Genetic Characteristics of Lipooligosaccharide and Capsular Polysaccharide of Campylobacter jejuni from Different Sources in China

WANG Jia Qi CHEN Xiao Li ZHOU Gui Lan WANG Hai Rui GU Yi Xin ZHANG Jian Zhong SHAO Zhu Jun ZHANG Mao Jun

WANG Jia Qi, CHEN Xiao Li, ZHOU Gui Lan, WANG Hai Rui, GU Yi Xin, ZHANG Jian Zhong, SHAO Zhu Jun, ZHANG Mao Jun. Genetic Characteristics of Lipooligosaccharide and Capsular Polysaccharide of Campylobacter jejuni from Different Sources in China[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 1106-1114. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.140
Citation: WANG Jia Qi, CHEN Xiao Li, ZHOU Gui Lan, WANG Hai Rui, GU Yi Xin, ZHANG Jian Zhong, SHAO Zhu Jun, ZHANG Mao Jun. Genetic Characteristics of Lipooligosaccharide and Capsular Polysaccharide of Campylobacter jejuni from Different Sources in China[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 1106-1114. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.140

doi: 10.3967/bes2022.140

Genetic Characteristics of Lipooligosaccharide and Capsular Polysaccharide of Campylobacter jejuni from Different Sources in China

Funds: This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFC2301000] and the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen [SZSM201803081]
More Information
    Author Bio:

    WANG Jia Qi, male, born in 1986, PhD, majoring in prevention and control of infectious diseases

    Corresponding author: ZHANG Mao Jun, PhD, E-mail: zhangmaojun@icdc.cn
  • All authors contributed substantially to the study. ZHANG Mao Jun, ZHANG Jian Zhong, and SHAO Zhu Jun designed, supervised and oversaw the study; WANG Jia Qi, CHEN Xiao Li, ZHOU Gui Lan, and WANG Hai Rui analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; GU Yi Xin isolated and identified the strains; ZHANG Mao Jun revised the manuscript and supported this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  • Availability: Shell scripts for identifying specific serotype sequences are available from the authors upon request.
    • 关键词:
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  
    All authors contributed substantially to the study. ZHANG Mao Jun, ZHANG Jian Zhong, and SHAO Zhu Jun designed, supervised and oversaw the study; WANG Jia Qi, CHEN Xiao Li, ZHOU Gui Lan, and WANG Hai Rui analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; GU Yi Xin isolated and identified the strains; ZHANG Mao Jun revised the manuscript and supported this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
    Availability: Shell scripts for identifying specific serotype sequences are available from the authors upon request.
    注释:
    1) AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS: 2) CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: 3) CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
  • Figure  1.  Distribution of different CPS types in strains from different sources: The CPS genotype for each strain was determined based on the different serospecific sequences. The top five CPS types were HS2 (90 strains, 20.1%), HS4c (70 strains, 15.6%), HS5/31 (40 strains, 8.9%), HS19 (35 strains, 7.8%), and HS8/17 (28 strains, 6.3%), which accounted for 58.7% (263/448) of the tested strains. CPS, capsular polysaccharide

    Figure  2.  Newly confirmed LOS classes (CDC11–CDC19) OrthoMCL was used to cluster all LOS genes into orthologous and paralogous groups and visualized in Geneious software. Arrows represent orthologues and paralogues. Numbers are orthologue ID numbers, and “N” are paralogues. (Supplementary Table S3 available in www.besjournal.com). LOS, lipooligosaccharide.

    Figure  3.  Schematic of CPS loci from HS2/HS19/HS41 and polymorphism distribution: OrthoMCL was used to cluster all CPS genes into orthologous and paralogous groups and visualized in Geneious software. Arrows represent orthologues and paralogues. Numbers are orthologue IDs, and “N” are paralogues. (Supplementary Table S4 available in www.besjournal.com) The different coloured dots represent gene polymorphism types. CPS: capsular polysaccharide.

    S1.   The accession numbers for CPS gene clusters of C. jejuni

    CPS typesAccession number
    HS1BX545859
    HS2AL111168.1
    HS3HQ343268
    HS4cHQ343269
    HS5/31KT868847
    HS6/S7NC_009839
    HS8/17HQ343270
    HS9KT868844
    HS10HQ343271
    HS11KT868845
    HS12KT868848
    HS15/31/58HQ343272
    HS18KT932997
    HS19BX545860
    HS21KT868849
    HS22KT893439
    HS23/36BX545858
    HS27KT893437
    HS29KT868846
    HS32KT893435
    HS33/35KT893436
    HS37KT893431
    HS38KT893430
    HS40KT893434
    HS41BX545857
    HS42HQ343274
    HS44JF496678
    HS45/5/32/60KT893432
    HS52KT893429
    HS53CP000025.1
    HS55KT893433
    HS57KT893428
    HS58/32KT893427
    HS60KT893426
    HS63KT893438
    下载: 导出CSV

    S2.   The accession numbers for LOS gene clusters of C. jejuni

    LOS classAccession number
    AAF215659
    BAF401528
    CAF400047
    DAF400669
    EAJ131360
    FAY423554
    GAY436358
    HAY800272
    IEU404107
    JEU404104
    KAY573819
    LEU404111
    MEF140720
    NAY816330
    OEF143352
    PAY943308
    QEU404112
    RAY962325
    SEU404110
    TAIOC00000000
    UAIOU00000000
    VAIOP00000000
    WCP001900
    CDC1-10reference[24]
    CDC11-19In this study
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  1.   Primers and probes for real-time PCR detection of HS2, HS19, and HS41

    Capsular typePrimers and probesNucleotide sequence (5’ to 3’)
    HS2HS2-FAACCAACCATCCACTATTTTCATCT
    HS2-RACTCTTTGATTTTCCAATGCAATGTT
    HS2-PFAM-CGCACCTTCCAATGCAACCAAAGAGC-BHQ1
    HS19HS19-FCTGAAATATCAACACAGGGAAAATG
    HS19-RTGTTGGAGGTAAAAGACATGGTG
    HS19-PHEX-TCCAATCCTGTTGCTCATAACGCATTCA-BHQ1
    HS41HS41-FCACCCTGATTTCTATTAACTCTACCAC
    HS41-RGAGTTATTCTTGATGCTGAAAATGGA
    HS41-PCY5-AAACGGGATAAGATCGCTTGGGGGAATA-BHQ2
      Note. PCR, Polymerase chain reaction.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  2.   The distribution of the LOS classes in strains from different sources

    LOS classDiarrhoea
    patients
    GBS
    patients
    LivestockPoultryIn total
    (%)
    A33915461 (12.35)
    B7302741141 (28.54)
    C19071036 (7.29)
    D00011 (0.20)
    E30317 (1.42)
    F916218 (3.64)
    G1000212 (2.43)
    H2412431 (6.28)
    I00202 (0.40)
    J20002 (0.40)
    K50038 (1.62)
    M00011 (0.20)
    O20002 (0.40)
    P2122833 (6.68)
    R1001415 (3.04)
    S50319 (1.82)
    T10012 (0.40)
    V10124 (0.81)
    W4001014 (2.83)
    CDC11011113 (2.63)
    CDC21200214 (2.83)
    CDC330014 (0.81)
    CDC450005 (1.01)
    CDC51800523 (4.66)
    CDC62011417 (3.44)
    CDC700011 (0.20)
    CDC830003 (0.61)
    CDC900011 (0.20)
    CDC1010023 (0.61)
    CDC1100011 (0.20)
    CDC1220013 (0.61)
    CDC1300011 (0.20)
    CDC1400011 (0.20)
    CDC1500011 (0.20)
    CDC1600011 (0.20)
    CDC1700011 (0.02)
    CDC1800011 (0.02)
    CDC1900011 (0.02)
      Note. LOS, lipooligosaccharide, GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  3.   Distribution characteristics of CPS/LOS types for 494 isolates of C. jejuni from China

    CPS typesNumLOS classes (Num)Proportion of strains
    possessed sialic acid
    synthesis genes in LOS (%)a
    HS121B (8), C (10), F (1), V (1), CDC15 (1)90.5
    HS290A (21), B (54), H (1), P (6), R (4), CDC6 (2), CDC8 (2)90.0
    HS4c70A (2), B (35), C (2), G (2), H (20), O (2), P (1), R (5), V (1)64.3
    HS5/3140A (2), B (24), D (1), F (3), K (6), V (1), CDC10 (3)67.5
    HS6/712E (6), T (1), CDC1 (4), CDC5 (1)0
    HS8/1728B (1), C (17), G (7), V (1), CDC13 (1), CDC18 (1)67.9
    HS918CDC5 (18)0
    HS1011B (11)100
    HS1112F (12)0
    HS1221W (8), CDC2 (13)61.9
    HS1512G (1), H (2), P (5), CDC3 (4)0
    HS188T (1), CDC4 (5), CDC7 (1), CDC17 (1)0
    HS1935A (33), R (1), CDC11 (1)100
    HS214W (4)0
    HS23/363P (2), W (1)0
    HS323CDC6 (3)0
    HS3717P (17)0
    HS403B (1), H (1), M (1)66.7
    HS418A (3), R (4), CDC2 (1)100
    HS423C (1), K (1), W (1)33.3
    HS448C (4), F (1), I (2), K (1)50.0
    HS522B (1), CDC9 (1)/
    HS5316F (1), J (2), S (9), CDC5 (3), CDC6 (1)0
    HS551E (1)/
    HS571H (1)/
    HS601CDC19 (1)/
    ND46B (6), C (2), G (2), H (6), P (2), R (1), CDC1 (9),
    CDC5 (1), CDC6 (11), CDC8 (1),
    CDC12 (3), CDC14 (1), CDC16 (1)
    21.7
    In total494/56.5
      Note. aLOS classes A, B, C, M, R, V, CDC2, CDC8, CDC11, CDC15, CDC16, or CDC19. LOS: lipooligosaccharide; CPS: capsular polysaccharide.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  4.   Genetic variation in the same CPS types

    StrainsCPS typePhenotypic serotypeSequence identity to reference (%)Polymorphisms in ORFsSense mutations in ORFs
    HB_CJGB_LXCHS19HS19100//
    HB-CJGB-ZBHS19HS19100//
    HBJ_CJGB_96G25HS19HS1999.991 SNP (30)/
    BJ-CJGB96114HS19HS1999.991 SNP (30)/
    NH_A12HS19HS1998.0185 SNPs (1, 2, 3, 16, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 77, 78 and a noncoding region); 1 deletion (3); 1 insertion (in a noncoding region)56 substitutions (1, 2, 3, 16, 27, 28
    , 29, 30, 31, 32, 78); 1 deletion (3)
    NH_F47HS41HS4198.9208 SNPs (1, 2, 3, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 22, 28, 42, 43, 46, 47, 48, 59, 61, 87 and three noncoding regions); 6 deletions (3, 10, 16, 46, 47, 59); 4 insertions (2, 28, 46, and one noncoding region)99 substitutions (1, 2, 3, 14, 15, 16, 20, 22, 28, 42, 43, 46, 47, 48, 61, 87); 2 extensions (3, 46, 47); 7 frame shifts (3, 10, 16, 42, 46, 47, 59); 2 insertions (2, 28)
    ICDCCJ07004HS41NTa99.911 SNPs (3, 42, 46, 61, 87 and a noncoding region); 1 insertion (46);
    7 deletions (3, 10, 16, 46, 47, 59, 87)
    8 substitutions (3, 42, 46, 61, 87); 1 truncation (46); 2 extensions (3, 46); 7 frame shifts (3, 10, 16, 46, 47, 59, 87)
      Note. aThe phenotypic serotype could not be determined using a commercial kit. CPS: capsular polysaccharide.
    下载: 导出CSV

    S3.   The annotations of ORFs in novel LOS classes of C. jejuni

    LOS classORFProducts (annotated by prokka)Length (bp)
    CDC118Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
    5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
    6hypothetical protein702
    18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
    alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
    1,071
    39hypothetical protein780
    7hypothetical protein933
    37hypothetical protein929
    41N,N'-diacetyllegionaminic acid synthase1,041
    38UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase1,119
    1N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase666
    532,3,4,5-tetrahydropyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate N-acetyltransferase831
    4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ813
    60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
    CDC128Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
    5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase888
    6hypothetical protein1,551
    2hypothetical protein1,158
    50hypothetical protein981
    56hypothetical protein1,121
    37hypothetical protein891
    Nhypothetical protein489
    Nhypothetical protein1,168
    Nhypothetical protein782
    Nhypothetical protein1,128
    4Putative glycosyltransferase EpsH819
    60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
    CDC138Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
    5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
    6hypothetical protein702
    18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
    alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
    1,071
    39hypothetical protein780
    7hypothetical protein933
    14hypothetical protein1,386
    1hypothetical protein1,074
    26hypothetical protein822
    4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ810
    60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2939
    CDC148Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
    5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
    6hypothetical protein702
    18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
    alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
    1,071
    39hypothetical protein780
    7hypothetical protein936
    2Undecaprenyl-phosphate 4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose transferase1,584
    26hypothetical protein2,022
    4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ810
    60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2939
    CDC158Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
    5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
    6hypothetical protein702
    18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
    alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
    1,027
    39hypothetical protein780
    7hypothetical protein936
    2Undecaprenyl-phosphate 4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose transferase1,420
    7hypothetical protein936
    2hypothetical protein1,281
    37hypothetical protein944
    41N,N'-diacetyllegionaminic acid synthase1,041
    38UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase1,119
    1N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase666
    532,3,4,5-tetrahydropyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate N-acetyltransferase755
    4Undecaprenyl-phosphate 4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose transferase758
    60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
    CDC168Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
    5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
    2hypothetical protein1,224
    Nhypothetical protein1,066
    7hypothetical protein872
    37hypothetical protein918
    41N,N'-diacetyllegionaminic acid synthase1,032
    38UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase1,116
    1hypothetical protein954
    1N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase663
    26hypothetical protein705
    4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ825
    60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
    CDC178Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
    5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
    2hypothetical protein1,224
    6hypothetical protein1,601
    18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
    alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
    1,068
    13hypothetical protein1,148
    2hypothetical protein1,203
    1hypothetical protein1,058
    1N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase663
    26hypothetical protein843
    4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ825
    60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
    CDC188Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
    5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
    6hypothetical protein702
    18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
    alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
    811
    39hypothetical protein966
    7hypothetical protein936
    26hypothetical protein891
    4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ810
    60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
    CDC198Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
    5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
    2Undecaprenyl-phosphate 4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose transferase1,275
    6hypothetical protein1,560
    37hypothetical protein935
    41N,N'-diacetyllegionaminic acid synthase1,041
    38UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase1,119
    1N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase798
    53Streptogramin A acetyltransferase615
    4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ813
    60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
    下载: 导出CSV

    S4.   The annotations of ORFs in CPS gene clusters of HS2, HS19, and HS41 of C. jejuni

    CPS typesORFProduct (annotated by prokka)Length (bp)
    HS221Capsule polysaccharide modification protein2,067
    1adenylyl-sulfate kinase513
    29sugar nucleotidyltransferase762
    30amidotransferase603
    27hypothetical protein2,340
    31methyltransferase762
    32methyltransferase774
    3sugar transferase1,839
    3sugar transferase1,878
    9D-glycero-D-manno-heptose 1-phosphate guanosyltransferase666
    11phosphoheptose isomerase606
    17D-glycero-D-manno-heptose 7-phosphate kinase1,020
    110methyltransferase family protein852
    54sugar-nucleotide epimerase/dehydratease942
    10GDP-L-fucose synthetase1,041
    52hypothetical protein927
    24dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase546
    14capsular polysaccharide heptosyltransferase1,749
    Nsugar transferase3,096
    Nhypothetical protein1,107
    22sugar transferase1,335
    77phosphatase636
    Naminotransferase1,230
    78aminotransferase1,104
    22sugar transferase2,328
    20UDP-galactopyranose mutase1,107
    2sugar transferase1,224
    16UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase1,182
    28sugar transferase1,635
    12D-arabinose 5-phosphate isomerase495
    HS1921Capsule polysaccharide modification protein2,067
    1adenylyl-sulfate kinase513
    29sugar nucleotidyltransferase762
    30amidotransferase603
    27hypothetical protein2,340
    31methyltransferase762
    32methyltransferase774
    3sugar transferase1,833
    2hypothetical protein1,509
    77phosphatase633
    78aminotransferase1,077
    2hypothetical protein2,499
    16UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase1,176
    28hypothetical protein2,124
    12D-arabinose 5-phosphate isomerase495
    HS4121Capsule polysaccharide modification protein2,067
    46Na(+)/H(+)-K(+) antiporter GerN1,254
    47pyruvate kinase960
    48sulfate adenylyltransferase1,047
    1adenylyl-sulfate kinase534
    3sugar transferase1,854
    42hypothetical protein1,749
    9D-glycero-D-manno-heptose 1-phosphate guanosyltransferase666
    11phosphoheptose isomerase606
    59hypothetical protein1,236
    17D-glycero-D-manno-heptose 7-phosphate kinase1,020
    19NAD-dependent 4,6-dehydratase1,032
    10GDP-L-fucose synthase2,214
    24dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase546
    55hypothetical protein1,251
    14capsular polysaccharide heptosyltransferase1,608
    20UDP-galactopyranose mutase1,131
    61NAD-dependent 4,6-dehydratase885
    87dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase630
    84NAD-dependent 4,6-dehydratase1,071
    57Glucose-1-phosphate cytidylyltransferase801
    43hypothetical protein2,157
    13hypothetical protein1,380
    20UDP-galactopyranose mutase1,170
    23UDP-GlcNAc/Glc 4-epimerase975
    16UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase1,299
    15NAD-dependent 4,6-dehydratase957
    2hypothetical protein1,371
    22sugar transferase1,050
    28sugar transferase1,632
    12D-arabinose 5-phosphate isomerase495
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Kaakoush NO, Castaño-Rodríguez N, Mitchell HM, et al. Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2015; 28, 687−720. doi:  10.1128/CMR.00006-15
    [2] Koga M, Gilbert M, Takahashi M, et al. Comprehensive analysis of bacterial risk factors for the development of Guillain-Barre syndrome after Campylobacter jejuni enteritis. J Infect Dis, 2006; 193, 547−55. doi:  10.1086/499969
    [3] Godschalk PCR, Heikema AP, Gilbert M, et al. The crucial role of Campylobacter jejuni genes in anti-ganglioside antibody induction in Guillain-Barré syndrome. J Clin Invest, 2004; 114, 1659−65. doi:  10.1172/JCI200415707
    [4] Yuki N. Campylobacter sialyltransferase gene polymorphism directs clinical features of Guillain-Barré syndrome. J Neurochem, 2007; 103 Suppl 1, 150−8.
    [5] Karlyshev AV, Linton D, Gregson NA, et al. Genetic and biochemical evidence of a Campylobacter jejuni capsular polysaccharide that accounts for Penner serotype specificity. Mol Microbiol, 2000; 35, 529−41.
    [6] Heikema AP, Islam Z, Horst-Kreft D, et al. Campylobacter jejuni capsular genotypes are related to Guillain-Barré syndrome. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2015; 21, 852. e1−9.
    [7] Salloway S, Mermel LA, Seamans M, et al. Miller-Fisher syndrome associated with Campylobacter jejuni bearing lipopolysaccharide molecules that mimic human ganglioside GD3. Infect Immun, 1996; 64, 2945−9. doi:  10.1128/iai.64.8.2945-2949.1996
    [8] Takahashi M, Koga M, Yokoyama K, et al. Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from patients with Guillain-Barre and Fisher syndromes in Japan. J Clin Microbiol, 2005; 43, 335−9. doi:  10.1128/JCM.43.1.335-339.2005
    [9] Zhang MJ, Li Q, He LH, et al. Association study between an outbreak of Guillain-Barre syndrome in Jilin, China, and preceding Campylobacter jejuni infection. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2010; 7, 913−9. doi:  10.1089/fpd.2009.0493
    [10] Zhang MJ, He LH, Li Q, et al. Genomic characterization of the Guillain-Barre syndrome-associated Campylobacter jejuni ICDCCJ07001 Isolate. PLoS One, 2010; 5, e15060. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0015060
    [11] Yuki N. Molecular mimicry between gangliosides and lipopolysaccharides of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome and Miller Fisher syndrome. J Infect Dis, 1997; 176 Suppl 2, S150−3.
    [12] Yuki N, Takahashi M, Tagawa Y, et al. Association of Campylobacter jejuni serotype with antiganglioside antibody in Guillain-Barré syndrome and Fisher's syndrome. Ann Neurol, 1997; 42, 28−33. doi:  10.1002/ana.410420107
    [13] Liang H, Wen ZY, Li Y, et al. Comparison of the filtration culture and multiple real-time PCR examination for Campylobacter spp. from stool specimens in diarrheal patients. Front Microbiol, 2018; 9, 2995. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2018.02995
    [14] Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics, 2014; 30, 2068−9. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153
    [15] Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Brown GR, et al. NCBI Reference Sequences (RefSeq): current status, new features and genome annotation policy. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012; 40, D130−5. doi:  10.1093/nar/gkr1079
    [16] Karlyshev AV, Champion OL, Churcher C, et al. Analysis of Campylobacter jejuni capsular loci reveals multiple mechanisms for the generation of structural diversity and the ability to form complex heptoses. Mol Microbiol, 2005; 55, 90−103.
    [17] Klena JD, Gray SA, Konkel ME. Cloning, sequencing, and characterization of the lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic enzyme heptosyltransferase I gene (waaC) from Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Gene, 1998; 222, 177−85. doi:  10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00501-0
    [18] Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res, 2003; 13, 2178−89. doi:  10.1101/gr.1224503
    [19] Richards VP, Lefébure T, Pavinski Bitar PD, et al. Comparative characterization of the virulence gene clusters (lipooligosaccharide and capsular polysaccharide) for Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and related Campylobacter species. Infect Genet Evol, 2013; 14, 200−13. doi:  10.1016/j.meegid.2012.12.010
    [20] Kuzniar A, van Ham RCHJ, Pongor S, et al. The quest for orthologs: finding the corresponding gene across genomes. Trends Genet, 2008; 24, 539−51. doi:  10.1016/j.tig.2008.08.009
    [21] Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 2009; 25, 2078−9. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
    [22] Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997, 2013. [2022-3-12].
    [23] Li DH, Liu CM, Luo RB, et al. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics, 2015; 31, 1674−6. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033
    [24] Wang JQ, Gu YX, Zhou GL, et al. Genetic diversity of lipooligosaccharide core biosynthesis gene clusters in Campylobacter jejuni. Dis Surveill, 2020; 35, 11−5. (In Chinese
    [25] Gilbert M, Karwaski MF, Bernatchez S, et al. The genetic bases for the variation in the lipo-oligosaccharide of the mucosal pathogen, Campylobacter jejuni: biosynthesis of sialylated ganglioside mimics in the core oligosaccharide. J Biol Chem, 2002; 277, 327−37. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M108452200
    [26] Parker CT, Gilbert M, Yuki N, et al. Characterization of lipooligosaccharide-biosynthetic loci of Campylobacter jejuni reveals new lipooligosaccharide classes: evidence of mosaic organizations. J Bacteriol, 2008; 190, 5681−9. doi:  10.1128/JB.00254-08
    [27] Poly F, Read TD, Chen YH, et al. Characterization of two Campylobacter jejuni strains for use in volunteer experimental-infection studies. Infect Immun, 2008; 76, 5655−67. doi:  10.1128/IAI.00780-08
  • [1] CHE Jie, CHEN Bo Han, XU Li, GAO Yuan, YUE Meng Meng, CHEN Zi Man, ZHANG Mao Jun, SHAO Zhu Jun.  Establishment and Modification of Ninety-seven Pneumococcal Serotyping Assays Based on Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(9): 787-799. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.078
    [2] YIN Cai Hong, SONG Zhan Yun, LIU Xing Xing, WANG Xiao Mu, WANG Ying, GAO Cheng Cheng, SONG Xiu Ling, FENG Xin.  Comparison of Microdroplet Digital PCR Assays with Real-time Fluorescence Quantitative PCR for Clostridioides difficile Detection . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(7): 653-657. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.094
    [3] YAN Ai Xia, ZHOU Gui Lan, GAO Peng, KANG Ying, LI Shou Fei, WANG Yuan Yuan, WANG Feng Shuang, WANG Hai Rui, LI Ying, ZHANG Mao Jun.  A Campylobacteriosis Outbreak Caused by One Asymptomatic Food Handler Carrier . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(8): 779-782. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.105
    [4] CHEN Xiao Li, LIANG Hao, GUO Peng Bo, GU Yi Xin, WANG Jia Qi, WANG Hai Rui, ZHOU Gui Lan, SHAO Zhu Jun, ZHANG Jian Zhong, ZHANG Mao Jun.  Genetic and Phenotypic Variation of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC11168 Caused by flhA Mutation during Laboratory Passage . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(7): 604-613. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.088
    [5] LIAO Lei, SHI Wen, MA Chao, TANG Wen Lian, QIAN Qi Lan, WANG Yu, LI Jiao Jiao, SHEN Jin Yang, JI Jing, MA Jin Ming, GAO Song.  Duplex Detection of Vibrio Cholerae and Vibrio Parahaemolyticus by Real-time Recombinase Polymerase Amplification . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 1161-1165. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.148
    [6] WEI Xiao, LI Yan, LU Xin, ZHAO Rong Tao, YUAN Zheng Quan, SHI Hua, ZHAO Xiang Na.  Rapid Detection of Yersinia pestis by Real-time Recombinase-aided Amplification . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(4): 309-313. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.040
    [7] XIAO Kang, YANG Xue Hua, ZOU Wen Quan, DONG Xiao Ping, SHI Qi.  Assessment of the Sensitivity and Specificity of the Established Real-time Quaking-induced Conversion (RT-QuIC) Technique in Chinese CJD Surveillance . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(8): 620-622. doi: 10.3967/bes2020.081
    [8] CHE Jie, LU Jin Xing, LI Wen Ge, ZHANG Yun Fei, ZHAO Xiao Fei, YUAN Min, BAI Xue Mei, CHEN Xia, LI Juan.  A New High-throughput Real-time PCR Assay for the Screening of Multiple Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Broiler Fecal Samples from China . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(12): 881-892. doi: 10.3967/bes2019.111
    [9] WANG Hui, ZHANG Jing, HU Shao Hua, TAN Sheng Zhi, ZHANG Bo, ZHOU Hong Mei, PENG Rui Yun.  Real-time Microwave Exposure Induces Calcium Efflux in Primary Hippocampal Neurons and Primary Cardiomyocytes . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(8): 561-571. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.077
    [10] SHAO Nan, LI Fan, NIE Kai, FU Shi Hong, ZHANG Wei Jia, HE Ying, LEI Wen Wen, WANG Qian Ying, LIANG Guo Dong, CAO Yu Xi, WANG Huan Yu.  TaqMan Real-time RT-PCR Assay for Detecting and Differentiating Japanese Encephalitis Virus . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(3): 208-214. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.026
    [11] JU Chang Yan, ZHANG Mao Jun, MA Yan Ping, LU Jing Rang, YU Mu Hua, CHEN Hui, LIU Chu Yun, GU Yi Xin, FU Yan Yan, DUAN Yong Xiang.  Genetic and Antibiotic Resistance Characteristics of Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Diarrheal Patients, Poultry and Cattle in Shenzhen . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(8): 579-585. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.079
    [12] HU Shao Hua, WANG Hui, LU Li, ZHOU Hong Mei, WANG Chang Zhen, GAO Ya Bing, DONG Ji, PENG Rui Yun.  Real-time Assessment of Cytosolic, Mitochondrial, and Nuclear Calcium Levels Change in Rat Pheochromocytoma Cells during Pulsed Microwave Exposure Using a Genetically Encoded Calcium Indicator . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2017, 30(12): 927-931. doi: 10.3967/bes2017.125
    [13] LI Hao, CAO Yu Xi, HE Xiao Xia, FU Shi Hong, LYU Zhi, HE Ying, GAO Xiao Yan, LIANG Guo Dong, WANG Huan Yu.  Real-time RT-PCR Assay for the detection of Tahyna Virus . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 28(5): 374-377. doi: 10.3967/bes2015.052
    [14] CAO Yu Xi, HE Xiao Xia, FU Shi Hong, HE Ying, LI Hao, GAO Xiao Yan, LIANG Guo Dong.  Real-time RT-PCR Assay for the Detection of Culex flavivirus . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 28(12): 917-919. doi: 10.3967/bes2015.019
    [15] NIU Pei Hua, ZHANG Chen, WANG Ji, TAN Wen Jie, MA Xue Jun.  Detection and Identification of Six Foodborne Bacteria by Two-tube Multiplex Real Time PCR and Melting Curve Analysis . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 27(10): 770-778. doi: 10.3967/bes2014.112
    [16] BAI Yao, CUI Sheng Hui, XU Xiao, LI Feng Qin.  Modification and Evaluation of Brucella Broth Based Campylobacter jejuni Transport Medium . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 27(6): 466-470. doi: 10.3967/bes2014.075
    [17] ZHANG Mao Jun, GU Yi Xin, DI Xiao, ZHAO Fei, YOU Yuan Hai, MENG Fan Liang, ZHANG Jian Zhong.  In Vitro Protein Expression Profile of Campylobacter jejuni Strain NCTC11168 by Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis and Mass Spectrometry . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2013, 26(1): 48-53. doi: 10.3967/0895-3988.2013.01.006
    [18] WANG Jun, GUO Yun Chang, LI Ning.  Prevalence and Risk Assessment of Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken in China . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2013, 26(4): 243-248. doi: 10.3967/0895-3988.2013.04.002
    [19] ZHAO Fei, CAO Bin, HE Li Hua, YIN Yu Dong, TAO Xiao Xia, SONG Shu Fan, MENG Fan Liang, ZHANG Jian Zhong.  Evaluation of a New Real-time PCR Assay for Detection of Mycoplasma Pneumoniae in Clinical Specimens . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2012, 25(1): 77-81. doi: 10.3967/0895-3988.2012.01.011
    [20] ZENG-HUI WU, YONG-LIANG LOU, YI-YU LU, JIE YAN.  Development of Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Detection of Vibrio vulnificus Based on Hemolysin (vvhA) Coding System . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2008, 21(4): 296-301.
  • 22159Supplementary Materials.pdf
  • 加载中
图(3) / 表ll (8)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  601
  • HTML全文浏览量:  267
  • PDF下载量:  73
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-05-05
  • 录用日期:  2022-09-20
  • 刊出日期:  2022-12-20

Genetic Characteristics of Lipooligosaccharide and Capsular Polysaccharide of Campylobacter jejuni from Different Sources in China

doi: 10.3967/bes2022.140
    基金项目:  This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFC2301000] and the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen [SZSM201803081]
    作者简介:

    WANG Jia Qi, male, born in 1986, PhD, majoring in prevention and control of infectious diseases

    通讯作者: ZHANG Mao Jun, PhD, E-mail: zhangmaojun@icdc.cn
注释:
1) AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS: 2) CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: 3) CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:

English Abstract

WANG Jia Qi, CHEN Xiao Li, ZHOU Gui Lan, WANG Hai Rui, GU Yi Xin, ZHANG Jian Zhong, SHAO Zhu Jun, ZHANG Mao Jun. Genetic Characteristics of Lipooligosaccharide and Capsular Polysaccharide of Campylobacter jejuni from Different Sources in China[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 1106-1114. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.140
Citation: WANG Jia Qi, CHEN Xiao Li, ZHOU Gui Lan, WANG Hai Rui, GU Yi Xin, ZHANG Jian Zhong, SHAO Zhu Jun, ZHANG Mao Jun. Genetic Characteristics of Lipooligosaccharide and Capsular Polysaccharide of Campylobacter jejuni from Different Sources in China[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 1106-1114. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.140
    • Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) is a major cause of human gastroenteritis worldwide. It commonly colonizes the intestinal tract of poultry and other livestock. The number of campylobacteriosis cases in China is estimated to be much higher than in Europe and the USA[1].

      Lipooligosaccharide (LOS) is an important virulence factor that may play a role in microbial adhesion and invasion. In addition, the sialylated LOS is the determinant structure, which mimics human gangliosides. The LOS loci of classes A, B, and C are the major genetic types related to the Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS)[2-4].

      Capsular polysaccharide (CPS) is another major virulence factor and is the serodeterminant of the Penner serotyping scheme for C. jejuni[5]. Some specific serotypes of C. jejuni strains, such as HS1/44, HS2, HS4c, HS10, HS19, HS23/36, and HS41[6-8], are associated with GBS. Previous studies in China suggest that HS2, HS19, and HS41 are dominant C. jejuni strains that trigger GBS [9-12].

      In this study, the genetic characteristics of LOS and CPS of C. jejuni strains from different sources in China were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS), and a multiplex real-time Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was developed for the rapid identification of three crucial GBS-associated CPS types in China.

    • A total of 494 C. jejuni strains, including 260 strains from diarrhea patients, 13 strains from GBS patients, 70 strains from livestock, and 151 strains from poultry, were collected for this study. All strains were identified as C. jejuni using previously described methods[13]. All tested strains were grown on Campylobacter selective medium (Karmali; Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) supplemented with 5% sheep blood at 37 °C under microaerobic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, and 85% N2) for 48 h. DNA was extracted from each strain using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions for WGS.

    • The genome of C. jejuni isolates was sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing platform at the Beijing Genomics Institution with a depth of 450 × coverage. The low-quality reads were removed if the quality scores of ≥ 3 consecutive bases were ≤ Q30. The reads were then assembled into contigs and scaffolds using SOAPdenovo v2.04 (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapdenovo.html). PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing were used to fill the gaps in the region of the CPS/LOS sequences. The CPS/LOS locus sequences were annotated using Prokka V1.13.3[14] with default parameters and the genus-specific database from RefSeq [15].

      According to a previous study [16], the integrated sequences between the conserved genes kpsF and kpsC were considered the CPS biosynthesis gene cluster, and the LOS biosynthesis gene cluster was recognized by the genes waaC and waaF[17].

      OrthoMCL v2.0.9 was used to cluster all CPS/LOS genes into orthologous and paralogous groups[18] (the accession numbers of CPS/LOS reference sequences used in this study are listed in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 available in www.besjournal.com). A database of translated coding sequences for C. jejuni LOS/CPS biosynthesis was assembled according to the orthologue nomenclature described in a previous study[19]. Reciprocal all-versus-all BLASTP was performed (E-value < 1 × 10−5), and the results were processed by OrthoMCL with default parameters (percent match length ≥ 50%). A database was created containing orthologues and paralogues. Orthologues are homologous sequences derived from speciation events, and paralogues are homologous sequences derived from duplication events[20].

      Table S1.  The accession numbers for CPS gene clusters of C. jejuni

      CPS typesAccession number
      HS1BX545859
      HS2AL111168.1
      HS3HQ343268
      HS4cHQ343269
      HS5/31KT868847
      HS6/S7NC_009839
      HS8/17HQ343270
      HS9KT868844
      HS10HQ343271
      HS11KT868845
      HS12KT868848
      HS15/31/58HQ343272
      HS18KT932997
      HS19BX545860
      HS21KT868849
      HS22KT893439
      HS23/36BX545858
      HS27KT893437
      HS29KT868846
      HS32KT893435
      HS33/35KT893436
      HS37KT893431
      HS38KT893430
      HS40KT893434
      HS41BX545857
      HS42HQ343274
      HS44JF496678
      HS45/5/32/60KT893432
      HS52KT893429
      HS53CP000025.1
      HS55KT893433
      HS57KT893428
      HS58/32KT893427
      HS60KT893426
      HS63KT893438

      Table S2.  The accession numbers for LOS gene clusters of C. jejuni

      LOS classAccession number
      AAF215659
      BAF401528
      CAF400047
      DAF400669
      EAJ131360
      FAY423554
      GAY436358
      HAY800272
      IEU404107
      JEU404104
      KAY573819
      LEU404111
      MEF140720
      NAY816330
      OEF143352
      PAY943308
      QEU404112
      RAY962325
      SEU404110
      TAIOC00000000
      UAIOU00000000
      VAIOP00000000
      WCP001900
      CDC1-10reference[24]
      CDC11-19In this study
    • A serotype-specific sequence database for 33 CPS types (HS1, HS2, HS4 complex, HS5, HS6/7, HS8/17, HS9, HS10, HS11, HS12, HS15, HS18, HS19, HS21, HS22, HS27, HS29, HS31, HS32, HS33, HS37, HS38, HS40, HS41, HS42, HS44, HS45, HS52, HS53, HS55, HS57, HS58, and HS60) was created. Serotype-specific genes in each serotype were identified by a shell script run on CentOS release 6.9. This shell script requires several preinstalled bioinformatics software programs, including Samtools[21], BWA[22], Wgsim, and Megahit[23]. Briefly, Wgsim was used to simulate sequencing reads from each CPS reference sequence, and the reads were then mapped to other CPS reference sequences with BWA. The unmapped reads were obtained with Samtools and subsequently assembled with Megahit. The assembled contigs were subjected to BLAST in the NCBI database to eliminate the sequences mapped onto the CPS loci of other known serotypes. The serotype-specific sequence database was established through the above process. The CPS genotype for each strain in this study was determined based on searching and BLASTing with serotype-specific sequences in the database.

    • The optimized primers and probes for this study were designed using Primer-BLAST (Table 1). The reaction volume was 25 µL in total, containing 12.5 µL 2 × qPCR SuperMix, 2 μmol/L HS2-F and HS2-R, 3 μmol/L HS19-F and HS19-R, 3 μmol/L HS41-F and HS41-R, 1 μmol/L probe HS2, 1.5 μmol/L probe HS19, 1.5 μmol/L probe HS41 and 1 µL of DNA template. The thermocycling conditions were optimized as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. This assay was further validated with 109 strains of known serotype strains. The DNA template of each strain was prepared after lysing whole bacterial cells by boiling. The Ct value of ≤ 35 was considered positive, and the result was considered negative when the Ct value was more than 40 or no amplification curve was obtained. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for this multiplex real-time PCR assay. Sensitivity was calculated as the number of true positives divided by the sum of true positives and false negatives (true positive was defined as the Penner phenotypic serotyping results). Specificity was calculated as the number of true negatives divided by the number of true negatives and false positives.

      Table 1.  Primers and probes for real-time PCR detection of HS2, HS19, and HS41

      Capsular typePrimers and probesNucleotide sequence (5’ to 3’)
      HS2HS2-FAACCAACCATCCACTATTTTCATCT
      HS2-RACTCTTTGATTTTCCAATGCAATGTT
      HS2-PFAM-CGCACCTTCCAATGCAACCAAAGAGC-BHQ1
      HS19HS19-FCTGAAATATCAACACAGGGAAAATG
      HS19-RTGTTGGAGGTAAAAGACATGGTG
      HS19-PHEX-TCCAATCCTGTTGCTCATAACGCATTCA-BHQ1
      HS41HS41-FCACCCTGATTTCTATTAACTCTACCAC
      HS41-RGAGTTATTCTTGATGCTGAAAATGGA
      HS41-PCY5-AAACGGGATAAGATCGCTTGGGGGAATA-BHQ2
        Note. PCR, Polymerase chain reaction.
    • Among the HS2, HS19, and HS41 strains identified by multiplex real-time PCR, the integrated CPS loci were selected for further analysis of genetic variation. CPS loci from six HS19 strains and three HS41 strains were selected. The phenotypic serotype was analyzed previously. Eleven CPS loci from HS2 strains were also selected for genetic variation analysis. The sequences of each CPS locus from the strains with the same CPS type were aligned with mafft v7.471. Variant calling was performed using the Find Variations/SNPs program on Geneious v2021.03 with the default settings.

    • The Chi-square test was used for all of the statistical analyses throughout the whole study. A P-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All analyses were conducted with a statistical software package (IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0, Chicago, IL, USA).

    • A panel of 26 different capsular types was identified in 448 C. jejuni strains. The CPS genotypes of 46 strains (9.31%) could not be determined using serotype-specific sequences. The number of different CPS genotypes and the distribution of different CPS genotypes in strains from different sources are presented in Figure 1. The five most common CPS types, which accounted for 58.71% (263/448) of all the tested strains, were HS2 (90 strains, 20.08%), HS4c (70 strains, 15.63%), HS5/31 (40 strains, 8.93%), HS19 (35 strains, 7.81%), and HS8/17 (28 strains, 6.25%).

      Figure 1.  Distribution of different CPS types in strains from different sources: The CPS genotype for each strain was determined based on the different serospecific sequences. The top five CPS types were HS2 (90 strains, 20.1%), HS4c (70 strains, 15.6%), HS5/31 (40 strains, 8.9%), HS19 (35 strains, 7.8%), and HS8/17 (28 strains, 6.3%), which accounted for 58.7% (263/448) of the tested strains. CPS, capsular polysaccharide

      The CPS genotypes of 12 strains (4.62%) from diarrhea patients could not be determined. The remaining 248 strains were classified into 22 CPS genotypes. The five most common CPS genotypes of the strains from diarrhea patients were HS2 (53 strains, 21.4%), HS4c (45 strains, 18.1%), HS5/31 (24 strains, 9.7%), HS19 (16 strains, 6.5%), and HS8/17 (16 strains, 6.5%). The CPS genotype of only one of the strains (7.7%) from GBS patients could not be determined. The remaining 12 GBS-associated strains consisted of five CPS types (HS19, HS37, HS2, HS53, and HS41). The CPS genotypes could not be determined for 11.43% (8/70) and 16.56% (25/151) of the strains from livestock and poultry, respectively. The five most common CPS genotypes for the strains from livestock were HS2 (12 strains, 17.14%), HS19 (10 strains, 14.29%), HS4c (7 strains, 10.0%), HS10 (7 strains, 10.0%), and HS11 (6 strains, 8.57%), and the five most common CPS types for the strains from poultry were HS2 (23 strains, 15.23%), HS4c (18 strains, 11.92%), HS5/31 (13 strains, 8.61%), HS8/17 (10 strains, 6.62%), and HS1 (9 strains, 5.96%). Except for the strains from GBS patients, HS2 and HS4c were the most frequent CPS types among the tested strains from different sources.

      In total, 38 LOS classes were identified in 494 C. jejuni strains. Twenty-nine were previously confirmed LOS [3,24-26]. Nine novel classes were identified in 11 strains (9 from poultry and 2 from diarrhea patients) and were named CDC11–CDC19 (Figure 2). Four poultry strains (classified as CDC11, CDC15, CDC16, and CDC19) possessed the sialic acid synthesis genes ORF1 (cgtA/NeuA), ORF37 (cstII), ORF41 (NeuB), and ORF38 (NeuC) in the LOS locus. The distribution of the LOS classes in strains from different sources is presented in Table 2. LOS classes A, B, and C accounted for 12.35% (61/494), 28.54% (141/494), and 7.29% (36/494) of the tested strains, respectively. These three classes accounted for the largest proportion (48.18%, 238/494). Classes P, H, CDC5, F, CDC6, R, CDC2, W, CDC1, and G accounted for 38.46% (190/494) of the tested strains.

      Table 2.  The distribution of the LOS classes in strains from different sources

      LOS classDiarrhoea
      patients
      GBS
      patients
      LivestockPoultryIn total
      (%)
      A33915461 (12.35)
      B7302741141 (28.54)
      C19071036 (7.29)
      D00011 (0.20)
      E30317 (1.42)
      F916218 (3.64)
      G1000212 (2.43)
      H2412431 (6.28)
      I00202 (0.40)
      J20002 (0.40)
      K50038 (1.62)
      M00011 (0.20)
      O20002 (0.40)
      P2122833 (6.68)
      R1001415 (3.04)
      S50319 (1.82)
      T10012 (0.40)
      V10124 (0.81)
      W4001014 (2.83)
      CDC11011113 (2.63)
      CDC21200214 (2.83)
      CDC330014 (0.81)
      CDC450005 (1.01)
      CDC51800523 (4.66)
      CDC62011417 (3.44)
      CDC700011 (0.20)
      CDC830003 (0.61)
      CDC900011 (0.20)
      CDC1010023 (0.61)
      CDC1100011 (0.20)
      CDC1220013 (0.61)
      CDC1300011 (0.20)
      CDC1400011 (0.20)
      CDC1500011 (0.20)
      CDC1600011 (0.20)
      CDC1700011 (0.02)
      CDC1800011 (0.02)
      CDC1900011 (0.02)
        Note. LOS, lipooligosaccharide, GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome.

      Figure 2.  Newly confirmed LOS classes (CDC11–CDC19) OrthoMCL was used to cluster all LOS genes into orthologous and paralogous groups and visualized in Geneious software. Arrows represent orthologues and paralogues. Numbers are orthologue ID numbers, and “N” are paralogues. (Supplementary Table S3 available in www.besjournal.com). LOS, lipooligosaccharide.

      Twenty-five LOS classes were identified in 260 strains from diarrhea patients. The five most common LOS classes were class B (28.08%, 73/260), A (12.69%, 33/260), H (9.23%, 24/260), P (8.08%, 21/260), and C (7.31%, 19/260). A total of 9 of 13 (69.23%) GBS-associated strains had class A LOS, and another 4 strains had LOS class P (2 strains), F (1 strain), and H (1 strain). Twelve LOS classes were identified in 70 livestock strains, and the five most abundant classes were class B (38.57%, 27/70), A (21.43%, 15/70), C (10%, 7/70), F (8.57%, 6/70), and S (4.29%, 3/70). Thirty-three LOS classes were identified in 151 strains from poultry. The five most common classes were class B (27.15%, 41/151), CDC6 (9.27%, 14/151), R (9.27%, 14/151), CDC1 (7.28%, 11/151), and W (6.62%, 10/151).

    • In Table 3, 17 CPS types of strains (strain number > 5) were analyzed. Strains of HS9, HS10, HS11, and HS37 were classified into LOS class CDC5, B, F, and P, respectively. And strains of the other 13 CPS types also had one or two prevalent LOS classes (bold in Table 3, P < 0.05). Four GBS-related genes (NeuA, NeuB, NseuC, and cst) involved in the sialic acid biosynthesis pathway were detected in 279 strains (56.48%, 279/494). In these strains, 14 CPS genotypes (HS1, HS2, HS4c, HS5/31, HS10, HS12, HS8/17, HS19, HS40, HS41, HS42, HS44, HS52, and HS60) were detected. The prevalence of GBS-related genes was higher (90%–100%) in strains HS1, HS2, HS10, HS19, and HS41 than the average (56.48%, P < 0.01). All strains of HS19 and HS41 contained GBS-related genes. Among HS19 strains, LOS class A was dominant (33/35), and the remaining 2 strains were classified into class R (1/35) and CDC11 (1/35). Strains of HS41 were classified into LOS class A (3/8), R (4/8), and CDC2 (1/8). LOS class A, R, CDC2, and CDC11 all possess GBS-related genes.

      Table 3.  Distribution characteristics of CPS/LOS types for 494 isolates of C. jejuni from China

      CPS typesNumLOS classes (Num)Proportion of strains
      possessed sialic acid
      synthesis genes in LOS (%)a
      HS121B (8), C (10), F (1), V (1), CDC15 (1)90.5
      HS290A (21), B (54), H (1), P (6), R (4), CDC6 (2), CDC8 (2)90.0
      HS4c70A (2), B (35), C (2), G (2), H (20), O (2), P (1), R (5), V (1)64.3
      HS5/3140A (2), B (24), D (1), F (3), K (6), V (1), CDC10 (3)67.5
      HS6/712E (6), T (1), CDC1 (4), CDC5 (1)0
      HS8/1728B (1), C (17), G (7), V (1), CDC13 (1), CDC18 (1)67.9
      HS918CDC5 (18)0
      HS1011B (11)100
      HS1112F (12)0
      HS1221W (8), CDC2 (13)61.9
      HS1512G (1), H (2), P (5), CDC3 (4)0
      HS188T (1), CDC4 (5), CDC7 (1), CDC17 (1)0
      HS1935A (33), R (1), CDC11 (1)100
      HS214W (4)0
      HS23/363P (2), W (1)0
      HS323CDC6 (3)0
      HS3717P (17)0
      HS403B (1), H (1), M (1)66.7
      HS418A (3), R (4), CDC2 (1)100
      HS423C (1), K (1), W (1)33.3
      HS448C (4), F (1), I (2), K (1)50.0
      HS522B (1), CDC9 (1)/
      HS5316F (1), J (2), S (9), CDC5 (3), CDC6 (1)0
      HS551E (1)/
      HS571H (1)/
      HS601CDC19 (1)/
      ND46B (6), C (2), G (2), H (6), P (2), R (1), CDC1 (9),
      CDC5 (1), CDC6 (11), CDC8 (1),
      CDC12 (3), CDC14 (1), CDC16 (1)
      21.7
      In total494/56.5
        Note. aLOS classes A, B, C, M, R, V, CDC2, CDC8, CDC11, CDC15, CDC16, or CDC19. LOS: lipooligosaccharide; CPS: capsular polysaccharide.
    • Among the tested 109 serotype known C. jejuni strains, all of the 11 HS2 strains, 9 HS19 strains and 8 HS41 strains were detected as positive, and 81 other serotype strains were all negative. The results were consistent with previously identified serotype results. The sensitivity and specificity of this multiplex real-time PCR assay were 100%, respectively.

    • Among the six HS19 strains, all had identical phenotypic serotypes. From the alignment, each of the CPS loci in the HS19 strain was 19 kb in length and contained 15 ORFs (Figure 3). The sequence identity of these six CPS loci was 98.2%. Taking the CPS locus sequences from strain HB_CJGB_ZHX (phenotypic serotype HS19) as the reference, the sequences of the CPS locus of strains HB_CJGB_LXC and HB-CJGB-ZB were 100% identical. However, 185 SNPs and one indel (insertion/deletion) were found in the CPS loci in strain NH_A12 (Figure 3 and Table 4), which had the same phenotypic serotype as strain HB_CJGB_ZHX. One SNP was found at the same location in ORF30 in each of the CPS loci in strains HBJ_CJGB_96G25 and BJ-CJGB96114. The CPS locus sequences of these two strains were 99.99% identical to the reference.

      Figure 3.  Schematic of CPS loci from HS2/HS19/HS41 and polymorphism distribution: OrthoMCL was used to cluster all CPS genes into orthologous and paralogous groups and visualized in Geneious software. Arrows represent orthologues and paralogues. Numbers are orthologue IDs, and “N” are paralogues. (Supplementary Table S4 available in www.besjournal.com) The different coloured dots represent gene polymorphism types. CPS: capsular polysaccharide.

      Table 4.  Genetic variation in the same CPS types

      StrainsCPS typePhenotypic serotypeSequence identity to reference (%)Polymorphisms in ORFsSense mutations in ORFs
      HB_CJGB_LXCHS19HS19100//
      HB-CJGB-ZBHS19HS19100//
      HBJ_CJGB_96G25HS19HS1999.991 SNP (30)/
      BJ-CJGB96114HS19HS1999.991 SNP (30)/
      NH_A12HS19HS1998.0185 SNPs (1, 2, 3, 16, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 77, 78 and a noncoding region); 1 deletion (3); 1 insertion (in a noncoding region)56 substitutions (1, 2, 3, 16, 27, 28
      , 29, 30, 31, 32, 78); 1 deletion (3)
      NH_F47HS41HS4198.9208 SNPs (1, 2, 3, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 22, 28, 42, 43, 46, 47, 48, 59, 61, 87 and three noncoding regions); 6 deletions (3, 10, 16, 46, 47, 59); 4 insertions (2, 28, 46, and one noncoding region)99 substitutions (1, 2, 3, 14, 15, 16, 20, 22, 28, 42, 43, 46, 47, 48, 61, 87); 2 extensions (3, 46, 47); 7 frame shifts (3, 10, 16, 42, 46, 47, 59); 2 insertions (2, 28)
      ICDCCJ07004HS41NTa99.911 SNPs (3, 42, 46, 61, 87 and a noncoding region); 1 insertion (46);
      7 deletions (3, 10, 16, 46, 47, 59, 87)
      8 substitutions (3, 42, 46, 61, 87); 1 truncation (46); 2 extensions (3, 46); 7 frame shifts (3, 10, 16, 46, 47, 59, 87)
        Note. aThe phenotypic serotype could not be determined using a commercial kit. CPS: capsular polysaccharide.

      Two of the three HS41 strains had the same phenotypic serotypes (ICDCCJ07001 and NH_F47). The phenotypic serotypes of strain ICDCCJ07004 could not be determined using the same commercial phenotypic serotyping kit. The CPS locus of HS41 was 36 kb in length and contained 31 ORFs. Taking the CPS locus from ICDCCJ07001 as the reference, the sequence identity of these three CPS loci was 98.9% with the reference. In total, 208 SNPs and 6 indels (insertions/deletions) were found in NH_F47, and 11 SNPs and 8 indels were identified in ICDCCJ07004. Among the 11 HS2 strains, CPS loci were 37 kb in length and contained 30 ORFs. Taking the CPS locus from NCTC11168 as the reference, the sequence identity of 11 CPS gene clusters was 98.5%, and the polymorphisms among these strains included 212 SNPs and 18 indels. The genetic variations and schematics of the ORFs for each CPS type are presented in Figure 3 and Table 4.

    • In this study, we identified five major capsule types (> 5%): HS2, HS4c, HS5/31, HS19, and HS8/17 in 448 C. jejuni strains isolated from different sources in China. Forty-six strains could not be genotyped, possibly due to incomplete CPS loci or because their CPS types were not included in the database. Five capsule types (HS2, HS19, HS37, HS41, and HS53) were identified in 13 GBS-associated strains. Capsular-type HS19 was detected in 5.8% (35/259) of the enteritis strains but accounted for 42.9% (6/14) of the GBS-associated strains. Capsular-type HS41 was detected in 0.8% (2/259) of the enteritis strains but accounted for 14.3% (2/14) of the GBS-associated strains. We suggest that capsular types HS19 and HS41 might be associated with GBS.

      In this study, we found that certain CPS types and LOS locus classes tended to appear in combination in C. jejuni strains. As described in Table 3, strains of most CPS types involved in this study had one or two prevalent LOS classes (Bold in Table 3); however, some CPS types could not be analyzed because the number of strains was too small (< 5). We speculate that certain combinations of CPS/LOS types might be related to the pathogenicity and environmental adaptation of C. jejuni.

      The LOS classes A, B, C, M, R, V, CDC2, CDC8, CDC11, CDC15, CDC16, and CDC19 possess GBS-related genes (NeuA, NeuB, NeuC, and cst) involved in the sialic acid biosynthesis pathway. Approximately 90%–100% of strains of GBS-associated CPS types in this study (HS1, HS2, HS10, HS19, HS41) have LOS loci containing GBS-related genes, a prevalence that is much higher than the average (56.48%) (Table 3). All strains with capsular types HS19 and HS41 were classified into LOS classes A, R, CDC2, and CDC11. Interestingly, LOS classes A, R, CDC2, and CDC11 possess the sialylation genes necessary to produce ganglioside mimics. This ability may partly explain why HS19 and HS41 are the most prevalent serotypes among GBS-associated strains in China. All strains of capsular-type HS10 were identified as LOS class B, and HS10 was also reported as a Miller-Fisher syndrome-associated CPS type[7]; Miller-Fisher syndrome is a clinical variant of GBS.

      A major weakness of this study is that our findings were not comprehensive. HS23/36 and HS37 were reported as GBS-associated serotypes, but strains of these capsular types do not possess sialylation genes. In this study, most strains of HS23/36 and HS37 were identified as LOS class P, which is a nonsialylated LOS with N-acetyl quinovosamine[27]. Further research is required to obtain evidence for the mechanism underlying the specific combination of capsular types and LOS classes resulting in synergistic effects on GBS risk.

      The integrated sequence alignment revealed that the strains had identical CPS locus sequences and were classified into the same serotype (strains HB_CJGB_ZHX, HB_CJGB_LXC, HB-CJGB-ZB). Some strains had only a few SNPs and almost 99.99% similarity with the reference (strains HBJ_CJGB_96G25 and BJ-CJGB96114) and had the same phenotypic serotypes as the reference. Some other ORFs in the CPS locus had sense mutations, and the phenotypic serotype remained the same as the reference in strain NH_A12. We speculated that these mutations might not have affected the antigen structure of the CPS for the specific serotyping antibodies. For the same reason, the CPS locus in strain NH_F47 also had many SNPs, indels, extensions and frameshifts in the ORF regions, and none of these variations affected the phenotypic serotype. Eight nonsynonymous SNPs in ORFs 3/42/46/61/87, one truncation in ORF46, 7 frameshifts in ORFs 3/10/16/46/47/59/87, and two extensions in ORFs 3/46 were identified in the CPS locus from strain ICDCCJ07004. These mutations in the CPS locus caused a phenotypic variation in the serotype. Further investigation is needed to determine which mutation is crucial or causes the phase change in different serotypes.

      The phenotypic serotyping method is time-consuming and labor-intensive. In this study, multiplex real-time PCR for the CPS types HS19, HS41, and HS2 was developed based on serotype-specific sequences. The multiplex PCR results were consistent with the phenotypic serotype results, which indicated the DNA variations in the CPS types HS19, HS41, and HS2 were not in the locations of the primers and probes. This approach offered a rapid screening strategy, which could not be affected by the expression of the CPS and focused on the rapid identification of the highly GBS-associated strains. However, the specific phenotypic serotypes of these strains need to be confirmed with specific serotypic antibodies.

    • The analysis of LOS and CPS typing characteristics contributes to recognizing the prevalence of virulence gene clusters of C. jejuni in China. The LOS class CDC11–CDC19 was first identified in this study. CDC11, CDC15, CDC16, and CDC19 possess genes for sialic acid synthesis and translocation, which are worthy of attention in strain monitoring. Strains of most capsular types had one or two prevalent LOS classes, supporting the hypothesis that capsular types and LOS locus classes tend to appear as a combination. The incidence of GBS is rare, and it is difficult to isolate Campylobacter strains once the neurological sign occurs; more GBS-related strains are needed for further confirmation study in the future. The multiplex real-time PCR developed in this study will be helpful for the identification of GBS-associated CPS types in China.

    • Table S3.  The annotations of ORFs in novel LOS classes of C. jejuni

      LOS classORFProducts (annotated by prokka)Length (bp)
      CDC118Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
      5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
      6hypothetical protein702
      18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
      alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
      1,071
      39hypothetical protein780
      7hypothetical protein933
      37hypothetical protein929
      41N,N'-diacetyllegionaminic acid synthase1,041
      38UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase1,119
      1N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase666
      532,3,4,5-tetrahydropyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate N-acetyltransferase831
      4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ813
      60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
      CDC128Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
      5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase888
      6hypothetical protein1,551
      2hypothetical protein1,158
      50hypothetical protein981
      56hypothetical protein1,121
      37hypothetical protein891
      Nhypothetical protein489
      Nhypothetical protein1,168
      Nhypothetical protein782
      Nhypothetical protein1,128
      4Putative glycosyltransferase EpsH819
      60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
      CDC138Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
      5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
      6hypothetical protein702
      18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
      alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
      1,071
      39hypothetical protein780
      7hypothetical protein933
      14hypothetical protein1,386
      1hypothetical protein1,074
      26hypothetical protein822
      4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ810
      60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2939
      CDC148Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
      5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
      6hypothetical protein702
      18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
      alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
      1,071
      39hypothetical protein780
      7hypothetical protein936
      2Undecaprenyl-phosphate 4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose transferase1,584
      26hypothetical protein2,022
      4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ810
      60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2939
      CDC158Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
      5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
      6hypothetical protein702
      18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
      alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
      1,027
      39hypothetical protein780
      7hypothetical protein936
      2Undecaprenyl-phosphate 4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose transferase1,420
      7hypothetical protein936
      2hypothetical protein1,281
      37hypothetical protein944
      41N,N'-diacetyllegionaminic acid synthase1,041
      38UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase1,119
      1N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase666
      532,3,4,5-tetrahydropyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate N-acetyltransferase755
      4Undecaprenyl-phosphate 4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose transferase758
      60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
      CDC168Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
      5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
      2hypothetical protein1,224
      Nhypothetical protein1,066
      7hypothetical protein872
      37hypothetical protein918
      41N,N'-diacetyllegionaminic acid synthase1,032
      38UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase1,116
      1hypothetical protein954
      1N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase663
      26hypothetical protein705
      4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ825
      60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
      CDC178Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
      5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
      2hypothetical protein1,224
      6hypothetical protein1,601
      18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
      alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
      1,068
      13hypothetical protein1,148
      2hypothetical protein1,203
      1hypothetical protein1,058
      1N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase663
      26hypothetical protein843
      4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ825
      60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
      CDC188Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
      5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
      6hypothetical protein702
      18GalNAc-alpha-(1->4)-GalNAc-alpha-(1->3)- diNAcBac-PP-undecaprenol
      alpha-1,4-N-acetyl-D-galactosaminyltransferase
      811
      39hypothetical protein966
      7hypothetical protein936
      26hypothetical protein891
      4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ810
      60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944
      CDC198Lipopolysaccharide heptosyltransferase 11,029
      5Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyltransferase879
      2Undecaprenyl-phosphate 4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose transferase1,275
      6hypothetical protein1,560
      37hypothetical protein935
      41N,N'-diacetyllegionaminic acid synthase1,041
      38UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase1,119
      1N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase798
      53Streptogramin A acetyltransferase615
      4putative glycosyltransferase EpsJ813
      60ADP-heptose--LPS heptosyltransferase 2944

      Table S4.  The annotations of ORFs in CPS gene clusters of HS2, HS19, and HS41 of C. jejuni

      CPS typesORFProduct (annotated by prokka)Length (bp)
      HS221Capsule polysaccharide modification protein2,067
      1adenylyl-sulfate kinase513
      29sugar nucleotidyltransferase762
      30amidotransferase603
      27hypothetical protein2,340
      31methyltransferase762
      32methyltransferase774
      3sugar transferase1,839
      3sugar transferase1,878
      9D-glycero-D-manno-heptose 1-phosphate guanosyltransferase666
      11phosphoheptose isomerase606
      17D-glycero-D-manno-heptose 7-phosphate kinase1,020
      110methyltransferase family protein852
      54sugar-nucleotide epimerase/dehydratease942
      10GDP-L-fucose synthetase1,041
      52hypothetical protein927
      24dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase546
      14capsular polysaccharide heptosyltransferase1,749
      Nsugar transferase3,096
      Nhypothetical protein1,107
      22sugar transferase1,335
      77phosphatase636
      Naminotransferase1,230
      78aminotransferase1,104
      22sugar transferase2,328
      20UDP-galactopyranose mutase1,107
      2sugar transferase1,224
      16UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase1,182
      28sugar transferase1,635
      12D-arabinose 5-phosphate isomerase495
      HS1921Capsule polysaccharide modification protein2,067
      1adenylyl-sulfate kinase513
      29sugar nucleotidyltransferase762
      30amidotransferase603
      27hypothetical protein2,340
      31methyltransferase762
      32methyltransferase774
      3sugar transferase1,833
      2hypothetical protein1,509
      77phosphatase633
      78aminotransferase1,077
      2hypothetical protein2,499
      16UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase1,176
      28hypothetical protein2,124
      12D-arabinose 5-phosphate isomerase495
      HS4121Capsule polysaccharide modification protein2,067
      46Na(+)/H(+)-K(+) antiporter GerN1,254
      47pyruvate kinase960
      48sulfate adenylyltransferase1,047
      1adenylyl-sulfate kinase534
      3sugar transferase1,854
      42hypothetical protein1,749
      9D-glycero-D-manno-heptose 1-phosphate guanosyltransferase666
      11phosphoheptose isomerase606
      59hypothetical protein1,236
      17D-glycero-D-manno-heptose 7-phosphate kinase1,020
      19NAD-dependent 4,6-dehydratase1,032
      10GDP-L-fucose synthase2,214
      24dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase546
      55hypothetical protein1,251
      14capsular polysaccharide heptosyltransferase1,608
      20UDP-galactopyranose mutase1,131
      61NAD-dependent 4,6-dehydratase885
      87dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase630
      84NAD-dependent 4,6-dehydratase1,071
      57Glucose-1-phosphate cytidylyltransferase801
      43hypothetical protein2,157
      13hypothetical protein1,380
      20UDP-galactopyranose mutase1,170
      23UDP-GlcNAc/Glc 4-epimerase975
      16UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase1,299
      15NAD-dependent 4,6-dehydratase957
      2hypothetical protein1,371
      22sugar transferase1,050
      28sugar transferase1,632
      12D-arabinose 5-phosphate isomerase495
参考文献 (27)
补充材料:
22159Supplementary Materials.pdf

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回