Volume 38 Issue 4
Apr.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Xiaoyun Shan, Yuting Li, Xiayu Zhao, Yichun Hu, Siran Li, Huidi Zhang, Yang Cao, Rui Wang, Lichen Yang. Threshold-Effect Associations of Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D on Bone Turnover Markers and GC rs2282679 Variants in Chinese Women of Childbearing Age[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 38(4): 433-446. doi: 10.3967/bes2024.151
Citation: Xiaoyun Shan, Yuting Li, Xiayu Zhao, Yichun Hu, Siran Li, Huidi Zhang, Yang Cao, Rui Wang, Lichen Yang. Threshold-Effect Associations of Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D on Bone Turnover Markers and GC rs2282679 Variants in Chinese Women of Childbearing Age[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 38(4): 433-446. doi: 10.3967/bes2024.151

Threshold-Effect Associations of Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D on Bone Turnover Markers and GC rs2282679 Variants in Chinese Women of Childbearing Age

doi: 10.3967/bes2024.151
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Xiaoyun Shan, Lecturer, Doctor, majoring in nutrition and food hygiene, E-mail: shanxiaoyun0924@163.com

    Yuting Li, Doctor, majoring in nutrition and food hygiene, E-mail: lytting@yeah.net

  • Corresponding author: Lichen Yang, Professor, Doctor, Tel: 86-10-66237184, E-mail: yanglc@ninh.chinacdc.cn
  • Study design and supervision: Lichen Yang. Material preparation and data collection: Yuting Li, Xiayu Zhao, Yichun Hu, Siran Li, Huidi Zhang, Yang Cao, and Rui Wang. Data analysis and manuscript writing: Xiaoyun Shan. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
  • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
  • The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (No.201519−B). Ethichs Written informed consent was obtained from each participant and all procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the committee’s ethical standards.
  • &These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • Received Date: 2024-04-11
  •   Objective  This study aimed to investigate possible serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] cutoffs for the associations between 25(OH)D and Bone turnover markers (BTMs), and how GC gene variation influences such cutoffs in Chinese women of childbearing age.  Methods  In total, 1,505 non-pregnant or non-lactating women (18–45 years) were recruited from the 2015 Chinese Adult Chronic Disease and Nutrition Surveillance. Serum 25(OH)D, osteocalcin (OC), procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), β-CrossLaps of type 1 collagen containing cross-linked C-telopeptide (β-CTX), and single nucleotide polymorphisms were determined. Locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplot and segmented regression were performed to estimate the 25(OH)D thresholds.  Results  The median serum 25(OH)D was 16.63 (11.96–22.55) ng/mL and the prevalence of low serum 25(OH)D (< 12 ng/mL) was 25.2%. Women with the lowest 25(OH)D had the highest β-CTX. After adjustment for the confounders, 25(OH)D cutoffs for OC [14.04 (12.84–15.23) ng/mL], β-CTX [13.94 (12.49–15.39) ng/mL], and P1NP [13.87 (12.37–15.37) ng/mL] in the whole population, cutoffs for OC [12.30 (10.68–13.91) ng/mL], β-CTX [12.23 (10.22–14.23) ng/mL], and P1NP [11.85 (10.40–13.31) ng/mL] in women with the GC rs2282679 G allele, and cutoffs for OC [12.75 (11.81–13.68) ng/mL], β-CTX [13.05 (11.78–14.32) ng/mL], and P1NP [12.81 (11.57–14.06) ng/mL] in women with the GC rs2282679 T allele, were observed. Below these cutoffs, BTMs were negatively associated with 25(OH)D, while above these cutoffs, BTMs plateaued.  Conclusion  In Chinese women of childbearing age, there were thresholds effect of serum 25(OH)D concentrations on BTMs. The results indicated that serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 13.87 ng/mL in this population had adverse influences on maintaining bone remodeling. BTMs were suppressed at a relatively lower serum 25(OH)D in women with the GC rs2282679 G allele compared with those with the T allele.
  • Study design and supervision: Lichen Yang. Material preparation and data collection: Yuting Li, Xiayu Zhao, Yichun Hu, Siran Li, Huidi Zhang, Yang Cao, and Rui Wang. Data analysis and manuscript writing: Xiaoyun Shan. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
    The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (No.201519−B). Ethichs Written informed consent was obtained from each participant and all procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the committee’s ethical standards.
    &These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Christakos S, Li SS, DeLa Cruz J, et al. Vitamin D and bone. Handb Exp Pharmacol, 2020; 262, 47−63.
    [2] Cashman KD. Vitamin D deficiency: defining, prevalence, causes, and strategies of addressing. Calcif Tissue Int, 2020; 106, 14−29. doi:  10.1007/s00223-019-00559-4
    [3] Lu JX, Liu XB, Chen J, et al. The vitamin D nutritional status in Chinese urban women of child-bearing age from 2010 to 2012. Chin J Prev Med, 2017; 51, 112−6. (In Chinese)
    [4] Liu XB, Zhang Y, Mao DQ, et al. Serum vitamin D levels of Chinese rural women of childbearing age in 2010-2012. J Hyg Res, 2017; 46, 367−72. (In Chinese)
    [5] Hu YC, Wang R, Mao DQ, et al. Vitamin D nutritional status of Chinese pregnant women, comparing the Chinese national nutrition surveillance (CNHS) 2015-2017 with CNHS 2010-2012. Nutrients, 2021; 13, 2237. doi:  10.3390/nu13072237
    [6] Cheng XG, Zhao KP, Zha XJ, et al. Opportunistic screening using low-dose CT and the prevalence of osteoporosis in China: a nationwide, multicenter study. J Bone Miner Res, 2021; 36, 427−35.
    [7] Wang LH, Yu W, Yin XJ, et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis and fracture in China: the China osteoporosis prevalence study. JAMA Netw Open, 2021; 4, e2121106. doi:  10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21106
    [8] Ma CF, Li X, Li W, et al. Osteomalacia induced by vitamin D deficiency: a case report. Chin J Osteoporos Bone Miner Res, 2020; 13, 357−61. (In Chinese)
    [9] Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2011; 96, 1911−30. doi:  10.1210/jc.2011-0385
    [10] Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, et al. Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr, 2006; 84, 18−28. doi:  10.1093/ajcn/84.1.18
    [11] Dawson-Hughes B, Heaney RP, Holick MF, et al. Estimates of optimal vitamin D status. Osteoporos Int, 2005; 16, 713−6. doi:  10.1007/s00198-005-1867-7
    [12] Grant WB, Al Anouti F, Boucher BJ, et al. A narrative review of the evidence for variations in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration thresholds for optimal health. Nutrients, 2022; 14, 639. doi:  10.3390/nu14030639
    [13] Kramer H, Camacho P, Aloia J, et al. Association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D and intact parathyroid hormone levels across latitude among adults with African ancestry. Endocr Pract, 2016; 22, 911−9. doi:  10.4158/EP151079.OR
    [14] Gallagher JC, Jindal PS, Smith LM. Vitamin D does not increase calcium absorption in young women: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res, 2014; 29, 1081−7. doi:  10.1002/jbmr.2121
    [15] Xu F, Li F, Li L, et al. Vitamin D as a risk factor for the presence of asymptomatic uterine fibroids in premenopausal Han Chinese women. Fertil Steril, 2021; 115, 1288−93. doi:  10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.001
    [16] Abbas S, Chang-Claude J, Linseisen J. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and premenopausal breast cancer risk in a German case-control study. Int J Cancer, 2009; 124, 250−5. doi:  10.1002/ijc.23904
    [17] Di Medio L, Brandi ML. Advances in bone turnover markers. Adv Clin Chem, 2021; 105, 101−40.
    [18] Kuchuk NO, Pluijm SMF, van Schoor NM, et al. Relationships of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D to bone mineral density and serum parathyroid hormone and markers of bone turnover in older persons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2009; 94, 1244−50. doi:  10.1210/jc.2008-1832
    [19] Lee DY, Jee JH, Cho YY, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D cutoffs for functional bone measures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int, 2017; 28, 1377−84. doi:  10.1007/s00198-016-3892-0
    [20] Sai AJ, Walters RW, Fang X, et al. Relationship between vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and bone health. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2011; 96, E436−46. doi:  10.1210/jc.2010-1886
    [21] Ismail TST, Muda BC, Rosdi RAM, et al. Determining the required vitamin D level for bone health based on bone turnover markers. Korean J Clin Lab Sci, 2017; 49, 337−44. doi:  10.15324/kjcls.2017.49.4.337
    [22] Lu HK, Zhang Z, Ke YH, et al. High prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in China: relationship with the levels of parathyroid hormone and markers of bone turnover. PLoS One, 2012; 7, e47264. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0047264
    [23] Krasniqi E, Boshnjaku A, Wagner KH, et al. Association between polymorphisms in vitamin D pathway-related genes, vitamin d status, muscle mass and function: a systematic review. Nutrients, 2021; 13, 3109. doi:  10.3390/nu13093109
    [24] Ruiz-Ballesteros AI, Meza-Meza MR, Vizmanos-Lamotte B, et al. Association of vitamin D metabolism gene polymorphisms with autoimmunity: evidence in population genetic studies. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21, 9626. doi:  10.3390/ijms21249626
    [25] Shan XY, Zhao XY, Li SR, et al. Association of vitamin D gene polymorphisms and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in Chinese women of childbearing age. J Hyg Res, 2022; 51, 961−8. (In Chinese)
    [26] Yu DM, Zhao LY, Zhang J, et al. China nutrition and health surveys (1982−2017). China CDC Wkly, 2021; 3, 193−5. doi:  10.46234/ccdcw2021.058
    [27] Tomal JH, Ciborowski JJH. Ecological models for estimating breakpoints and prediction intervals. Ecol Evol, 2020; 10, 13500−17. doi:  10.1002/ece3.6955
    [28] Otani K, Kanno K, Akutsu T, et al. Applying machine learning to determine 25(OH)D threshold levels using data from the AMATERASU vitamin D supplementation trial in patients with digestive tract cancer. Nutrients, 2022; 14, 1689. doi:  10.3390/nu14091689
    [29] Durazo-Arvizu RA, Dawson-Hughes B, Sempos CT, et al. Three-phase model harmonizes estimates of the maximal suppression of parathyroid hormone by 25-hydroxyvitamin D in persons 65 years of age and older. J Nutr, 2010; 140, 595−9. doi:  10.3945/jn.109.116681
    [30] National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. WS/T 677-2020 Method for vitamin D deficiency screening. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020. (In Chinese)
    [31] Hu YC, Li SR, Wang J, et al. Threshold for relationship between vitamin D and parathyroid hormone in Chinese women of childbearing age. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021; 18, 13060. doi:  10.3390/ijerph182413060
    [32] Steingrimsdottir L, Gunnarsson O, Indridason OS, et al. Relationship between serum parathyroid hormone levels, vitamin D sufficiency, and calcium intake. JAMA, 2005; 294, 2336−41. doi:  10.1001/jama.294.18.2336
    [33] Adami S, Viapiana O, Gatti D, et al. Relationship between serum parathyroid hormone, vitamin D sufficiency, age, and calcium intake. Bone, 2008; 42, 267−70. doi:  10.1016/j.bone.2007.10.003
    [34] Niculescu DA, Deacu LG, Caragheorgheopol A, et al. Combined effects of vitamin D status, renal function and age on serum parathyroid hormone levels. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2021; 12, 657991. doi:  10.3389/fendo.2021.657991
    [35] Lombardi G, Ziemann E, Banfi G, et al. Physical activity-dependent regulation of parathyroid hormone and calcium-phosphorous metabolism. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21, 5388. doi:  10.3390/ijms21155388
    [36] Jorde R, Grimnes G. Serum PTH is not a good marker for defining a threshold for vitamin D deficiency. Endocr Connect, 2020; 9, 396−404. doi:  10.1530/EC-20-0067
    [37] Tan KML, Saw S, Sethi SK. Vitamin D and its relationship with markers of bone metabolism in healthy Asian women. J Clin Lab Anal, 2013; 27, 301−4. doi:  10.1002/jcla.21602
    [38] Shan XY, Zhao XY, Li SR, et al. Association of serum 25(OH)D with metabolic syndrome in Chinese women of childbearing age. Nutrients, 2022; 14, 2301. doi:  10.3390/nu14112301
    [39] Li M, Lv F, Zhang Z, et al. Establishment of a normal reference value of parathyroid hormone in a large healthy Chinese population and evaluation of its relation to bone turnover and bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int, 2016; 27, 1907−16. doi:  10.1007/s00198-015-3475-5
    [40] Pasco JA, Henry MJ, Kotowicz MA, et al. Seasonal periodicity of serum vitamin D and parathyroid hormone, bone resorption, and fractures: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res, 2004; 19, 752−8. doi:  10.1359/jbmr.040125
    [41] Sharan K, Siddiqui JA, Swarnkar G, et al. Role of calcium-sensing receptor in bone biology. Indian J Med Res, 2008; 127, 274−86.
    [42] Al-Daghri NM, Yakout S, Al-Shehri E, et al. Inflammatory and bone turnover markers in relation to PTH and vitamin D status among Saudi postmenopausal women with and without osteoporosis. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2014; 7, 2812−9.
    [43] Jorde R, Stunes AK, Kubiak J, et al. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on bone turnover markers and other bone-related substances in subjects with vitamin D deficiency. Bone, 2019; 124, 7−13. doi:  10.1016/j.bone.2019.04.002
    [44] Wu F, Wills K, Laslett LL, et al. Cut-points for associations between vitamin D status and multiple musculoskeletal outcomes in middle-aged women. Osteoporos Int, 2017; 28, 505−15. doi:  10.1007/s00198-016-3754-9
    [45] Ramasamy I. Vitamin D metabolism and guidelines for vitamin D supplementation. Clin Biochem Rev, 2020; 41, 103−26. doi:  10.33176/AACB-20-00006
    [46] Liu WH, Hu J, Fang YY, et al. Vitamin D status in Mainland of China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine, 2021; 38, 101017. doi:  10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101017
    [47] van Schoor N, Lips P. Global overview of vitamin D status. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 2017; 46, 845−70. doi:  10.1016/j.ecl.2017.07.002
    [48] Jiang X, Kiel DP, Kraft P. The genetics of vitamin D. Bone, 2019; 126, 59−77. doi:  10.1016/j.bone.2018.10.006
    [49] Li LH, Yin XY, Wu XH, et al. Serum 25(OH)D and vitamin D status in relation to VDR, GC and CYP2R1 variants in Chinese. Endocr J, 2014; 61, 133−41. doi:  10.1507/endocrj.EJ13-0369
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(3)  / Tables(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(295) PDF downloads(9) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Threshold-Effect Associations of Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D on Bone Turnover Markers and GC rs2282679 Variants in Chinese Women of Childbearing Age

doi: 10.3967/bes2024.151
  • Author Bio:

  • Corresponding author: Lichen Yang, Professor, Doctor, Tel: 86-10-66237184, E-mail: yanglc@ninh.chinacdc.cn
  • Study design and supervision: Lichen Yang. Material preparation and data collection: Yuting Li, Xiayu Zhao, Yichun Hu, Siran Li, Huidi Zhang, Yang Cao, and Rui Wang. Data analysis and manuscript writing: Xiaoyun Shan. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
  • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
  • The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (No.201519−B). Ethichs Written informed consent was obtained from each participant and all procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the committee’s ethical standards.
  • &These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract:   Objective  This study aimed to investigate possible serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] cutoffs for the associations between 25(OH)D and Bone turnover markers (BTMs), and how GC gene variation influences such cutoffs in Chinese women of childbearing age.  Methods  In total, 1,505 non-pregnant or non-lactating women (18–45 years) were recruited from the 2015 Chinese Adult Chronic Disease and Nutrition Surveillance. Serum 25(OH)D, osteocalcin (OC), procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), β-CrossLaps of type 1 collagen containing cross-linked C-telopeptide (β-CTX), and single nucleotide polymorphisms were determined. Locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplot and segmented regression were performed to estimate the 25(OH)D thresholds.  Results  The median serum 25(OH)D was 16.63 (11.96–22.55) ng/mL and the prevalence of low serum 25(OH)D (< 12 ng/mL) was 25.2%. Women with the lowest 25(OH)D had the highest β-CTX. After adjustment for the confounders, 25(OH)D cutoffs for OC [14.04 (12.84–15.23) ng/mL], β-CTX [13.94 (12.49–15.39) ng/mL], and P1NP [13.87 (12.37–15.37) ng/mL] in the whole population, cutoffs for OC [12.30 (10.68–13.91) ng/mL], β-CTX [12.23 (10.22–14.23) ng/mL], and P1NP [11.85 (10.40–13.31) ng/mL] in women with the GC rs2282679 G allele, and cutoffs for OC [12.75 (11.81–13.68) ng/mL], β-CTX [13.05 (11.78–14.32) ng/mL], and P1NP [12.81 (11.57–14.06) ng/mL] in women with the GC rs2282679 T allele, were observed. Below these cutoffs, BTMs were negatively associated with 25(OH)D, while above these cutoffs, BTMs plateaued.  Conclusion  In Chinese women of childbearing age, there were thresholds effect of serum 25(OH)D concentrations on BTMs. The results indicated that serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 13.87 ng/mL in this population had adverse influences on maintaining bone remodeling. BTMs were suppressed at a relatively lower serum 25(OH)D in women with the GC rs2282679 G allele compared with those with the T allele.

Study design and supervision: Lichen Yang. Material preparation and data collection: Yuting Li, Xiayu Zhao, Yichun Hu, Siran Li, Huidi Zhang, Yang Cao, and Rui Wang. Data analysis and manuscript writing: Xiaoyun Shan. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (No.201519−B). Ethichs Written informed consent was obtained from each participant and all procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the committee’s ethical standards.
&These authors contributed equally to this work.
Xiaoyun Shan, Yuting Li, Xiayu Zhao, Yichun Hu, Siran Li, Huidi Zhang, Yang Cao, Rui Wang, Lichen Yang. Threshold-Effect Associations of Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D on Bone Turnover Markers and GC rs2282679 Variants in Chinese Women of Childbearing Age[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 38(4): 433-446. doi: 10.3967/bes2024.151
Citation: Xiaoyun Shan, Yuting Li, Xiayu Zhao, Yichun Hu, Siran Li, Huidi Zhang, Yang Cao, Rui Wang, Lichen Yang. Threshold-Effect Associations of Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D on Bone Turnover Markers and GC rs2282679 Variants in Chinese Women of Childbearing Age[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 38(4): 433-446. doi: 10.3967/bes2024.151
    • Vitamin D plays a critical role in maintaining calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) homeostasis as well as bone development and maintenance[1]. Inadequate vitamin D causes osteomalacia, and contributes to and exacerbates osteoporosis in adults. However, universal agreements on methods and thresholds for determining vitamin D deficiency or sufficiency have not been reached[2], which may be associated with differences in race, sex, age, endpoints, and analytical methods. Notably, if we choose an inappropriate threshold, it is likely to overestimate or underestimate the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D.

      Different from the women aged > 45 (have age-related changes in hormone levels, metabolism, and other physiological factors) or with pregnancy or lactating (pregnancy and lactation are physiological states that are known to profoundly affect a woman’s hormonal and metabolic profiles), the reproductive system of women of childbearing age is mature, and there is a complete feedback system and a fine and tight coordination function that carries out physiological regulation to keep hormones in balance. However, poor nutritional status increases the risk of adverse pregnancy and postmenopausal diseases. Therefore, during this period, women should pay attention to their nutritional status and physical health. In Chinese women of childbearing age, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in urban and rural areas is high, reaching 49.5%[3] and 38.7%[4], respectively, based on the widely used threshold of 20 ng/mL. Moreover, the rate was much higher in pregnant women, reaching 74.8%[5]. However, osteoporosis, clinical fractures, and low bone mass are not common in this population[6,7], and osteomalacia due to vitamin D deficiency in adults is relatively uncommon[8]. Therefore, the application of bone disease outcomes such as low bone mineral density, osteomalacia, and osteoporosis may not be appropriate for investigating the threshold of vitamin D deficiency. There is a need to investigate an optimal threshold for this population with some rational indices and methods.

      Because vitamin D deficiency results in a decrease in the absorption of dietary Ca, an increase in parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, a decrease in bone mineral density[9], and a variety of other health outcomes[10], these endpoints have been widely used to predict optimal 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels[11,12]. Several epidemiological studies have estimated the optimal serum concentrations of 25(OH)D for PTH[13], Ca absorption[14], asymptomatic uterine fibroids[15], and breast cancer[16] in premenopausal women. However, the results were inconclusive. Because bone turnover markers (BTMs), including bone formation markers [osteocalcin(OC) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP)] and bone resorption markers [CrossLaps of type 1 collagen containing cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX)], could reflect the metabolic activity of bone tissue[17], some studies also attempted to explore the optimal 25(OH)D concentrations for BTMs. However, such studies were mainly in the elderly or mixed-gender[18-22], and there are no studies describing the cutoffs for associations of vitamin D with BTMs balance just focusing on women of childbearing age.

      Evidence indicates that genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450-2R1 (CYP2R1), cytochrome P450-27B1 (CYP27B1), vitamin binding protein (GC), and vitamin D receptor (VDR) genes are associated with lower serum 25(OH)D levels[23,24]. In our previous study, individuals carrying the GG genotype at rs2282679 presented a 2.466-fold higher risk of vitamin D deficiency than those carrying the TT genotype (odds ratio [OR] = 2.466 (1.690–3.598), P < 0.001)[25]. However, to our knowledge, no studies have reported the genetic differences in the threshold-effect associations between serum 25(OH)D and BTMs.

      Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether serum 25(OH)D thresholds for BTMs could be determined by employing combined statistical models, in a representative sample of Chinese women of childbearing age. We further analyzed whether there would be differences in the inflection point values among the populations with different alleles. If so, this might provide a useful reference for investigating the thresholds of vitamin D deficiency or sufficiency in women of childbearing age as well as pregnant women.

    • This was a sub-study based on a nationally representative cross-sectional investigation, the 2015 Chinese Chronic Diseases and Nutrition Survey[26]. Women of childbearing age (18−45 years) were eligible for the study. Individuals who were pregnant or lactating were excluded. The minimum sample size of this study was calculated according to the reported vitamin D deficiency rate [approximately 44.1%, 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL] of Chinese women of childbearing age[3,4] in 2010−2012. The formula was as follows:

      $$ N=\frac{{\mu }^{2}p\;(1-p)}{{d}^{2}} $$ (1)

      N, sample size; p, deficiency rate; μ (confidence level), 1.96; d (allowance error), 3%. The power (1−β) was 0.8. The calculated sample size was 1,053. Subsequently, the population was divided into three age groups: 18−25, 25−35, and 35−45 years, and two participants were randomly selected from each age stratum at each monitoring site. A total of 1,674 samples were selected from 30 provincial administrative regions covering 279 monitoring sites. After excluding participants with missing anthropometric measurements or other pertinent covariates (n = 169), the data for 1,505 participants were included in the final analysis.

    • Fasting blood was drawn between 8:00 and 10:00 AM and serum samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis. All biological indicators were measured according to the manufacturers’ protocols and standard laboratory assay quality control procedures. Serum 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (AB Sciex Pte. Ltd., Framingham, MA, USA). The standard reference material SRM 972a from the National Institute for Standards and Technology was used to verify the calibration of the assay. Total 25(OH)D consisted of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3. PTH, OC, β-CTX, and P1NP were determined by electronic chemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche e601, F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland). Serum Ca was detected by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (NexION 350, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). In addition, a Hitachi 7600-210 ISE automatic biochemistry analyzer (Hitachi 7600, Tokyo, Japan) was used to detect serum P, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine (CRE), and albumin (Alb). All inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were ≤ 4.78%. The normal reference ranges used for OC, β-CTX, and P1NP according to the Roche Kit were: 11−43, ≤ 0.573, and 15.13−58.59 ng/mL, respectively. The single nucleotide polymorphism in GC (rs2282679) was detected by the improved multiple ligase detection reactions and followed the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in this population, as mentioned in our previous report[25].

    • The basic information (including age, nationality, educational level, smoking and drinking status, physical activity, and disease status) was obtained by questionnaires. Districts were divided into three categories: Eastern, Center, and Western. Regional types were divided into urban and rural areas. China was divided into the Northern and Southern regions according to the Qinling Mountains and the Huaihe River (latitude 33 °N). The season was recorded as either spring (March to May), autumn (September to November), or winter (December to February), according to the month when blood was drawn. The education level was divided into primary (primary school and below), medium (junior/senior high school), and advanced (junior college and above). The intensity of activity was classed into High intensity activity, Medium intensity activity, and Low intensity activity. “High intensity activity” refers to activity that requires considerable physical strength or can cause a significant increase in respiration or heart rate. “Medium intensity activity” refers to activity that requires a moderate amount of physical strength or can cause a slight increase in respiration or heart rate. “Low intensity activity” refers to activity that involves mainly sitting or standing. Bone and joint diseases/conditions included arthritis, fracture, and other diseases associated with the bone or joint. Cigarette smoker refered to current or former smoker. Participants were categorized as alcohol consumers if they had a history of alcohol consumption in the past year. Height and body weight were measured using a uniform height meter and an electronic weight scale, respectively. Body weight was rounded to the nearest kg. Height was measured to the nearest cm. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m2). The BMI was classified as underweight, normal, overweight, and obese according to the cutoffs of 18.5, 24, and 28 kg/m2, respectively. The serum Ca, as Alb adjusted by the formula [serum Ca−0.02 × (Alb−40)], was termed “corrected Ca”.

    • Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 23.0, Chicago, IL) and R version 4.0.3 statistical software, with the mgcv, nlme, and segmented package (The Comprehensive R Archive Network: http://cran.rproject.org). Normal distribution was evaluated by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. If variables were considered non-normally distributed, they were presented as medians and interquartile ranges (P25P75). All data comparisons were analyzed with non-parametric statistics. A generalized linear model was used to analyze the relationship between different 25(OH)D levels and BTM concentrations. The above analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). To predictthe thresholds of 25(OH)D, R version 4.1.1 statistical software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used. The analysis procedures followed the previous study[27-29]. First, the locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplot (LOESS) was applied to describe the nonlinear relationship between 25(OH)D and BTMs, and to obtain the potential cutoffs of 25(OH)D, which would be used as the initial cutoffs value in the segmented regression (SR) analysis. Second, the exact cutoffs and the relationships between 25(OH)D and the BTMs before and after the cutoffs were determined by the SR, described as the β coefficient and P-value. Before the LOESS and SR analyses, a generalized additive model was performed to adjust the confounders for 25(OH)D and BTM, respectively. 25(OH)D and BTMs were adjusted for district, regional type, latitude, season, nationality, education, smoking, drinking, exercise, age, BMI, corrected Ca, P, CRE, ALT, hsCRP, PTH, and disease status. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

    • As shown in Table 1, the median age was 30.0 (24.0−37.8) years old. The median BMI was 22.7 (20.3−25.1) kg/m2, the median Alb was 53.1 (50.7−55.1) g/L, the median corrected Ca was 2.3 (2.2−2.4) mmol/L, the median P concentration was 1.4 (1.2−1.5) mmol/L, the median ALT concentration was 12.5 (9.0−16.4) U/L, the median CRE concentration was 76.7 (71.0–82.0) nmol/L, the median PTH concentration was 34.2 (26.0−44.4) pg/mL, and the median hsCRP concentration was 0.7 (0.2−1.4) mg/L. Only 5.5% of women claimed to have bone or joint diseases. Additionally, the genetic variant in the GC gene (rs2282679) was not associated with bone or joint diseases (data not shown).

      Parameters Median (P25P75) or N (%)
      District
      Eastern 522 (34.7)
      Center 478 (31.8)
      Western 505 (33.6)
      Latitude, N 32.3 (27.8−38.0)
      Urban 614 (40.8)
      Season
      Spring 118 (7.8)
      Autumn 774 (51.4)
      Winter 613 (40.7)
      Nationality
      Han 1,309 (87.0)
      Ethnic minorities 196 (13.0)
      Education
      Primary 375 (24.9)
      Medium 876 (58.2)
      Advanced 254 (16.9)
      Cigarette smoker 22 (1.5)
      Alcohol consumer 322 (21.4)
      High and medium intensity activity 228 (15.2)
      Bone and joint diseases/conditions 83 (5.5)
      GC rs2282679
      GG 152 (10.1)
      GT 620 (41.2)
      TT 733 (48.7)
      Age, y 30.0 (24.0−37.8)
      BMI, kg/m2 22.7 (20.3−25.1)
      ALT, U/L 12.5 (9.0−16.4)
      CRE, nmol/L 76.7 (71.0–82.0)
      Alb, g/L 53.1 (50.7−55.1)
      Corrected Ca, mmol/L 2.3 (2.2−2.4)
      P, mmol/L 1.4 (1.2−1.5)
      PTH, pg/mL 34.2 (26.0−44.4)
      hsCRP, mg/L 0.7 (0.2−1.4)
        Note. BMI, body mass index; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CRE, creatinine; Alb, albumin; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus; PTH, parathyroid hormone; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein. Spring, march to may; Autumn, september to november; Winter, december to february. Primary education, primary school and below; Medium education, junior/senior high school; Advanced education, junior college and above. High intensity activity, activity that requires considerable physical strength or can cause a significant increase in respiration or heart rate; Medium intensity activity, activity that requires a moderate amount of physical strength or can cause a slight increase in respiration or heart rate; Low intensity activity, activity that involves mainly sitting or standing. Cigarette smoker, current or former smoker; Alcohol consumers, have a history of alcohol consumption in the past year.

      Table 1.  Characteristics of the study population (n = 1,505)

    • The median 25(OH)D was 16.63 (11.96–22.55) ng/mL, and significant differences were observed between the subgroups, including district, latitude, regional type, season, age, and genotypes. A lower 25(OH)D concentration was found in the western, northern, and urban areas. Women aged 18–25 years or examined in winter had significantly lower 25(OH)D concentrations than the other age or season groups. In addition, the 25(OH)D concentration in individuals carrying the GG genotype at rs2282679 was much lower than that in individuals carrying the TT genotype. By contrast, no statistical differences were found between the nationality, education, BMI, lifestyle subgroups. The serum 25(OH)D concentration was also found to be unassociated with bone and joint diseases/ conditions. The median OC, β-CTX, and P1NP concentrations were 17.23 (13.82–21.36), 0.40 (0.29–0.52), and 52.82 (40.08–68.40) ng/mL, respectively. All these three BTMs were found to be significantly different between the age and BMI groups. OC, and P1NP concentrations were much higher in participants with bone or joint diseases (Table 2).

      Parameters N (%) 25(OH)D (ng/mL) OC (ng/mL) β−CTX (ng/mL) P1NP (ng/mL)
      Median (P25P75) P1 Median (P25P75) P2 Median (P25P75) P3 Median (P25P75) P4
      District
      Eastern 522
      (34.7)
      18.07
      (12.94−24.20)*
      < 0.001 16.96
      (13.76−20.70)
      0.412 0.39
      (0.29−0.50)
      0.431 51.74
      (39.71−65.57)
      0.198
      Central 478
      (31.8)
      15.84
      (11.58−21.75)
      17.39
      (13.85−21.47)
      0.40
      (0.29−0.53)
      52.67
      (39.84−68.64)
      Western 505
      (33.6)
      15.86
      (11.33−21.19)
      17.34
      (13.90−21.98)
      0.40
      (0.30−0.53)
      53.13
      (40.58−71.94)
      Latitude
      ≥ 33 °N 710
      (47.2)
      12.75
      (9.89−16.67)
      < 0.001 17.02
      (13.77−21.18)
      0.179 0.40
      (0.30−0.51)
      0.656 52.08
      (39.86−66.22)
      0.076
      < 33 °N 795
      (52.8)
      20.63
      (15.92−25.42)
      17.64
      (13.94−21.62)
      0.40
      (0.29−0.53)
      53.56
      (40.41−70.21)
      Regional type
      Urban 614
      (40.8)
      15.24
      (11.40−20.88)
      < 0.001 17.47
      (14.17−20.81)
      0.536 0.41
      (0.30−0.50)
      0.878 54.34
      (41.92−66.93)
      0.455
      Rural 891
      (59.2)
      17.61
      (12.55−23.87)
      17.15
      (13.65−22.10)
      0.39
      (0.29−0.54)
      51.70
      (39.22−70.18)
      Season
      Spring 118
      (7.8)
      16.16
      (11.83−21.83)
      < 0.001 17.65
      (14.30−21.90)
      0.410 0.41
      (0.28−0.54)
      0.165 55.11
      (39.40−70.61)
      0.560
      Autumn 774
      (51.4)
      17.60
      (12.79−23.39)
      17.28
      (13.73−21.00)
      0.39
      (0.29−0.51)
      52.59
      (39.88−67.72)
      Winter 613
      (40.7)
      15.42
      (11.17−21.63)a
      17.19
      (13.88−21.56)
      0.40
      (0.30−0.54)
      52.31
      (40.53−68.96)
      Nationality
      Han 1,309
      (87.0)
      16.63
      (12.24−22.29)
      0.542 17.32
      (13.89−21.18)
      0.876 0.40
      (0.30−0.52)
      0.688 53.00
      (40.54−68.04)
      0.319
      Ethnic minorities 196
      (13.0)
      16.72
      (10.60−24.03)
      16.82
      (13.26−23.40)
      0.39
      (0.28−0.54)
      51.15
      (36.50−72.20)
      Education
      Primary 375
      (24.9)
      16.46
      (11.68−22.27)
      0.286 17.21
      (13.91−21.24)
      0.791 0.40
      (0.30−0.52)
      0.967 52.82
      (40.58−68.86)
      0.930
      Medium 876
      (58.2)
      16.88
      (12.27−23.04)
      17.26
      (13.74−21.31)
      0.40
      (0.29−0.52)
      53.03
      (39.90−68.27)
      Advanced 254
      (16.9)
      16.39
      (11.99−21.89)
      17.25
      (14.06−21.80)
      0.40
      (0.29−0.52)
      52.02
      (39.24−68.52)
      Age (years)
      18−25 492
      (32.7)
      15.78
      (11.65−20.90)b
      0.016 20.08
      (16.72−23.32)*
      < 0.001 0.48
      (0.39−0.58)*
      < 0.001 63.91
      (51.74−77.31)*
      < 0.001
      25−35 519
      (34.5)
      16.66
      (12.11−22.81)
      16.74
      (13.94−20.52)*
      0.39
      (0.29−0.50)*
      50.93
      (39.01−65.61)*
      35−45 494
      (32.8)
      17.31
      (12.40−23.44)
      15.21
      (12.30−18.53)*
      0.33
      (0.25−0.42)*
      44.71
      (35.57−55.65)*
      BMI (kg/m2)
      < 18.5 136
      (9.0)
      16.18
      (11.94−22.09)
      0.799 19.62
      (15.58−23.52)*
      < 0.001 0.47
      (0.33−0.56)
      < 0.001 60.84
      (44.25−74.46)
      < 0.001
      18.5−24 837
      (55.6)
      16.75
      (12.07−22.96)
      17.69
      (14.26−21.76)*
      0.41
      (0.30−0.52)
      54.15
      (40.57−69.80)
      24−28 379
      (25.2)
      16.26
      (11.96−22.95)
      16.25
      (13.36−20.37)c,d
      0.37
      (0.28−0.50)c,d
      49.54
      (36.93−63.03)c,d
      ≥ 28 153
      (10.2)
      16.81
      (11.79−20.85)
      16.13
      (12.88−18.88)e,f
      0.37
      (0.27−0.48)e,f
      48.55
      (39.46−63.04)e
      Cigarette smoker
      Yes 22
      (1.5)
      15.93
      (11.78−21.12)
      0.853 17.68
      (15.29−26.48)
      0.298 0.44
      (0.32−0.58)
      0.479 58.15
      (43.25−71.77)
      0.279
      No 1483
      (98.5)
      16.64
      (11.96−22.60)
      17.23
      (13.80−21.33)
      0.40
      (0.29−0.52)
      52.66
      (39.94−68.37)
      Alcohol consumer
      Yes 322
      (21.4)
      16.73
      (12.01−22.41)
      0.895 17.22
      (13.84−21.25)
      0.775 0.40
      (0.29−0.52)
      0.932 52.86
      (40.77−68.90)
      0.690
      No 1183
      (78.6)
      16.59
      (11.93−22.61)
      17.24
      (13.80−21.43)
      0.40
      (0.29−0.52)
      52.79
      (39.82−68.34)
      Exercise
      Yes 228
      (15.2)
      15.48
      (11.85−20.83)
      0.091 17.18
      (14.66−21.10)
      0.983 0.42
      (0.3−0.51)
      0.720 55.77
      (42.04−68.02)
      0.253
      No 1277
      (84.8)
      16.77
      (12.00−22.85)
      17.27
      (13.76−21.48)
      0.40
      (0.29−0.52)
      52.00
      (39.77−68.67)
      Bone and joint diseases 0.679 0.026 0.068 0.040
      Yes 83
      (5.5)
      16.47
      (12.57−23.28)
      15.24
      (13.21−19.33)
      0.36
      (0.28−0.47)
      48.81
      (36.48−60.58)
      No 1422
      (94.5)
      16.65
      (11.90−22.54)
      17.34
      (13.90−21.39)
      0.40
      (0.29−0.52)
      53.16
      (40.10−68.74)
      GC rs2282679
      GG 152
      (10.1)
      14.11
      (10.68−18.91)*
      < 0.001 16.69
      (13.48−21.03)
      0.478 0.38
      (0.29−0.48)
      0.193 51.68
      (38.22−68.36)
      0.356
      GT 620
      (41.2)
      16.15
      (11.87−21.15)*
      17.49
      (13.92−21.83)
      0.41
      (0.29−0.54)
      53.34
      (40.78−69.10)
      TT 733
      (48.7)
      17.73
      (12.54−23.89)*
      17.17
      (13.77−21.35)
      0.40
      (0.29−0.52)
      52.40
      (39.85−67.59)
      All 1505
      (100.00)
      16.63
      (11.96−22.55)
      17.23
      (13.82−21.36)
      0.40
      (0.29−0.52)
      52.82
      (40.08−68.40)
        Note. *Compared with other groups; a: autumn vs. winter; b: 18−25 years vs. 35−45 years; c and d: 24−28 kg/m2 vs. < 18.5 and 18.5−24 kg/m2; e and f: ≥ 28 kg/m2 vs. < 18.5 and 18.5−24 kg/m2, P < 0.05. 25(OH)D, 25−hydroxyvitamin D; OC, osteocalcin; β−CTX, β−CrossLaps of type 1 collagen containing cross−linked C−telopeptide; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N−terminal propeptide; BMI, body mass index. Spring, March to May; Autumn, September to November; Winter, December to February. Primary education, primary school and below; Medium education, junior/senior high school; Advanced education, junior college and above. Exercise, high intensity activity plus medium intensity activity. High intensity activity, activity that requires considerable physical strength or can cause a significant increase in respiration or heart rate; Medium intensity activity, activity that requires a moderate amount of physical strength or can cause a slight increase in respiration or heart rate.

      Table 2.  Serum 25(OH)D, OC, β−CTX, and P1NP levels of the study population (medians [P25P75])

    • In this study, we stratified the 25(OH)D status according to the existing domestic vitamin D deficiency screening standards[30]. As shown in Table 3, 25.18% of the women displayed low serum 25(OH)D (< 12 ng/mL). After adjusting for district, latitude, regional type, season, nationality, education, smoking, drinking, exercise, bone and joint disease/conditions, age, BMI, corrected Ca, P, PTH, CRE, ALT, and hsCRP, β-CTX was much higher in the < 12 ng/mL group compared with the ≥ 30 ng/mL group (P = 0.048). However, no OC and P1NP differences were found between between different 25(OH)D concentrations (P > 0.05).

      25(OH)D concentrations
      (ng/mL)
      N (%) OC (ng/mL) β−CTX (ng/mL) P1NP (ng/mL)
      β (95% CI) P β (95% CI) P β (95% CI) P
      < 12 379 (25.18) 1.510 (−0.280, 3.301) 0.098 0.055 (0.0004, 0.109) 0.048 4.720 (−2.059, 11.500) 0.172
      12−20 601 (39.93) 1.111 (−0.540, 2.762) 0.187 0.044 (−0.006, 0.094) 0.086 6.081 (−1.170, 12.332) 0.057
      20−30 437 (29.04) 1.148 (−0.449, 2.746) 0.159 0.045 (−0.003, 0.094) 0.067 5.223 (−0.827, 11.272) 0.091
      ≥ 30 88 (5.85) 0 0 0
        Note. Vitamin D deficiency: 25(OH)D < 12 ng/mL; Vitamin D insufficiency: 25(OH)D 12−20 ng/mL; Vitamin D sufficiency (recommended by the Institute of Medicine): 25(OH)D ≥ 20 ng/mL; Vitamin D sufficiency(recommended by the Endocrine Society): 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL. 25(OH)D, 25−hydroxyvitamin D; OC, osteocalcin; β−CTX, β−CrossLaps of type 1 collagen containing cross−linked C−telopeptide; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N−terminal propeptide; OC, β−CTX and P1NP was adjusted for district, latitude, regional type, season, nationality, education, smoking, drinking, exercise, bone and joint disease/conditions, age, BMI, corrected Ca, P, PTH, CRE, ALT, and hsCRP. BMI, body mass index; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus; PTH, parathyroid hormone; CRE, creatinine; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; hsCRP, high sensitivity C−reactive protein.

      Table 3.  Relationship with bone turnover markers and different 25(OH)D concentrations by generalized linear model

    • Figure 1 shows the unadjusted and adjusted LOESS scatter plots of the non-linear relationships of serum 25(OH)D with BTMs. These non-linear relationships were more pronounced after adjusting for confounding factors.

      Figure 1.  LOESS of unadjusted and adjusted relationships between 25(OH)D and BTMs: y–OC, β-CTX or P1NP, x–unadjusted or adjusted 25(OH)D. (A), (C), and (E): serum 25(OH)D was unadjusted. (B), (D), and (F): serum 25(OH)D and BTMs were adjusted for district, latitude, regional type, season, nationality, education, smoking, drinking, exercise, bone and joint disease status, age, BMI, corrected Ca, P, PTH, CRE, ALT, and hsCRP. 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; BTMs, bone turnover markers; OC, osteocalcin; β-CTX, β-CrossLaps of type 1 collagen containing cross-linked C-telopeptide; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide; BMI, body mass index; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus; PTH, parathyroid hormone; CRE, creatinine; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein.

    • Figure 2 gives the exact cutoffs by the SR model. In the unadjusted models, the first cutoff for all endpoints ranged from 9.26 to 11.92 ng/mL and the second cutoff was from 15.20 to 25.12 ng/mL. In the adjusted models, one optimal 25(OH)D inflection point was estimated for each BTM. The adjusted 25(OH)D cutoffs for OC, β-CTX, and P1NP were 14.04 (12.84–15.23), 13.94 (12.49–15.39), and 13.87 (12.37–15.37) ng/mL, respectively.

      Figure 2.  Cutoffs of unadjusted and adjusted 25(OH)D in view of BTMs: y–OC, β-CTX or P1NP, x–unadjusted or adjusted 25(OH)D; (A), (C), and (E): serum 25(OH)D was unadjusted. (B), (D), and (F): serum 25(OH)D and BTMs were adjusted for district, latitude, regional type, season, nationality, education, smoking, drinking, exercise, bone and joint disease status, age, BMI, corrected Ca, P, PTH, CRE, ALT, and hsCRP. 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; BTMs, bone turnover markers; OC, osteocalcin; β-CTX, β-CrossLaps of type 1 collagen containing cross-linked C-telopeptide; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide; BMI, body mass index; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus; PTH, parathyroid hormone; CRE, creatinine; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein.

    • Figure 3 gives the exact 25(OH)D cutoffs after adjustment by the SR model for different allele carriers. The cutoff in women with the G allele for all endpoints ranged from 11.85–12.30 ng/mL. In women with the T allele, the cutoffs were also observed, ranging from 12.75 to 13.05 ng/mL.

      Figure 3.  Cutoffs of unadjusted and adjusted 25(OH)D in view of BTMs: y–OC, β-CTX or P1NP, x–unadjusted or adjusted 25(OH)D; (A), (C), and (E): serum 25(OH)D was unadjusted. (B), (D), and (F): serum 25(OH)D was adjusted for district, latitude, regional type, season, nationality, education, smoking, drinking, exercise, bone and joint disease status, age, BMI, corrected Ca, P, PTH, and hsCRP. Each BTM was adjusted for district, latitude, regional type, season, bone and joint disease/conditions, age, BMI, corrected Ca, P, PTH, CRE, ALT, and hsCRP. 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; BTMs, bone turnover markers; OC, osteocalcin; β-CTX, β-CrossLaps of type 1 collagen containing cross-linked C-telopeptide; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide; BMI, body mass index; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus; PTH, parathyroid hormone; CRE, creatinine; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein.

    • Unadjusted and adjusted analyses by the SR models for associations between 25(OH)D concentration and BTMs in participants with 25(OH)D concentration below and above the cutoffs are presented in Table 4. In the unadjusted models, OC and β-CTX were negatively associated with 25(OH)D below the first cutoffs, while statistically significant associations were also observed for β-CTX and P1NP above the second cutoffs. After adjustment, lower 25(OH)D concentrations were associated with increased BTMs below the cutoffs. Above the 25(OH)D cutoffs, BTMs plateaued. Carriers of the G allele and T allele showed similar results. In addition, the cutoff values of G allele carriers, where BTMs began to plateau, were slightly lower than that of T allele carriers.

      Unadjusted and adjusted BTMsBelow cutoff 1 β (95% CI)Cutoff 1Above cutoff 1 β (95% CI)Cutoff 2Above cutoff 2 β (95% CI)
      Total−unadjusted
      OC −0.45 (−0.80, −0.10) 11.92 0.32 (−0.61, 1.26) 15.20 −0.06 (−0.15, 0.03)
      β−CTX −0.02 (−0.05,−0.002) 9.33 0.0016 (−0.0014, 0.0047) 25.12 −0.009 (−0.015, −0.002)
      P1NP −2.44 (−5.32,0.42) 9.26 1.24 (−0.15, 2.64) 15.57 −0.53 (−0.88, −0.18)
      Total−adjusted
      OC −0.50 (−0.72, −0.28) 14.04 0.03 (−0.02, 0.07)
      β−CTX −0.01 (−0.02, −0.007) 13.94 −0.0003 (−0.002, 0.001)
      P1NP −31.69 (−2.711, −0.660) 13. 87 0.142 (−0.060, 0.345)
      G allele−adjusted
      OC −0.74 (−1.30, −0.18) 12.30 −0.005 (−0.08, 0.07)
      β−CTX −0.02 (−0.04, −0.0005) 12.23 0.0003 (−0.002, 0.003)
      P1NP −3.07 (−5.41, −20.74) 11.85 −0.03 (−0.28, 0.21)
      T allele−adjusted
      OC −0.87 (−1.13, −0.51) 12.75 0.007 (−0.04, 0.05)
      β−CTX −0.02 (−0.03, −0.011) 13.05 0.001 (−0.003, 0.0002)
      P1NP −2.80 (−4.29, −1.32) 12.81 −0.02 (−0.21, 0.18)
        Note. Serum 25(OH)D and BTMs were adjusted for district, latitude, regional type, season, nationality, education, smoking, drinking, exercise, bone and joint disease status, age, BMI, corrected Ca, P, PTH, CRE, ALT, and hsCRP. 25(OH)D, 25−hydroxyvitamin D; BTMs, bone turnover markers; OC, osteocalcin; β−CTX, β−CrossLaps of type 1 collagen containing cross−linked C−telopeptide; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N−terminal propeptide; BMI, body mass index; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus; PTH, parathyroid hormone; CRE, creatinine; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; hsCRP, high sensitivity C−reactive protein.

      Table 4.  Associations between serum 25(OH)D concentration and BTMs below and above the unadjusted and adjusted cutoffs of 25(OH)D

    • To further validate the clinical significance of the above thresholds, we also analyzed the associations between BTMs, PTH and calcium phosphorus ratio at different vitamin D levels (based on 13.87 ng/mL) by generalized linear model. Table 5 showed that when 25(OH)D ≥ 13.87 ng/mL, P1NP was negatively associated with calcium phosphorus ratio (P = 0.045).

      BTMs for different 25(OH)D status Calcium phosphorus ratio
      β (95% CI) P
      OC
      25(OH)D < 13.87 ng/mL −0.284 (−0.916, 0.348) 0.378
      25(OH)D ≥ 13.87 ng/mL −0.010 (−0.022, 0.002) 0.090
      β−CTX
      25(OH)D < 13.87 ng/mL −0.016 (−0.034, 0.002) 0.075
      25(OH)D ≥ 13.87 ng/mL −0.302 (−0.674, 0.070) 0.111
      P1NP
      25(OH)D < 13.87 ng/mL −1.660 (−3.896, 0.575) 0.146
      25(OH)D ≥ 13.87 ng/mL −1.496 (−2.960, −0.032) 0.045
      PTH
      25(OH)D < 13.87 ng/mL 1.148 (−0.462, 2.758) 0.162
      25(OH)D ≥ 13.87 ng/mL 0.448 (−0.364, 1.259) 0.280
        Note. BTMs were adjusted for district, latitude, regional type, season, nationality, education, smoking, drinking, exercise, bone and joint disease status, age, BMI, 25(OH)D, PTH, CRE, ALT, and hsCRP. PTH was adjusted for district, latitude, regional type, season, nationality, education, smoking, drinking, exercise, bone and joint disease status, age, BMI, 25(OH)D, OC, β-CTX, P1NP, CRE, ALT, and hsCRP. 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; BTMs, bone turnover markers; OC, osteocalcin; β-CTX, β-CrossLaps of type 1 collagen containing cross-linked C-telopeptide; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide; BMI, body mass index; PTH, parathyroid hormone; CRE, creatinine; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein.

      Table 5.  Associations between serum calcium phosphorus ratio and BTMs below and above the 25(OH)D cutoff by generalized linear model

    • Accumulating evidence has defined vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency based on changes in indicators associated with bone metabolism and increased risk of numerous diseases, but the optimal 25(OH)D concentration remains a considerably debated topic. Our previous research has applied PTH to investigate the sufficient threshold of serum 25(OH)D for women of childbearing age[31]. Because PTH may fluctuate with dietary Ca intake[32,33], renal function[34], or physical activity[35], the thresholds of 25(OH)D obtained from the existing researches varied widely (from 10 to 50 ng/mL)[20] and some studies even did not find such thresholds[18,36,37]. Given that BTMs respond rapidly to changes in skeletal physiology[17], when vitamin D is insufficient, it is possible for BTMs to react quickly to serum 25(OH)D changes. Therefore, in this study, we also analyzed the nonlinear relationship between 25(OH)D and BTMs, and the Threshold of Serum 25(OH)D in Terms of BTMs.

      In our study, the prevalence of bone and joint diseases/conditions (including arthritis, fracture, and other diseases associated with the bone or joint) was low (5.5%) and the prevalence of osteomalacia was not known. Therefore, we did not apply such outcome indicators to investigate the appropriate threshold of vitamin D. To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the threshold-effect associations of serum 25(OH)D on BTMs (including OC, β-CTX, and P1NP) in Chinese women of childbearing age. After adjustment, significant cutoffs of serum 25(OH)D concentrations for BTMs were observed, ranging from 13.87 to 14.04 ng/mL. Below these cutoffs, lower 25(OH)D concentrations were associated with increased BTMs, while above them, BTMs plateaued. Moreover, when 25(OH)D ≥ 13.87 ng/mL, P1NP was negatively associated with calcium phosphorus ratio. These results suggested that serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 13.35 ng/mL were insufficient to maintain bone remodeling. The results of this cross-sectional study confirmed those of other studies. For example, a study of Chinese men (20–89 years) reported that LOESS plots between serum 25(OH)D and BTMs (including β-CTX, OC, and P1NP) showed plateau concentrations of BTMs and these plateaus began when 25(OH)D approached 30 ng/mL[22]. Similarly, the BTMs also showed plateauing results in healthy Malaysian adults (18–50 years) at a 25(OH)D concentration of 35 nmol/L (14 ng/mL) for CTX and 20 nmol/L (8 ng/mL) for P1NP[21]. In addition, a 25(OH)D threshold of approximately 40 nmol/L (16 ng/mL) for OC in the old population in the Netherlands was also found[18]. From these results, it can be assumed that appropriate 25(OH)D concentrations are capable of maintaining bone remodeling. Naturally, there are some differences in the cutoff values in these studies, and even some studies of women (including postmenopausal women) have not found similar results[19,22]. We proposed that this might be associated with race, age, sex, and BTMs differences.

      To date, the statistical methods to estimate the 25(OH)D cutoff value were mainly based on the LOESS. Therefore, we investigated the potential thresholds of serum 25(OH)D in terms of BTMs first by this typical method at the beginning. Because the serum 25(OH)D concentration was significantly different between the district, regional type, latitude, season, and age groups in this study. BMI was proved to have an independent influence on 25(OH)D concentrations in our previous study for the same population[38]. Additionally, studies reported that age[39], season[40], blood Ca[41], and the inflammatory processes[42] were involved in bone remodeling and supplementation with vitamin D appeared to suppress bone turnover possibly mediated by PTH reduction[43]. Subsequently, we performed the LOESS for the visual assessment of the associations of serum 25(OH)D with BTMs after adjusting for district, regional type, latitude, season, age, BMI, hsCRP, PTH, and Alb-corrected Ca, among others for both 25(OH)D and BTM. A potential cutoff for each BTM was observed after adjustment. Because the LOESS method could not accurately obtain the cutoff, we applied another method, the SR approach combined with NLS, which could not only provide an excellent approximation of the LOESS curve, but also estimate the exact thresholds and assess the degree of the change in slope before and after the thresholds simultaneously[29,44]. Therefore, in our study, the three two methods of LOESS, NLS, and SR were applied in combination with or without adjustment.

      Consequently, the SR model results showed that BTMs decreased significantly and then entered plateau with the increase of 25(OH)D. The cutoff of the adjusted serum 25(OH)D in relation to the adjusted OC, β-CTX, and P1NP by NLS was 14.04, 13.94, and 13. 87 ng/mL, respectively. This indicated that all the three BTMs plateaued when serum 25(OH)D concentration was > 14.04 ng/mL. This threshold was lower than the sufficient range (14.22–18.06 ng/mL) of 25(OH)D to maintain PTH at a plateau, which was obtained from our previous study[31]. Additionally, the cut-point was similar to two other studies for middle-aged women (36–57 years) in Australia and healthy adults (18–50 years) in Malaysia, which showed that serum 25(OH)D concentrations of 13.2[44] and 14[21] ng/mL, respectively, were required for optimal musculoskeletal health. Though the cutoff was much lower than the threshold for vitamin D sufficiency (20 ng/mL), as recommended by the Institute of Medicine[45], we believed that this result was quite reasonable. Because the median 25(OH)D concentration (16.63 ng/mL) of the study population, which was close to the result of a meta-analysis on adult 25(OH)D status (mean: 17.72 ng/mL) in mainland China[46], was much lower than that in South America and the Middle East (≥ 24 ng/mL)[47]. However, because studies on the 25(OH)D threshold are limited in Chinese women of childbearing women, whether these values are the thresholds for determining vitamin D deficiency or sufficiency needs to be further studied by combining other outcomes. Vitamin D binding protein, encoded by the GC gene, is the main carrier of vitamin D. Furthermore, GC gene polymorphism is closely associated with vitamin D status[48,49]. In our previous study for the same population, serum 25(OH)D concentration was reported to be strongly associated with GC rs2282679 genotypes. As a preliminary study, we also found that the cutoff values of G allele carriers, where BTMs began to level off, were slightly lower than that of T allele carriers. The result indicated that individuals carrying the G allele were able to maintain normal bone remodeling at a lower serum 25(OH)D level for this study population with a low prevalence of bone diseases.

      The strengths of our study are that, we measured serum 25(OH)D based on the gold standard reference measurement procedures and certified reference materials from the National Institute for Standards and Technology, and we analyzed the nonlinear relationships between serum BTMs and 25(OH)D by adjusting the possible confounders in women of childbearing age based on a national representative database. Furthermore, we used a combination of LOESS and SR to estimate the cutoffs for the whole population and different allele carriers. The limitations are as follows: 1) Due to the lack of both general vitamin D data in our food composition table and complete sunlight exposure information, the effects of vitamin D intake and sunlight exposure on serum 25(OH)D and bone markers could not be accessed in this study; 2) We only analyzed the cutoffs for one gene locus, and further genetic factors should be considered; 3) Because this study is cross-sectional, it is insufficient to be able to draw a conclusion about the threshold of serum 25(OH)D.

    • For Chinese women of childbearing age in this study, low serum 25(OH)D concentrations were associated with increased BTMs. Through the nonlinear regression, the cutoffs of serum 25(OH)D were observed when the BTMs entered the plateau stage, which implicated that serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 13.35 ng/mL in women of childbearing age had adverse influences on maintaining bone remodeling. Additionally, women with the GC rs2282679 G allele had a lower cutoff than those with the T allele. These results provided useful references for investigating the thresholds of vitamin D deficiency or sufficiency in women of childbearing age as well as pregnant women. However, further studies including cohort studies and randomized controlled trials with more endpoints are still needed to verify the threshold-effect associations of 25(OH)D on BTMs.

Reference (49)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return