Relationship of Non-essential and Essential Metals With Vitamin D in a Chinese Early Adolescent Cohort

Gengfu Wang Weibo Liu Min Li Ting Tang Qi Zhong Guangbo Qu Yi Zhou Mengyuan Yuan Yonghan Li Fangbiao Tao Puyu Su Chaoxue Zhang

Gengfu Wang, Weibo Liu, Min Li, Ting Tang, Qi Zhong, Guangbo Qu, Yi Zhou, Mengyuan Yuan, Yonghan Li, Fangbiao Tao, Puyu Su, Chaoxue Zhang. Relationship of Non-essential and Essential Metals With Vitamin D in a Chinese Early Adolescent Cohort[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2025.168
Citation: Gengfu Wang, Weibo Liu, Min Li, Ting Tang, Qi Zhong, Guangbo Qu, Yi Zhou, Mengyuan Yuan, Yonghan Li, Fangbiao Tao, Puyu Su, Chaoxue Zhang. Relationship of Non-essential and Essential Metals With Vitamin D in a Chinese Early Adolescent Cohort[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2025.168

doi: 10.3967/bes2025.168

Relationship of Non-essential and Essential Metals With Vitamin D in a Chinese Early Adolescent Cohort

More Information
    Author Bio:

    Gengfu Wang, PhD, majoring in children and adolescent health care

    Weibo Liu, majoring in childhood adversity and adolescent health

    Min Li, majoring in childhood adversity and adolescent health

    Corresponding author: Puyu Su, E-mail: supuyu@ahmu.edu.cnChaoxue Zhang, E-mail: zcxay@163.com
  • Gengfu Wang, Weibo Liu, and Min Li: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, writing – review, and editing. Tang Ting, Qi Zhong: Data curation, Investigation, writing the original draft, writing the review, and editing. Guangbo Qu, Yi Zhou, Mengyuan Yuan: Methodology, writing, review, and editing. Yonghan Li: Formal analysis and methodology. Fangbiao Tao: Resources and supervision. Puyu Su: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, writing, review, and editing. Chaoxue Zhang: Data curation, funding acquisition, methodology, writing, reviewing, and editing.
  • The authors declare no competing interests.
  • This study was approved by the Biomedicine Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University (approval no. 20180083). All participants provided informed consent before participating in the study.
  • &These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • Gengfu Wang, Weibo Liu, and Min Li: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, writing – review, and editing. Tang Ting, Qi Zhong: Data curation, Investigation, writing the original draft, writing the review, and editing. Guangbo Qu, Yi Zhou, Mengyuan Yuan: Methodology, writing, review, and editing. Yonghan Li: Formal analysis and methodology. Fangbiao Tao: Resources and supervision. Puyu Su: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, writing, review, and editing. Chaoxue Zhang: Data curation, funding acquisition, methodology, writing, reviewing, and editing.
    The authors declare no competing interests.
    This study was approved by the Biomedicine Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University (approval no. 20180083). All participants provided informed consent before participating in the study.
    &These authors contributed equally to this work.
    注释:
    1) Authors’ contributions: 2) Competing interests: 3) Ethics:
  • Table  1.   Univariable associations between potential confounders and serum 25(OH)D concentration

    Variables 25(OH)D level at wave 1 25(OH)D level at wave 3
    n(%)/M ± SD M ± SD β(95%CI) P value M ± SD β(95%CI) P value
    Age 12.49 ± 0.48 −0.58 (−1.19 ~ 0.03) 0.063 0.53 (−0.47 ~ 1.55) 0.297
    BMI 19.21 ± 4.46 −0.12(−0.19 ~ −0.15) 0.000 0.12 (−0.11 ~ 0.34) 0.085
    Sex
    Males 865(60.7) 23.90 ± 5.74 Reference 20.41 ± 5.96 Reference
    Female 560(39.3) 22.04 ± 5.38 −1.89 (−2.45~ −1.26) 0.000 18.08 ± 5.40 −2.47 (−3.41 ~ −1.53) 0.000
    Residence
    City 1107(77.7) 22.35 ± 5.85 Reference 18.83 ± 5.89 Reference
    Rural 318(22.3) 23.40 ± 5.60 1.05 (0.35 ~ 1.76) 0.004 19.69 ± 5.84 0.84 (−0.30 ~ 1.98) 0.151
    Only child
    Yes 232(16.3) 23.25 ± 5.79 Reference 19.68 ± 6.27 Reference
    No 1193(83.7) 23.15 ± 5.65 −0.10 (−0.90 ~ 0.69) 0.799 19.46 ± 5.78 0.88 (−0.43 ~ 2.19) 0.187
    Family structure
    Nuclear family 655(46.0) 22.78 ± 5.48 Reference 19.30 ± 5.82 Reference
    Single−parent family 227(15.9) 23.49 ± 6.29 0.39 (−0.42~ 1.19) 0.345 19.57 ± 6.01 −0.50 (−1.88 ~ 0.87) 0.475
    Large family 524(36.8) 23.48 ± 5.66 0.49 (−0.11 ~ 1.11) 0.111 19.63 ± 5.84 −0.06 (−1.04 ~ 0.92) 0.900
    Other 19(1.3) 24.10 ± 4.00 0.95 (−1.62 ~ 3.51) 0.471 21.71 ± 5.55 2.51 (−1.13 ~ 6.15) 0.178
    Self−perceived family economic status
    Low 159(11.2) 23.55 ± 5.82 Reference 19.22 ± 5.47 Reference
    Medium 1063(74.6) 23.17 ± 5.72 −0.01 (−0.68 ~ 0.67) 0.983 19.60 ± 5.86 0.42 (−0.73~ 1.58) 0.473
    High 203(14.2) 22.88 ± 5.27 −0.33 (−1.18 ~ 0.51) 0.437 19.18 ± 6.12 −0.69 (−2.18 ~ 0.80) 0.364
    Father’s education level
    Primary school and below 221(15.5) 23.17 ± 5.83 Reference 19.14 ± 5.99 Reference
    Middle school 765(53.7) 23.26 ± 5.53 0.21 (−0.38 ~ 0.80) 0.486 19.68 ± 5.81 0.88 (−0.07 ~ 1.83) 0.071
    Senior high school and above 439(30.8) 23.00 ± 5.83 −0.25 (−0.88 ~ 0.39) 0.449 19.36 ± 5.88 −0.93 (−1.97 ~ 0.10) 0.079
    Mother’s education level
    Primary school and below 367(25.8) 23.32 ± 5.86 Reference 19.49 ± 5.86 Reference
    Middle school 721(50.6) 23.10 ± 5.64 −0.15 (−0.74 ~ 0.44) 0.626 19.45 ± 5.74 −0.19(−1.14 ~ 0.76) 0.693
    Senior high school and above 337(23.6) 23.16 ± 5.73 −0.01 (−0.71 ~ 0.68) 0.974 19.62 ± 6.11 0.18 (−0.93 ~ 1.28) 0.756
    Moderate−intensity Physical activity
    No 516(36.2) 22.93 ± 5.47 Reference 19.02 ± 5.76 Reference
    1–2 days 590(41.4) 23.01 ± 5.74 −0.27 (−0.87 ~ 0.33) 0.371 19.46 ± 5.60 −0.78 (−1.74 ~ 0.19) 0.115
    ≥ 3 days 319(22.4) 23.85 ± 5.83 0.88 (0.17 ~ 1.58) 0.015 20.33 ± 6.39 1.42 (0.34 ~ 2.49) 0.010
    High−intensity Physical activity
    No 568(39.9) 23.19 ± 5.49 Reference 19.18 ± 5.41 Reference
    1–2 days 583(40.9) 22.85 ± 5.85 −0.53 (−1.13 ~ 0.07) 0.083 19.37 ± 5.93 −0.28 (−1.26 ~ 0.69) 0.565
    ≥ 3 days 274(19.2) 23.79 ± 5.62 0.77 (0.03 ~ 1.52) 0.042 20.42 ± 6.49 1.06 (−0.06 ~ 2.17) 0.063
      Note. CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation; M, mean
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  2.   Cross−sectional associations between individual metals with 25(OH)D levels at baseline

    Metals Total Male Female
    β (95%CI) P value β (95%CI) P value β (95%CI) P value
    Non−essential metals
    Single−metal model
    V 4.73 (0.84 ~ 8.61) 0.017 7.72 (2.61 ~ 12.84) 0.003 −0.02 (−5.99 ~ 5.96) 0.994
    Cr −3.26 (−7.29 ~ −0.78) 0.013 −5.71 (−11.07 ~ −0.35) 0.037 0.75 (−5.35 ~ 6.85) 0.809
    Ni 0.26 (−0.69 ~ 1.21) 0.593 −0.07 (−1.31 ~ 1.17) 0.913 0.78 (−0.71 ~ 2.27) 0.304
    Cd 1.09 (−0.17 ~ 2.36) 0.090 1.39 (−0.27 ~ 3.06) 0.101 0.60 (−1.34 ~ 2.54) 0.542
    Pb 1.51 (−0.41 ~ 3.42) 0.123 1.47 (−1.03 ~ 3.98) 0.249 1.59 (−1.40 ~ 4.59) 0.296
    As 0.67 (−0.43 ~ 1.77) 0.231 −0.08 (−1.52 ~ 1.35) 0.906 1.82 (0.10 ~ 3.53) 0.038
    Multi−metal adjusted model
    V 6.02 (1.72 ~ 10.32) 0.006 10.51 (4.85 ~ 16.17) 0.000 −0.79 (−7.38 ~ 5.80) 0.814
    Cr −6.72 (−11.14 ~ −2.30) 0.003 −9.81 (−15.67 ~ −3.95) 0.001 −0.93 (−7.56 ~ 5.71) 0.784
    Ni 0.39 (−0.57 ~ 1.36) 0.421 0.18 (−1.06 ~ 1.42) 0.778 0.45 (−1.06 ~ 1.97) 0.558
    Cd 0.82 (−0.50 ~ 2.13) 0.222 1.04 (−0.69 ~ 2.76) 0.238 0.40 (−1.64 ~ 2.43) 0.703
    Pb 1.66 (−0.48 ~ 3.81) 0.128 0.79 (−1.99 ~ 3.57) 0.578 3.02 (−0.34 ~ 6.38) 0.078
    As 0.99 (−0.23 ~ 2.20) 0.111 −0.10 (−1.68 ~ 1.48) 0.905 2.49 (0.61 ~ 4.38) 0.010
    Essential metals
    Single−metal model
    Mn −2.02 (−3.64 ~ −0.39) 0.015 −2.92 (−5.03 ~ −0.80) 0.007 −0.33 (−2.88 ~ 2.23) 0.802
    Fe −0.32 (−2.20 ~ 1.56) 0.742 −0.86 (−3.35 ~ 1.63) 0.500 0.47 (−2.4 ~ 3.37) 0.751
    Co −1.86 (−3.68 ~ −0.03) 0.047 −1.91 (−4.34 ~ 0.51) 0.122 −1.98 (−4.77 ~ 0.81) 0.163
    Cu 5.51 (1.69 ~ 9.31) 0.005 5.35 (0.61 ~ 10.09) 0.027 6.32 (−0.18 ~ 12.81) 0.057
    Zn 3.07 (−2.43 ~ 8.57) 0.274 3.01 (−4.04 ~ 10.06) 0.402 2.52 (−6.42 ~ 11.45) 0.580
    Mo 0.20 (−2.17 ~ 2.57) 0.868 −2.33 (−5.33 ~ 0.66) 0.126 5.38 (1.47 ~ 9.29) 0.007
    Multi−metal adjusted model
    Mn −2.38 (−4.17 ~ −0.59) 0.009 −3.00 (−5.32 ~ −0.68) 0.011 −1.95 (−4.79 ~ 0.88) 0.177
    Fe 0.33 (−1.67 ~ 2.33) 0.743 0.63 (−2.04 ~ 3.30) 0.643 0.32 (−2.74 ~ 3.37) 0.839
    Co −1.30 (−3.17 ~ 0.57) 0.328 −1.03 (−3.55 ~ 1.50) 0.424 −2.18 (−5.03 ~ 0.66) 0.132
    Cu 6.01 (2.11 ~ 9.92) 0.003 6.19 (1.30 ~ 11.09) 0.013 7.76 (1.21 ~ 14.31) 0.020
    Zn 3.39 (−2.35 ~ 9.13) 0.246 3.14 (−4.18 ~ 10.47) 0.400 2.37 (−7.00 ~ 11.74) 0.620
    Mo 1.41 (−1.09 ~ 3.90) 0.269 −0.79 (−3.93 ~ 2.36) 0.624 6.50 (2.36 ~ 10.63) 0.002
      Note. V, Vanadium; Cr, Chromium; Mn, Manganese; Fe, Iron; Co, Cobalt; Ni, Nickel; Cu, Copper; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic; Mo, Molybdenum; Cd, Cadmium; Pb, Lead; CI, confidence interval
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  3.   Logistic regression models of the relationship between single serum metal concentrations at baseline and incident vitamin D deficiency at follow−up

    Metals Overall Male Female
    OR (95%CI) P−value OR (95%CI) P−value OR (95%CI) P−value
    Non−essential metals
    Single−metal model
    V 0.12 (0.02 ~ 0.64) 0.014 0.05 (0.01 ~ 0.41) 0.006 0.65 (0.04 ~ 11.73) 0.767
    Cr 0.34 (0.05 ~ 2.20) 0.260 1.04 (0.10 ~ 11.42) 0.975 0.04 (0.01 ~ 0.99) 0.053
    Ni 1.06 (0.69 ~ 1.62) 0.787 1.34 (0.80 ~ 2.26) 0.273 0.64 (0.29 ~ 1.34) 0.237
    Cd 0.674 (0.39 ~ 1.16) 0.157 0.81 (0.40 ~ 1.62) 0.545 0.42 (0.16 ~ 1.10) 0.082
    Pb 0.71 (0.29 ~ 1.68) 0.430 1.34 (0.45 ~ 3.95) 0.595 0.16 (0.03 ~ 0.75) 0.021
    As 0.94 (0.588 ~ 1.53) 0.801 1.02 (0.56 ~ 1.87) 0.949 1.00 (0.43 ~ 2.34) 0.998
    Multi−metal adjusted model
    V 0.15 (0.02 ~ 0.97) 0.046 0.02 (0.01 ~ 0.28) 0.003 2.10 (0.09 ~ 50.80) 0.649
    Cr 0.78 (0.10 ~ 5.96) 0.812 3.32 (0.24 ~ 45.82) 0.371 0.07 (0.01 ~ 2.02) 0.119
    Ni 1.01 (0.65 ~ 1.56) 0.962 1.17 (0.69 ~ 2.01) 0.561 0.73 (0.33 ~ 1.60) 0.426
    Cd 0.75 (0.42 ~ 1.33) 0.323 0.85 (0.41 ~ 1.77) 0.667 0.60 (0.21 ~ 1.56) 0.273
    Pb 0.95 (0.35 ~ 2.54) 0.912 2.10 (0.61 ~ 7.25) 0.241 0.19 (0.03 ~ 1.08) 0.061
    As 1.03 (0.60 ~ 1.78) 0.910 1.35 (0.68 ~ 2.68) 0.384 0.84 (0.32 ~ 2.16) 0.712
    Essential metals
    Single−metal model
    Mn 0.92 (0.44 ~ 1.92) 0.828 1.71 (0.69 ~ 4.23) 0.243 0.29 (0.08 ~ 1.07) 0.064
    Fe 0.81 (0.35 ~ 1.87) 0.622 1.21 (0.41 ~ 3.57) 0.734 0.49 (0.12 ~ 1.95) 0.312
    Co 1.23 (0.55 ~ 2.76) 0.616 1.86 (0.68 ~ 5.16) 0.230 0.57 (0.14 ~ 2.30) 0.429
    Cu 1.09 (0.20 ~ 5.82) 0.923 1.30 (0.18 ~ 9.52) 0.795 0.62 (0.02 ~ 16.85) 0.777
    Zn 6.13 (0.49 ~ 77.65) 0.160 10.87 (0.49 ~ 249.49) 0.133 0.94 (0.01 ~ 93.16) 0.977
    Mo 0.93 (0.32 ~ 2.71) 0.889 0.96 (0.26 ~ 3.53) 0.948 1.10 (0.15 ~ 8.13) 0.924
    Multi−metal adjusted model
    Mn 0.87 (0.39 ~ 1.95) 0.739 1.56 (0.58 ~ 4.20) 0.380 0.28 (0.07 ~ 1.19) 0.085
    Fe 0.70 (0.28 ~ 1.71) 0.432 0.87 (0.27 ~ 2.82) 0.817 0.59 (0.13 ~ 2.64) 0.492
    Co 1.30 (0.57 ~ 3.00) 0.531 1.84 (0.64 ~ 5.34) 0.259 0.61 (0.15 ~ 2.56) 0.502
    Cu 0.92 (0.17 ~ 5.09) 0.923 1.23 (0.16 ~ 9.69) 0.846 0.62 (0.02 ~ 17.25) 0.780
    Zn 9.02 (0.64 ~ 127.95) 0.104 9.30 (0.36 ~ 243.96) 0.181 4.14 (0.03 ~ 538.05) 0.567
    Mo 1.04 (0.34 ~ 3.21) 0.946 0.82 (0.21 ~ 3.25) 0.777 2.22 (0.27 ~ 18.21) 0.458
      Note. V, Vanadium; Cr, Chromium; Mn, Manganese; Fe, Iron; Co, Cobalt; Ni, Nickel; Cu, Copper; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic; Mo, Molybdenum; Cd, Cadmium; Pb, Lead; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Liu WH, Hu J, Fang YY, et al. Vitamin D status in Mainland of China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine, 2021; 38, 101017. doi:  10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101017
    [2] Saggese G, Vierucci F, Boot AM, et al. Vitamin D in childhood and adolescence: an expert position statement. Eur J Pediatr, 2015; 174, 565−76. doi:  10.1007/s00431-015-2524-6
    [3] Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med, 2007; 357, 266−81. doi:  10.1056/NEJMra070553
    [4] Rechtman E, Navarro E, de Water E, et al. Early-life critical windows of susceptibility to manganese exposure and sex-specific changes in brain connectivity in late adolescence. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci, 2023; 3, 460−9. doi:  10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.03.016
    [5] Yuan MY, Li YH, Chang JJ, et al. Vitamin D and suicidality: a Chinese early adolescent cohort and Mendelian randomization study. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci, 2023; 32, e52. doi:  10.1017/S2045796023000665
    [6] Liang CM, Li ZJ, Xia X, et al. Determine multiple elements simultaneously in the sera of umbilical cord blood samples—a very simple method. Biol Trace Elem Res, 2017; 177, 1−8. doi:  10.1007/s12011-016-0853-6
    [7] Zamoiski RD, Guallar E, García-Vargas GG, et al. Association of arsenic and metals with concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D among adolescents in Torreón, Mexico. Environ Health Perspect, 2014; 122, 1233−8. doi:  10.1289/ehp.1307861
    [8] Zhao MD, Ge XY, Xu J, et al. Association between urine metals and liver function biomarkers in Northeast China: a cross-sectional study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2022; 231, 113163. doi:  10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113163
    [9] Sanders AP, Mazzella MJ, Malin AJ, et al. Combined exposure to lead, cadmium, mercury, and arsenic and kidney health in adolescents age 12–19 in NHANES 2009–2014. Environ Int, 2019; 131, 104993. doi:  10.1016/j.envint.2019.104993
    [10] Ciarambino T, Crispino P, Minervini G, et al. Vitamin D: can gender medicine have a role?. Biomedicines, 2023; 11, 1762. doi:  10.3390/biomedicines11061762
  • [1] Xiujuan Zhang, Hongfei Wang, Xia Gao, Yang Zhao.  Effects of Oral Vitamin D Supplementation on Vitamin D Levels and Glycemic Parameters in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2025.066
    [2] Ting Tang, Xinhui Wang, Xue Wen, Min Li, Mengyuan Yuan, Yonghan Li, Xiaoqin Zhong, Fangbiao Tao, Puyu Su, Xihua Yu, Gengfu Wang.  Longitudinal Associations between Vitamin D Status and Systemic Inflammation Markers among Early Adolescents . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2024.139
    [3] Ma Runxue, Liu Ce, Zhang Ling, Guo Jingzhe, Zhou Erkai, Zheng Ling, He Li, Shan Xiaobing, Yu Yunhui, Luo Bin.  Selenium, Type-2 Diabetes, and the Possible Protective Role of Vitamin D . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2024.072
    [4] Huirong Jing, Wenyan Jia, Xuewen Tang.  TIPE2 is Essential for Apocynin-mediated Protection against Intestinal Ischemia/Reperfusion-induced Acute Lung Injury . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2024.124
    [5] Method for Vitamin D Deficiency Screening . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2023.109
    [6] SUN Hua Lei, ZHAO Tong, ZHANG Dong Dong, FENG Ming Ming, XU Ze, HUANG Hao Yue, ZHANG Luo Ya, LI Wen Jie, LI Xing, DUAN Jia Yu, LI Jia.  Interactions of Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms with Hypertriglyceridemia and Obesity in Chinese Individuals Susceptible to Hypertension and Diabetes Comorbidity . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2023.022
    [7] CHEN Yan Mei, XU Ping, WANG Zhou Tian, ZHU Yu Mei, GONG Chun Mei, HUANG Chang Hua, LIU Xiao Li, ZHOU Ji Chang.  Polymorphisms of the Vitamin D Receptor Gene and Sex-Differential Associations with Lipid Profiles in Chinese Han Adults . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2022.016
    [8] SUN Hua Lei, LONG Shao Rong, FU San Xian, CHEN Gai Yun, WANG Ya Juan, LIANG Rui, WANG Su Fan, ZHANG Li Ke, ZHOU Li Wei, LU Quan Jun, LI Wen Jie.  Association between Vitamin D Levels and the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in a Rural Chinese Population . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2021.043
    [9] Hajer BEN SAAD, Fatma BEN ABDALLAH, Intidhar BKHAIRIA, Ons BOUDAWARA, Moncef NASRI, Ahmed HAKIM, Ibtissem BEN AMARA.  Efficacy of Essential Trace Elements Supplementation on Mineral Composition, Sperm Characteristics, Antioxidant Status, and Genotoxicity in Testis of Tebuconazole-treated Rats . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2020.101
    [10] WANG Jun, WANG Yan, HAN Han, WANG Teng, SHEN Fang, LI Wen Jie, LI Xing.  Association of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms with Metabolic Syndrome in Rural Areas of China . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2019.041
    [11] WANG Yan, HAN Han, WANG Jun, SHEN Fang, YU Fei, WANG Ling, YU Song Cheng, ZHANG Dong Dong, SUN Hua Lei, XUE Yuan, BA Yue, WANG Chong Jian, LI Wen Jie.  Polymorphisms in CYP2R1 Gene Associated with Serum Vitamin D Levels and Status in a Chinese Rural Population . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2019.072
    [12] Guesmi Fatma, Amit K Tyagi, Bellamine Houda, Landoulsi Ahmed.  Antioxidant Machinery Related to Decreased MDA Generation by Thymus Algeriensis Essential Oil-induced Liver and Kidney Regeneration . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2016.086
    [13] ZHANG Rong Hua, HE Deng Hua, ZHOU Biao, ZHU Yi Bo, ZHAO Dong, HUANG Li Chun, DING Gang Qiang.  Analysis of Vitamin D Status in Men Highly Exposed to Sunlight . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2015.125
    [14] ZHOU Ji Chang, ZHU Yu Mei, GUO Ping, CHEN Zheng, XIE Feng Zhu, LIU Xiao Li, HE Shan.  Serum 25(OH)D and Lipid Levels in Chinese Obese and Normal Weight Males before and after Oral Vitamin D Supplementation . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/bes2013.003
    [15] WANG Ou, NIE Min, HU Ying Ying, ZHANG Kui, LI Wei, PING Fan, LIU Jun Tao, CHEN Li Meng, XING Xiao Ping.  Association between Vitamin D Insufficiency and the Risk for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant Chinese Women . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, doi: 10.3967/0895-3988.2012.04.004
    [16] Relatively High Bone Mineral Density in Chinese Adolescent Dancers Despite Lower Energy Intake and Menstrual Disorder . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences,
    [17] WEI-YAN ZHAO, JIAN-FENG HUANG, LAI-YUAN WANG, HONG-FAN LI, PENG-HUA ZHANG, QI ZHAO, SHU-FENG CHEN, DONG-FENG GU.  Association of the Apolipoprotein B Gene Polymorphisms With Essential Hypertension in Northern Chinese Han Population . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences,
    [18] QUN XU, YAN-HUA WANG, WEI-JUN TONG, MING-LIANG GU, GANG WU, BATU BUREN, YONG-YUE LIU, JIAN WANG, YONG-SHAN LI, HUA Feng, SHUANG-LIAN BAI, HAI-HUA PANG, GUI-RONG HUANG, MING-WU FANG, Yong-hong ZHANG, ZHENG-LAI WU, Chang-chun Qiu.  Interaction and Relationship Between Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Gene and Environmental Factors Predisposing to Essential Hypertension in Mongolian Population of China . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences,
    [19] Bei Sun, TSERING DRONMA, WEI-JUN QIN, CHAO-YING CUI, DAN TSE, TASHI PINGTSO, YING LIU, Chang-chun Qiu.  Polymorphisms of Renin-angiotensin System in Essential Hypertension in Chinese Tibetans . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences,
    [20] Ge Ke-you, CHANG SU-YING.  Dietary Intake of Some Essential Micronutrients in China . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences,
  • 加载中
表ll (3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  28
  • HTML全文浏览量:  11
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-07-17
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-11-10

Relationship of Non-essential and Essential Metals With Vitamin D in a Chinese Early Adolescent Cohort

doi: 10.3967/bes2025.168
    作者简介:

    Gengfu Wang, PhD, majoring in children and adolescent health care

    Weibo Liu, majoring in childhood adversity and adolescent health

    Min Li, majoring in childhood adversity and adolescent health

    通讯作者: Puyu Su, E-mail: supuyu@ahmu.edu.cnChaoxue Zhang, E-mail: zcxay@163.com
注释:
1) Authors’ contributions: 2) Competing interests: 3) Ethics:

English Abstract

Gengfu Wang, Weibo Liu, Min Li, Ting Tang, Qi Zhong, Guangbo Qu, Yi Zhou, Mengyuan Yuan, Yonghan Li, Fangbiao Tao, Puyu Su, Chaoxue Zhang. Relationship of Non-essential and Essential Metals With Vitamin D in a Chinese Early Adolescent Cohort[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2025.168
Citation: Gengfu Wang, Weibo Liu, Min Li, Ting Tang, Qi Zhong, Guangbo Qu, Yi Zhou, Mengyuan Yuan, Yonghan Li, Fangbiao Tao, Puyu Su, Chaoxue Zhang. Relationship of Non-essential and Essential Metals With Vitamin D in a Chinese Early Adolescent Cohort[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. doi: 10.3967/bes2025.168
  • Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) represents a significant nutritional concern among children and adolescents. The estimated prevalence of VDD in China is 46.8% in this population[1]. VDD during childhood and adolescence has been associated with the onset of various conditions, including acute respiratory infections, asthma, atopic dermatitis, and food allergies[2]. Multiple factors, including age, sun exposure, adiposity, and genetics, influence vitamin D levels[2,3]. Increasing attention has been directed toward understanding the environmental determinants that may influence vitamin D status. Given the potential of metallic pollutants to disrupt endocrine function and their ubiquity in the environment, investigating the effects of metal exposure on human vitamin D status, particularly in vulnerable populations, is imperative.

    Metallic elements can be categorized into two types: hazardous heavy metals and trace essential elements. Exposure to toxic metals such as cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) can adversely affect the vitamin D status in children. However, essential trace elements, including copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), cobalt (Co), and manganese (Mn), are vital for supporting diverse metabolic and physiological functions. Few studies have explored the association between exposure to multiple metals and vitamin D levels in adolescents. Therefore, we conducted a study involving the early adolescent population to investigate the association between exposure to 12 metals and vitamin D levels. The metals investigated included non-essential metals (such as vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), Cd, Pb, and arsenic (As)) and essential metals (such as Mn, iron (Fe), Co, Cu, Zn, and molybdenum (Mo)). These twelve metals were selected due to their widespread occurrence in the environment. We analyzed the correlations between individual metals, metal mixtures, and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations. Furthermore, existing literature indicates that the effects of metal exposure vary between male and female adolescents[4]. In addition, the absorption and half-lives of certain metals exhibit sex-based differences. Therefore, exploring sex-related variations in the association between metal exposure and total serum 25(OH)D levels is important.

    This study utilized the data from the Chinese Early Adolescent Cohort (CEAC); detailed information on the cohort is available in our previous publications[5]. The baseline survey (Wave 1) included all seventh-grade students from the selected school, excluding individuals diagnosed with chronic or organic diseases that could affect vitamin D metabolism, including inflammatory disorders, liver disease, and chronic renal disease, as well as those with a documented history of psychiatric conditions, specifically depression and anxiety. Follow-up surveys were conducted at one-year intervals, ending September 2021 (Wave 3). Participants with missing baseline serum metal concentrations, and serum 25(OH)D levels at wave 1 and wave 3 were excluded. The study protocol adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University (Approval No. 20180083). Written informed consent was obtained from both parents and participants.

    The concentrations of 12 metals—including non-essential metals (V, Cr, Ni, Cd, Pb, and As) and essential metals (Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, and Mo)—in the serum specimens were simultaneously quantified using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; Perkin Elmer NexION 350X, Shelton, CT, USA). The analytical procedure followed the protocols highlighted in earlier studies[6]. The intra- and inter-assay variation coefficients were less than 20%. Detection frequencies exceeded 95% for all metals, and values below the limit of detection (LOD) were imputed as LOD divided by √2. Due to the markedly skewed distribution of metal concentration in the study population, a log10 transformation was applied to all 12 metals to approximate normality. Serum 25(OH)D levels (ng/mL) were measured using a direct competitive chemiluminescence immunoassay via the LIASON 25-OH vitamin D assay (TOTAL; DiaSorin, Inc.). VDD status was defined as a serum 25(OH)D concentration below 20 ng/mL[2].

    The model encompassed several covariates, including sex, age, whether the participant was an only child (yes or no), family structure (nuclear family, single-parent family, large family, or others), father’s education level (primary school and below, middle school, or senior high school and above), mother’s education level (primary school and below, middle school, or senior high school and above), self-perceived family economic status (high, middle, or low), body mass index, physical activity, and place of residence (urban or rural)[2]. The baseline survey documented participants’ engagement in intense physical activities lasting 20 min and moderate exercises continuing for 30 min in the previous week. The response options were coded as 0, 1–2, and ≥ 3 days.

    Descriptive statistics were calculated for the serum 25(OH)D levels, 12 metals, and sociodemographic variables. The metal detection rates and geometric means were analyzed separately by sex. The analysis primarily examined both the cross-sectional and longitudinal links between metal exposure and vitamin D levels or status. Generalized linear regression models, logistic regression analysis, and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) models were employed to explore the relationships among individual metals, metal mixtures, and serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Details of the statistical analysis are presented in the Supplementary Materials.

    Finally, a sample of 1425 middle school students with a mean age of 12.49 years was included in the analysis. Univariate associations between potential confounders and serum 25(OH)D concentrations are displayed in Table 1. The detection rates and concentration distributions of the 12 metals in the serum samples are presented in Supplementary Table S1. The majority of metal concentrations exhibited low to moderate positive correlations (Supplementary Figure S1).

    Table 1.  Univariable associations between potential confounders and serum 25(OH)D concentration

    Variables 25(OH)D level at wave 1 25(OH)D level at wave 3
    n(%)/M ± SD M ± SD β(95%CI) P value M ± SD β(95%CI) P value
    Age 12.49 ± 0.48 −0.58 (−1.19 ~ 0.03) 0.063 0.53 (−0.47 ~ 1.55) 0.297
    BMI 19.21 ± 4.46 −0.12(−0.19 ~ −0.15) 0.000 0.12 (−0.11 ~ 0.34) 0.085
    Sex
    Males 865(60.7) 23.90 ± 5.74 Reference 20.41 ± 5.96 Reference
    Female 560(39.3) 22.04 ± 5.38 −1.89 (−2.45~ −1.26) 0.000 18.08 ± 5.40 −2.47 (−3.41 ~ −1.53) 0.000
    Residence
    City 1107(77.7) 22.35 ± 5.85 Reference 18.83 ± 5.89 Reference
    Rural 318(22.3) 23.40 ± 5.60 1.05 (0.35 ~ 1.76) 0.004 19.69 ± 5.84 0.84 (−0.30 ~ 1.98) 0.151
    Only child
    Yes 232(16.3) 23.25 ± 5.79 Reference 19.68 ± 6.27 Reference
    No 1193(83.7) 23.15 ± 5.65 −0.10 (−0.90 ~ 0.69) 0.799 19.46 ± 5.78 0.88 (−0.43 ~ 2.19) 0.187
    Family structure
    Nuclear family 655(46.0) 22.78 ± 5.48 Reference 19.30 ± 5.82 Reference
    Single−parent family 227(15.9) 23.49 ± 6.29 0.39 (−0.42~ 1.19) 0.345 19.57 ± 6.01 −0.50 (−1.88 ~ 0.87) 0.475
    Large family 524(36.8) 23.48 ± 5.66 0.49 (−0.11 ~ 1.11) 0.111 19.63 ± 5.84 −0.06 (−1.04 ~ 0.92) 0.900
    Other 19(1.3) 24.10 ± 4.00 0.95 (−1.62 ~ 3.51) 0.471 21.71 ± 5.55 2.51 (−1.13 ~ 6.15) 0.178
    Self−perceived family economic status
    Low 159(11.2) 23.55 ± 5.82 Reference 19.22 ± 5.47 Reference
    Medium 1063(74.6) 23.17 ± 5.72 −0.01 (−0.68 ~ 0.67) 0.983 19.60 ± 5.86 0.42 (−0.73~ 1.58) 0.473
    High 203(14.2) 22.88 ± 5.27 −0.33 (−1.18 ~ 0.51) 0.437 19.18 ± 6.12 −0.69 (−2.18 ~ 0.80) 0.364
    Father’s education level
    Primary school and below 221(15.5) 23.17 ± 5.83 Reference 19.14 ± 5.99 Reference
    Middle school 765(53.7) 23.26 ± 5.53 0.21 (−0.38 ~ 0.80) 0.486 19.68 ± 5.81 0.88 (−0.07 ~ 1.83) 0.071
    Senior high school and above 439(30.8) 23.00 ± 5.83 −0.25 (−0.88 ~ 0.39) 0.449 19.36 ± 5.88 −0.93 (−1.97 ~ 0.10) 0.079
    Mother’s education level
    Primary school and below 367(25.8) 23.32 ± 5.86 Reference 19.49 ± 5.86 Reference
    Middle school 721(50.6) 23.10 ± 5.64 −0.15 (−0.74 ~ 0.44) 0.626 19.45 ± 5.74 −0.19(−1.14 ~ 0.76) 0.693
    Senior high school and above 337(23.6) 23.16 ± 5.73 −0.01 (−0.71 ~ 0.68) 0.974 19.62 ± 6.11 0.18 (−0.93 ~ 1.28) 0.756
    Moderate−intensity Physical activity
    No 516(36.2) 22.93 ± 5.47 Reference 19.02 ± 5.76 Reference
    1–2 days 590(41.4) 23.01 ± 5.74 −0.27 (−0.87 ~ 0.33) 0.371 19.46 ± 5.60 −0.78 (−1.74 ~ 0.19) 0.115
    ≥ 3 days 319(22.4) 23.85 ± 5.83 0.88 (0.17 ~ 1.58) 0.015 20.33 ± 6.39 1.42 (0.34 ~ 2.49) 0.010
    High−intensity Physical activity
    No 568(39.9) 23.19 ± 5.49 Reference 19.18 ± 5.41 Reference
    1–2 days 583(40.9) 22.85 ± 5.85 −0.53 (−1.13 ~ 0.07) 0.083 19.37 ± 5.93 −0.28 (−1.26 ~ 0.69) 0.565
    ≥ 3 days 274(19.2) 23.79 ± 5.62 0.77 (0.03 ~ 1.52) 0.042 20.42 ± 6.49 1.06 (−0.06 ~ 2.17) 0.063
      Note. CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation; M, mean

    Table 2 presents the cross-sectional associations between individual metals and baseline 25(OH)D concentrations. In both the total sample and male subgroup, V and Cu were positively correlated with the serum 25(OH)D level, while Cr and Mn were negatively associated. In females, log-transformed As and Mo were positively associated with baseline 25(OH)D levels across both model types, and As and Mo demonstrated an inverse association with baseline VDD in the multi-metal adjusted model (Tables 2 and Supplementary Table S2). In the analysis of incident VDD, V exhibited a significant inverse association with incident VDD in the overall population and among males, across both model types (P < 0.05, see Table 3). Moreover, aside from the pronounced negative associations between V and changes in 25(OH)D levels observed in the single-metal regression models, no other significant relationships were identified between baseline metal concentrations and changes in 25(OH)D levels (Supplementary Table S3).

    Table 2.  Cross−sectional associations between individual metals with 25(OH)D levels at baseline

    Metals Total Male Female
    β (95%CI) P value β (95%CI) P value β (95%CI) P value
    Non−essential metals
    Single−metal model
    V 4.73 (0.84 ~ 8.61) 0.017 7.72 (2.61 ~ 12.84) 0.003 −0.02 (−5.99 ~ 5.96) 0.994
    Cr −3.26 (−7.29 ~ −0.78) 0.013 −5.71 (−11.07 ~ −0.35) 0.037 0.75 (−5.35 ~ 6.85) 0.809
    Ni 0.26 (−0.69 ~ 1.21) 0.593 −0.07 (−1.31 ~ 1.17) 0.913 0.78 (−0.71 ~ 2.27) 0.304
    Cd 1.09 (−0.17 ~ 2.36) 0.090 1.39 (−0.27 ~ 3.06) 0.101 0.60 (−1.34 ~ 2.54) 0.542
    Pb 1.51 (−0.41 ~ 3.42) 0.123 1.47 (−1.03 ~ 3.98) 0.249 1.59 (−1.40 ~ 4.59) 0.296
    As 0.67 (−0.43 ~ 1.77) 0.231 −0.08 (−1.52 ~ 1.35) 0.906 1.82 (0.10 ~ 3.53) 0.038
    Multi−metal adjusted model
    V 6.02 (1.72 ~ 10.32) 0.006 10.51 (4.85 ~ 16.17) 0.000 −0.79 (−7.38 ~ 5.80) 0.814
    Cr −6.72 (−11.14 ~ −2.30) 0.003 −9.81 (−15.67 ~ −3.95) 0.001 −0.93 (−7.56 ~ 5.71) 0.784
    Ni 0.39 (−0.57 ~ 1.36) 0.421 0.18 (−1.06 ~ 1.42) 0.778 0.45 (−1.06 ~ 1.97) 0.558
    Cd 0.82 (−0.50 ~ 2.13) 0.222 1.04 (−0.69 ~ 2.76) 0.238 0.40 (−1.64 ~ 2.43) 0.703
    Pb 1.66 (−0.48 ~ 3.81) 0.128 0.79 (−1.99 ~ 3.57) 0.578 3.02 (−0.34 ~ 6.38) 0.078
    As 0.99 (−0.23 ~ 2.20) 0.111 −0.10 (−1.68 ~ 1.48) 0.905 2.49 (0.61 ~ 4.38) 0.010
    Essential metals
    Single−metal model
    Mn −2.02 (−3.64 ~ −0.39) 0.015 −2.92 (−5.03 ~ −0.80) 0.007 −0.33 (−2.88 ~ 2.23) 0.802
    Fe −0.32 (−2.20 ~ 1.56) 0.742 −0.86 (−3.35 ~ 1.63) 0.500 0.47 (−2.4 ~ 3.37) 0.751
    Co −1.86 (−3.68 ~ −0.03) 0.047 −1.91 (−4.34 ~ 0.51) 0.122 −1.98 (−4.77 ~ 0.81) 0.163
    Cu 5.51 (1.69 ~ 9.31) 0.005 5.35 (0.61 ~ 10.09) 0.027 6.32 (−0.18 ~ 12.81) 0.057
    Zn 3.07 (−2.43 ~ 8.57) 0.274 3.01 (−4.04 ~ 10.06) 0.402 2.52 (−6.42 ~ 11.45) 0.580
    Mo 0.20 (−2.17 ~ 2.57) 0.868 −2.33 (−5.33 ~ 0.66) 0.126 5.38 (1.47 ~ 9.29) 0.007
    Multi−metal adjusted model
    Mn −2.38 (−4.17 ~ −0.59) 0.009 −3.00 (−5.32 ~ −0.68) 0.011 −1.95 (−4.79 ~ 0.88) 0.177
    Fe 0.33 (−1.67 ~ 2.33) 0.743 0.63 (−2.04 ~ 3.30) 0.643 0.32 (−2.74 ~ 3.37) 0.839
    Co −1.30 (−3.17 ~ 0.57) 0.328 −1.03 (−3.55 ~ 1.50) 0.424 −2.18 (−5.03 ~ 0.66) 0.132
    Cu 6.01 (2.11 ~ 9.92) 0.003 6.19 (1.30 ~ 11.09) 0.013 7.76 (1.21 ~ 14.31) 0.020
    Zn 3.39 (−2.35 ~ 9.13) 0.246 3.14 (−4.18 ~ 10.47) 0.400 2.37 (−7.00 ~ 11.74) 0.620
    Mo 1.41 (−1.09 ~ 3.90) 0.269 −0.79 (−3.93 ~ 2.36) 0.624 6.50 (2.36 ~ 10.63) 0.002
      Note. V, Vanadium; Cr, Chromium; Mn, Manganese; Fe, Iron; Co, Cobalt; Ni, Nickel; Cu, Copper; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic; Mo, Molybdenum; Cd, Cadmium; Pb, Lead; CI, confidence interval

    Table 3.  Logistic regression models of the relationship between single serum metal concentrations at baseline and incident vitamin D deficiency at follow−up

    Metals Overall Male Female
    OR (95%CI) P−value OR (95%CI) P−value OR (95%CI) P−value
    Non−essential metals
    Single−metal model
    V 0.12 (0.02 ~ 0.64) 0.014 0.05 (0.01 ~ 0.41) 0.006 0.65 (0.04 ~ 11.73) 0.767
    Cr 0.34 (0.05 ~ 2.20) 0.260 1.04 (0.10 ~ 11.42) 0.975 0.04 (0.01 ~ 0.99) 0.053
    Ni 1.06 (0.69 ~ 1.62) 0.787 1.34 (0.80 ~ 2.26) 0.273 0.64 (0.29 ~ 1.34) 0.237
    Cd 0.674 (0.39 ~ 1.16) 0.157 0.81 (0.40 ~ 1.62) 0.545 0.42 (0.16 ~ 1.10) 0.082
    Pb 0.71 (0.29 ~ 1.68) 0.430 1.34 (0.45 ~ 3.95) 0.595 0.16 (0.03 ~ 0.75) 0.021
    As 0.94 (0.588 ~ 1.53) 0.801 1.02 (0.56 ~ 1.87) 0.949 1.00 (0.43 ~ 2.34) 0.998
    Multi−metal adjusted model
    V 0.15 (0.02 ~ 0.97) 0.046 0.02 (0.01 ~ 0.28) 0.003 2.10 (0.09 ~ 50.80) 0.649
    Cr 0.78 (0.10 ~ 5.96) 0.812 3.32 (0.24 ~ 45.82) 0.371 0.07 (0.01 ~ 2.02) 0.119
    Ni 1.01 (0.65 ~ 1.56) 0.962 1.17 (0.69 ~ 2.01) 0.561 0.73 (0.33 ~ 1.60) 0.426
    Cd 0.75 (0.42 ~ 1.33) 0.323 0.85 (0.41 ~ 1.77) 0.667 0.60 (0.21 ~ 1.56) 0.273
    Pb 0.95 (0.35 ~ 2.54) 0.912 2.10 (0.61 ~ 7.25) 0.241 0.19 (0.03 ~ 1.08) 0.061
    As 1.03 (0.60 ~ 1.78) 0.910 1.35 (0.68 ~ 2.68) 0.384 0.84 (0.32 ~ 2.16) 0.712
    Essential metals
    Single−metal model
    Mn 0.92 (0.44 ~ 1.92) 0.828 1.71 (0.69 ~ 4.23) 0.243 0.29 (0.08 ~ 1.07) 0.064
    Fe 0.81 (0.35 ~ 1.87) 0.622 1.21 (0.41 ~ 3.57) 0.734 0.49 (0.12 ~ 1.95) 0.312
    Co 1.23 (0.55 ~ 2.76) 0.616 1.86 (0.68 ~ 5.16) 0.230 0.57 (0.14 ~ 2.30) 0.429
    Cu 1.09 (0.20 ~ 5.82) 0.923 1.30 (0.18 ~ 9.52) 0.795 0.62 (0.02 ~ 16.85) 0.777
    Zn 6.13 (0.49 ~ 77.65) 0.160 10.87 (0.49 ~ 249.49) 0.133 0.94 (0.01 ~ 93.16) 0.977
    Mo 0.93 (0.32 ~ 2.71) 0.889 0.96 (0.26 ~ 3.53) 0.948 1.10 (0.15 ~ 8.13) 0.924
    Multi−metal adjusted model
    Mn 0.87 (0.39 ~ 1.95) 0.739 1.56 (0.58 ~ 4.20) 0.380 0.28 (0.07 ~ 1.19) 0.085
    Fe 0.70 (0.28 ~ 1.71) 0.432 0.87 (0.27 ~ 2.82) 0.817 0.59 (0.13 ~ 2.64) 0.492
    Co 1.30 (0.57 ~ 3.00) 0.531 1.84 (0.64 ~ 5.34) 0.259 0.61 (0.15 ~ 2.56) 0.502
    Cu 0.92 (0.17 ~ 5.09) 0.923 1.23 (0.16 ~ 9.69) 0.846 0.62 (0.02 ~ 17.25) 0.780
    Zn 9.02 (0.64 ~ 127.95) 0.104 9.30 (0.36 ~ 243.96) 0.181 4.14 (0.03 ~ 538.05) 0.567
    Mo 1.04 (0.34 ~ 3.21) 0.946 0.82 (0.21 ~ 3.25) 0.777 2.22 (0.27 ~ 18.21) 0.458
      Note. V, Vanadium; Cr, Chromium; Mn, Manganese; Fe, Iron; Co, Cobalt; Ni, Nickel; Cu, Copper; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic; Mo, Molybdenum; Cd, Cadmium; Pb, Lead; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

    The BKMR model identified no statistically significant associations between the non-essential and essential metal mixtures and initial serum 25(OH)D concentrations, VDD, subsequent VDD, or alterations in 25(OH)D concentrations (Supplementary Figure S2). Supplementary Figure S3 illustrates the estimated effects of individual metals on vitamin D-related outcomes based on the BKMR model for the entire sample. At fixed percentiles, serum Cu levels were positively associated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations. When the remaining metals were set at the 50th and 75th percentiles, serum Mn levels were also negatively correlated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations. When the other metals were fixed at the 50th and 75th percentiles, serum Cr levels were negatively associated with baseline serum 25(OH)D levels. Serum As levels were positively associated with baseline serum 25(OH)D levels at the 75th percentile. When other metals were fixed at the 50th and 75th percentiles, serum Cr was positively associated with baseline VDD, whereas serum As was inversely associated with baseline VDD. Additionally, serum V was negatively associated with incident VDD at the 25th and 50th percentiles. The univariate exposure–response curves of the BKMR model are presented in Supplementary Figure S4.

    The sex-stratified BKMR models (Supplementary Figures S5 and S6) did not identify any significant relationships among the metal mixture, essential metal mixture, and vitamin D-related outcomes in either sex. In addition, a positive linear correlation was observed between the essential metal mixture and baseline serum 25(OH)D levels in females. This positive association was observed when the essential metal mixture exceeded the 60th percentile. When other metals were fixed at the 50th and 75th percentiles, serum Cr levels were negatively associated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations but positively associated with VDD in males (Supplementary Figure S7). Serum As levels were also positively correlated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations at the 75th percentile in both sexes (Supplementary Figures S7 and S8). When other metals were fixed at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, serum V levels were negatively associated with incident VDD in males (Supplementary Figure S7). As demonstrated in Supplementary Figures S7, when other metals were fixed at the 25th and 50th percentiles, the serum Cu was positively associated with the baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations in males. In females, serum Cu levels were positively correlated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations at the 50th and 75th percentiles. Serum Mo levels were positively associated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations and inversely associated with VDD in females (Supplementary Figure S8). The univariate exposure–response curves of the BKMR model are illustrated in Supplementary Figures S9 and S10.

    In this study, we observed an inverse association between serum V levels and 25(OH)D concentrations in males in the cross-sectional analysis. In addition, baseline serum V was inversely associated with both incident VDD and longitudinal changes in 25(OH)D across the two waves. This finding suggests a nonlinear relationship between V and 25(OH)D, as supported by the BKMR analysis. Significant positive cross-sectional associations were observed between serum Mo and 25(OH)D levels in females. In a study involving 512 adolescents (with an average blood lead concentration of 46 μg/L), a positive association was observed between serum 25(OH)D levels and urinary Mo and Tl; meanwhile, no significant association was noted between 25(OH)D concentrations and either Pb or Cd[7]. Cross-sectional association was observed between serum As and 25(OH)D levels. Previous reports have indicated that serum 25(OH)D concentrations are negatively correlated with urinary As levels[7]. Among females, median serum As concentrations were 2.52 μg/L (interquartile range=2.70 [P25–P75:1.53–4.23]), and the observed positive correlation may indicate a low-dose potential protective effect.

    This study identified a positive link between serum Cu levels and 25(OH)D concentrations in both sexes. Furthermore, Cu homeostasis is essential, and the dose–response relationship between Cu levels and health outcomes follows a U-shaped pattern. The positive association between Cu and vitamin D levels may reflect only the left segment of the U-shaped curve. The absence of a longitudinal association between the 11 metals and vitamin D levels or status in this study may be attributed to the extended interval between follow-up and baseline. The biological half-life of the prohormone 25(OH)D is approximately 2–3 weeks[3]. In addition, most metals, including Mn and As, are primarily excreted via the serum, reflecting exposures within the preceding hours or days. The short half-lives of both metals and vitamin D suggest that metals may exert cross-sectional or short-term effects on vitamin D levels, a notion supported by the findings of the cross-sectional analysis in this study.

    A male-specific negative association was observed between serum Cr and Mn concentrations and reduced 25 (OH) D levels. Studies have reported that Cr and Mn are positively associated with liver function biomarkers, indicating that heavy metal exposure may affect D levels by impacting liver function[8]. Furthermore, metals, such as As, Pb, Hg, and Cd, individually and in combination, have been reported to correlate with renal function parameters in adolescents aged 12–18 years[9]. However, the biological mechanisms underlying the association between metal exposure and elevated 25(OH)D levels remain unclear. Given that 25(OH)D is strongly influenced by sun exposure, metal concentrations may serve as proxies for environmental exposure during outdoor activities, which could, in turn, contribute to higher 25(OH)D levels. In addition, sex-specific differences in the association between heavy metal exposure and vitamin D may be attributable to variations in gene expression, dietary patterns, behavioral habits, and the duration of outdoor activities between females and males[10]. This was partly confirmed by the sex differences between moderate-(at least one in last 7 days, males: 68.1% vs. females: 57.1%, P < 0.001) and high-intensity physical activity (at least one in last 7 days: 66.9% (males: 66.9% vs. females: 49.6%, P < 0.001) in this study.

    Nevertheless, this study has certain limitations that warrant consideration. First, several factors potentially influencing vitamin D status—such as genetic background, dietary vitamin D intake, smoking status, quantified sun exposure, and pubertal status—were not assessed. Second, given the short biological half-lives of some metals, relying on the concentration of a single measurement to estimate metal exposure levels may result in misclassification. Finally, this study was conducted among students within a narrow age range at a single school in one city, limiting the generalizability of the findings to other age groups or populations with different levels of environmental metal exposure.

    Overall, this study suggests that some metals influence serum vitamin D levels in a sex-specific manner. This study underscores the importance of minimizing environmental metal exposure to prevent VDD in adolescents, thereby supporting overall adolescent health. However, this was only a preliminary analysis. Future studies should employ longitudinal designs with repeated measurements of both metals and vitamin D, along with evaluations of calcium and phosphorus metabolism, to further uncover the potential health impacts of metal exposure.

参考文献 (10)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回