari AJ, Charlson FJ, Norman RE, et al. Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS Med, 2013; 10, e1001547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001547 [4] Opie RS, Itsiopoulos C, Parletta N, et al. Dietary recommendations for the prevention of depression. Nutr Neurosci, 2017; 20, 161−71. doi: 10.1179/1476830515Y.0000000043 [5] Slomski A. Even low amounts of physical activity reduce depression risk. JAMA, 2022; 327, 2066. [6] Fulton S, Décarie-Spain L, Fioramonti X, et al. The menace of obesity to depression and anxiety prevalence. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2022; 33, 18−35. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2021.10.005 [7] Pan XF, Wang LM, Pan A. Epidemiology and determinants of obesity in China. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2021; 9, 373−92. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00045-0 [8] Goes VF, Wazlawik E, D'orsi E, et al. Severe obesity increases the prevalence but not the incidence of depressive symptoms in the elderly-population-based cohort in Southern Brazil. Int Psychogeriatr, 2017; 29, 1307−16. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216002246 [9] Konttinen H, Kiviruusu O, Huurre T, et al. Longitudinal associations between depressive symptoms and body mass index in a 20-year follow-up. Int J Obes, 2014; 38, 668−74. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.151 [10] Huang C, Kogure M, Tomata Y, et al. Association of serum adiponectin levels and body mass index with worsening depressive symptoms in elderly individuals: a 10-year longitudinal study. Aging Ment Health, 2020; 24, 725−31. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1584877 [11] Qian JH, Li NX, Ren XH. Obesity and depressive symptoms among Chinese people aged 45 and over. Sci Rep, 2017; 7, 45637. doi: 10.1038/srep45637 [12] Frank P, Jokela M, Batty GD, et al. Overweight, obesity, and individual symptoms of depression: a multicohort study with replication in UK Biobank. Brain Behav Immun, 2022; 105, 192−200. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2022.07.009 [13] Milaneschi Y, Simmons WK, Van Rossum EFC, et al. Depression and obesity: evidence of shared biological mechanisms. Mol Psychiatry, 2019; 24, 18−33. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0017-5 [14] Cao MY, Liu D, Zhang XY, et al. Association of C-reactive protein with cardiovascular outcomes: a mendelian randomization study in the Japanese Population. Biomed Environ Sci, 2022; 35, 126−32. [15] Ambrósio G, Kaufmann FN, Manosso L, et al. Depression and peripheral inflammatory profile of patients with obesity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2018; 91, 132−41. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.03.005 [16] Frank P, Jokela M, Batty GD, et al. Association between systemic inflammation and individual symptoms of depression: a pooled analysis of 15 population-based cohort studies. Am J Psychiatry, 2021; 178, 1107−18. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20121776 [17] Almeida OP, Almeida SA. Short versions of the geriatric depression scale: a study of their validity for the diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 1999; 14, 858−65. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199910)14:10<858::AID-GPS35>3.0.CO;2-8 [18] Nyunt MSZ, Fones C, Niti M, et al. Criterion-based validity and reliability of the Geriatric Depression Screening Scale (GDS-15) in a large validation sample of community-living Asian older adults. Aging Ment Health, 2009; 13, 376−82. doi: 10.1080/13607860902861027 [19] Maglione JE, Ancoli-Israel S, Peters KW, et al. Subjective and objective sleep disturbance and longitudinal risk of depression in a cohort of older women. Sleep, 2014; 37, 1179−87. [20] Zhao HF, He JY, Yi JY, et al. Factor structure and measurement invariance across gender groups of the 15-item geriatric depression scale among Chinese Elders. Front Psychol, 2019; 10, 1360. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01360 [21] Chen CM, Lu FC. The guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci, 2004; 17 Suppl, 1-36. [22] Ridker PM. Clinical application of C-reactive protein for cardiovascular disease detection and prevention. Circulation, 2003; 107, 363−9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000053730.47739.3C [23] Chou MH, Yang YK, Wang JD, et al. Elevated C-reactive protein levels modify the effect of magnesium on depressive symptoms: a population-based study. Nutrients, 2023; 15, 1560. doi: 10.3390/nu15071560 [24] Yin ZX, Chen J, Zhang J, et al. Dietary patterns associated with cognitive function among the older people in underdeveloped regions: finding from the NCDFaC study. Nutrients, 2018; 10, 464. doi: 10.3390/nu10040464 [25] Yu CQ, Shi ZM, Lv J, et al. Dietary patterns and insomnia symptoms in Chinese adults: the China Kadoorie Biobank. Nutrients, 2017; 9, 232. doi: 10.3390/nu9030232 [26] Noh JW, Kwon YD, Park J, et al. Body mass index and depressive symptoms in middle aged and older adults. BMC Public Health, 2015; 15, 310. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1663-z [27] Pereira-Miranda E, Costa PRF, Queiroz VaO, et al. Overweight and obesity associated with higher depression prevalence in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Nutr, 2017; 36, 223−33. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2016.1261053 [28] Tyrrell J, Mulugeta A, Wood AR, et al. Using genetics to understand the causal influence of higher BMI on depression. Int J Epidemiol, 2019; 48, 834−48. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy223 [29] Kim E, Song JH, Hwang JY, et al. Obesity and depressive symptoms in elderly Koreans: evidence for the "Jolly Fat" hypothesis from the Ansan Geriatric (AGE) Study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2010; 51, 231−4. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.10.014 [30] Zhang L, Liu K, Li H, et al. Relationship between body mass index and depressive symptoms: the "fat and jolly" hypothesis for the middle-aged and elderly in China. BMC Public Health, 2016; 16, 1201. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3864-5 [31] Yu MM, Shi YX, Gu LB, et al. "Jolly fat" or "sad fat": a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between obesity and depression among community-dwelling older adults. Aging Ment Health, 2022; 26, 13−25. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1857687 [32] Quek YH, Tam WWS, Zhang MWB, et al. Exploring the association between childhood and adolescent obesity and depression: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev, 2017; 18, 742−54. doi: 10.1111/obr.12535 [33] Almeida OP, Calver J, Jamrozik K, et al. Obesity and metabolic syndrome increase the risk of incident depression in older men: the health in men study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2009; 17, 889−98. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181b047e3 [34] Luo HQ, Li JJ, Zhang Q, et al. Obesity and the onset of depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older adults in China: evidence from the CHARLS. BMC Public Health, 2018; 18, 909. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5834-6 [35] Hetemäki N, Savolainen-Peltonen H, Tikkanen MJ, et al. Estrogen metabolism in abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2017; 102, 4588−95. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-01474 [36] Leeners B, Geary N, Tobler PN, et al. Ovarian hormones and obesity. Hum Reprod Update, 2017; 23, 300−21. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw045 [37] Albert KM, Newhouse PA. Estrogen, stress, and depression: cognitive and biological interactions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 2019; 15, 399−423. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095557 [38] Vittengl JR. Mediation of the bidirectional relations between obesity and depression among women. Psychiatry Res, 2018; 264, 254−9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.023 [39] Lee JH, Park SK, Ryoo JH, et al. U-shaped relationship between depression and body mass index in the Korean adults. Eur Psychiatry, 2017; 45, 72−80. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.05.025 [40] Ceolin G, Moreira JD, Breda V, et al. Association between adiposity and emergent depressive symptoms in a 10-years prospective cohort of older adults: the EpiFloripa Aging study. J Affect Disord, 2023; 330, 198−205. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.009 [41] Alshehri T, Boone S, De Mutsert R, et al. The association between overall and abdominal adiposity and depressive mood: A cross-sectional analysis in 6459 participants. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2019; 110, 104429. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104429 [42] Vogelzangs N, Kritchevsky SB, Beekman ATF, et al. Depressive symptoms and change in abdominal obesity in older persons. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2008; 65, 1386−93. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1386 [43] Sudhakar M, Silambanan S, Chandran AS, et al. C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and leptin receptor in obesity: binding of monomeric CRP to leptin receptor. Front Immunol, 2018; 9, 1167. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01167 [44] Cobos-Palacios L, Ruiz-Moreno MI, Vilches-Perez A, et al. Metabolically healthy obesity: inflammatory biomarkers and adipokines in elderly population. PLoS One, 2022; 17, e0265362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265362 [45] Chamberlain SR, Cavanagh J, De Boer P, et al. Treatment-resistant depression and peripheral C-reactive protein. Br J Psychiatry, 2019; 214, 11−9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.66 [46] Nowakowski ACH, Graves KY, Sumerau JE. Mediation analysis of relationships between chronic inflammation and quality of life in older adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2016; 14, 46. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0452-4 [47] Fancourt D, Steptoe A. The longitudinal relationship between changes in wellbeing and inflammatory markers: are associations independent of depression? Brain Behav Immun, 2020; 83, 146−52. [48] Leonard BE. Inflammation and depression: a causal or coincidental link to the pathophysiology? Acta Neuropsychiatr, 2018; 30, 1−16. [49] Mikulska J, Juszczyk G, Gawrońska-Grzywacz M, et al. HPA axis in the pathomechanism of depression and schizophrenia: new therapeutic strategies based on its participation. Brain Sci, 2021; 11, 1298. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101298 [50] Ho CSH, Zhang MWB, Mak A, et al. Metabolic syndrome in psychiatry: advances in understanding and management. Adv Psychiatr Treat, 2014; 20, 101−12. doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.113.011619 [51] Yang JL, Liu DX, Jiang H, et al. The effects of high-fat-diet combined with chronic unpredictable mild stress on depression-like behavior and Leptin/LepRb in male rats. Sci Rep, 2016; 6, 35239. doi: 10.1038/srep35239