-
Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) represents a significant nutritional concern among children and adolescents. The estimated prevalence of VDD in China is 46.8% in this population[1]. VDD during childhood and adolescence has been associated with the onset of various conditions, including acute respiratory infections, asthma, atopic dermatitis, and food allergies[2]. Multiple factors, including age, sun exposure, adiposity, and genetics, influence vitamin D levels[2,3]. Increasing attention has been directed toward understanding the environmental determinants that may influence vitamin D status. Given the potential of metallic pollutants to disrupt endocrine function and their ubiquity in the environment, investigating the effects of metal exposure on human vitamin D status, particularly in vulnerable populations, is imperative.
Metallic elements can be categorized into two types: hazardous heavy metals and trace essential elements. Exposure to toxic metals such as cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) can adversely affect the vitamin D status in children. However, essential trace elements, including copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), cobalt (Co), and manganese (Mn), are vital for supporting diverse metabolic and physiological functions. Few studies have explored the association between exposure to multiple metals and vitamin D levels in adolescents. Therefore, we conducted a study involving the early adolescent population to investigate the association between exposure to 12 metals and vitamin D levels. The metals investigated included non-essential metals (such as vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), Cd, Pb, and arsenic (As)) and essential metals (such as Mn, iron (Fe), Co, Cu, Zn, and molybdenum (Mo)). These twelve metals were selected due to their widespread occurrence in the environment. We analyzed the correlations between individual metals, metal mixtures, and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations. Furthermore, existing literature indicates that the effects of metal exposure vary between male and female adolescents[4]. In addition, the absorption and half-lives of certain metals exhibit sex-based differences. Therefore, exploring sex-related variations in the association between metal exposure and total serum 25(OH)D levels is important.
This study utilized the data from the Chinese Early Adolescent Cohort (CEAC); detailed information on the cohort is available in our previous publications[5]. The baseline survey (Wave 1) included all seventh-grade students from the selected school, excluding individuals diagnosed with chronic or organic diseases that could affect vitamin D metabolism, including inflammatory disorders, liver disease, and chronic renal disease, as well as those with a documented history of psychiatric conditions, specifically depression and anxiety. Follow-up surveys were conducted at one-year intervals, ending September 2021 (Wave 3). Participants with missing baseline serum metal concentrations, and serum 25(OH)D levels at wave 1 and wave 3 were excluded. The study protocol adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University (Approval No. 20180083). Written informed consent was obtained from both parents and participants.
The concentrations of 12 metals—including non-essential metals (V, Cr, Ni, Cd, Pb, and As) and essential metals (Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, and Mo)—in the serum specimens were simultaneously quantified using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; Perkin Elmer NexION 350X, Shelton, CT, USA). The analytical procedure followed the protocols highlighted in earlier studies[6]. The intra- and inter-assay variation coefficients were less than 20%. Detection frequencies exceeded 95% for all metals, and values below the limit of detection (LOD) were imputed as LOD divided by √2. Due to the markedly skewed distribution of metal concentration in the study population, a log10 transformation was applied to all 12 metals to approximate normality. Serum 25(OH)D levels (ng/mL) were measured using a direct competitive chemiluminescence immunoassay via the LIASON 25-OH vitamin D assay (TOTAL; DiaSorin, Inc.). VDD status was defined as a serum 25(OH)D concentration below 20 ng/mL[2].
The model encompassed several covariates, including sex, age, whether the participant was an only child (yes or no), family structure (nuclear family, single-parent family, large family, or others), father’s education level (primary school and below, middle school, or senior high school and above), mother’s education level (primary school and below, middle school, or senior high school and above), self-perceived family economic status (high, middle, or low), body mass index, physical activity, and place of residence (urban or rural)[2]. The baseline survey documented participants’ engagement in intense physical activities lasting 20 min and moderate exercises continuing for 30 min in the previous week. The response options were coded as 0, 1–2, and ≥ 3 days.
Descriptive statistics were calculated for the serum 25(OH)D levels, 12 metals, and sociodemographic variables. The metal detection rates and geometric means were analyzed separately by sex. The analysis primarily examined both the cross-sectional and longitudinal links between metal exposure and vitamin D levels or status. Generalized linear regression models, logistic regression analysis, and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) models were employed to explore the relationships among individual metals, metal mixtures, and serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Details of the statistical analysis are presented in the Supplementary Materials.
Finally, a sample of 1425 middle school students with a mean age of 12.49 years was included in the analysis. Univariate associations between potential confounders and serum 25(OH)D concentrations are displayed in Table 1. The detection rates and concentration distributions of the 12 metals in the serum samples are presented in Supplementary Table S1. The majority of metal concentrations exhibited low to moderate positive correlations (Supplementary Figure S1).
Table 1. Univariable associations between potential confounders and serum 25(OH)D concentration
Variables 25(OH)D level at wave 1 25(OH)D level at wave 3 n(%)/M ± SD M ± SD β(95%CI) P value M ± SD β(95%CI) P value Age 12.49 ± 0.48 − −0.58 (−1.19 ~ 0.03) 0.063 − 0.53 (−0.47 ~ 1.55) 0.297 BMI 19.21 ± 4.46 − −0.12(−0.19 ~ −0.15) 0.000 − 0.12 (−0.11 ~ 0.34) 0.085 Sex Males 865(60.7) 23.90 ± 5.74 Reference 20.41 ± 5.96 Reference Female 560(39.3) 22.04 ± 5.38 −1.89 (−2.45~ −1.26) 0.000 18.08 ± 5.40 −2.47 (−3.41 ~ −1.53) 0.000 Residence City 1107(77.7) 22.35 ± 5.85 Reference 18.83 ± 5.89 Reference Rural 318(22.3) 23.40 ± 5.60 1.05 (0.35 ~ 1.76) 0.004 19.69 ± 5.84 0.84 (−0.30 ~ 1.98) 0.151 Only child Yes 232(16.3) 23.25 ± 5.79 Reference 19.68 ± 6.27 Reference No 1193(83.7) 23.15 ± 5.65 −0.10 (−0.90 ~ 0.69) 0.799 19.46 ± 5.78 0.88 (−0.43 ~ 2.19) 0.187 Family structure Nuclear family 655(46.0) 22.78 ± 5.48 Reference 19.30 ± 5.82 Reference Single−parent family 227(15.9) 23.49 ± 6.29 0.39 (−0.42~ 1.19) 0.345 19.57 ± 6.01 −0.50 (−1.88 ~ 0.87) 0.475 Large family 524(36.8) 23.48 ± 5.66 0.49 (−0.11 ~ 1.11) 0.111 19.63 ± 5.84 −0.06 (−1.04 ~ 0.92) 0.900 Other 19(1.3) 24.10 ± 4.00 0.95 (−1.62 ~ 3.51) 0.471 21.71 ± 5.55 2.51 (−1.13 ~ 6.15) 0.178 Self−perceived family economic status Low 159(11.2) 23.55 ± 5.82 Reference 19.22 ± 5.47 Reference Medium 1063(74.6) 23.17 ± 5.72 −0.01 (−0.68 ~ 0.67) 0.983 19.60 ± 5.86 0.42 (−0.73~ 1.58) 0.473 High 203(14.2) 22.88 ± 5.27 −0.33 (−1.18 ~ 0.51) 0.437 19.18 ± 6.12 −0.69 (−2.18 ~ 0.80) 0.364 Father’s education level Primary school and below 221(15.5) 23.17 ± 5.83 Reference 19.14 ± 5.99 Reference Middle school 765(53.7) 23.26 ± 5.53 0.21 (−0.38 ~ 0.80) 0.486 19.68 ± 5.81 0.88 (−0.07 ~ 1.83) 0.071 Senior high school and above 439(30.8) 23.00 ± 5.83 −0.25 (−0.88 ~ 0.39) 0.449 19.36 ± 5.88 −0.93 (−1.97 ~ 0.10) 0.079 Mother’s education level Primary school and below 367(25.8) 23.32 ± 5.86 Reference 19.49 ± 5.86 Reference Middle school 721(50.6) 23.10 ± 5.64 −0.15 (−0.74 ~ 0.44) 0.626 19.45 ± 5.74 −0.19(−1.14 ~ 0.76) 0.693 Senior high school and above 337(23.6) 23.16 ± 5.73 −0.01 (−0.71 ~ 0.68) 0.974 19.62 ± 6.11 0.18 (−0.93 ~ 1.28) 0.756 Moderate−intensity Physical activity No 516(36.2) 22.93 ± 5.47 Reference 19.02 ± 5.76 Reference 1–2 days 590(41.4) 23.01 ± 5.74 −0.27 (−0.87 ~ 0.33) 0.371 19.46 ± 5.60 −0.78 (−1.74 ~ 0.19) 0.115 ≥ 3 days 319(22.4) 23.85 ± 5.83 0.88 (0.17 ~ 1.58) 0.015 20.33 ± 6.39 1.42 (0.34 ~ 2.49) 0.010 High−intensity Physical activity No 568(39.9) 23.19 ± 5.49 Reference 19.18 ± 5.41 Reference 1–2 days 583(40.9) 22.85 ± 5.85 −0.53 (−1.13 ~ 0.07) 0.083 19.37 ± 5.93 −0.28 (−1.26 ~ 0.69) 0.565 ≥ 3 days 274(19.2) 23.79 ± 5.62 0.77 (0.03 ~ 1.52) 0.042 20.42 ± 6.49 1.06 (−0.06 ~ 2.17) 0.063 Note. CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation; M, mean Table 2 presents the cross-sectional associations between individual metals and baseline 25(OH)D concentrations. In both the total sample and male subgroup, V and Cu were positively correlated with the serum 25(OH)D level, while Cr and Mn were negatively associated. In females, log-transformed As and Mo were positively associated with baseline 25(OH)D levels across both model types, and As and Mo demonstrated an inverse association with baseline VDD in the multi-metal adjusted model (Tables 2 and Supplementary Table S2). In the analysis of incident VDD, V exhibited a significant inverse association with incident VDD in the overall population and among males, across both model types (P < 0.05, see Table 3). Moreover, aside from the pronounced negative associations between V and changes in 25(OH)D levels observed in the single-metal regression models, no other significant relationships were identified between baseline metal concentrations and changes in 25(OH)D levels (Supplementary Table S3).
Table 2. Cross−sectional associations between individual metals with 25(OH)D levels at baseline
Metals Total Male Female β (95%CI) P value β (95%CI) P value β (95%CI) P value Non−essential metals Single−metal model V 4.73 (0.84 ~ 8.61) 0.017 7.72 (2.61 ~ 12.84) 0.003 −0.02 (−5.99 ~ 5.96) 0.994 Cr −3.26 (−7.29 ~ −0.78) 0.013 −5.71 (−11.07 ~ −0.35) 0.037 0.75 (−5.35 ~ 6.85) 0.809 Ni 0.26 (−0.69 ~ 1.21) 0.593 −0.07 (−1.31 ~ 1.17) 0.913 0.78 (−0.71 ~ 2.27) 0.304 Cd 1.09 (−0.17 ~ 2.36) 0.090 1.39 (−0.27 ~ 3.06) 0.101 0.60 (−1.34 ~ 2.54) 0.542 Pb 1.51 (−0.41 ~ 3.42) 0.123 1.47 (−1.03 ~ 3.98) 0.249 1.59 (−1.40 ~ 4.59) 0.296 As 0.67 (−0.43 ~ 1.77) 0.231 −0.08 (−1.52 ~ 1.35) 0.906 1.82 (0.10 ~ 3.53) 0.038 Multi−metal adjusted model V 6.02 (1.72 ~ 10.32) 0.006 10.51 (4.85 ~ 16.17) 0.000 −0.79 (−7.38 ~ 5.80) 0.814 Cr −6.72 (−11.14 ~ −2.30) 0.003 −9.81 (−15.67 ~ −3.95) 0.001 −0.93 (−7.56 ~ 5.71) 0.784 Ni 0.39 (−0.57 ~ 1.36) 0.421 0.18 (−1.06 ~ 1.42) 0.778 0.45 (−1.06 ~ 1.97) 0.558 Cd 0.82 (−0.50 ~ 2.13) 0.222 1.04 (−0.69 ~ 2.76) 0.238 0.40 (−1.64 ~ 2.43) 0.703 Pb 1.66 (−0.48 ~ 3.81) 0.128 0.79 (−1.99 ~ 3.57) 0.578 3.02 (−0.34 ~ 6.38) 0.078 As 0.99 (−0.23 ~ 2.20) 0.111 −0.10 (−1.68 ~ 1.48) 0.905 2.49 (0.61 ~ 4.38) 0.010 Essential metals Single−metal model Mn −2.02 (−3.64 ~ −0.39) 0.015 −2.92 (−5.03 ~ −0.80) 0.007 −0.33 (−2.88 ~ 2.23) 0.802 Fe −0.32 (−2.20 ~ 1.56) 0.742 −0.86 (−3.35 ~ 1.63) 0.500 0.47 (−2.4 ~ 3.37) 0.751 Co −1.86 (−3.68 ~ −0.03) 0.047 −1.91 (−4.34 ~ 0.51) 0.122 −1.98 (−4.77 ~ 0.81) 0.163 Cu 5.51 (1.69 ~ 9.31) 0.005 5.35 (0.61 ~ 10.09) 0.027 6.32 (−0.18 ~ 12.81) 0.057 Zn 3.07 (−2.43 ~ 8.57) 0.274 3.01 (−4.04 ~ 10.06) 0.402 2.52 (−6.42 ~ 11.45) 0.580 Mo 0.20 (−2.17 ~ 2.57) 0.868 −2.33 (−5.33 ~ 0.66) 0.126 5.38 (1.47 ~ 9.29) 0.007 Multi−metal adjusted model Mn −2.38 (−4.17 ~ −0.59) 0.009 −3.00 (−5.32 ~ −0.68) 0.011 −1.95 (−4.79 ~ 0.88) 0.177 Fe 0.33 (−1.67 ~ 2.33) 0.743 0.63 (−2.04 ~ 3.30) 0.643 0.32 (−2.74 ~ 3.37) 0.839 Co −1.30 (−3.17 ~ 0.57) 0.328 −1.03 (−3.55 ~ 1.50) 0.424 −2.18 (−5.03 ~ 0.66) 0.132 Cu 6.01 (2.11 ~ 9.92) 0.003 6.19 (1.30 ~ 11.09) 0.013 7.76 (1.21 ~ 14.31) 0.020 Zn 3.39 (−2.35 ~ 9.13) 0.246 3.14 (−4.18 ~ 10.47) 0.400 2.37 (−7.00 ~ 11.74) 0.620 Mo 1.41 (−1.09 ~ 3.90) 0.269 −0.79 (−3.93 ~ 2.36) 0.624 6.50 (2.36 ~ 10.63) 0.002 Note. V, Vanadium; Cr, Chromium; Mn, Manganese; Fe, Iron; Co, Cobalt; Ni, Nickel; Cu, Copper; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic; Mo, Molybdenum; Cd, Cadmium; Pb, Lead; CI, confidence interval Table 3. Logistic regression models of the relationship between single serum metal concentrations at baseline and incident vitamin D deficiency at follow−up
Metals Overall Male Female OR (95%CI) P−value OR (95%CI) P−value OR (95%CI) P−value Non−essential metals Single−metal model V 0.12 (0.02 ~ 0.64) 0.014 0.05 (0.01 ~ 0.41) 0.006 0.65 (0.04 ~ 11.73) 0.767 Cr 0.34 (0.05 ~ 2.20) 0.260 1.04 (0.10 ~ 11.42) 0.975 0.04 (0.01 ~ 0.99) 0.053 Ni 1.06 (0.69 ~ 1.62) 0.787 1.34 (0.80 ~ 2.26) 0.273 0.64 (0.29 ~ 1.34) 0.237 Cd 0.674 (0.39 ~ 1.16) 0.157 0.81 (0.40 ~ 1.62) 0.545 0.42 (0.16 ~ 1.10) 0.082 Pb 0.71 (0.29 ~ 1.68) 0.430 1.34 (0.45 ~ 3.95) 0.595 0.16 (0.03 ~ 0.75) 0.021 As 0.94 (0.588 ~ 1.53) 0.801 1.02 (0.56 ~ 1.87) 0.949 1.00 (0.43 ~ 2.34) 0.998 Multi−metal adjusted model V 0.15 (0.02 ~ 0.97) 0.046 0.02 (0.01 ~ 0.28) 0.003 2.10 (0.09 ~ 50.80) 0.649 Cr 0.78 (0.10 ~ 5.96) 0.812 3.32 (0.24 ~ 45.82) 0.371 0.07 (0.01 ~ 2.02) 0.119 Ni 1.01 (0.65 ~ 1.56) 0.962 1.17 (0.69 ~ 2.01) 0.561 0.73 (0.33 ~ 1.60) 0.426 Cd 0.75 (0.42 ~ 1.33) 0.323 0.85 (0.41 ~ 1.77) 0.667 0.60 (0.21 ~ 1.56) 0.273 Pb 0.95 (0.35 ~ 2.54) 0.912 2.10 (0.61 ~ 7.25) 0.241 0.19 (0.03 ~ 1.08) 0.061 As 1.03 (0.60 ~ 1.78) 0.910 1.35 (0.68 ~ 2.68) 0.384 0.84 (0.32 ~ 2.16) 0.712 Essential metals Single−metal model Mn 0.92 (0.44 ~ 1.92) 0.828 1.71 (0.69 ~ 4.23) 0.243 0.29 (0.08 ~ 1.07) 0.064 Fe 0.81 (0.35 ~ 1.87) 0.622 1.21 (0.41 ~ 3.57) 0.734 0.49 (0.12 ~ 1.95) 0.312 Co 1.23 (0.55 ~ 2.76) 0.616 1.86 (0.68 ~ 5.16) 0.230 0.57 (0.14 ~ 2.30) 0.429 Cu 1.09 (0.20 ~ 5.82) 0.923 1.30 (0.18 ~ 9.52) 0.795 0.62 (0.02 ~ 16.85) 0.777 Zn 6.13 (0.49 ~ 77.65) 0.160 10.87 (0.49 ~ 249.49) 0.133 0.94 (0.01 ~ 93.16) 0.977 Mo 0.93 (0.32 ~ 2.71) 0.889 0.96 (0.26 ~ 3.53) 0.948 1.10 (0.15 ~ 8.13) 0.924 Multi−metal adjusted model Mn 0.87 (0.39 ~ 1.95) 0.739 1.56 (0.58 ~ 4.20) 0.380 0.28 (0.07 ~ 1.19) 0.085 Fe 0.70 (0.28 ~ 1.71) 0.432 0.87 (0.27 ~ 2.82) 0.817 0.59 (0.13 ~ 2.64) 0.492 Co 1.30 (0.57 ~ 3.00) 0.531 1.84 (0.64 ~ 5.34) 0.259 0.61 (0.15 ~ 2.56) 0.502 Cu 0.92 (0.17 ~ 5.09) 0.923 1.23 (0.16 ~ 9.69) 0.846 0.62 (0.02 ~ 17.25) 0.780 Zn 9.02 (0.64 ~ 127.95) 0.104 9.30 (0.36 ~ 243.96) 0.181 4.14 (0.03 ~ 538.05) 0.567 Mo 1.04 (0.34 ~ 3.21) 0.946 0.82 (0.21 ~ 3.25) 0.777 2.22 (0.27 ~ 18.21) 0.458 Note. V, Vanadium; Cr, Chromium; Mn, Manganese; Fe, Iron; Co, Cobalt; Ni, Nickel; Cu, Copper; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic; Mo, Molybdenum; Cd, Cadmium; Pb, Lead; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval The BKMR model identified no statistically significant associations between the non-essential and essential metal mixtures and initial serum 25(OH)D concentrations, VDD, subsequent VDD, or alterations in 25(OH)D concentrations (Supplementary Figure S2). Supplementary Figure S3 illustrates the estimated effects of individual metals on vitamin D-related outcomes based on the BKMR model for the entire sample. At fixed percentiles, serum Cu levels were positively associated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations. When the remaining metals were set at the 50th and 75th percentiles, serum Mn levels were also negatively correlated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations. When the other metals were fixed at the 50th and 75th percentiles, serum Cr levels were negatively associated with baseline serum 25(OH)D levels. Serum As levels were positively associated with baseline serum 25(OH)D levels at the 75th percentile. When other metals were fixed at the 50th and 75th percentiles, serum Cr was positively associated with baseline VDD, whereas serum As was inversely associated with baseline VDD. Additionally, serum V was negatively associated with incident VDD at the 25th and 50th percentiles. The univariate exposure–response curves of the BKMR model are presented in Supplementary Figure S4.
The sex-stratified BKMR models (Supplementary Figures S5 and S6) did not identify any significant relationships among the metal mixture, essential metal mixture, and vitamin D-related outcomes in either sex. In addition, a positive linear correlation was observed between the essential metal mixture and baseline serum 25(OH)D levels in females. This positive association was observed when the essential metal mixture exceeded the 60th percentile. When other metals were fixed at the 50th and 75th percentiles, serum Cr levels were negatively associated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations but positively associated with VDD in males (Supplementary Figure S7). Serum As levels were also positively correlated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations at the 75th percentile in both sexes (Supplementary Figures S7 and S8). When other metals were fixed at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, serum V levels were negatively associated with incident VDD in males (Supplementary Figure S7). As demonstrated in Supplementary Figures S7, when other metals were fixed at the 25th and 50th percentiles, the serum Cu was positively associated with the baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations in males. In females, serum Cu levels were positively correlated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations at the 50th and 75th percentiles. Serum Mo levels were positively associated with baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations and inversely associated with VDD in females (Supplementary Figure S8). The univariate exposure–response curves of the BKMR model are illustrated in Supplementary Figures S9 and S10.
In this study, we observed an inverse association between serum V levels and 25(OH)D concentrations in males in the cross-sectional analysis. In addition, baseline serum V was inversely associated with both incident VDD and longitudinal changes in 25(OH)D across the two waves. This finding suggests a nonlinear relationship between V and 25(OH)D, as supported by the BKMR analysis. Significant positive cross-sectional associations were observed between serum Mo and 25(OH)D levels in females. In a study involving 512 adolescents (with an average blood lead concentration of 46 μg/L), a positive association was observed between serum 25(OH)D levels and urinary Mo and Tl; meanwhile, no significant association was noted between 25(OH)D concentrations and either Pb or Cd[7]. Cross-sectional association was observed between serum As and 25(OH)D levels. Previous reports have indicated that serum 25(OH)D concentrations are negatively correlated with urinary As levels[7]. Among females, median serum As concentrations were 2.52 μg/L (interquartile range=2.70 [P25–P75:1.53–4.23]), and the observed positive correlation may indicate a low-dose potential protective effect.
This study identified a positive link between serum Cu levels and 25(OH)D concentrations in both sexes. Furthermore, Cu homeostasis is essential, and the dose–response relationship between Cu levels and health outcomes follows a U-shaped pattern. The positive association between Cu and vitamin D levels may reflect only the left segment of the U-shaped curve. The absence of a longitudinal association between the 11 metals and vitamin D levels or status in this study may be attributed to the extended interval between follow-up and baseline. The biological half-life of the prohormone 25(OH)D is approximately 2–3 weeks[3]. In addition, most metals, including Mn and As, are primarily excreted via the serum, reflecting exposures within the preceding hours or days. The short half-lives of both metals and vitamin D suggest that metals may exert cross-sectional or short-term effects on vitamin D levels, a notion supported by the findings of the cross-sectional analysis in this study.
A male-specific negative association was observed between serum Cr and Mn concentrations and reduced 25 (OH) D levels. Studies have reported that Cr and Mn are positively associated with liver function biomarkers, indicating that heavy metal exposure may affect D levels by impacting liver function[8]. Furthermore, metals, such as As, Pb, Hg, and Cd, individually and in combination, have been reported to correlate with renal function parameters in adolescents aged 12–18 years[9]. However, the biological mechanisms underlying the association between metal exposure and elevated 25(OH)D levels remain unclear. Given that 25(OH)D is strongly influenced by sun exposure, metal concentrations may serve as proxies for environmental exposure during outdoor activities, which could, in turn, contribute to higher 25(OH)D levels. In addition, sex-specific differences in the association between heavy metal exposure and vitamin D may be attributable to variations in gene expression, dietary patterns, behavioral habits, and the duration of outdoor activities between females and males[10]. This was partly confirmed by the sex differences between moderate-(at least one in last 7 days, males: 68.1% vs. females: 57.1%, P < 0.001) and high-intensity physical activity (at least one in last 7 days: 66.9% (males: 66.9% vs. females: 49.6%, P < 0.001) in this study.
Nevertheless, this study has certain limitations that warrant consideration. First, several factors potentially influencing vitamin D status—such as genetic background, dietary vitamin D intake, smoking status, quantified sun exposure, and pubertal status—were not assessed. Second, given the short biological half-lives of some metals, relying on the concentration of a single measurement to estimate metal exposure levels may result in misclassification. Finally, this study was conducted among students within a narrow age range at a single school in one city, limiting the generalizability of the findings to other age groups or populations with different levels of environmental metal exposure.
Overall, this study suggests that some metals influence serum vitamin D levels in a sex-specific manner. This study underscores the importance of minimizing environmental metal exposure to prevent VDD in adolescents, thereby supporting overall adolescent health. However, this was only a preliminary analysis. Future studies should employ longitudinal designs with repeated measurements of both metals and vitamin D, along with evaluations of calcium and phosphorus metabolism, to further uncover the potential health impacts of metal exposure.
doi: 10.3967/bes2025.168
Relationship of Non-essential and Essential Metals With Vitamin D in a Chinese Early Adolescent Cohort
-
Gengfu Wang, Weibo Liu, and Min Li: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, writing – review, and editing. Tang Ting, Qi Zhong: Data curation, Investigation, writing the original draft, writing the review, and editing. Guangbo Qu, Yi Zhou, Mengyuan Yuan: Methodology, writing, review, and editing. Yonghan Li: Formal analysis and methodology. Fangbiao Tao: Resources and supervision. Puyu Su: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, writing, review, and editing. Chaoxue Zhang: Data curation, funding acquisition, methodology, writing, reviewing, and editing.
The authors declare no competing interests.
This study was approved by the Biomedicine Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University (approval no. 20180083). All participants provided informed consent before participating in the study.
&These authors contributed equally to this work.
注释:1) Authors’ contributions: 2) Competing interests: 3) Ethics: -
Table 1. Univariable associations between potential confounders and serum 25(OH)D concentration
Variables 25(OH)D level at wave 1 25(OH)D level at wave 3 n(%)/M ± SD M ± SD β(95%CI) P value M ± SD β(95%CI) P value Age 12.49 ± 0.48 − −0.58 (−1.19 ~ 0.03) 0.063 − 0.53 (−0.47 ~ 1.55) 0.297 BMI 19.21 ± 4.46 − −0.12(−0.19 ~ −0.15) 0.000 − 0.12 (−0.11 ~ 0.34) 0.085 Sex Males 865(60.7) 23.90 ± 5.74 Reference 20.41 ± 5.96 Reference Female 560(39.3) 22.04 ± 5.38 −1.89 (−2.45~ −1.26) 0.000 18.08 ± 5.40 −2.47 (−3.41 ~ −1.53) 0.000 Residence City 1107(77.7) 22.35 ± 5.85 Reference 18.83 ± 5.89 Reference Rural 318(22.3) 23.40 ± 5.60 1.05 (0.35 ~ 1.76) 0.004 19.69 ± 5.84 0.84 (−0.30 ~ 1.98) 0.151 Only child Yes 232(16.3) 23.25 ± 5.79 Reference 19.68 ± 6.27 Reference No 1193(83.7) 23.15 ± 5.65 −0.10 (−0.90 ~ 0.69) 0.799 19.46 ± 5.78 0.88 (−0.43 ~ 2.19) 0.187 Family structure Nuclear family 655(46.0) 22.78 ± 5.48 Reference 19.30 ± 5.82 Reference Single−parent family 227(15.9) 23.49 ± 6.29 0.39 (−0.42~ 1.19) 0.345 19.57 ± 6.01 −0.50 (−1.88 ~ 0.87) 0.475 Large family 524(36.8) 23.48 ± 5.66 0.49 (−0.11 ~ 1.11) 0.111 19.63 ± 5.84 −0.06 (−1.04 ~ 0.92) 0.900 Other 19(1.3) 24.10 ± 4.00 0.95 (−1.62 ~ 3.51) 0.471 21.71 ± 5.55 2.51 (−1.13 ~ 6.15) 0.178 Self−perceived family economic status Low 159(11.2) 23.55 ± 5.82 Reference 19.22 ± 5.47 Reference Medium 1063(74.6) 23.17 ± 5.72 −0.01 (−0.68 ~ 0.67) 0.983 19.60 ± 5.86 0.42 (−0.73~ 1.58) 0.473 High 203(14.2) 22.88 ± 5.27 −0.33 (−1.18 ~ 0.51) 0.437 19.18 ± 6.12 −0.69 (−2.18 ~ 0.80) 0.364 Father’s education level Primary school and below 221(15.5) 23.17 ± 5.83 Reference 19.14 ± 5.99 Reference Middle school 765(53.7) 23.26 ± 5.53 0.21 (−0.38 ~ 0.80) 0.486 19.68 ± 5.81 0.88 (−0.07 ~ 1.83) 0.071 Senior high school and above 439(30.8) 23.00 ± 5.83 −0.25 (−0.88 ~ 0.39) 0.449 19.36 ± 5.88 −0.93 (−1.97 ~ 0.10) 0.079 Mother’s education level Primary school and below 367(25.8) 23.32 ± 5.86 Reference 19.49 ± 5.86 Reference Middle school 721(50.6) 23.10 ± 5.64 −0.15 (−0.74 ~ 0.44) 0.626 19.45 ± 5.74 −0.19(−1.14 ~ 0.76) 0.693 Senior high school and above 337(23.6) 23.16 ± 5.73 −0.01 (−0.71 ~ 0.68) 0.974 19.62 ± 6.11 0.18 (−0.93 ~ 1.28) 0.756 Moderate−intensity Physical activity No 516(36.2) 22.93 ± 5.47 Reference 19.02 ± 5.76 Reference 1–2 days 590(41.4) 23.01 ± 5.74 −0.27 (−0.87 ~ 0.33) 0.371 19.46 ± 5.60 −0.78 (−1.74 ~ 0.19) 0.115 ≥ 3 days 319(22.4) 23.85 ± 5.83 0.88 (0.17 ~ 1.58) 0.015 20.33 ± 6.39 1.42 (0.34 ~ 2.49) 0.010 High−intensity Physical activity No 568(39.9) 23.19 ± 5.49 Reference 19.18 ± 5.41 Reference 1–2 days 583(40.9) 22.85 ± 5.85 −0.53 (−1.13 ~ 0.07) 0.083 19.37 ± 5.93 −0.28 (−1.26 ~ 0.69) 0.565 ≥ 3 days 274(19.2) 23.79 ± 5.62 0.77 (0.03 ~ 1.52) 0.042 20.42 ± 6.49 1.06 (−0.06 ~ 2.17) 0.063 Note. CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation; M, mean Table 2. Cross−sectional associations between individual metals with 25(OH)D levels at baseline
Metals Total Male Female β (95%CI) P value β (95%CI) P value β (95%CI) P value Non−essential metals Single−metal model V 4.73 (0.84 ~ 8.61) 0.017 7.72 (2.61 ~ 12.84) 0.003 −0.02 (−5.99 ~ 5.96) 0.994 Cr −3.26 (−7.29 ~ −0.78) 0.013 −5.71 (−11.07 ~ −0.35) 0.037 0.75 (−5.35 ~ 6.85) 0.809 Ni 0.26 (−0.69 ~ 1.21) 0.593 −0.07 (−1.31 ~ 1.17) 0.913 0.78 (−0.71 ~ 2.27) 0.304 Cd 1.09 (−0.17 ~ 2.36) 0.090 1.39 (−0.27 ~ 3.06) 0.101 0.60 (−1.34 ~ 2.54) 0.542 Pb 1.51 (−0.41 ~ 3.42) 0.123 1.47 (−1.03 ~ 3.98) 0.249 1.59 (−1.40 ~ 4.59) 0.296 As 0.67 (−0.43 ~ 1.77) 0.231 −0.08 (−1.52 ~ 1.35) 0.906 1.82 (0.10 ~ 3.53) 0.038 Multi−metal adjusted model V 6.02 (1.72 ~ 10.32) 0.006 10.51 (4.85 ~ 16.17) 0.000 −0.79 (−7.38 ~ 5.80) 0.814 Cr −6.72 (−11.14 ~ −2.30) 0.003 −9.81 (−15.67 ~ −3.95) 0.001 −0.93 (−7.56 ~ 5.71) 0.784 Ni 0.39 (−0.57 ~ 1.36) 0.421 0.18 (−1.06 ~ 1.42) 0.778 0.45 (−1.06 ~ 1.97) 0.558 Cd 0.82 (−0.50 ~ 2.13) 0.222 1.04 (−0.69 ~ 2.76) 0.238 0.40 (−1.64 ~ 2.43) 0.703 Pb 1.66 (−0.48 ~ 3.81) 0.128 0.79 (−1.99 ~ 3.57) 0.578 3.02 (−0.34 ~ 6.38) 0.078 As 0.99 (−0.23 ~ 2.20) 0.111 −0.10 (−1.68 ~ 1.48) 0.905 2.49 (0.61 ~ 4.38) 0.010 Essential metals Single−metal model Mn −2.02 (−3.64 ~ −0.39) 0.015 −2.92 (−5.03 ~ −0.80) 0.007 −0.33 (−2.88 ~ 2.23) 0.802 Fe −0.32 (−2.20 ~ 1.56) 0.742 −0.86 (−3.35 ~ 1.63) 0.500 0.47 (−2.4 ~ 3.37) 0.751 Co −1.86 (−3.68 ~ −0.03) 0.047 −1.91 (−4.34 ~ 0.51) 0.122 −1.98 (−4.77 ~ 0.81) 0.163 Cu 5.51 (1.69 ~ 9.31) 0.005 5.35 (0.61 ~ 10.09) 0.027 6.32 (−0.18 ~ 12.81) 0.057 Zn 3.07 (−2.43 ~ 8.57) 0.274 3.01 (−4.04 ~ 10.06) 0.402 2.52 (−6.42 ~ 11.45) 0.580 Mo 0.20 (−2.17 ~ 2.57) 0.868 −2.33 (−5.33 ~ 0.66) 0.126 5.38 (1.47 ~ 9.29) 0.007 Multi−metal adjusted model Mn −2.38 (−4.17 ~ −0.59) 0.009 −3.00 (−5.32 ~ −0.68) 0.011 −1.95 (−4.79 ~ 0.88) 0.177 Fe 0.33 (−1.67 ~ 2.33) 0.743 0.63 (−2.04 ~ 3.30) 0.643 0.32 (−2.74 ~ 3.37) 0.839 Co −1.30 (−3.17 ~ 0.57) 0.328 −1.03 (−3.55 ~ 1.50) 0.424 −2.18 (−5.03 ~ 0.66) 0.132 Cu 6.01 (2.11 ~ 9.92) 0.003 6.19 (1.30 ~ 11.09) 0.013 7.76 (1.21 ~ 14.31) 0.020 Zn 3.39 (−2.35 ~ 9.13) 0.246 3.14 (−4.18 ~ 10.47) 0.400 2.37 (−7.00 ~ 11.74) 0.620 Mo 1.41 (−1.09 ~ 3.90) 0.269 −0.79 (−3.93 ~ 2.36) 0.624 6.50 (2.36 ~ 10.63) 0.002 Note. V, Vanadium; Cr, Chromium; Mn, Manganese; Fe, Iron; Co, Cobalt; Ni, Nickel; Cu, Copper; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic; Mo, Molybdenum; Cd, Cadmium; Pb, Lead; CI, confidence interval Table 3. Logistic regression models of the relationship between single serum metal concentrations at baseline and incident vitamin D deficiency at follow−up
Metals Overall Male Female OR (95%CI) P−value OR (95%CI) P−value OR (95%CI) P−value Non−essential metals Single−metal model V 0.12 (0.02 ~ 0.64) 0.014 0.05 (0.01 ~ 0.41) 0.006 0.65 (0.04 ~ 11.73) 0.767 Cr 0.34 (0.05 ~ 2.20) 0.260 1.04 (0.10 ~ 11.42) 0.975 0.04 (0.01 ~ 0.99) 0.053 Ni 1.06 (0.69 ~ 1.62) 0.787 1.34 (0.80 ~ 2.26) 0.273 0.64 (0.29 ~ 1.34) 0.237 Cd 0.674 (0.39 ~ 1.16) 0.157 0.81 (0.40 ~ 1.62) 0.545 0.42 (0.16 ~ 1.10) 0.082 Pb 0.71 (0.29 ~ 1.68) 0.430 1.34 (0.45 ~ 3.95) 0.595 0.16 (0.03 ~ 0.75) 0.021 As 0.94 (0.588 ~ 1.53) 0.801 1.02 (0.56 ~ 1.87) 0.949 1.00 (0.43 ~ 2.34) 0.998 Multi−metal adjusted model V 0.15 (0.02 ~ 0.97) 0.046 0.02 (0.01 ~ 0.28) 0.003 2.10 (0.09 ~ 50.80) 0.649 Cr 0.78 (0.10 ~ 5.96) 0.812 3.32 (0.24 ~ 45.82) 0.371 0.07 (0.01 ~ 2.02) 0.119 Ni 1.01 (0.65 ~ 1.56) 0.962 1.17 (0.69 ~ 2.01) 0.561 0.73 (0.33 ~ 1.60) 0.426 Cd 0.75 (0.42 ~ 1.33) 0.323 0.85 (0.41 ~ 1.77) 0.667 0.60 (0.21 ~ 1.56) 0.273 Pb 0.95 (0.35 ~ 2.54) 0.912 2.10 (0.61 ~ 7.25) 0.241 0.19 (0.03 ~ 1.08) 0.061 As 1.03 (0.60 ~ 1.78) 0.910 1.35 (0.68 ~ 2.68) 0.384 0.84 (0.32 ~ 2.16) 0.712 Essential metals Single−metal model Mn 0.92 (0.44 ~ 1.92) 0.828 1.71 (0.69 ~ 4.23) 0.243 0.29 (0.08 ~ 1.07) 0.064 Fe 0.81 (0.35 ~ 1.87) 0.622 1.21 (0.41 ~ 3.57) 0.734 0.49 (0.12 ~ 1.95) 0.312 Co 1.23 (0.55 ~ 2.76) 0.616 1.86 (0.68 ~ 5.16) 0.230 0.57 (0.14 ~ 2.30) 0.429 Cu 1.09 (0.20 ~ 5.82) 0.923 1.30 (0.18 ~ 9.52) 0.795 0.62 (0.02 ~ 16.85) 0.777 Zn 6.13 (0.49 ~ 77.65) 0.160 10.87 (0.49 ~ 249.49) 0.133 0.94 (0.01 ~ 93.16) 0.977 Mo 0.93 (0.32 ~ 2.71) 0.889 0.96 (0.26 ~ 3.53) 0.948 1.10 (0.15 ~ 8.13) 0.924 Multi−metal adjusted model Mn 0.87 (0.39 ~ 1.95) 0.739 1.56 (0.58 ~ 4.20) 0.380 0.28 (0.07 ~ 1.19) 0.085 Fe 0.70 (0.28 ~ 1.71) 0.432 0.87 (0.27 ~ 2.82) 0.817 0.59 (0.13 ~ 2.64) 0.492 Co 1.30 (0.57 ~ 3.00) 0.531 1.84 (0.64 ~ 5.34) 0.259 0.61 (0.15 ~ 2.56) 0.502 Cu 0.92 (0.17 ~ 5.09) 0.923 1.23 (0.16 ~ 9.69) 0.846 0.62 (0.02 ~ 17.25) 0.780 Zn 9.02 (0.64 ~ 127.95) 0.104 9.30 (0.36 ~ 243.96) 0.181 4.14 (0.03 ~ 538.05) 0.567 Mo 1.04 (0.34 ~ 3.21) 0.946 0.82 (0.21 ~ 3.25) 0.777 2.22 (0.27 ~ 18.21) 0.458 Note. V, Vanadium; Cr, Chromium; Mn, Manganese; Fe, Iron; Co, Cobalt; Ni, Nickel; Cu, Copper; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic; Mo, Molybdenum; Cd, Cadmium; Pb, Lead; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval -
[1] Liu WH, Hu J, Fang YY, et al. Vitamin D status in Mainland of China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine, 2021; 38, 101017. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101017 [2] Saggese G, Vierucci F, Boot AM, et al. Vitamin D in childhood and adolescence: an expert position statement. Eur J Pediatr, 2015; 174, 565−76. doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2524-6 [3] Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med, 2007; 357, 266−81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra070553 [4] Rechtman E, Navarro E, de Water E, et al. Early-life critical windows of susceptibility to manganese exposure and sex-specific changes in brain connectivity in late adolescence. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci, 2023; 3, 460−9. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.03.016 [5] Yuan MY, Li YH, Chang JJ, et al. Vitamin D and suicidality: a Chinese early adolescent cohort and Mendelian randomization study. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci, 2023; 32, e52. doi: 10.1017/S2045796023000665 [6] Liang CM, Li ZJ, Xia X, et al. Determine multiple elements simultaneously in the sera of umbilical cord blood samples—a very simple method. Biol Trace Elem Res, 2017; 177, 1−8. doi: 10.1007/s12011-016-0853-6 [7] Zamoiski RD, Guallar E, García-Vargas GG, et al. Association of arsenic and metals with concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D among adolescents in Torreón, Mexico. Environ Health Perspect, 2014; 122, 1233−8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307861 [8] Zhao MD, Ge XY, Xu J, et al. Association between urine metals and liver function biomarkers in Northeast China: a cross-sectional study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2022; 231, 113163. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113163 [9] Sanders AP, Mazzella MJ, Malin AJ, et al. Combined exposure to lead, cadmium, mercury, and arsenic and kidney health in adolescents age 12–19 in NHANES 2009–2014. Environ Int, 2019; 131, 104993. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104993 [10] Ciarambino T, Crispino P, Minervini G, et al. Vitamin D: can gender medicine have a role?. Biomedicines, 2023; 11, 1762. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061762 -
下载:
Quick Links