-
A total of 140 subjects including 60 ISSHL patients who received only medicine treatment (medicine group), sixty who received medicine and HBOT (HBO group), and 20 healthy subjects (control group) were evaluated in this study. The clinical characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences in sex, age, degree of hearing loss, interval between onset of hearing loss and initial treatment, smoking, tinnitus, or vertigo that could affect hearing outcomes between the medicine and HBO groups (P > 0.05).
Parameter Medicine group HBO group Control group Pa Sex, female/male, n 39/21 40/20 12/8 1.000 Age, years 0.556 17–45 17 21 9 46–75 43 39 11 Degree of hearing loss 0.774 Mild 19 21 − Moderate 13 9 − Moderate to severe 13 11 − Severe 7 7 − Profound 8 12 − Visit time, d 0.660 0–7 15 10 − 8–14 16 20 − 15–21 17 19 − 22–28 12 11 − Smoking, yes/no, n 8/52 12/48 4/16 0.463 Tinnitus, yes/no, n 42/18 37/23 − 0.336 Vertigo, yes/no, n 36/24 18/42 − 0.130 Note. aHBO vs. Medicine group. HBO, Hyperbaric oxygen. Table 1. Clinical parameters of study subjects
The HBO group underwent 15 consecutive HBOT sessions without any serious side effects, and the hearing threshold was evaluated after treatment. Treatment efficacy was higher in the HBO group (86.67%) than in the medicine group (66.67%, P < 0.05), indicating that HBOT improved the hearing threshold of ISSHL patients (Table 2).
Group Patient number Complete recovery Marked improvement Slight improvement No recovery Effective treatment (%) Medicine 60 6 13 21 20 66.67 HBO 60 12 18 22 8 86.67a Note. aP < 0.05, HBO vs. medicine group. HBO, hyperbaric oxygen. ISSHL, sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Table 2. Hearing improvement in ISSHL patients
Frequency averages before and after treatment are shown in Figure 1. There were not differences in PTA values between the medicine and HBO groups before treatment (P > 0.05); however, a decrease in the values was observed after treatment in both groups (P < 0.01). The change in hearing level was greater in the HBO group than in the medicine group at all frequencies (P < 0.01).
Figure 1. Hearing threshold average frequencies (A) and change in hearing threshold average frequencies (B) in the medicine and HBO groups. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error. **P < 0.01, HBO vs. medicine group. Pre, pre-treatment; Post, post-treatment; HBO, hyperbaric oxygen.
TLR4, NF-κB, and TNF-α levels in peripheral blood before treatment did not differ between the medicine and HBO groups, but were higher in ISSHL patients than in healthy control subjects (P < 0.01, Table 3). TLR4, NF-κB, and TNF-α levels in the medicine and HBO groups were lower after treatment (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01), and the levels differed significantly between the medicine and HBO groups (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01; Figure 2). These results demonstrated that HBOT lowered the expression of inflammatory cytokines TLR4, NF-κB, and TNF-α in ISSHL patients.
Figure 2. Expression levels of TLR4 (A), NF-κB (B), and TNF-α (C) in the medicine and HBO groups. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Pre, pre-treatment; Post, post-treatment; HBO, hyperbaric oxygen.
Parameter Medicine group HBO group Control group TLR4 4.60 ± 0.83b 4.69 ± 0.92c 1.86 ± 0.49 NF-κB 3.94 ± 0.94b 3.98 ± 0.79c 1.31 ± 0.36 TNF-a 4.05 ± 0.90b 4.11 ± 0.91c 1.16 ± 0.31 Note. aData are shown as mean ± SD. control group. bP < 0.01, Medicine vs. Control group. cP < 0.01, HBO vs. control group. HBO, hyperbaric oxygen. Table 3. Expression levels of inflammation-related factors before treatment (μg/mL)a
In addition, in ISSHL patients, the percent decrease (the posttreatment divided by the pretreatment) in TLR4, NF-κB, and TNF-α expression after treatment was greater for those who received medicine as compared to HBOT (TLR4: 0.90 ± 0.14 vs. 0.80 ± 0.13, P = 0.023; NF-κB: 0.92 ± 0.19 vs. 0.76 ± 0.17, P = 0.006; TNF-α: 0.90 ± 0.18 vs. 0.79 ± 0.17, P = 0.035). Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant negative correlation between the percent decrease of TLR4, NF-κB, and TNF-α expression after HBOT and a relative hearing gain in HBO group; in other words, greater hearing improvement was significantly associated with a larger reduction in the expression of TLR4, NF-κB, and TNF-α after HBOT (TLR4: r = –0.341, P = 0.008; NF-κB: r = –0.310, P = 0.016; TNF-α: r = –0.286, P = 0.027; Figure 3).
Figure 3. Association of TLR4 (A), NF-κB (B), and TNF-α (C) decline with hearing outcome. Pearson analysis showing the negative correlation between the percent decrease (the posttreatment divided by the pretreatment) of TLR4, NF-κB, and TNF-α expression after hyperbaric oxygen therapy and the relative hearing gain in HBO group (ΔPTA).
Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment Improves Hearing Level via Attenuating TLR4/NF-κB Mediated Inflammation in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Patients
doi: 10.3967/bes2020.045
- Received Date: 2019-07-30
- Accepted Date: 2020-03-26
-
Key words:
- Hyperbaric oxygen treatment /
- Sudden sensorineural hearing loss /
- Toll-like receptor 4 /
- Nuclear factor-kB
Abstract:
Citation: | LIU Xue Hua, LIANG Fang, JIA Xing Yuan, ZHAO Lin, ZHOU Yan, YANG Jing. Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment Improves Hearing Level via Attenuating TLR4/NF-κB Mediated Inflammation in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Patients[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(5): 331-337. doi: 10.3967/bes2020.045 |