-
3, 187 SCAD patients entered in the final analysis after the exclusion of 21 patients who were lost to follow-up and 1, 085 patients with missing NT-proBNP data (Figure 1), with a mean age of 58.09 ± 10.20 year; number of female patients: 705 (22.12%). This patient cohort included 649 cases of asymptomatic myocardial ischemia (20.36%). On discharge, the majority of patients were being treated using clopidogrel (3, 182 patients, 99.84%) and only four patients were taking ticagrelor (0.13%), and 1 patient did not take any P2Y12 receptor antagonist (0.03%). Almost all enrolled patients took aspirin 3, 146 (98.71%). Most enrolled patients were treated using statins (3, 060 patients, 96.02%). Among these, 2, 947 patients had a LVEF > 50% (92.47%). All patients underwent PCI (100%), and 3, 007 patients (94.35%) were successfully implanted with drug-eluting stents; only nine patients (0.28%) were implanted with bare metal stents, and 171 patients (5.37%) were treated through percutaneous transluminal percutaneous coronary angioplasty alone.
After a 2-year follow-up, 36 patients died (1.13%) and 387 patients experienced MACCE (12.14%). Patients who died were older, had a lower BMI and a more significant previous history of MI, a previous history of PCI, a previous history of CABG, a previous history of congestive heart failure, CrCl < 60 mL/min, lower LVEF and underwent more intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) treatment. Patients with MACCE were older, and were more likely to demonstrate hyperlipidemia, have a previous history of PCI and a higher baseline SYNTAX score, and more of these patients accepted IABP treatment (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline Clinical Characteristics in SCAD Patients with Versus without Death or MACCE
Characteristing Death
(n = 36)Survival
(n = 3, 151)P
ValueMACCE
(n = 387)No MACCE
(n = 2, 800)P
ValueAge, y 65.61 ± 11.12 58.00 ± 10.16 < 0.001 59.55 ± 10.62 57.89 ± 10.13 0.003 Female, n (%) 5 (13.89) 700 (22.22) 0.231 75 (19.38) 630 (22.50) 0.166 NT-proBNP (P25, P75, pg/mL) 890.70 (714.70, 1353.25) 547.30 (448.90, 761.90) < 0.001 587.50 (456.80, 815.30) 574.45 (449.20, 761.05) 0.064 BMI, kg/m2 24.68 ± 2.92 26.06 ± 3.18 0.010 25.81 ± 3.36 26.08 ± 3.15 0.122 Hypertension, n (%) 25 (69.44) 2, 060 (65.38) 0.610 261 (67.44) 1, 824 (65.14) 0.373 Diabetes mellitus, n (%) Non Diabetes mellitus 22 (61.11) 2, 132 (67.66) 0.706 245 (63.31) 1, 909 (68.18) 0.137 Non-insulin-treated 9 (25.00) 658 (20.88) 89 (23.00) 578 (20.64) Insulin-treated 5 (13.89) 361 (11.46) 53 (13.70) 313 (11.18) Current smoking, n (%) 23 (63.89) 1, 747 (55.44) 0.311 232 (59.95) 1, 538 (54.93) 0.063 dyslipidemia, n (%) 29 (80.56) 2, 184 (69.31) 0.145 286 (73.90) 1, 927 (68.82) 0.042 Previous MI, n (%) 18 (50.00) 832 (26.40) 0.001 110 (28.42) 740 (26.43) 0.405 Previous PCI, n (%) 16 (44.44) 902 (28.63) 0.037 129 (33.33) 789 (28.18) 0.036 Prevous CABG, n (%) 5 (13.89) 141 (4.47) 0.022 23 (5.94) 123 (4.39) 0.172 Previous stroke, n (%) 5 (13.89) 317 (10.06) 0.631 39 (10.08) 283 (10.11) 0.986 CrCl < 60 mL/min 10 (27.78) 422 (13.50) 0.025 62 (16.10) 370 (13.33) 0.137 LVEF (%) 60.02 ± 9.76 63.66 ± 6.93 0.040 63.03 ± 7.30 63.70 ± 6.93 0.078 CAD extension, n (%) LM extension 1 (2.78) 82 (2.60) 1.000 10 (2.58) 73 (2.61) 0.979 1-vessel disease 29 (80.56) 2, 432 (77.18) 0.631 306 (79.07) 2, 155 (76.96) 0.355 2-vessel disease 6 (16.67) 585 (18.60) 0.767 67 (17.31) 525 (18.75) 0.496 3-vessel disease 0 (0.00) 48 (1.52) 0.954 4 (1.03) 44 (1.57) 0.415 Bridge vascular lesions 0 (0.00) 3 (0.10) 1.000 0 (0.00) 3 (0.11) 1.000 IABP use, n (%) 3 (8.33) 30 (0.95) < 0.001 10 (2.58) 23 (9.82) 0.003 NO. of stents per patient (x ± s) 1.89 ± 1.04 1.84 ± 1.11 0.781 1.85 ± 1.09 1.84 ± 1.11 0.875 Femoral artery puncture, n(%) 4 (11.11) 256 (8.12) 0.730 36 (9.30) 224 (8.00) 0.380 Baseline SYNTAX score (x ± s) 12.25 ± 8.08 12.37 ± 7.91 0.932 13.96 ± 8.40 12.15 ± 7.82 < 0.001 Note.NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; SCAD: stable coronary artery disease; MACCE: major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; BMI: body mass index; MI: myocardial infarction; CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD: coronary artery disease; CrCl: creatinine clearance; SYNTAX: synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery; IABP: intra-aortic balloon pump. Values are presented as mean ± SD, n (%), or median (P25, P75). -
NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in the death group compared with the survivor group [890.70 pg/mL (714.70, 1353.25) vs. 547.30 pg/mL (448.90, 761.90), P < 0.001]; but there was no significant difference between the MACCE and the non-MACCE group in terms of NT-proBNP levels [587.50 pg/mL (456.80, 815.30) vs. 574.45 pg/mL (449.20, 761.05), P = 0.064].
-
NT-proBNP levels were predictive of all-cause death in the SCAD population (AUROC, 0.768; 95% CI, 0.687-0.849; P < 0.001) (Figure 2). However, NT-proBNP levels did not show a significant predictive value for MACCE (AUROC, 0.529; 95% CI, 0.497-0.561; P = 0.064).
Figure 2. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of prognostic value of NT-proBNP in evaluating all-cause death in SCAD population. AUROC, 0.768; 95% CI, 0.687-0.849; P < 0.001. NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; SCAD: stable coronary artery disease; AUROC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI: confidence interval.
-
When 732 pg/mL was taken as the NT-proBNP cutoff point, the sensitivity was 75.0%, the specificity was 72.3%, the Youden index was the minimum, the sum of specificity and sensitivity was the maximum, and this value was the optimal cutoff point for predicting death.
A Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was performed, with a NT-proBNP cutoff point of 732 pg/mL (Figure 3). There were 2, 279 patients with NT-proBNP levels < 732 pg/mL, including nine patients who died during the follow-up period, with an average event-free survival time of 25.27 months. A total of 872 patients with NT-proBNP ≥ 732 pg/mL suffered 27 deaths during the follow-up period, with an average event-free survival time of 24.92 months. A log-rank test was performed, using the NT-proBNP cutoff of 732 pg/mL, and the results suggested that there was a significant difference in survival time between the two groups (P < 0.001).
-
Model 1: Univariate analysis showed that log NT-proBNP was a predictor of death, and the death risk in patients with NT-proBNP levels ≥ 732 pg/mL was 7.73 times higher than the risk in patients with NT-proBNP levels < 732 pg/mL [hazard ratio (HR): 7.73; 95% CI, 3.64-16.44, P < 0.001].
Model 2: After including age and gender variables to be adjusted, log NT-proBNP was still an independent predictor of death, and the death risk for patients with NT-proBNP levels ≥ 732 pg/mL was 6.28 times for those with NT-proBNP levels < 732 pg/mL (HR: 7.73; 95% CI, 2.92-13.50, P < 0.001).
Model 3: Based on model 2, 14 factors have been filtered through a stepwise regression model, including BMI, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, hyperlipidemia, previous MI, previous PCI, previous CABG, history of stroke, previous vascular disease, anemia, CrCl < 60 mL/min, LVEF, and baseline SYNTAX score. Only previous PCI was independently associated with mortality. Including previous PCI, log NT-proBNP, age and gender in a multivariate analysis indicated that log NT-proBNP was still an independent predictor of death, whereby patients with NT-proBNP levels ≥ 732 pg/mL demonstrated 6.43 times the risk of death compared with those with NT-proBNP levels < 732 pg/mL (HR: 6.43; 95% CI: 2.99-13.82, P < 0.001) (Table 2).
Table 2. Univariate and Multivariate Cox Model Analysis between NT-proBNP and Survival
Model, pg/mL HR 95% CI P Value Model 1 < 732 1.00 ≥ 732 7.73 3.64-16.44 < 0.001 Model 2 < 732 1.00 ≥ 732 6.28 2.92-13.50 < 0.001 Model 3 < 732 1.00 ≥ 732 6.43 2.99-13.82 < 0.001 Note.Model 1: Univariate Cox Model analyses; Model 2: Adding age, gender variables to be adjusted; Model 3: Model 2+previous PCI (Using stepwise regression, entry probability = 0.05, deletion probability = 0.10, age, gender and LOG NT-proBNP were forcedly introduced; and screening of BMI, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, hyperlipidemia, previous myocardial infarction, previous PCI, Previous CABG, Previous Stroke, Previous Vascular Disease, Anemia, CrCl < 60 mL/min, LVEF, SQSS, eventually only previous PCI left in mode). NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; CrCl: creatinine clearance; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.
doi: 10.3967/bes2018.117
Prognostic Value of NT-proBNP in Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Chinese Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Drug-eluting Stent Era
-
Abstract:
Objective The predictive value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) in the drug-eluting stent era is not yet clear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of NT-proBNP in SCAD patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods We examined 4, 293 consecutive SCAD patients who underwent PCI between January 2013 and December 2013 in Fuwai Hospital, China. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. NT-proBNP levels were measured before PCI using Elisa kits (Biomedica, Austria). The indication for PCI was based on the degree of coronary stenosis and evidence of ischemia. Results Among 3, 187 SCAD patients with NT-proBNP data, after a 2-year follow-up, NT-proBNP levels were predictive for all-cause death in the SCAD population[area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.768; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.687-0.849; P < 0.001]. At the optimum cutoff point of 732 pg/mL, the sensitivity and specificity of death was 75.0% and 72.3%, respectively. In a multivariable Cox regression model, the death hazard ratio was 6.43 (95% CI, 2.99-13.82; P < 0.001) for patients with NT-proBNP levels ≥ 732 pg/mL, compared with < 732 pg/mL. Conclusion NT-proBNP is a strong predictor of 2-year death with SCAD after PCI in the drug-eluting stent era. -
Key words:
- NT-proBNP /
- Stable coronary disease /
- Death /
- Prognosis /
- Percutaneous coronary intervention
-
Figure 2. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of prognostic value of NT-proBNP in evaluating all-cause death in SCAD population. AUROC, 0.768; 95% CI, 0.687-0.849; P < 0.001. NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; SCAD: stable coronary artery disease; AUROC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI: confidence interval.
Table 1. Baseline Clinical Characteristics in SCAD Patients with Versus without Death or MACCE
Characteristing Death
(n = 36)Survival
(n = 3, 151)P
ValueMACCE
(n = 387)No MACCE
(n = 2, 800)P
ValueAge, y 65.61 ± 11.12 58.00 ± 10.16 < 0.001 59.55 ± 10.62 57.89 ± 10.13 0.003 Female, n (%) 5 (13.89) 700 (22.22) 0.231 75 (19.38) 630 (22.50) 0.166 NT-proBNP (P25, P75, pg/mL) 890.70 (714.70, 1353.25) 547.30 (448.90, 761.90) < 0.001 587.50 (456.80, 815.30) 574.45 (449.20, 761.05) 0.064 BMI, kg/m2 24.68 ± 2.92 26.06 ± 3.18 0.010 25.81 ± 3.36 26.08 ± 3.15 0.122 Hypertension, n (%) 25 (69.44) 2, 060 (65.38) 0.610 261 (67.44) 1, 824 (65.14) 0.373 Diabetes mellitus, n (%) Non Diabetes mellitus 22 (61.11) 2, 132 (67.66) 0.706 245 (63.31) 1, 909 (68.18) 0.137 Non-insulin-treated 9 (25.00) 658 (20.88) 89 (23.00) 578 (20.64) Insulin-treated 5 (13.89) 361 (11.46) 53 (13.70) 313 (11.18) Current smoking, n (%) 23 (63.89) 1, 747 (55.44) 0.311 232 (59.95) 1, 538 (54.93) 0.063 dyslipidemia, n (%) 29 (80.56) 2, 184 (69.31) 0.145 286 (73.90) 1, 927 (68.82) 0.042 Previous MI, n (%) 18 (50.00) 832 (26.40) 0.001 110 (28.42) 740 (26.43) 0.405 Previous PCI, n (%) 16 (44.44) 902 (28.63) 0.037 129 (33.33) 789 (28.18) 0.036 Prevous CABG, n (%) 5 (13.89) 141 (4.47) 0.022 23 (5.94) 123 (4.39) 0.172 Previous stroke, n (%) 5 (13.89) 317 (10.06) 0.631 39 (10.08) 283 (10.11) 0.986 CrCl < 60 mL/min 10 (27.78) 422 (13.50) 0.025 62 (16.10) 370 (13.33) 0.137 LVEF (%) 60.02 ± 9.76 63.66 ± 6.93 0.040 63.03 ± 7.30 63.70 ± 6.93 0.078 CAD extension, n (%) LM extension 1 (2.78) 82 (2.60) 1.000 10 (2.58) 73 (2.61) 0.979 1-vessel disease 29 (80.56) 2, 432 (77.18) 0.631 306 (79.07) 2, 155 (76.96) 0.355 2-vessel disease 6 (16.67) 585 (18.60) 0.767 67 (17.31) 525 (18.75) 0.496 3-vessel disease 0 (0.00) 48 (1.52) 0.954 4 (1.03) 44 (1.57) 0.415 Bridge vascular lesions 0 (0.00) 3 (0.10) 1.000 0 (0.00) 3 (0.11) 1.000 IABP use, n (%) 3 (8.33) 30 (0.95) < 0.001 10 (2.58) 23 (9.82) 0.003 NO. of stents per patient (x ± s) 1.89 ± 1.04 1.84 ± 1.11 0.781 1.85 ± 1.09 1.84 ± 1.11 0.875 Femoral artery puncture, n(%) 4 (11.11) 256 (8.12) 0.730 36 (9.30) 224 (8.00) 0.380 Baseline SYNTAX score (x ± s) 12.25 ± 8.08 12.37 ± 7.91 0.932 13.96 ± 8.40 12.15 ± 7.82 < 0.001 Note.NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; SCAD: stable coronary artery disease; MACCE: major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; BMI: body mass index; MI: myocardial infarction; CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD: coronary artery disease; CrCl: creatinine clearance; SYNTAX: synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery; IABP: intra-aortic balloon pump. Values are presented as mean ± SD, n (%), or median (P25, P75). Table 2. Univariate and Multivariate Cox Model Analysis between NT-proBNP and Survival
Model, pg/mL HR 95% CI P Value Model 1 < 732 1.00 ≥ 732 7.73 3.64-16.44 < 0.001 Model 2 < 732 1.00 ≥ 732 6.28 2.92-13.50 < 0.001 Model 3 < 732 1.00 ≥ 732 6.43 2.99-13.82 < 0.001 Note.Model 1: Univariate Cox Model analyses; Model 2: Adding age, gender variables to be adjusted; Model 3: Model 2+previous PCI (Using stepwise regression, entry probability = 0.05, deletion probability = 0.10, age, gender and LOG NT-proBNP were forcedly introduced; and screening of BMI, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, hyperlipidemia, previous myocardial infarction, previous PCI, Previous CABG, Previous Stroke, Previous Vascular Disease, Anemia, CrCl < 60 mL/min, LVEF, SQSS, eventually only previous PCI left in mode). NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; CrCl: creatinine clearance; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval. -
[1] Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA):a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2017; 391, 31-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29103656 [2] Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med, 2007; 356, 1503-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070829 [3] Scirica BM, Sabatine MS, Jarolim P, et al. Assessment of multiple cardiac biomarkers in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes:observations from the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial. Eur Heart J, 2011; 32, 697-705. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq468 [4] Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Mitrovic V, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels for dynamic risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation, 2004; 110, 3206-12. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147611.92021.2B [5] Windhausen F, Hirsch A, Sanders GT, et al. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide for additional risk stratification in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and an elevated troponin T:an Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable coronary Syndromes (ICTUS) substudy. Am Heart J, 2007; 153, 485-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.12.012 [6] James SK, Lindahl B, Siegbahn A, et al. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and other risk markers for the separate prediction of mortality and subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with unstable coronary artery disease:a Global Utilization of Strategies To Open occluded arteries (GUSTO)-Ⅳ substudy. Circulation, 2003; 108, 275-81. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000079170.10579.DC [7] de Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Bentley JH, et al. The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med, 2001; 345, 1014-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011053 [8] Kurtul A, Yarlioglues M, Murat SN, et al. N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Level is Associated With Severity and Complexity of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2016; 22, 69-76. doi: 10.1177/1076029614541954 [9] Kurtul A, Duran M, Yarlioglues M, et al. Association between N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels and contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. Clin Cardiol, 2014; 37, 485-92. doi: 10.1002/clc.2014.37.issue-8 [10] Kragelund C, Gronning B, Kober L, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and long-term mortality in stable coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med, 2005; 352, 666-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042330 [11] Bibbins-Domingo K, Gupta R, Na B, et al. N-terminal fragment of the prohormone brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiovascular events, and mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease. JAMA, 2007; 297, 169-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.2.169 [12] Ndrepepa G, Braun S, Niemoller K, et al. Prognostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with chronic stable angina. Circulation, 2005; 112, 2102-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.550715 [13] Dai DF, Hwang JJ, Lin JL, et al. Joint effects of N-terminal pro-B-type-natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein vs. angiographic severity in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events and clinical restenosis after coronary angioplasty in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circ J, 2008; 72, 1316-23. doi: 10.1253/circj.72.1316 [14] Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease:the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2013; 34, 2949-3003. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht296 [15] Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials:a case for standardized definitions. Circulation, 2007; 115, 2344-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313 [16] Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012; 60, 1581-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.001 [17] Bonaa KH, Mannsverk J, Wiseth R, et al. Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents for Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med, 2016; 375, 1242-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607991 [18] Mishra RK, Beatty AL, Jaganath R, et al. B-type natriuretic peptides for the prediction of cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary heart disease:the Heart and Soul Study. J Am Heart Assoc, 2014; 3, e000907. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25053234 [19] Niccoli G, Conte M, Marchitti S, et al. NT-proANP and NT-proBNP circulating levels as predictors of cardiovascular outcome following coronary stent implantation. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2016; 17, 162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.02.012 [20] van Kimmenade RR, Pinto YM, Januzzi JL Jr. Importance and interpretation of intermediate (gray zone) amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations. Am J Cardiol, 2008; 101, 39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.11.018 [21] Das SR, Drazner MH, Dries DL, et al. Impact of body mass and body composition on circulating levels of natriuretic peptides:results from the Dallas Heart Study. Circulation, 2005; 112, 2163-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.555573 [22] Wu N, Ma F, Guo Y, et al. Association of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide with the severity of coronary artery disease in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Chin Med J, 2014; 127, 627-32. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zhcmj201404007 [23] Hama N, Itoh H, Shirakami G, et al. Rapid Ventricular Induction of Brain Natriuretic Peptide Gene Expression in Experimental Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation, 1995; 92, 1558-64. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.92.6.1558 [24] Goetze JP, Christoffersen C, Perko M, et al. Increased cardiac BNP expression associated with myocardial ischemia. FASEB J, 2003; 17, 1105-7. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0796fje [25] Bibbins-Domingo K, Ansari M, Schiller NB, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide and ischemia in patients with stable coronary disease:data from the Heart and Soul study. Circulation, 2003; 108, 2987-92. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000103681.04726.9C [26] D'Souza SP, Davis M, Baxter GF. Autocrine and paracrine actions of natriuretic peptides in the heart. Pharmacol Ther, 2004; 101, 113-29. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2003.11.001