-
Eighty-six isolates belonging to 10 genetic clusters of E. cloacae, which were isolated from patients in different hospitals, were used in the study (Table 1). Each genetic cluster contained 2 to 16 isolates. A reference strain (ATCC 13047) was also included. All isolates were characterized for clonality using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and subtyped using hsp60 genotyping[7, 19, 20]. Because no strain from clusters Ⅶ, Ⅹ, and Ⅻ was isolated from the clinical samples, our study did not contain these three genetic clusters.
Table 1. Enterobacter cloacae Strains Isolated from China
Cluster No. of strains Source Province Year I 10 SP (9), Ur (1) HB, HLJ 2011, 2012, 2013 Ⅱ 7 SP (3), Ur (1), SC (1), BI (2) HB, HLJ, SX 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 Ⅲ 14 SP (7), Ur (1), SC (5), BL (1) HB, HLJ 2011, 2012 Ⅳ 5 SP (3), BI (1), OT (1) HB, HLJ 2011, 2012, 2013 V 6 SP (3), SC (2), BI (1) HB, HLJ 2011, 2012, 2013 Ⅵ 15 SP (8), Ur (2), SC (3), OT (2) HB, HLJ, BJ 2011, 2012, 2013 Ⅷ 16 SP (9), SC (4), BL (1), ST (2) HB, HLJ 2011, 2012 Ⅸ 5 SP (4), BL (1) HB, HLJ 2010, 2011, 2012 Ⅺ 2 SP (2) HB 2011, 2012 XⅢ 6 SP (3), BI (1), BL (1), ST (1) HB, HLJ, SX, GZ 2011, 2012, 2013 Total 86 Note.Sources: SP (sputum), UR (urine), SC (secretion), BI (bile), BL (blood culture), ST (stool), OT (others) Regions: BJ (Beijing), GZ (Guizhou), HB (Hebei), HLJ (Heilongjiang), HN (Henan), QH (Qinghai), SX (Shanxi). In this study, all strains were isolated from human patients for routine diagnostic purposes. All participants gave written informed consent. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC, according to the medical research regulations of the Ministry of Health, China [Approval No. ICDC-2014003].
-
Each strain was selected from brain-heart agar plates. After culturing at 37 ℃ for 12 h, two samples were prepared from each strain. The extraction method for sample preparation and data acquisition was in accordance with our previously described methods[16-17]. A colony was suspended in 300 μL of molecular-grade water and vortexed, and 900 μL of anhydrous ethanol was added. The samples were vortexed and centrifuged (13, 000 × g) for 2 min. The supernatant was discarded and 50 μL of 70% formic acid was added and mixed. Finally, 50 μL of acetonitrile was added, and the solution was carefully mixed. After centrifuging (13, 000 × g) for 2 min, the supernatant was the prepared sample. A Microflex LT (Bruker Daltonics) mass spectrometer was used for data acquisition. Escherichia coli strain ATCC 8739 was used for mass calibration and instrument parameter optimization. A Microflex LT instrument was equipped with an N2 laser (λ = 377 nm). The software program used for the data acquisition was FlexControl (version 3.0, Bruker Daltonics). The parameters used were as follows: mass range, 2, 000-20, 000 Da; ion source 1, 20 kV; ion source 2, 18.5 kV; lens, 8.45 kV; pulsed ion extraction, 330 ns; and laser frequency, 20.0 Hz. Each spectrum was obtained by using 100 shots, and the spectra obtained after 500 shots were superimposed to generate the total spectrum.
-
In brief, only 17 E. cloacae reference strains were present in the original reference database (ORD) of the Biotyper system. Thus, an NRD was constructed using the automated Biotyper (version 2.0) software package[21]. Thirty-four strains belonging to 10 genetic clusters of E. cloacae were added to the NRD. The parameters used were as follows: desired mass error for main spectra projection, 200; desired peak frequency minimum, 25%; max, desired peak number for the MSP: 70. For each database entry, 20 individually measured mass spectra were imported into the MSP, which perform normalization, smoothing, baseline correction and peak picking to generate a list of the most significant peaks. The program then calculates a primary spectrum containing average peak mass, peak intensity and frequency. Based on the results of the genetic cluster analysis, strains with common features were included in the SRD using the MSP function of Biotyper.
Fifty-three E. cloacae strains were used to evaluate the ORD, NRD, and SRD. For the ORD and NRD, score values > 2.300 were considered the highest recognition at the species level; score values > 2.000 were considered identified at the species level; score values of 1.700-1.999 were considered identified at the genus level; and score values < 1.700 were considered unidentified. For the SRD, score values > 1.700 were considered correctly classified[22].
-
To visualize the relationships among E. cloacae strains, an MSP dendrogram was created using the external MATLAB software tool in Biotyper 2.0. The creation of the dendrogram was based on the parameter settings of the standard MSP dendrogram creation method and the general dendrogram settings.
According to the results of the cluster analysis and the super reference spectra, peaks with frequencies greater than 95% were extracted using the Biotyper MSP Peak List Editor (version 2.0.57.0).
-
Individually measured mass spectra of the E. cloacae strains were imported into MSP, which performs normalization, smoothing, baseline correction, and peak picking and generates a list of the most significant peaks. Then, a primary spectrum that contains the average peak mass, the peak intensity and frequency was calculated using the program. Thirty-four reference spectra of 10 genetic clusters were added to the original 17 reference spectra in the ORD; thus, there are 51 reference spectra in the NRD (Table 2). Based on the results of the clustering analysis, 14 strains from clusters Ⅲ, Ⅵ, and Ⅷ were closely related and constituted clade 1, and 20 strains of the other seven clusters were closely related and constituted clade 2. Thus, the strains of clade 1 and clade 2 were compiled as two super reference spectra in the SRD.
Table 2. Evaluation of Different Reference Databases
Cluster For Construction For Evaluation ORD NRD SRD Misidentified
(n/%)Species Level
(n/%)Cluster Level
(n/%)Misidentified
(n/%)Species Level
(n/%)Cluster Level
(n/%)Misidentified
(n/%)Species Level
(n/%)Clades Level
(n/%)I 3 7 7/100 7/100 6/86 7/100 7/100 Ⅱ 4 3 3/100 3/100 3/100 3/100 3/100 Ⅲ 5 9 9/100 9/100 6/68 1/11 8/89 8/89 Ⅳ 3 2 1/50 1/50 2/100 2/100 2/100 2/100 Ⅴ 2 4 4/100 4/100 3/75 4/100 4/100 Ⅵ 5 10 10/100 10/100 7/70 10/100 10/100 Ⅷ 4 12 12/100 12/100 9/75 12/100 12/100 Ⅸ 3 2 2/100 2/100 2/100 2/100 2/100 Ⅺ 2 1 1/100 1/100 1/100 1/100 1/100 XⅢ 3 3 2/67 1/33 3/100 3/100 3/100 3/100 Total 34 53 13/25 40/75 53/100 42/79 1/2 52/98 52/98 Note. ORD, original reference database; NRD, new reference database; SRD, super reference database. -
Fifty-three strains were used to evaluate the ORD and NRD. By searching the ORD, thirteen strains with high scores (≥ 2.000) were identified as E. asburiae. The other 40 strains were identified as E. cloacae, but the score values of eight of these strains were lower than 2.000 (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Comparison of the ORD, NRD, and SRD. The phylogenetic tree based on the hsp60 gene illustrates the relationship of the 10 clusters of E. cloacae. Thirty-four strains were added to the NRD, and another 53 strains were used to evaluate the NRD and SRD. The search results with score values are shown.
By searching the NRD, all isolates with high score values (100%, ≥ 2.000) were identified as E. cloacae. Only the spectrum for strain CN13EC0078, with a score value of 2.199, matched a previous spectrum; the remaining strains were the first to be matched to the Chinese reference spectrum in the NRD. While the strains of clusters Ⅱ, Ⅳ, Ⅸ, Ⅺ, and XⅢ were correctly identified to the genetic cluster level, misidentifications were identified in strains of clusters Ⅰ, Ⅴ, Ⅲ, Ⅵ, and Ⅷ, although these strains had high scores (Figure 1). Strains CN12EC0101 (cluster Ⅰ) and CN14EC0021 (cluster Ⅴ) were misidentified as belonging to cluster Ⅳ, which suggested that strain CN14EC0017 may be atypical as a reference for cluster Ⅳ.
In addition, we constructed and evaluated an SRD for E. cloacae identification. Searching the SRD, 30 strains of clusters Ⅲ, Ⅵ, and Ⅷ were identified in clade 1, and twenty-two isolates of seven other genetic clusters were identified in clade 2 (Figure 1). One strain of cluster Ⅲ (CN12EC0021) was not reliably identified (score value of 1.642) (Table 2).
-
A score-oriented MSP dendrogram was generated using the default settings in Biotyper 2.0 (Figure 2). The 87 strains were categorized into two distinct clades with a distance level of 600. Strains of clusters Ⅲ, Ⅵ, and Ⅷ were categorized as clade 1. Most strains of clade 1 were clustered at the genetic cluster level, with some exceptions. Strains of clade 2 consisted of seven other genetic clusters of E. cloacae. The strains clustered at distance levels of 650, 500, 450, 400, 350, 300, and 250 were also classified to the genetic cluster level (Figure 2). Because cluster XⅢ was a sequence crowd, the high number of branches suggested that there may be many genotypes in this cluster.
Figure 2. Cluster analysis of E. cloacae based on the entire protein spectrum (2, 000 to 20, 000 Da). Strains of clusters Ⅲ, Ⅵ, and Ⅷ were categorized as clade 1, and strains of the seven remaining genetic clusters were clustered as clade 2. Strains that were non-clustered based on their hsp60 genotypes are labelled with asterisks.
From the MSP of Biotyper, fifteen specific peaks with spectra frequencies > 97% were analysed and extracted from 44 strains of clade 1 (Figure 3A). Eighteen specific peaks with spectra frequencies > 97% were acquired from 43 strains of clade 2 (Figure 3B).
Figure 3. Specific peaks of clade 1 and clade 2 from 2, 000 to 20, 000 Da. (A) Representative pattern of a clade 1 strain (CN11EC0025); (B) Representative pattern of a clade 2 strain (CN12EC0032). The relative intensities of the ions (a.u., arbitrary units) are shown on the Y axis, and the masses (in Da) of the ions are shown on the X axis.
doi: 10.3967/bes2018.005
Rapid Identification and Subtyping of Enterobacter cloacae Clinical Isolates Using Peptide Mass Fingerprinting
-
Abstract:
Objective To establish a domestic database of Enterobacteria cloacae (E. cloacae), and improve the identification efficiency using peptide mass fingerprinting. Methods Peptide mass fingerprinting was used for the identification and subtyping of E. cloacae. Eighty-seven strains, identified based on hsp60 genotyping, were used to construct and evaluate a new reference database. Results Compared with the original reference database, the identification efficiency and accuracy of the new reference database was greatly improved at the species level. The first super reference database for E. cloacae identification was also constructed and evaluated. Based on the super reference database and the main spectra projection dendrogram, E. cloacae strains were divided into two clades. Conclusion Peptide mass fingerprinting is a powerful method to identify and subtype E. cloacae, and the use of this method will allow us to obtain more information to understand the heterogeneous organism E. cloacae. -
Key words:
- E.cloacae /
- Identification /
- Peptide mass fingerprinting
-
Figure 1. Comparison of the ORD, NRD, and SRD. The phylogenetic tree based on the hsp60 gene illustrates the relationship of the 10 clusters of E. cloacae. Thirty-four strains were added to the NRD, and another 53 strains were used to evaluate the NRD and SRD. The search results with score values are shown.
Figure 2. Cluster analysis of E. cloacae based on the entire protein spectrum (2, 000 to 20, 000 Da). Strains of clusters Ⅲ, Ⅵ, and Ⅷ were categorized as clade 1, and strains of the seven remaining genetic clusters were clustered as clade 2. Strains that were non-clustered based on their hsp60 genotypes are labelled with asterisks.
Figure 3. Specific peaks of clade 1 and clade 2 from 2, 000 to 20, 000 Da. (A) Representative pattern of a clade 1 strain (CN11EC0025); (B) Representative pattern of a clade 2 strain (CN12EC0032). The relative intensities of the ions (a.u., arbitrary units) are shown on the Y axis, and the masses (in Da) of the ions are shown on the X axis.
Table 1. Enterobacter cloacae Strains Isolated from China
Cluster No. of strains Source Province Year I 10 SP (9), Ur (1) HB, HLJ 2011, 2012, 2013 Ⅱ 7 SP (3), Ur (1), SC (1), BI (2) HB, HLJ, SX 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 Ⅲ 14 SP (7), Ur (1), SC (5), BL (1) HB, HLJ 2011, 2012 Ⅳ 5 SP (3), BI (1), OT (1) HB, HLJ 2011, 2012, 2013 V 6 SP (3), SC (2), BI (1) HB, HLJ 2011, 2012, 2013 Ⅵ 15 SP (8), Ur (2), SC (3), OT (2) HB, HLJ, BJ 2011, 2012, 2013 Ⅷ 16 SP (9), SC (4), BL (1), ST (2) HB, HLJ 2011, 2012 Ⅸ 5 SP (4), BL (1) HB, HLJ 2010, 2011, 2012 Ⅺ 2 SP (2) HB 2011, 2012 XⅢ 6 SP (3), BI (1), BL (1), ST (1) HB, HLJ, SX, GZ 2011, 2012, 2013 Total 86 Note.Sources: SP (sputum), UR (urine), SC (secretion), BI (bile), BL (blood culture), ST (stool), OT (others) Regions: BJ (Beijing), GZ (Guizhou), HB (Hebei), HLJ (Heilongjiang), HN (Henan), QH (Qinghai), SX (Shanxi). Table 2. Evaluation of Different Reference Databases
Cluster For Construction For Evaluation ORD NRD SRD Misidentified
(n/%)Species Level
(n/%)Cluster Level
(n/%)Misidentified
(n/%)Species Level
(n/%)Cluster Level
(n/%)Misidentified
(n/%)Species Level
(n/%)Clades Level
(n/%)I 3 7 7/100 7/100 6/86 7/100 7/100 Ⅱ 4 3 3/100 3/100 3/100 3/100 3/100 Ⅲ 5 9 9/100 9/100 6/68 1/11 8/89 8/89 Ⅳ 3 2 1/50 1/50 2/100 2/100 2/100 2/100 Ⅴ 2 4 4/100 4/100 3/75 4/100 4/100 Ⅵ 5 10 10/100 10/100 7/70 10/100 10/100 Ⅷ 4 12 12/100 12/100 9/75 12/100 12/100 Ⅸ 3 2 2/100 2/100 2/100 2/100 2/100 Ⅺ 2 1 1/100 1/100 1/100 1/100 1/100 XⅢ 3 3 2/67 1/33 3/100 3/100 3/100 3/100 Total 34 53 13/25 40/75 53/100 42/79 1/2 52/98 52/98 Note. ORD, original reference database; NRD, new reference database; SRD, super reference database. -
[1] Akbari M, Bakhshi B, Najar Peerayeh S. Particular Distribution of Enterobacter cloacae Strains Isolated from Urinary Tract Infection within Clonal Complexes. Iran Biomed J, 2016; 20, 49-55. http://applications.emro.who.int/imemrf/Iran_Biomed_J/Iran_Biomed_J_2016_20_1_49_55.pdf [2] Fursova NK, Astashkin EI, Knyazeva AI, et al. The spread of bla OXA-48 and bla OXA-244 carbapenemase genes among Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis and Enterobacter spp. isolated in Moscow, Russia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2015; 14, 46. doi: 10.1186/s12941-015-0108-y [3] Du H, Chen L, Chavda KD, et al. Genomic characterization of Enterobacter cloacae isolates from China that co-produce KPC-3 and NDM-1 carbapenemases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2016; 60, 2519-23. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03053-15 [4] Zhao K, Jin M, Chen Q, et al. Polysaccharides produced by Enterobacter cloacae induce apoptosis in cervical cancer cells. Int J Biol Macromol, 2015; 72, 960-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.09.047 [5] Taniyama D, Miyamoto K. Purpura Fulminans due to Enterobacter cloacae. Intern Med, 2015; 54, 2425-6. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.4971 [6] Stoesser N, Sheppard AE, Shakya M, et al. Dynamics of MDR Enterobacter cloacae outbreaks in a neonatal unit in Nepal:insights using wider sampling frames and next-generation sequencing. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2015; 70, 1008-15. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku521 [7] Hoffmann H, Roggenkamp A. Population genetics of the nomenspecies Enterobacter cloacae. Appl Environl Microb, 2003; 69, 5306-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5306-5318.2003 [8] Lee SO, Kim YS, Kim BN, et al. Impact of previous use of antibiotics on development of resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins in patients with enterobacter bacteremia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2002; 21, 577-81. doi: 10.1007/s10096-002-0772-7 [9] Sanders WE Jr, Sanders CC. Enterobacter spp.:pathogens poised to flourish at the turn of the century. Clin Microbiol Rev, 1997; 10, 220-41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14111533_Enterobacter_spp_Pathogens_poised_to_flourish_at_the_turn_of_the_century [10] Brenner DJ, McWhorter AC, Kai A, et al. Enterobacter asburiae sp. nov., a new species found in clinical specimens, and reassignment of Erwinia dissolvens and Erwinia nimipressuralis to the genus Enterobacter as Enterobacter dissolvens comb. nov. and Enterobacter nimipressuralis comb. nov. J Clin Microbiol, 1986; 23, 1114-20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281623165_Enterobacter_tabaci_sp_nov_a_novel_member_of_the_genus_Enterobacter_isolated_from_a_tobacco_stem [11] Hoffmann H, Schmoldt S, Trulzsch K, et al. Nosocomial urosepsis caused by Enterobacter kobei with aberrant phenotype. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2005; 53, 143-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.06.008 [12] Hoffmann H, Stindl S, Ludwig W. et al. Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. oharae subsp. nov., E. hormaechei subsp. hormaechei comb. nov., and E. hormaechei subsp. steigerwaltii subsp. nov., three new subspecies of clinical importance. J Clin Microbiol, 2005; 43, 3297-303. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7744750_Enterobacter_hormaechei_subsp_oharae_subsp_nov_E_hormaechei_subsp_hormaechei_comb_nov_and_E_hormaechei_subsp_steigerwaltii_subsp_nov_Three_New_Subspecies_of_Clinical_Importance [13] Hoffmann H, Stindl S, Stumpf A, et al. Description of Enterobacter ludwigii sp. nov., a novel Enterobacter species of clinical relevance. Syst Appl Microbiol, 2005; 28, 206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2004.12.009 [14] Camara JE, Hays FA. Discrimination between wild-type and ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2007; 389, 1633-8. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1558-7 [15] van Veen SQ, Claas EC, Kuijper EJ. High-throughput identification of bacteria and yeast by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in conventional medical microbiology laboratories. J Clin Microbiol, 2010; 48, 900-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02071-09 [16] Xiao D, Zhao F, Lv M, et al. Rapid identification of microorganisms isolated from throat swab specimens of community-acquired pneumonia patients by two MALDI-TOF MS systems. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2012; 73, 301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.04.004 [17] Xiao D, Ye C, Zhang H, et al. The construction and evaluation of reference spectra for the identification of human pathogenic microorganisms by MALDI-TOF MS. PLoS One, 2014; 9, e106312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106312 [18] Zhu B, Xiao D, Zhang H, et al. MALDI-TOF MS distinctly differentiates nontypable Haemophilus influenzae from Haemophilus haemolyticus. PLoS One, 2013; 8, e56139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056139 [19] Paauw A, Caspers MP, Schuren FH, et al. Genomic diversity within the Enterobacter cloacae complex. PLoS One, 2008; 3, e3018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003018 [20] Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, et al. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol, 2007; 24, 1596-9. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092 [21] Murugaiyan J, Ahrholdt J, Kowbel V, et al. Establishment of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry database for rapid identification of infectious achlorophyllous green micro-algae of the genus Prototheca. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2012; 18, 461-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03593.x [22] Xiao D, Zhang H, He L, et al. High natural variability bacteria identification and typing:Helicobacter pylori analysis based on peptide mass fingerprinting. J Proteomics, 2014; 98, 112-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.11.021 [23] Mezzatesta ML, Gona F, Stefani S. Enterobacter cloacae complex:clinical impact and emerging antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol, 2012; 7, 887-902. doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.61 [24] Kremer A, Hoffmann H. Prevalences of the Enterobacter cloacae complex and its phylogenetic derivatives in the nosocomial environment. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2012; 31, 2951-5. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1646-2 [25] Fernandez A, Pereira MJ, Suarez JM, et al. Emergence in Spain of a multidrug-resistant Enterobacter cloacae clinical isolate producing SFO-1 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase. J Clin Microbiol, 2011; 49, 822-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01872-10 [26] Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Hayakawa K, Ohmagari N, et al. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for characterization of Enterobacter cloacae. PLoS One, 2013; 8, e66358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066358 [27] Khennouchi NC, Loucif L, Boutefnouchet N, et al. MALDI-TOF MS as a Tool To Detect a Nosocomial Outbreak of Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase-and ArmA Methyltransferase-Producing Enterobacter cloacae Clinical Isolates in Algeria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2015; 59, 6477-83. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00615-15 [28] Chui H, Chan M, Hernandez D, et al. Rapid, Sensitive, and Specific Escherichia coli H Antigen Typing by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight-Based Peptide Mass Fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol, 2015; 53, 2480-85. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00593-15 [29] Planatscher H, Weiss F, Eisen D, et al. Identification of short terminal motifs enriched by antibodies using peptide mass fingerprinting. Bioinformatics, 2014; 30, 1205-13. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu009