-
The ethical approval of the present study was granted by Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of Ondokuz Mayıs University. All rats were purchased from the Experimental Animal Research and Application Center of Medicine Faculty of Ondokuz Mayıs University Samsun, Turkey. Twenty-four adult male Wistar albino rats (200 g body weight and 12 weeks old) were used. The rats were randomly selected and maintained in plastic cages under a 12:12 h day/night cycle at a temperature of (22 ± 2 ) °C and humidity of 50% ± 5%. Animals had ad libitum access to food and water during the 28-d experimental period. All rats were randomly assigned into the following four groups (n = 6 per group):
1. Control group: rats were not exposed to EMF, any substance, and stress during the 28-d experimental period. They were only kept in a plastic cage with ad libitum access to food and water.
2. EMF group: rats were exposed to 900 MHz EMF for 1 h/d for 28 d and treated with no substance.
3. LUT group: rats were treated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with LUT dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide [20 µg/(kg·d); Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA] for 28 d[21].
4. EMF + LUT group: Rats were not only exposed to 900 MHz EMF for 1 h/d but also treated i.p. with LUT [20 µg/(kg·d); Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA] during the experiment period.
At the end of the experiment period, cardiac perfusion was performed on all rats under anesthesia by injecting a 5:1 ratio of ketamine/xylazine (ketamine: 0.5 mL, xylazine: 0.1 mL; Sigma Chemical Comp, St. Louis, MO, USA). A 80 mg/kg dose of ketamine is safe as an anesthetic drug but a poor skeletal muscle relaxant; therefore, 10 mg/kg xylazine was administered to induce skeletal muscle relaxation[22]. Then, the CSC tissues were immediately removed and cut into two unequal parts. We used the CSC samples at the C6–C7 level for immunohistochemical, stereological, and histopathological investigation. The rest of the samples at the C1–C5 level was stored at −80 °C for biochemical analysis.
-
EMF exposure procedure was performed in accordance with Yahyazadeh and Altunkaynak[23]. We used a device that generates a 900 MHz continuous electromagnetic wave, with a peak specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2 W/kg and an average power density of (1 ± 0.4) mW/cm2[20,24]. This generator was manufactured by the Electromagnetic Compatibility Laboratory of Suleyman Demirel University. The localized SAR values were calculated in accordance with the procedure reported by Sirav and Seyhan[6]. Power density was also measured using an EMF meter (Holaday Industry Inc., Adapazarı, Turkey). During EMF exposure, the monopole antenna of the exposure system was perpendicularly located in the center of the round plastic cage. The long axis of the antenna was perpendicular to the long axis of the rats to ensure an equal electric field distribution[24]. Rats were freely placed in the small chambers of the cages; these chambers were separated using thick plastic sheets. Moreover, the rats’ heads were positioned in the direction of the antenna, with a distance of 1 cm from the antenna[2]. A 1 cm-diameter air hole was created on the lid of the plastic cage to reduce stress. Lastly, the rats were exposed to 900 MHz EMF for 1 h/d for 28 d at an environmental temperature of (22 ± 2) °C.
-
Dissected CSC samples were fixed in 10% formalin solution, followed by tissue processing, which includes dehydration, clearing, and embedding. Through the use of a rotary microtome, consecutive sections were cut at a thickness of 7 μm and in an interval of 1/140. These sections were selected on the basis of a systematic random sampling technique. The CSC paraffin sections were then mounted on glass slides and stained with cresyl violet for stereological and histological examination[24]. All sections were photographed using an HD digital camera (Leica Microsystems Ltd., CH 9435, Heerbrugg, Switzerland) and a Leica DM2500 LED microscope (Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). We scored motor neuron degeneration and motor neurons with sparse Nissl substance as follows: 0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe in the CSC samples.
-
The unbiased physical dissection and Cavalieri methods were used to estimate the number of motor neurons and the mean volume of CSC tissues (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Images of spinal cords for the stereological procedures of the Cavalieri principle (A and B) and the physical dissector (C and D). Image (C), reference section; image (D), look-up section; X, motor neurons hitting the exclusion lines; white arrowhead, motor neuron inside the counting frames in the reference sections; black arrowhead, motor neuron hitting the inclusion line in the reference section; white arrowhead, motor neuron located within the counting frame in the reference section; black arrow, motor neuron located within the counting frames in the reference and look-up sections. Motor neurons (white and black arrowhead) located within the reference section but not in the look-up section were considered for counting.
-
Volume estimation was performed using the unbiased Cavalieri and point-counting methods[23,25]. First, 7 μm transverse serial sections were photographed, and then a grid of the testing points was randomly superimposed on micrographs. Second, the point density of the point-counting grid was validated through a pilot study. The number of points hitting the regions of interest was counted in accordance with the Cavalieri principle. Lastly, the area of each section was calculated using the following formula[26,27]:
$$ {\text{A} }{\text{r}}{\text{e}}{\text{a}}\left({\text{A}}\right)={\text{a}}\left({\text{p}}\right)\times \;\sum {\text{P}} $$ (1) where a (p) is the point interval area, and ΣP is the number of points hitting the regions of each section. The mean volume of the region of interest was estimated using the following formula:
$$ {\text{V}}{\text{o}}{\text{l}}{\text{u}}{\text{m}}{\text{e}}\left({\text{V}}\right)={\text{t}} \times \sum {\text{A}} $$ (2) where t is the total thickness of each section and interval, and ΣA is the area of the region of interest.
-
The number of motor neurons was estimated using the physical dissection method[25,28]. Fifteen to twenty dissection pairs sampled from each CSC tissue were used for the investigation. These consecutive paired sections were photographed, and then the images were transferred to a private computer. An unbiased counting frame was randomly placed on the same counting field of a pair. On the basis of the principles of physical dissection, the motor neurons that appeared in the reference section but not in the look-up section were accepted for counting. The numerical density of motor neurons was estimated as follows[29]:
$$ {\text{N}}_{\text{v}}=\frac{\sum{\text{Q}}-}{\sum {\text{V}}\;{\text{d}}{\text{i}}{\text{s}}{\text{s}}{\text{e}}{\text{c}}{\text{t}}{\text{o}}{\text{r}}} $$ (3) where ΣQ is the number of motor neurons counted in each animal, and ΣV dissector is the total volume of the dissected frames in the reference sections. Lastly, the total number of motor neurons was calculated using the following formula:
$$ {\text{T}}{\text{N }}\left({\text{t}}{\text{o}}{\text{t}}{\text{a}}{\text{l}}\;{\text{m}}{\text{o}}{\text{t}}{\text{o}}{\text{r}}\;{\text{n}}{\text{e}}{\text{u}}{\text{r}}{\text{o}}{\text{n}}\;{\text{c}}{\text{e}}{\text{l}}{\text{l}}{\text{s}}\right)={{\text{N}}}_{{\text{V}}}\times {{\text{V}}}_{{\text{r}}{\text{e}}{\text{f}}} $$ (4) where Vref is the mean volume of the CSC, and Nv is the numerical density of the motor neurons.
The values of the coefficients of error and variation respectively showed that the number of motor neurons counted in each animal and each group was sufficient[30].
-
CSC samples were taken from the freezer and then homogenized in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to maintain a constant pH at 12,000 ×g for 2 min on ice (IKA, Germany). Homogenized tissues were centrifuged at 3,000 ×g for 20 min at 4 °C for preparing supernatants. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme activity was determined in accordance with the method reported by Sun et al.[31]. On the basis of this method, the generation rate of superoxide radicals was measured as a result of reaction between xanthine and xanthine oxidase. Lastly, samples were analyzed using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-MINI 1240; Shimadzu; Istanbul, Turkey) at 560 nm. Protein assays were also performed in accordance with Lowry et al.[32]. Superoxide dismutase activity was expressed as units per milligram protein.
-
The high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) is known as a mediator of the neurovascular unit, which may participate in causing damage to the central nervous system[33]. An anti-HMGB1 antibody kit (ab79823, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was used to detect HMGB1 molecules in astrocytes. An immunohistochemical study was conducted on paraffin-embedded sections mounted on poly-lysine slides. Briefly, sections were treated with 3% H2O2 to block the endogenous peroxidases for 15 min and incubated at 37 °C. Then, the sections were immersed in ficin solution (Invitrogen) to block endogenous peroxidase activity for 15 min. SuperBlock blocking buffer (ScyTek Laboratories, SitoGen Biomedikal Ltd., İstanbul, Turkey) was applied to eliminate nonspecific immunoreactivity for 7 min. Sections were treated with anti-HMGB1 antibody diluted 1:350 at a temperature of 37 °C and humidity of 70% ± 5% for 2 h for primary antibody binding. Subsequently, sections were washed in phosphate-buffered saline thrice for 5 min, followed by biotinylated secondary antibody for 30 min. Streptavidin peroxidase was used for visualization of antibody binding. These sections were incubated with 3-amino-9-ethyl carbazyl chromogen until red coloration was observed. Subsequently, all sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin and analyzed using a light microscope (Leica, LDM 4000, Wetzlar, Germany). Lastly, immunoreactivity was evaluated by calculating the histologic score (HScore) value of each CSC using the following formula:
$$ {\text{H}}{\text{S}}{\text{c}}{\text{o}}{\text{r}}{\text{e}}=\sum {\text{P}}{\text{i}}\;({\text{i}}+1) $$ where Pi is percentage of the cells, and i is intensity scores.
-
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM version 25.0 SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test were conducted for multiple comparisons. The results were expressed as mean ± SD. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
doi: 10.3967/bes2020.078
Effect of Luteolin on Biochemical, Immunohistochemical, and Morphometrical Changes in Rat Spinal Cord following Exposure to a 900 MHz Electromagnetic Field
-
Abstract:
Objective This study aimed to investigate the effect of exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field (EMF) on the cervical spinal cord (CSC) of rats and the possible protective effect of luteolin (LUT) against CSC tissue damage. Methods Quantitative data were obtained via stereological, biochemical, immunohistochemical, and histopathological techniques. We investigated morphometric value, superoxide dismutase (SOD) level, and the expression of high-mobility group box 1 protein molecules, as well as histological changes. Results The total number of motor neurons in the EMF group significantly decreased in comparison with that in the control group (P < 0.05). In the EMF + LUT group, we found a significant increase in the total number of motor neurons compared with that in the EMF group (P < 0.05). SOD enzyme activity in the EMF group significantly increased in comparison with that in the control group (P < 0.05). By contrast, the EMF+LUT group exhibited a decrease in SOD level compared with the EMF group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Our results suggested that exposure to EMF could be deleterious to CSC tissues. Furthermore, the protective efficacy of LUT against SC damage might have resulted from the alleviation of oxidative stress caused by EMF. -
Key words:
- Electromagnetic field /
- Luteolin /
- Motor neuron /
- Oxidative stress /
- Rat /
- Spinal cord
-
Figure 1. Images of spinal cords for the stereological procedures of the Cavalieri principle (A and B) and the physical dissector (C and D). Image (C), reference section; image (D), look-up section; X, motor neurons hitting the exclusion lines; white arrowhead, motor neuron inside the counting frames in the reference sections; black arrowhead, motor neuron hitting the inclusion line in the reference section; white arrowhead, motor neuron located within the counting frame in the reference section; black arrow, motor neuron located within the counting frames in the reference and look-up sections. Motor neurons (white and black arrowhead) located within the reference section but not in the look-up section were considered for counting.
-
[1] Yahyazadeh A, Altunkaynak BZ. Protective effects of luteolin on rat testis following exposure to 900 MHz electromagnetic field. Biotech Histochem, 2019; 23, 1−10. [2] Ulubay M, Yahyazadeh A, Deniz ÖG, et al. Effects of prenatal 900 MHz electromagnetic field exposures on the histology of rat kidney. Int J Radiat Biol, 2015; 91, 35−41. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2014.950436 [3] Budziosz J, Stanek A, Sieroń A, et al. Effects of low-frequency electromagnetic field on oxidative stress in selected structures of the central nervous system. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2018; 2018, 1427412. [4] Shahin NN, El-Nabarawy NA, Gouda AS, et al. The protective role of spermine against male reproductive aberrations induced by exposure to electromagnetic field - an experimental investigation in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2019; 370, 117−30. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.03.009 [5] Nittby H, Brun A, Eberhardt J, et al. Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone. Pathophysiology, 2009; 16, 103−12. doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.001 [6] Sirav B, Seyhan N. Effects of radiofrequency radiation exposure on the blood brain barrier permeability in male and female rats. Electromag Biol Med, 2011; 30, 253−60. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2011.600167 [7] Fredriksson K, Kalimo H, Norberg C, et al. Nerve cell injury in the brain of strokeprone spontaneously hypertensive rats Acta Neuropathol. Acta Neuropathol, 1988; 76, 227−37. doi: 10.1007/BF00687769 [8] Salford L, Nittby H, Brun A, et al. The mammalian brain in the electromagnetic fields designed by man with special reference to blood-brain barrier function, neuronal damage and possible physical mechanisms. Prog Theor Phys Supp, 2008; 173, 283−309. doi: 10.1143/PTPS.173.283 [9] Kim JH, Lee JK, Kim HG, et al. Possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on central nerve system. Biomol Ther (Seoul), 2019; 27, 265−75. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2018.152 [10] Jiang DP, Li JH, Zhang J, et al. Long-term electromagnetic pulse exposure induces Abeta deposition and cognitive dysfunction through oxidative stress and overexpression of APP and BACE1. Brain Res, 2016; 1642, 10−9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.053 [11] Yahyazadeh A, Deniz ÖG, Kaplan AA, et al. The genomic effects of cell phone exposure on the reproductive system. Environ Res, 2018; 167, 684−93. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.017 [12] Kıvrak EG, Yurt KK, Kaplan AA, et al. Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on the antioxidant defense system. J Microsc Ultrastruct, 2017; 5, 167−76. doi: 10.1016/j.jmau.2017.07.003 [13] Haripriya D, Sangeetha P, Kanchana A, et al. Modulation of age-associated oxidative DNA damage in rat brain cerebral cortex, striatum and hippocampus by L-karnitine. Exp Gerontol, 2005; 40, 129−35. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2004.10.006 [14] Haripriya D, Devi MA, Kokilavani V, et al. Age-dependent alterations in mitochondrial enzymes in cortex, striatum and hippocampus of rat brain-potential role of L-karnitine. Biogerontology, 2004; 5, 355−64. doi: 10.1007/s10522-004-2575-y [15] Kesari KK, Siddiqui MH, Meena R, et al. Cell phone radiation exposure on brain and associated biological systems. Indian J Exp Biol, 2013; 51, 187−200. [16] Balaguru S, Uppal R, Vaid RP, et al. Investigation of the spinal cord as a natural receptor antenna for incident electromagnetic waves and possible impact on the central nervous system. Electromagn Biol Med, 2012; 31, 101−11. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2011.624653 [17] Kerimoğlu G, Aslan A, Baş O, et al. Adverse effects in lumbar spinal cord morphology and tissue biochemistry in Sprague Dawley male rats following exposure to a continuous 1-h a day 900-MHz electromagnetic field throughout adolescence. J Chem Neuroanat, 2016; 78, 125−30. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.09.007 [18] Lopez-Lazaro M. Distribution and biological activities of the flavonoid luteolin. Mini Rev Med Chem, 2009; 9, 31−59. doi: 10.2174/138955709787001712 [19] Lin Y, Shi R, Wang X, et al. Luteolin, a flavonoid with potentials for cancer prevention and therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets, 2008; 8, 634−46. doi: 10.2174/156800908786241050 [20] Manju V, Balasubramaniyan V, Nalini N. Rat colonic lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status: the effects of dietary luteolin on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine challenge. Cell Mol Biol Lett, 2005; 10, 535−55. [21] Zhang Q, Yang J, Wang J. Modulatory effect of luteolin on redox homeostasis and inflammatory cytokines in a mouse model of liver cancer. Oncol Lett, 2016; 12, 4767−72. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.5291 [22] Koç GE, Kaplan S, Altun G, et al. Neuroprotective effects of melatonin and omega-3 on hippocampal cells prenatally exposed to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol, 2016; 92, 590−5. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1206223 [23] Yahyazadeh A, Altunkaynak BZ. Investigation of the neuroprotective effects of thymoquinone on rat spinal cord exposed to 900 MHz electromagnetic field. J Chem Neuroanat, 2019; 100, 101657. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2019.101657 [24] Koyu A, Cesur G, Ozguner F, et al. Effects of 900 MHz electromagnetic field on TSH and thyroid hormones in rats. Toxicol Lett, 2005; 157, 257−62. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.03.006 [25] Altunkaynak BZ, Akgül N, Yahyazedeh A, et al. A stereological study of the effects of mercury inhalation on the cerebellum. Biotech Histochem, 2019; 94, 42−7. doi: 10.1080/10520295.2018.1493224 [26] Altunkaynak BZ, Akgül N, Yahyazadeh A, et al. Effect of mercury vapor inhalation on rat ovary: Stereology and histopathology. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2016; 42, 410−16. [27] Gundersen HJ, Bagger P, Bendtsen TF, et al. The new stereological tools: disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS, 1988; 96, 857−81. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1988.tb00954.x [28] Yahyazedeh A, Altunkaynak BZ, Akgül N, et al. A histopathological and stereological study of liver damage in female rats caused by mercury vapor. Biotech Histochem, 2017; 92, 338−46. doi: 10.1080/10520295.2017.1312527 [29] Altunkaynak ME, Akgül N, Yahyazadeh A, et al. A stereological and histopathological study of the effects of exposure of male rat testes to mercury vapor. Biotech Histochem, 2015; 90, 529−34. doi: 10.3109/10520295.2015.1024739 [30] Gundersen HJ, Jensen EB. The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. J Microsc, 1987; 147, 229−63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02837.x [31] Sun Y, Oberley LW, Li Y. A simple method for clinical assay of superoxide dismutase. Clin Chem, 1988; 34, 497−500. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/34.3.497 [32] Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, et al. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem, 1951; 193, 265−75. [33] Fu L, Liu K, Wake H, et al. Therapeutic effects of anti-HMGB1 monoclonal antibody on pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in mice. Sci Rep, 2017; 7, 1179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01325-y [34] Hansson HA. Effects on the nervous system by exposure to electromagnetic fields: experimental and clinical studies. Prog Clin Biol Res, 1988; 257, 119−34. [35] Altun G, Kaplan S, Deniz OG, et al. Protective effects of melatonin and omega-3 on the hippocampus and the cerebellum of adult Wistar albino rats exposed to electromagnetic fields. J Microsc Ultrastruct, 2017; 5, 230−41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmau.2017.05.006 [36] Alkis ME, Bilgin HM, Akpolat V, et al. Effect of 900-, 1800-, and 2100-MHz radiofrequency radiation on DNA and oxidative stress in brain. Electromagn Biol Med, 2019; 38, 32−47. doi: 10.1080/15368378.2019.1567526 [37] Fujii J, Tsunoda S. Redox regulation of fertilisation and the spermatogenic process. Asian J Androl, 2011; 13, 420−23. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.10 [38] Helbock HJ, Beckman KB, Ames BN. 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine and 8-hydroxyguanine as biomarkers of oxidative DNA damage. Methods Enzymol, 1999; 300, 156−66. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)00123-8 [39] Hu JJ, Dubin N, Kurland D, et al. The effects of hydrogen-peroxide on DNA-repair activities. Mutat Res, 1995; 336, 193−201. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(94)00054-A [40] Xu S, Zhou Z, Zhang L, et al. Exposure to 1800 MHz radiofrequency radiation induces oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA in primary cultured neurons. Brain Res, 2010; 1311, 189−96. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.062 [41] Tang J, Zhang Y, Yang L, et al. Exposure to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields activates the mkp-1/ERK pathway and causes blood-brain barrier damage and cognitive impairment in rats. Brain Res, 2015; 1601, 92−101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.01.019 [42] Phillips JL, Singh NP, Lai H. Electromagnetic fields and DNA damage. Pathophysiology, 2009; 16, 79−88. doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2008.11.005 [43] Hamada AJ, Singh A, Agarwal A. Cell phones and their impact on male fertility: fact or fiction. Open Reprod Sci J, 2011; 5, 125−37. [44] Fu J, Sun H, Zhang Y, et al. Neuroprotective Effects of Luteolin Against Spinal Cord Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Attenuation of Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Apoptosis. J Med Food, 2018; 21, 13−20. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2017.4021 [45] Paterniti I, Impellizzeri D, Di Paola R, et al. A new co-ultramicronized composite including palmitoylethanolamide and luteolin to prevent neuroinflammation in spinal cord injury. J Neuroinflammation, 2013; 10, 91. [46] İkinci A, Mercantepe T, Unal D, et al. Morphological and antioxidant impairments in the spinal cord of male offspring rats following exposure to a continuous 900MHz electromagnetic field during early and mid-adolescence. J Chem Neuroanat, 2016; 75, 99−104. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.11.006 [47] Scaffidi P, Misteli T, Bianchi ME. Release of chromatin protein HMGB1 by necrotic cells triggers inflammation. Nature, 2002; 418, 191−5. doi: 10.1038/nature00858