-
Attenuated PV1 strain LSc/2ab was obtained from the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (UK). Viruses were propagated and titrated using Vero cells. Cultures of PV1-infected cells were harvested after the development of extensive cytopathic effects (usually 24 h post-inoculation). Cells were subjected to three freeze-thaw cycles to release the virus, followed by centrifugation at 1, 200 ×g for 10 min at 48 ℃ to remove cell debris. The supernatant was then assayed for infectious PV1 and found to contain 107.25 tissue culture infective dose/mL[22]. The viral suspension was stored at -80 ℃. Before use, the suspension was thawed, sonicated for 30 s at 20 kHz (150 W), and filtered through a 0.22-μm pore size membrane to remove any large clumps or aggregates of PV1.
-
Ozone was generated using an air source; ozone generated by the ozone-generating equipment was introduced into a glass cylinder containing 100 mL distilled water, and tail gas was absorbed using a surplus of sodium sulfite solution. Immediately, 2.5 mL potassium iodide and (1:3) sulfuric acid were added to the ozone water; the solution was thoroughly mixed and incubated for 5 min in the dark. Then, titration was performed using 0.01 mol/L Na2S2O3. When a pale-yellow color was obtained, 1 mL of 5 g/L starch was added. The solution consequently turned blue; titration was continued until the solution became colorless. The titration volume of Na2S2O3 was used to calculate the concentration of ozone[24].
-
The viral suspension was added to 100 mL water sample at 20 ℃ and thoroughly mixed to obtain a concentration of 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/L. The flow rate of ozone was 0.5 L/min, and the ventilation time was set to 0, 30, 60, 90, 105, and 120 s[24]. The ozone-sterilized viral suspension was connected to the Vero cells to detect any live viruses in the sample. The concentration of ozone in the water sample at each timepoint was measured by the above method, and three replicates were used for each timepoint.
-
The sterilized viral suspension was diluted and inoculated into a 25-cm2 cell culture flask containing a single layer of Vero cells; three replicates were used for each timepoint. After mixing 2× 1640 maintenance medium and 2% agar in equal volumes, it was added to a cell culture flask to cover the cells to form a solid medium, and the number of plaques formed was counted after 2 days of incubation in a cell culture incubator. PV1 concentration was subsequently calculated from the number of plaques formed and expressed as PFU.
$$ {\rm{PFU}} = {\rm{ Dilution}}\;\;{\rm{ factor }} \times \frac{{{\rm{P}}1 + {\rm{P}}2 + {\rm{P}}3}}{n} \times \frac{1}{v} $$ (1) In the above formula, P represents the number of plaques formed, n is the number of cell culture flasks, and v is the inoculum volume (mL).
-
Viral RNA was extracted and purified using RNeasy columns (Qiagen, USA), according to manufacturer's instructions.
-
Different regions of the viral genome were amplified using RT-PCR. Primers used for detecting viral genome sites that were damaged by ozone are listed in Supplementary Table S1, available in www.besjournal.com.
Table Supplementary Table S1. Primers Used to Amplify PV1 Genome
Primer Set Primer Name Sequence (5′→3′) Site (nt) 1 1F TTAAAACAGCTCTGGGGT 1-18 1R TTTGGAGGCGTTACACTG 1, 280-1, 297 2 2F CAATGCTAAACTCGCCAAAC 939-958 2R GATCCTGCCCAGTGTGTGT 2, 086-2, 104 3 3F CCCATACTCTGCCTGTCACTC 2, 006-2, 026 3R CAGCCAAAATACCGAAGTC 3, 185-3, 203 4 4F GCACTAGGTGACTCCCTC 3, 146-3, 163 4R TACGGTGTTTGCTCTTGAAC 4, 462-4, 481 5 5F CAGGAACACCAGGAAATTCT 4, 331-4, 349 5R CAGTGGGAGGTTGATTCCAT 6, 429-6, 448 6 6F TCTTGAACAAACAAACCAGAG 6, 375-6, 395 6R AAAAATTTACCCCTACAGCAGG 7, 407-7, 427 5'-NCR 5' -1a CTTGGTTTTGTGCGTCTAAG 105-124 5'-2Fb AGACGCACAAAACCAAGTT 108-126 5'-2R GAGCGAATCCAGCAAACAG 661-679 5'-3c CTGGATTCGCTCCATTGAG 669-686 Note. F, forward primer; R, reverse primer. aAmplification of the 1-124 nt region matched with primer 1F. bAmplification of the 108-679 nt region matched with 5'-2R. cAmplification of the 669-1, 297 nt region matched with primer 1R. First, the extracted RNA was reverse transcribed with random primers and oligo(dT) primers using PrimeScriptTM Ⅱ First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara 6210A), as per manufacturer's instructions. The obtained cDNA was then used as a template to amplify different target regions with corresponding primers. Each 20 μL reaction mixture included 2.5 μL cDNA template, 12.5 μL Taq polymerase, 0.5 μL primers (10 μmol/L), and 4 μL distilled water. The thermal cycler conditions were as follows: 1 cycle of initial denaturation at 94 ℃ for 3 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 ℃ for 30 s, annealing at 55 ℃ for 30 s, and extension at 72 ℃ for 60 s, followed by a final elongation step at 72 ℃ for 7 min. All PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis using 1.5% (w/v) agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide.
-
Spot hybridization assays were performed using biotinylated probes[25]. A nitrocellulose membrane was pre-soaked in 2× saline sodium citrate (SSC) buffer for 2 h and air-dried before use. PV1 RNA suspensions were mixed with an equal volume of RNA fixative, incubated at 68 ℃, and then chilled in an ice bath. Two volumes of 20× SSC were subsequently added to the mixture to establish an RNase-free environment. A pencil was used to create marks on the membrane, and viral RNA samples were dot blotted. The membrane was placed on a clean filter paper and then in a nucleic acid cross-linking instrument, and irradiated with a UV lamp to immobilize the RNA on the membrane. Subsequently, the membrane was completely immersed in a hybridization solution to facilitate pre-hybridization. The hybridization solution and probes were mixed in equal volumes, and this was applied to the locations marked on the membrane. The membrane was then placed in a hybridization medium to facilitate hybridization, and it was then washed using a washing buffer. After drying the membrane, 2 μL horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-biotin was diluted in 2 mL hybridization solution, and this was carefully applied to the defined RNA sample locations on the membrane. Once dried, the membrane was placed in the hybridization solution, incubated at 37 ℃, and washed using the washing buffer. One drop of 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine and 37% H2O2 were added to 2 mL phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and uniformly mixed, and the membrane was placed in this solution at room temperature to facilitate color development. The membrane was finally placed on a filter paper and allowed to dry before a photograph was taken. The probes used for spot hybridization assays are shown in Supplementary Table S2, available in www.besjournal.com.
Table Supplementary Table S2. Probes Used for Spot Hybridization Assays
Probe Site (nt) Sequence (5′→3′) 1 1-40 GTGGGCCTCTGGGGTGGGTACAACCCCAGAGCTGTTTTAA 2 40-80 GCGTACAAGGGTACCGCAATACCGGAGTACTAGCCGCCACG 3 80-124 CTTGGTTTTGTGCGTCTAAGTTACGGGAAGGGAGTATAAAACAGG -
Viral cDNA was synthesized in vitro and transcribed using RNA polymerase into RNA, which was used to infect cells, ultimately resulting in the synthesis of infectious PV[26]. RNA extraction and reverse transcription were performed as previously described. Primers used to construct damaged PV1 RNA are listed in Supplementary Table S3, available in www.besjournal.com.
Table Supplementary Table S3. Primers Used to Construct Damaged PV1 RNA
Primer name Site (nt) Sequence (5′→3′) F1 1-80 CCCGAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGTTAAAACAGCT CTGGGGTTGTACCCACCCCAGAGGCCCACGTGGCGG CTAGTACTCCGGTATTGCGGTACCCTTGTACGCCTTAAG F2 1-20 CCCGAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGTTAAAACAGCTCTGGGGTTG F3 125-144 CCGAATTCTCAAT AGAAG GGGGT ACAAA TR 7, 433-7, 471 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTCCTCCGAAT Note. Primer pair F3/TR was used to amplify the 125-7, 471 nt region; the obtained PCR products were ligated with F1 to construct PV1 lacking the 80-124 nt region. Primer pair F3/TR was used to construct PV1 lacking the 1-124 nt region. Primer pair F2/TR was used to construct complete PV1 genome. Each 50 μL reaction mixture contained 1 μL cDNA template, 1 μL primers (5 μmol/L), 1 μL Trans HiFi (10 U/μL), 5 μL 10× HiFi buffer, 5 μL dNTPs (2.5 mmol/L), and 36 μL distilled water. The thermal cycler conditions were as follows: 1 cycle of initial denaturation at 94 ℃ for 3 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 ℃ for 30 s, annealing at 53 ℃ for 30 s, and extension at 72 ℃ for 60 s, followed by a final elongation step at 72 ℃ for 10 min. All PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis using 1.5% (w/v) agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide.
The recovered PV1 DNA fragment was treated with EcoRI to form a sticky end between the 3′-end of the upstream fragment and the 5′-end of the downstream fragment of the injury site. Each 100 μL reaction mixture included 25 μL 10× EcoRI buffer, 10 μL template DNA, 10 μL EcoRI, and 55 μL ultrapure water. The reaction was performed at 37 ℃ for 2 h, and the DNA was precipitated using absolute ethanol. The upstream and downstream DNA fragments were ligated with T4 DNA ligase to obtain PV1 double-stranded genomic DNA that was damaged in the 5′-NCR partial region.
After constructing the recombinant PV1 genome, T7 RNA polymerase was used to synthesize recombinant viral genomic RNAs in vitro using the newly constructed PV1 genomic DNA with T7 bacteriophage transcript promoter. The reaction mixture comprised 10 μL 10× T7 RNA polymerase buffer, 10 μL dNTPs (2.5 mmol/L), 20 μL DTT (50 mmol/L), 2.5 μL RNase inhibitor (40 U/μL), 10 μL PV1 template DNA (20 ng/mL), and 5-25 U T7 RNA polymerase; DEPC water was used to obtain a final volume of 100 μL. After incubation at 37 ℃ for 30-60 min, 10 U of RNase-free DNase Ⅰ and RNase inhibitor were added to 1 U/μL, followed by incubation at 37 ℃ for 10 min. The solution was then transferred to a column and total RNA was extracted.
-
The infectivity of recombinant PV1 genomic RNAs was analyzed using plaque-forming assays[27]. Vero cells were grown on a 25-cm2 square to form a monolayer and washed twice with PBS in DEPC water. Viral RNA was serially diluted 10-fold with Hanks balanced salt solution containing 1 mg/mL DEAE-dextran, and chilled for 30 min in an ice batch. Subsequently, 1 mL DEPC-treated PBS was added to each cell culture well, and 200 μL of different concentrations of gradient RNA solution was added to each well. The culture flask was thoroughly stirred; two wells were inoculated for each dilution gradient. After adsorption for 30 min at room temperature, it was mixed with 2× 1640 maintenance medium and 2% agarose and then spread into a cell culture plate. At the same time, PV1 RNA extracted from viral particles was used as a control to infect Vero cells, and infectivity of the synthesized PV1 RNA was compared.
If no plaques formed in the first round of transfection, the culture supernatant was used to re-infect Vero cells, and the inoculation cycle was repeated three times. RNA isolated from the supernatant of the third inoculation was extracted using the extraction method described earlier, and RT-PCR was performed using the primer pair listed in Supplementary Table S1 to exclude the possibility of false-negative or latent infection.
-
The concentration of ozone in water (mg/L) increased with an increase in ventilation time, and the concentration became stable after saturation (Supplementary Table S4, available in www.besjournal.com).
Table Supplementary Table S4. Relationship between Ventilation Time and Ozone Concentration
Ventilation Time (s) Ozone Concentration (mg/L) 0 0.00 30 0.60 60 1.08 90 1.44 105 1.44 120 1.44 Note.Water volume was 100 mL, flow rate of ozone was 0.5 L/min, and temperature was 20 ℃. As ozone-depleting substances were present in the water body containing PV1, the concentration of ozone in water was 0 mg/L when ventilation was started. When equilibrium was reached, the concentration of ozone increased with ventilation time. Time-and dose-dependent effects of ozone on PV1 inactivation and antigenic injury were observed. An increase in the concentration of ozone or ventilation time resulted in a decline in PV1 survival rate and an increase in the degree of antigenic injury (Figure 1). The time required for ozone to inactivate PV1 was very short-PV1 was completely eradicated by ozone upon disinfecting water for 105-120 s (Supplementary Table S5, available in www.besjournal.com).
Figure 1. (A) Ozone-induced changes of PV1 inactivation rate. (B) Dissolved concentration curve of ozone in 100 mL distilled water and 100 mL PV1-containing water. The baseline conditions were: initial concentration of PV1 was 106 PFU/L in 100 mL water sample, ventilation flow was 0.5 L/min, and temperature was 20 ℃.
Table Supplementary Table S5. Relationship between Ventilation Time, Ozone Concentration, and PV1 Inactivation Rate
Ventilation Time (s) Ozone Concentration (mg/L) Inactivation Rate (%) 0 0.00 0.0 30 0.00 66.7 60 0.00 99.0 90 0.06 99.9 105 0.12 100.0 120 0.22 100.0 Note. Water volume was 100 mL, initial concentration of PV1 was 106 PFU/L in the water sample, flow rate of ozone was 0.5 L/min, and temperature was 20 ℃. -
Primers designed to amplify the full-length PV1 genome were validated by RT-PCR using untreated (native) PV1 RNA as a template. All expected targets, 6 long and 3 short fragments, were amplified successfully (Supplementary Figure S1, available in www.besjournal.com). Furthermore, the 6 long fragment sequences were verified by sequencing and aligning to the 7441-nt region, which were demonstrated by BLAST to be identical to those published earlier[28].
Figure Supplementary Figure S1. Validation of primers designed to target different regions in the PV1 genome. Lane M is DL2000 DNA markers (2, 000 bp, 1, 000 bp, 750 bp, 500 bp, 250 bp, 100 bp); lanes 1-6 are the amplification products of the primer set 1 to the primer set 6; lanes 7-10 are the amplification product of the primer set 1, 5'-1/1F, 5'-2F/5'-2R, 5'-3/1R.
-
PV1 infectivity was completely inhibited upon disinfecting the water sample with ozone for 105 s. When water samples exposed to different disinfection times were separately subjected to RT-PCR to study the PV1 genome, region-specific sensitivities to ozone were revealed. The first region lost to detection was the 1-1, 297 nt region in the 5′-NCR (Figure 2). Further study was conducted to elucidate the relationship between damage to the PV1 genome and changes to viral infectivity, and the obtained results showed that the 1-124 nt region was damaged (Figure 3). As ozone concentration or disinfection time increased, other regions of the genome were damaged after 120 s of disinfection. These findings indicated that different regions of the PV1 genome have different resistance to ozone. The 1-124 nt region was the most sensitive and its damage was consistent with the disappearance of PV1 infectivity. The rest of the genome showed stronger resistance, and damage to other regions, as evident from the data presented in Table 1, was not completely consistent with changes to PV1 infectivity. These observations indicated that ozone-induced inactivation of PV1 occurs via damage to the 1-124 nt region in the 5′-NCR.
Figure 2. Detection of RT-PCR products in virus-containing water samples sterilized by ozone at different times.(A) The RT-PCR products of PV1 cDNA synthesized with random primers. (B) The RT-PCR products of PV1 cDNA synthesized with oligo-dT primers. Lanes 1-6 were Positive controls, correspond to the amplification products of primer set 1 to primer set 6, respectively. Lanes 7-12: Disinfection time of 105 s, lanes 13-18: Disinfection time of 120 s, lane 19 was a negative control for primer set 1. Lanes MA and MB, DL2000 DNA markers (2, 000, 1, 000, 750, 500, 250, and 100 bp).
Figure 3. Precise detection of RT-PCR products in virus-containing water samples sterilized by ozone at different times.(A) The RT-PCR products of PV1 cDNA in the 5'-NCR synthesized with random primers. (B) The RT-PCR products of PV1 cDNA in the 5'-NCR synthesized with oligo-dT primers. Lanes 1-3 were positive controls, correspond to the amplification products of primer sets 5'-1/1F, 5'-2F/5'-2R, and 5'-3/1R, respectively. Lanes 4-6: Disinfection time of 30 s, lanes 7-9: Disinfection time of 60 s, lanes 10-12: Disinfection time of 90 s, lanes 13-15: Disinfection time of 105 s, lanes 16-18: Disinfection time of 120 s, lane 19-21 were negative controls. Lanes MA and MB, DL2000 DNA markers (2, 000, 1, 000, 750, 500, 250, and 100 bp).
Table 1. Damage to PV1 RNA by Different Concentrations of Ozone
Ventilation Time (s) Ozone Concentration (mg/L) Infectivity Nucleic Acid Region (nt) 1-1, 297 1-124 108-679 669-1, 274 939-7, 441 0 0 + + + + + + 30 0.60 + + + + + + 60 1.08 + + + + + + 90 1.44 + + + + + + 105 1.44 - - - + + + 120 1.44 - - - - - - Note.+, Positive result; -, Negative result in replicate experiments (n = 3). -
Spot hybridization assays reportedly have better sensitivity and the detection effect is ideal. Probe 2 was used for spot hybridization. The method could detect 17 PFU/mL of viral RNA (Supplementary Figure S2, available in www.besjournal.com).
Figure Supplementary Figure S2. Sensitivity verification of the spot hybridization assay (n = 3). PV1 RNA was cross-linked on a membrane and hybridized with probe 2. Spot 1, positive control; spots 2-, PV1 detection concentration of 1.7 × 106-1.7 × 101 PFU/mL.
Viral RNA was extracted from PV1 after disinfection using ozone for 0, 90, 105, and 120 s, and spot hybridization assay was used to accurately locate the 5′-NCR sensitive targets in the PV1 genome. The 5′-NCR loci corresponding to probe 3 (80-124 nt) was the most sensitive to damage by ozone (Figure 4). Moreover, loss of the integrity of this small 45-nt region was accompanied by loss of PV1 infectivity (Supplementary Table S6, available in www.besjournal.com).
Figure 4. Spot hybridization assay to determine ozone-sensitive regions in the 5′-NCR of the PV1 genome (n = 3). PV1 RNA was cross-linked on a membrane and hybridized with biotinylated probes targeting different regions. Spot 5 corresponds to the negetive control. Spots 1-4 correspond to RNA from PV1 treated with ozone for 0, 90, 105, and 120 sec. Spots were detected with probes to P1 (1-40 nt), P2 (40-80 nt), P3 (80-124 nt) region.
Table Supplementary Table S6. Spot Hybridization Assay to Detect Damage to the 1-124 nt Region in the 5'-NCR
Ventilation Time (s) Infectivity 1-40 40-80 80-124 0 + + + + 30 + + + + 60 + + + + 90 + + + + 105 - + + - 120 - - - - Note. +, Positive result; -, Negative result in replicate experiments (n = 3). -
PV1 genomic DNA and RNA lacking different target sequences were constructed and verified using RT-PCR (Supplementary Figure S3, available in www.besjournal.com). The plaque-forming assay of the corresponding recombinant viral genomes indicated that the full-length viral genomic RNA had high infectivity (Figure 5), whereas the viral genome lacking the 80-124 nt and 1-124 nt regions had no infectivity (Figure 6).
Figure Supplementary Figure S3. Verification of PV1 genomic DNA with 1-124 nt region deleted. Lane M: DL15000 DNA markers (15, 000, 10, 000, 7, 500, 5, 000, 4, 000, 3, 000, 1, 500, 500), PCR products of the full-length (integrated) PV1 genomic DNA (lane 3), and negative control (lane 1); PCR products of the PV1 genomic DNA lacking the 1-124 nt region (lane 4), and negative control (lane 2).
Figure 5. Plaque-forming cell assay using full-length viral genomic RNA and viral particles (n = 3). (A) Negative control, no PV1 RNA was inoculated, (B) Integrated virus RNA, (C) Complete virus particle (17 PFU), (D) Complete virus particle (170 PFU).
Figure 6. Plaque-forming cell assay to determine infectivity of recombinant PV1 RNA with sensitive targets deleted (n = 3). Recombinant viral RNA were inoculated into the culture supernatant of Vero cells. (A) RNA lacking 1-124 nt of 5'-NCR, (B) is parallel to, (C) RNA lacking 80-124 nt of 5'-NCR, (D) is parallel to C.
Viral nucleic acids were not detected in the culture supernatants from inoculated cells infected with recombinant viruses, indicating loss of infectivity when the 80-124 nt and 1-124 nt regions were missing.
doi: 10.3967/bes2019.044
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the mechanisms underlying ozone-induced inactivation of poliovirus type 1 (PV1). Methods We used cell culture, long-overlapping RT-PCR, and spot hybridization assays to verify and accurately locate the sites of action of ozone that cause PV1 inactivation. We also employed recombinant viral genome RNA infection models to confirm our observations. Results Our results indicated that ozone inactivated PV1 primarily by disrupting the 5'-non-coding region (5'-NCR) of the PV1 genome. Further study revealed that ozone specifically damaged the 80-124 nucleotide (nt) region in the 5'-NCR. Recombinant viral genome RNA infection models confirmed that PV1 lacking this region was non-infectious. Conclusion In this study, we not only elucidated the mechanisms by which ozone induces PV1 inactivation but also determined that the 80-124 nt region in the 5'-NCR is targeted by ozone to achieve this inactivation. -
Key words:
- Poliovirus /
- Poliomyelitis /
- Ozone /
- Disinfection
-
Figure 1. (A) Ozone-induced changes of PV1 inactivation rate. (B) Dissolved concentration curve of ozone in 100 mL distilled water and 100 mL PV1-containing water. The baseline conditions were: initial concentration of PV1 was 106 PFU/L in 100 mL water sample, ventilation flow was 0.5 L/min, and temperature was 20 ℃.
Supplementary Figure S1. Validation of primers designed to target different regions in the PV1 genome. Lane M is DL2000 DNA markers (2, 000 bp, 1, 000 bp, 750 bp, 500 bp, 250 bp, 100 bp); lanes 1-6 are the amplification products of the primer set 1 to the primer set 6; lanes 7-10 are the amplification product of the primer set 1, 5'-1/1F, 5'-2F/5'-2R, 5'-3/1R.
Figure 2. Detection of RT-PCR products in virus-containing water samples sterilized by ozone at different times.(A) The RT-PCR products of PV1 cDNA synthesized with random primers. (B) The RT-PCR products of PV1 cDNA synthesized with oligo-dT primers. Lanes 1-6 were Positive controls, correspond to the amplification products of primer set 1 to primer set 6, respectively. Lanes 7-12: Disinfection time of 105 s, lanes 13-18: Disinfection time of 120 s, lane 19 was a negative control for primer set 1. Lanes MA and MB, DL2000 DNA markers (2, 000, 1, 000, 750, 500, 250, and 100 bp).
Figure 3. Precise detection of RT-PCR products in virus-containing water samples sterilized by ozone at different times.(A) The RT-PCR products of PV1 cDNA in the 5'-NCR synthesized with random primers. (B) The RT-PCR products of PV1 cDNA in the 5'-NCR synthesized with oligo-dT primers. Lanes 1-3 were positive controls, correspond to the amplification products of primer sets 5'-1/1F, 5'-2F/5'-2R, and 5'-3/1R, respectively. Lanes 4-6: Disinfection time of 30 s, lanes 7-9: Disinfection time of 60 s, lanes 10-12: Disinfection time of 90 s, lanes 13-15: Disinfection time of 105 s, lanes 16-18: Disinfection time of 120 s, lane 19-21 were negative controls. Lanes MA and MB, DL2000 DNA markers (2, 000, 1, 000, 750, 500, 250, and 100 bp).
Figure 4. Spot hybridization assay to determine ozone-sensitive regions in the 5′-NCR of the PV1 genome (n = 3). PV1 RNA was cross-linked on a membrane and hybridized with biotinylated probes targeting different regions. Spot 5 corresponds to the negetive control. Spots 1-4 correspond to RNA from PV1 treated with ozone for 0, 90, 105, and 120 sec. Spots were detected with probes to P1 (1-40 nt), P2 (40-80 nt), P3 (80-124 nt) region.
Supplementary Figure S3. Verification of PV1 genomic DNA with 1-124 nt region deleted. Lane M: DL15000 DNA markers (15, 000, 10, 000, 7, 500, 5, 000, 4, 000, 3, 000, 1, 500, 500), PCR products of the full-length (integrated) PV1 genomic DNA (lane 3), and negative control (lane 1); PCR products of the PV1 genomic DNA lacking the 1-124 nt region (lane 4), and negative control (lane 2).
Figure 6. Plaque-forming cell assay to determine infectivity of recombinant PV1 RNA with sensitive targets deleted (n = 3). Recombinant viral RNA were inoculated into the culture supernatant of Vero cells. (A) RNA lacking 1-124 nt of 5'-NCR, (B) is parallel to, (C) RNA lacking 80-124 nt of 5'-NCR, (D) is parallel to C.
Supplementary Table S1. Primers Used to Amplify PV1 Genome
Primer Set Primer Name Sequence (5′→3′) Site (nt) 1 1F TTAAAACAGCTCTGGGGT 1-18 1R TTTGGAGGCGTTACACTG 1, 280-1, 297 2 2F CAATGCTAAACTCGCCAAAC 939-958 2R GATCCTGCCCAGTGTGTGT 2, 086-2, 104 3 3F CCCATACTCTGCCTGTCACTC 2, 006-2, 026 3R CAGCCAAAATACCGAAGTC 3, 185-3, 203 4 4F GCACTAGGTGACTCCCTC 3, 146-3, 163 4R TACGGTGTTTGCTCTTGAAC 4, 462-4, 481 5 5F CAGGAACACCAGGAAATTCT 4, 331-4, 349 5R CAGTGGGAGGTTGATTCCAT 6, 429-6, 448 6 6F TCTTGAACAAACAAACCAGAG 6, 375-6, 395 6R AAAAATTTACCCCTACAGCAGG 7, 407-7, 427 5'-NCR 5' -1a CTTGGTTTTGTGCGTCTAAG 105-124 5'-2Fb AGACGCACAAAACCAAGTT 108-126 5'-2R GAGCGAATCCAGCAAACAG 661-679 5'-3c CTGGATTCGCTCCATTGAG 669-686 Note. F, forward primer; R, reverse primer. aAmplification of the 1-124 nt region matched with primer 1F. bAmplification of the 108-679 nt region matched with 5'-2R. cAmplification of the 669-1, 297 nt region matched with primer 1R. Supplementary Table S2. Probes Used for Spot Hybridization Assays
Probe Site (nt) Sequence (5′→3′) 1 1-40 GTGGGCCTCTGGGGTGGGTACAACCCCAGAGCTGTTTTAA 2 40-80 GCGTACAAGGGTACCGCAATACCGGAGTACTAGCCGCCACG 3 80-124 CTTGGTTTTGTGCGTCTAAGTTACGGGAAGGGAGTATAAAACAGG Supplementary Table S3. Primers Used to Construct Damaged PV1 RNA
Primer name Site (nt) Sequence (5′→3′) F1 1-80 CCCGAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGTTAAAACAGCT CTGGGGTTGTACCCACCCCAGAGGCCCACGTGGCGG CTAGTACTCCGGTATTGCGGTACCCTTGTACGCCTTAAG F2 1-20 CCCGAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGTTAAAACAGCTCTGGGGTTG F3 125-144 CCGAATTCTCAAT AGAAG GGGGT ACAAA TR 7, 433-7, 471 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTCCTCCGAAT Note. Primer pair F3/TR was used to amplify the 125-7, 471 nt region; the obtained PCR products were ligated with F1 to construct PV1 lacking the 80-124 nt region. Primer pair F3/TR was used to construct PV1 lacking the 1-124 nt region. Primer pair F2/TR was used to construct complete PV1 genome. Supplementary Table S4. Relationship between Ventilation Time and Ozone Concentration
Ventilation Time (s) Ozone Concentration (mg/L) 0 0.00 30 0.60 60 1.08 90 1.44 105 1.44 120 1.44 Note.Water volume was 100 mL, flow rate of ozone was 0.5 L/min, and temperature was 20 ℃. Supplementary Table S5. Relationship between Ventilation Time, Ozone Concentration, and PV1 Inactivation Rate
Ventilation Time (s) Ozone Concentration (mg/L) Inactivation Rate (%) 0 0.00 0.0 30 0.00 66.7 60 0.00 99.0 90 0.06 99.9 105 0.12 100.0 120 0.22 100.0 Note. Water volume was 100 mL, initial concentration of PV1 was 106 PFU/L in the water sample, flow rate of ozone was 0.5 L/min, and temperature was 20 ℃. Table 1. Damage to PV1 RNA by Different Concentrations of Ozone
Ventilation Time (s) Ozone Concentration (mg/L) Infectivity Nucleic Acid Region (nt) 1-1, 297 1-124 108-679 669-1, 274 939-7, 441 0 0 + + + + + + 30 0.60 + + + + + + 60 1.08 + + + + + + 90 1.44 + + + + + + 105 1.44 - - - + + + 120 1.44 - - - - - - Note.+, Positive result; -, Negative result in replicate experiments (n = 3). Supplementary Table S6. Spot Hybridization Assay to Detect Damage to the 1-124 nt Region in the 5'-NCR
Ventilation Time (s) Infectivity 1-40 40-80 80-124 0 + + + + 30 + + + + 60 + + + + 90 + + + + 105 - + + - 120 - - - - Note. +, Positive result; -, Negative result in replicate experiments (n = 3). -
[1] Lévêque N, Semler BL. A 21st century perspective of poliovirus replication. PLoS Pathog, 2015; 11, e1004825. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004825 [2] Alam MM, Sharif S, Shaukat S, et al. Genomic Surveillance Elucidates Persistent Wild Poliovirus Transmission During 2013-2015 in Major Reservoir Areas of Pakistan. Clin Infect Dis, 2016; 62, 190-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ831 [3] Famulare M. Has Wild Poliovirus Been Eliminated from Nigeria. PLoS One, 2015; 10, e0135765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135765 [4] Moran-Gilad J, Kaliner E, Gdalevich M, et al. Public health response to the silent reintroduction of wild poliovirus to Israel, 2013-2014. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2016; 22, S140-S145. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.06.018 [5] Jin M, Shan J, Chen Z, et al. Chlorine dioxide inactivation of enterovirus 71 in water and its impact on genomic targets. Environ Sci Technol, 2013; 47, 4590-7. doi: 10.1021/es305282g [6] Lukasik J, Bradley ML, Scott TM, et al. Reduction of poliovirus 1, bacteriophages, Salmonella montevideo, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 on strawberries by physical and disinfectant washes. J Food Prot, 2003; 66, 188-93. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-66.2.188 [7] Tree JA, Adams MR, Lees DN. Chlorination of indicator bacteria and viruses in primary sewage effluent. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2003; 69, 2038-43. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.2038-2043.2003 [8] Nuanualsuwan S, Mariam T, Himathongkham S, et al. Ultraviolet inactivation of feline calicivirus, human enteric viruses and coliphages. Photochem Photobiol, 2002; 76, 406-10. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2002)0760406UIOFCH2.0.CO2 [9] Apaire-Marchais V, Robertson BH, Aubineau-Ferre V, et al. Direct sequencing of hepatitis A virus strains isolated during an epidemic in France. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1995; 61, 3977-80. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_pubmedcentral.nih.gov_167705 [10] Churn CC, Bates RC, Boardman GD. Mechanism of chlorine inactivation of DNA-containing parvovirus H-1. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1983; 46, 1394-402. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_pubmedcentral.nih.gov_239581 [11] LYK N, RMB F, VRDS F, et al. Pre-ozonation of source water:Assessment of efficacy against Giardia duodenalis cysts and effects on natural organic matter. Chemosphere, 2019; 214, 764-70. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.164 [12] von GU. Oxidation Processes in Water Treatment:Are We on Track. Environ Sci Technol, 2018; 52, 5062-75. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00586 [13] Dong S, Massalha N, Plewa MJ, et al. The impact of disinfection Ct values on cytotoxicity of agricultural wastewaters:Ozonation vs. chlorination. Water Res, 2018; 144, 482-90. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.065 [14] Wang H, Hu C, Zhang S, et al. Effects of O3/Cl2 disinfection on corrosion and opportunistic pathogens growth in drinking water distribution systems. J Environ Sci, 2018; 73, 38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.01.009 [15] Önnby L, Salhi E, McKay G, et al. Ozone and chlorine reactions with dissolved organic matter-Assessment of oxidant-reactive moieties by optical measurements and the electron donating capacities. Water Res, 2018; 144, 64-75. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.059 [16] Tamaki M, Kobayashi F, Ikeura H, et al. Disinfection by Ozone Microbubbles Can Cause Morphological Change of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis Spores. Plant Pathol J, 2018; 34, 335-40. [17] Ofori I, Maddila S, Lin J, et al. Ozone initiated inactivation of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in water:Influence of selected organic solvents prevalent in wastewaters. Chemosphere, 2018; 206, 43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.164 [18] Roy D, Wong PK, Engelbrecht RS, et al. Mechanism of enteroviral inactivation by ozone. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1981; 41, 718-23. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_pubmedcentral.nih.gov_243766 [19] Kitamura N.[Genome structure of poliovirus (author's transl)]. Seikagaku, 1982; 54, 151-6. [20] Simonet J, Gantzer C. Inactivation of poliovirus 1 and F-specific RNA phages and degradation of their genomes by UV irradiation at 254 nanometers. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2006; 72, 7671-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01106-06 [21] Bhattacharya SS, Kulka M, Lampel KA, et al. Use of reverse transcription and PCR to discriminate between infectious and non-infectious hepatitis A virus. J Virol Methods, 2004; 116, 181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2003.11.008 [22] Jin M, Zhao ZG, Wang XW, et al. The 40-80 nt region in the 5'-NCR of genome is a critical target for inactivating poliovirus by chlorine dioxide. J Med Virol, 2012; 84, 526-35. doi: 10.1002/jmv.v84.3 [23] Zaidi SS, Asghar H, Sharif S, et al. Poliovirus Laboratory Based Surveillance:An Overview. Methods Mol Biol, 2016; 1387, 11-8. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3292-4 [24] Katzenelson E, Biedermann N. Disinfection of viruses in sewage by ozone. Water Res, 1976; 10, 629-31. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(76)90144-5 [25] Chatterjee NK, Kaehler M, Deibel R. Detection of enteroviruses using subgenomic probes of Coxsackie virus B4 by hybridization. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 1988; 11, 129-36. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(88)90014-4 [26] Cello J, Paul AV, Wimmer E. Chemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA:generation of infectious virus in the absence of natural template. Science, 2002; 297, 1016-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1072266 [27] Nuanualsuwan S, Cliver DO. Infectivity of RNA from inactivated poliovirus. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2003; 69, 1629-32. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1629-1632.2003 [28] Nomoto A, Omata T, Toyoda H, et al. Complete nucleotide sequence of the attenuated poliovirus Sabin 1 strain genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1982; 79, 5793-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.19.5793 [29] Camel V, Bermond A. The use of ozone and associated oxidation processes in drinking water treatment. Water Res, 1998; 32, 3208-22. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00130-4 [30] Moore NJ, Margolin AB. Efficacy of Nucleic Acid Probes for Detection of Poliovirus in Water Disinfected by Chlorine, Chlorine Dioxide, Ozone, and UV Radiation. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1994; 60, 4189-91. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_pubmedcentral.nih.gov_201959 [31] Simonet J, Gantzer C. Degradation of the Poliovirus 1 genome by chlorine dioxide. J Appl Microbiol, 2006; 100, 862-70. doi: 10.1111/jam.2006.100.issue-4 [32] Li JW, Xin ZT, Wang XW, et al. Mechanisms of inactivation of hepatitis A virus in water by chlorine dioxide. Water Res, 2004; 38, 1514-9. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.021 [33] Souii A, Ben MM, Gharbi J. Role of RNA structure motifs in IRES-dependent translation initiation of the coxsackievirus B3:new insights for developing live-attenuated strains for vaccines and gene therapy. Mol Biotechnol, 2013; 55, 179-202. doi: 10.1007/s12033-013-9674-4 [34] Moustafa IM, Gohara DW, Uchida A, et al. Conformational Ensemble of the Poliovirus 3CD Precursor Observed by MD Simulations and Confirmed by SAXS:A Strategy to Expand the Viral Proteome. Viruses, 2015; 7, 5962-86. doi: 10.3390/v7112919 [35] Harris KS, Xiang W, Alexander L, et al. Interaction of poliovirus polypeptide 3CDpro with the 5' and 3' termini of the poliovirus genome. Identification of viral and cellular cofactors needed for efficient binding. J Biol Chem, 1994; 269, 27004-14. [36] Ogram SA, Spear A, Sharma N, et al. The 5'CL-PCBP RNP complex, 3' poly(A) tail and 2A(pro) are required for optimal translation of poliovirus RNA. Virology, 2010; 397, 14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.11.006 [37] Schmid M, Wimmer E. IRES-controlled protein synthesis and genome replication of poliovirus. Arch Virol Suppl, 1994; 9, 279-89. [38] Fitzgerald KD, Semler BL. Re-localization of cellular protein SRp20 during poliovirus infection:bridging a viral IRES to the host cell translation apparatus. PLoS Pathog, 2011; 7, e1002127. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002127 [39] Muslin C, Joffret ML, Pelletier I, et al. Evolution and Emergence of Enteroviruses through Intra-and Inter-species Recombination:Plasticity and Phenotypic Impact of Modular Genetic Exchanges in the 5' Untranslated Region. PLoS Pathog, 2015; 11, e1005266. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005266 [40] Viktorova EG, Khattar S, Samal S, et al. Poliovirus Replicon RNA Generation, Transfection, Packaging, and Quantitation of Replication. Curr Protoc Microbiol, 2018; 48, 15H. 4.1-15H. 4.15. [41] Ma JF, Straub TM, Pepper IL, et al. Cell culture and PCR determination of poliovirus inactivation by disinfectants. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1994; 60, 4203-6. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_pubmedcentral.nih.gov_201963 [42] Maier, Tougianidou, Wiedenmann, et al. Detection of poliovirus by cell culture and by PCR after UV disinfection. Water Sci Technoly, 1995; 31, 141-5. doi: 10.1016-0273-1223(95)00255-L/ [43] Lim MY, Kim JM, Ko G. Disinfection kinetics of murine norovirus using chlorine and chlorine dioxide. Water Res, 2010; 44, 3243-51. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.003