-
The total study population comprised 24,510 participants, and the median follow-up was 4.92 years. A total of 973 CVD events occurred. The incidence of CVD events was 4.96% (n = 562) in males and 3.12% (n = 411) in females (P < 0.001). Details of the baseline characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table 1. The mean age of participants was 56.31 years. Males (57.05 years) were slightly older than females (55.67 years). Diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension were more prevalent in males than in females, whereas females had a higher proportion of nonsmokers, a higher prevalence of CVD family history and medication history, and a higher BMI. The annual, summer, and winter average temperatures during the baseline survey were 12.71 °C, 23.86 °C, and -0.32 °C, respectively. The PM2.5 concentration at baseline survey was 62.10 μg/m3. Given China’s typical continental climate, the RH increased from the northern to southern regions. The annual, winter, and summer average RH in this study were 65.96%, 61.28%, and 74.97%, respectively. Figure 2 presents a map of China with the average annual, winter, and summer RH during the baseline survey period, which shows the humidity to be generally higher in the southern regions than in the northern regions.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study participants
Total (n = 24,510) Male (n = 11,322) Female (n = 13,188) P value Demographics Age (years) 56.31 ± 13.11 57.05 ± 13.25 55.67 ± 12.96 < 0.001 Han ethnicity (%) 22,076 (90.8%) 10,292 (90.91%) 11,784 (89.36%) < 0.001 Education
(≥ Middle school)11,978 (48.87%) 6,427 (56.77%) 5,551 (42.09%) < 0.001 Urban (%) 13,404 (54.69%) 6,099 (53.87%) 7,305 (55.40%) 0.017 Characteristics Smoking (%) 16,996 (69.35%) 6952 (61.40%) 562 (4.26%) < 0.001 Alcohol drinking (%) 6,842 (27.92%) 5,909 (52.20%) 933 (7.08%) < 0.001 BMI (kg/m2) 24.54 ± 3.49 24.37 ± 3.37 24.68 ± 3.58 < 0.001 Obesity (%) 4,257 (17.56%) 1,773 (15.85%) 2,484 (19.03%) < 0.001 Fasting blood glucose 5.57 ± 1.54 5.62 ± 1.56 5.53 ± 1.52 < 0.001 Diabetes mellitus (%) 2,535 (10.36%) 1,249 (11.05%) 1,286 (9.76%) 0.001 TC 4.79 ± 0.99 4.71 ± 0.95 4.85 ± 1.01 < 0.001 HDL-C 1.36 ± 0.34 1.32 ± 0.35 1.40 ± 0.33 < 0.001 LDL-C 2.80 ± 0.82 2.75 ± 0.80 2.85 ± 0.83 < 0.001 TG 1.45 ± 1.02 1.50 ± 1.14 1.41 ± 0.91 0.5162 Dyslipidemia (%) 8,377 (34.22%) 4,215 (37.27%) 4,162 (31.60%) < 0.001 SBP 132.02 ± 20.19 132.86 ± 19.12 131.30 ± 21.04 < 0.001 DBP 77.22 ± 11.05 79.22 ± 11.06 75.50 ± 10.75 < 0.001 Hypertension (%) 9,732 (39.71%) 4,708 (41.59%) 5,024 (38.10%) < 0.001 CVD family
History (%)2,824 (11.52%) 1,220 (10.78%) 1,604 (12.16%) < 0.001 Medication therapy (%) 5,393 (22.00%) 2,414 (21.32%) 2,979 (22.59%) 0.017 Environmental Characteristics Annual temperature (°C) 12.71 ± 4.88 12.68 ± 4.87 12.74 ± 4.88 0.868 Summer average Temperature (°C) 23.86 ± 4.27 23.87 ± 4.27 23.85 ± 4.88 0.434 Winter average Temperature (°C) -0.32 ± 6.70 -0.39 ± 6.72 -0.26 ± 6.67 0.578 PM2.5 (μg/m3) 74.97 ± 7.05 75.14 ± 6.97 74.83 ± 7.11 0.006 Annual average relative Humidity (%) 61.28 ± 13.46 61.62 ± 13.36 60.99 ± 13.53 0.002 Summer average relative Humidity (%) 62.10 ± 22.71 61.68 ± 22.44 62.46 ± 22.94 0.007 Winter average relative Humidity (%) 65.96 ± 9.82 66.17 ± 9.75 65.78 ± 9.86 0.005 Note. CVD, cardiovascular disease; BMI, body mass index; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; SBP, systolic Blood Pressure; DBP, diastolic Blood Pressure; PM2.5, particulate matter of diameter ≤ 2.5 mm. -
In Model 3, after adjusting for confounders of age, sex, ethnic minorities, education, urban, drinking, smoking, BMI, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, CVD family history, medication therapy, temperature, PM2.5, the HR (95% CI) of CVD risk was 1.06 (95% CI: 0.97-1.15), 1.17 (95% CI: 1.04-1.31), and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.95-1.09) per 10% increase in annual, summer, and winter mean RH, respectively. RH was divided into quintiles in ascending order, with the 3rd quintile used as the reference. The participants in the 1st and 5th quintiles of RH had a higher risk of developing CVD. The HRs (95% CIs) for annual average RH in the 1st and 5th quintiles were 1.09 (0.89-1.35) and 1.30 (0.94- 1.80), respectively. For summer mean RH, the HRs (95% CIs) for the 1st and 5th quintiles were 1.34 (95% CI: 1.04- 1.71) and 1.44 (95% CI: 1.14, 1.83), respectively. In the case of winter mean RH, the HRs (95% CIs) for the 1st and 5th quintiles were 1.16 (95% CI: 0.92-1.47) and 1.39 (95% CI: 1.10-1.75), respectively. This indicates that both dry and wet environments increased the risk of CVD (Table 2).
Table 2. HR (95% CI) of the relationship between relative humidity and CVD
RH Crude model Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) Annual RH Per 10% Increment 0.99 (0.93–1.05) 0.95 (0.89–1.01) 1.06 (0.97–1.15) 1.06 (0.97–1.15) RH quintile 1st quintile 1.11 (0.91–1.35) 1.01 (0.83–1.22) 1.09 (0.88–1.34) 1.09 (0.89–1.35) 2nd quintile 0.62 (0.49–0.78) 0.64 (0.51–0.80) 0.58 (0.46–0.74) 0.58 (0.46–0.74) 3rd quintile (reference) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4th quintile 1.08 (0.88–1.32) 1.01 (0.83–1.23) 1.46 (1.12–1.89) 1.49 (1.14,1.95) 5th quintile 0.91 (0.76–1.09) 0.76 (0.63–0.91) 1.35 (0.99–1.86) 1.30 (0.94–1.80) Summer RH Per 10% Increment 1.04 (0.95–1.15) 1.03 (0.94–1.12) 1.16 (1.04–1.30) 1.17 (1.04–1.31) RH quintile 1st quintile 1.69 (1.36–2.10) 1.59 (1.28–1.98) 1.38 (1.07–1.76) 1.34 (1.04–1.71) 2nd quintile 1.25 (1.01–1.54) 1.30 (1.05–1.61) 1.07 (0.85–1.35) 1.05 (0.83–1.33) 3rd quintile (reference) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4th quintile 1.17 (0.93–1.46) 1.13 (0.90–1.42) 0.91 (0.70–1.18) 0.83 (0.63–1.10) 5th quintile 1.42 (1.16–1.75) 1.31 (1.06–1.61) 1.35 (1.08–1.68) 1.44 (1.14–1.83) Winter RH Per 10% Increment 0.96 (0.92–1.01) 0.94 (0.90–0.99) 1.02 (0.95–1.09) 1.02 (0.95–1.09) RH quintile 1st quintile 1.48 (1.19–1.85) 1.42 (1.14–1.77) 1.17 (0.93–1.49) 1.16 (0.92–1.47) 2nd quintile 1.20 (0.96–1.49) 1.23 (0.98–1.53) 1.01 (0.80–1.28) 1.01 (0.80–1.28) 3rd quintile (reference) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4th quintile 1.34 (1.09–1.64) 1.27 (1.03–1.56) 1.44 (1.15–1.80) 1.45 (1.15–1.81) 5th quintile 1.26 (1.02–1.56) 1.18 (0.96–1.46) 1.38 (1.10–1.75) 1.39 (1.10–1.75) Note. RH, relative humidity; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; Model 1 adjusted for age and sex; Model 2: Model 1+ ethnic minorities, education, urban area, drinking, smoking, BMI, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, CVD family history, CVD medication, and temperature; Model 3: Model 2+ PM2.5 The exposure-response relationship curves further demonstrated the relationship between RH and CVD risk (Figure. 3). A U-shaped nonlinear relationship was observed between summer mean RH and CVD occurrence (Pnonlinear < 0.05). A serious risk of CVD occurrence with an extremely low humidity, and CVD risk decreased with an increase in humidity. However, after reaching the minimum risk of occurrence, the risk began to increase. These results were partially verified by the results of Cox regression analysis.
Figure 3. Exposure-response curves of the relationships between RH and incidence of CVD among Chinese adults, using a natural spline function. RH, relative humidity; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. HR was estimated by comparison with the median RH. The red curve represents the effect estimates of HR, and the light-red shaded area represents the 95% CI.
-
Age, sex, and geographical region were stratified and the analysis confirmed positive associations. The stratified exposure-response curves revealed significant variations in the relationship between summer RH and CVD risk across different groups (Figure. 4). The findings indicated that the association between summer RH and CVD was particularly pronounced among females, individuals aged 65 and above, and those residing in the southern regions (Poverall ≤ 0.001).
Figure 4. Exposure-response curves of the relationships between summer mean RH and incidence of CVD in various subgroups, using a natural spline function. RH, relative humidity; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. HR was estimated by comparison with the median RH. The red curve represents the effect estimates of HR, and the light-red shaded area represents the 95% CI.
doi: 10.3967/bes2024.156
Relationship of Ambient Humidity with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Prospective Study of 24,510 Adults in a General Population
-
Abstract:
Objective This study aimed to explore the association between humidity exposure and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), utilizing follow-up data and relative humidity (RH) metric assessments. Methods We extracted the baseline data from the China Hypertension Survey (CHS) of 24,510 enrolled participants aged ≥ 35 years without a history of CVD between 2012 and 2015 and followed them up from 2018 to 2019. The National Meteorological Information Center (NMIC) of the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) provided the quality-controlled relative humidity (RH) datasets. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD in relation to RH. Results During the follow-up period (2018–2019), 973 patients with CVD were identified. The HR of CVD risk was 1.17 (95% CI: 1.04–1.31) per 10% increase in summer mean RH. Compared with participants in the 3rd quintile group, those in the 1st and 5th quintiles of RH had a higher risk of CVD. For summer mean RH, the HRs (95% CIs) for the 1st and 5th quintiles were 1.34 (1.04–1.71) and 1.44 (1.14–1.83), respectively. The relationship (“U” shape) between summer mean RH and the risk of CVD was nonlinear. Stratified analyses indicated that the risk of CVD was substantially influenced by the summer mean RH in female, older individuals, and those in southern China. Conclusion Unsuitable (too high or low) humidity environments affect the risk of CVD. Our study highlights those future policies for adapting to climate change should consider the humidity–CVD relationship. -
Key words:
- Relative humidity /
- Cardiovascular disease /
- Risk factors /
- Climate change
Written informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to recruitment. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fuwai Hospital (Beijing, China). Each participant provided written informed consent before recruitment.
&These authors contributed equally to this work.
注释:1) COMPETING INTERESTS: 2) ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE: -
Figure 3. Exposure-response curves of the relationships between RH and incidence of CVD among Chinese adults, using a natural spline function. RH, relative humidity; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. HR was estimated by comparison with the median RH. The red curve represents the effect estimates of HR, and the light-red shaded area represents the 95% CI.
Figure 4. Exposure-response curves of the relationships between summer mean RH and incidence of CVD in various subgroups, using a natural spline function. RH, relative humidity; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. HR was estimated by comparison with the median RH. The red curve represents the effect estimates of HR, and the light-red shaded area represents the 95% CI.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study participants
Total (n = 24,510) Male (n = 11,322) Female (n = 13,188) P value Demographics Age (years) 56.31 ± 13.11 57.05 ± 13.25 55.67 ± 12.96 < 0.001 Han ethnicity (%) 22,076 (90.8%) 10,292 (90.91%) 11,784 (89.36%) < 0.001 Education
(≥ Middle school)11,978 (48.87%) 6,427 (56.77%) 5,551 (42.09%) < 0.001 Urban (%) 13,404 (54.69%) 6,099 (53.87%) 7,305 (55.40%) 0.017 Characteristics Smoking (%) 16,996 (69.35%) 6952 (61.40%) 562 (4.26%) < 0.001 Alcohol drinking (%) 6,842 (27.92%) 5,909 (52.20%) 933 (7.08%) < 0.001 BMI (kg/m2) 24.54 ± 3.49 24.37 ± 3.37 24.68 ± 3.58 < 0.001 Obesity (%) 4,257 (17.56%) 1,773 (15.85%) 2,484 (19.03%) < 0.001 Fasting blood glucose 5.57 ± 1.54 5.62 ± 1.56 5.53 ± 1.52 < 0.001 Diabetes mellitus (%) 2,535 (10.36%) 1,249 (11.05%) 1,286 (9.76%) 0.001 TC 4.79 ± 0.99 4.71 ± 0.95 4.85 ± 1.01 < 0.001 HDL-C 1.36 ± 0.34 1.32 ± 0.35 1.40 ± 0.33 < 0.001 LDL-C 2.80 ± 0.82 2.75 ± 0.80 2.85 ± 0.83 < 0.001 TG 1.45 ± 1.02 1.50 ± 1.14 1.41 ± 0.91 0.5162 Dyslipidemia (%) 8,377 (34.22%) 4,215 (37.27%) 4,162 (31.60%) < 0.001 SBP 132.02 ± 20.19 132.86 ± 19.12 131.30 ± 21.04 < 0.001 DBP 77.22 ± 11.05 79.22 ± 11.06 75.50 ± 10.75 < 0.001 Hypertension (%) 9,732 (39.71%) 4,708 (41.59%) 5,024 (38.10%) < 0.001 CVD family
History (%)2,824 (11.52%) 1,220 (10.78%) 1,604 (12.16%) < 0.001 Medication therapy (%) 5,393 (22.00%) 2,414 (21.32%) 2,979 (22.59%) 0.017 Environmental Characteristics Annual temperature (°C) 12.71 ± 4.88 12.68 ± 4.87 12.74 ± 4.88 0.868 Summer average Temperature (°C) 23.86 ± 4.27 23.87 ± 4.27 23.85 ± 4.88 0.434 Winter average Temperature (°C) -0.32 ± 6.70 -0.39 ± 6.72 -0.26 ± 6.67 0.578 PM2.5 (μg/m3) 74.97 ± 7.05 75.14 ± 6.97 74.83 ± 7.11 0.006 Annual average relative Humidity (%) 61.28 ± 13.46 61.62 ± 13.36 60.99 ± 13.53 0.002 Summer average relative Humidity (%) 62.10 ± 22.71 61.68 ± 22.44 62.46 ± 22.94 0.007 Winter average relative Humidity (%) 65.96 ± 9.82 66.17 ± 9.75 65.78 ± 9.86 0.005 Note. CVD, cardiovascular disease; BMI, body mass index; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; SBP, systolic Blood Pressure; DBP, diastolic Blood Pressure; PM2.5, particulate matter of diameter ≤ 2.5 mm. Table 2. HR (95% CI) of the relationship between relative humidity and CVD
RH Crude model Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) Annual RH Per 10% Increment 0.99 (0.93–1.05) 0.95 (0.89–1.01) 1.06 (0.97–1.15) 1.06 (0.97–1.15) RH quintile 1st quintile 1.11 (0.91–1.35) 1.01 (0.83–1.22) 1.09 (0.88–1.34) 1.09 (0.89–1.35) 2nd quintile 0.62 (0.49–0.78) 0.64 (0.51–0.80) 0.58 (0.46–0.74) 0.58 (0.46–0.74) 3rd quintile (reference) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4th quintile 1.08 (0.88–1.32) 1.01 (0.83–1.23) 1.46 (1.12–1.89) 1.49 (1.14,1.95) 5th quintile 0.91 (0.76–1.09) 0.76 (0.63–0.91) 1.35 (0.99–1.86) 1.30 (0.94–1.80) Summer RH Per 10% Increment 1.04 (0.95–1.15) 1.03 (0.94–1.12) 1.16 (1.04–1.30) 1.17 (1.04–1.31) RH quintile 1st quintile 1.69 (1.36–2.10) 1.59 (1.28–1.98) 1.38 (1.07–1.76) 1.34 (1.04–1.71) 2nd quintile 1.25 (1.01–1.54) 1.30 (1.05–1.61) 1.07 (0.85–1.35) 1.05 (0.83–1.33) 3rd quintile (reference) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4th quintile 1.17 (0.93–1.46) 1.13 (0.90–1.42) 0.91 (0.70–1.18) 0.83 (0.63–1.10) 5th quintile 1.42 (1.16–1.75) 1.31 (1.06–1.61) 1.35 (1.08–1.68) 1.44 (1.14–1.83) Winter RH Per 10% Increment 0.96 (0.92–1.01) 0.94 (0.90–0.99) 1.02 (0.95–1.09) 1.02 (0.95–1.09) RH quintile 1st quintile 1.48 (1.19–1.85) 1.42 (1.14–1.77) 1.17 (0.93–1.49) 1.16 (0.92–1.47) 2nd quintile 1.20 (0.96–1.49) 1.23 (0.98–1.53) 1.01 (0.80–1.28) 1.01 (0.80–1.28) 3rd quintile (reference) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4th quintile 1.34 (1.09–1.64) 1.27 (1.03–1.56) 1.44 (1.15–1.80) 1.45 (1.15–1.81) 5th quintile 1.26 (1.02–1.56) 1.18 (0.96–1.46) 1.38 (1.10–1.75) 1.39 (1.10–1.75) Note. RH, relative humidity; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; Model 1 adjusted for age and sex; Model 2: Model 1+ ethnic minorities, education, urban area, drinking, smoking, BMI, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, CVD family history, CVD medication, and temperature; Model 3: Model 2+ PM2.5 -
[1] Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update From the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020; 76, 2982−3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010 [2] Murray V, Ebi KL. IPCC special report on managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation (SREX). J Epidemiol Community Health, 2012; 66, 759−60. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201045 [3] Khraishah H, Alahmad B, Ostergard RL Jr, et al. Climate change and cardiovascular disease: implications for global health. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2022; 19, 798−812. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00720-x [4] Kang YT, Tang HS, Zhang LF, et al. Long-term temperature variability and the incidence of cardiovascular diseases: a large, representative cohort study in China. Environ Pollut, 2021; 278, 116831. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116831 [5] Kang YT, Tang HS, Jiang LL, et al. Air temperature variability and high-sensitivity C reactive protein in a general population of China. Sci Total Environ, 2020; 749, 141588. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141588 [6] Gasparrini A, Guo YM, Hashizume M, et al. Mortality risk attributable to high and low ambient temperature: a multicountry observational study. Lancet, 2015; 386, 369−75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62114-0 [7] Tang HS, Wang X, Kang YT, et al. Long-term impacts of diurnal temperature range on mortality and cardiovascular disease: a nationwide prospective cohort study. Metabolites, 2022; 12, 1287. doi: 10.3390/metabo12121287 [8] Barreca AI. Climate change, humidity, and mortality in the United States. J Environ Econ Manage, 2012; 63, 19−34. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.07.004 [9] Zeng J, Zhang XH, Yang J, et al. Humidity may modify the relationship between temperature and cardiovascular mortality in Zhejiang Province, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2017; 14, 1383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111383 [10] Davis RE, McGregor GR, Enfield KB. Humidity: a review and primer on atmospheric moisture and human health. Environ Res, 2016; 144, 106−16. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.10.014 [11] Huang CR, Chu C, Wang XM, et al. Unusually cold and dry winters increase mortality in Australia. Environ Res, 2015; 136, 1−7. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.08.046 [12] Qiu H, Yu ITS, Wang XR, et al. Cool and dry weather enhances the effects of air pollution on emergency IHD hospital admissions. Int J Cardiol, 2013; 168, 500−5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.199 [13] Ou CQ, Yang J, Ou QQ, et al. The impact of relative humidity and atmospheric pressure on mortality in Guangzhou, China. Biomed Environ Sci, 2014; 27, 917−25. [14] Yin Q, Wang JF. A better indicator to measure the effects of meteorological factors on cardiovascular mortality: heat index. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2018; 25, 22842−9. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2396-1 [15] Ferreira Braga AL, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. The time course of weather-related deaths. Epidemiology, 2001; 12, 662−7. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200111000-00014 [16] Braga ALF, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. The effect of weather on respiratory and cardiovascular deaths in 12 U. S. cities. Environ Health Perspect, 2002; 110, 859−63. [17] Schwartz J, Samet JM, Patz JA. Hospital admissions for heart disease: the effects of temperature and humidity. Epidemiology, 2004; 15, 755−61. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000134875.15919.0f [18] Klompmaker JO, Hart JE, James P, et al. Air pollution and cardiovascular disease hospitalization - Are associations modified by greenness, temperature and humidity?. Environ Int, 2021; 156, 106715. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106715 [19] Basu R, Ostro BD. A multicounty analysis identifying the populations vulnerable to mortality associated with high ambient temperature in California. Am J Epidemiol, 2008; 168, 632−7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn170 [20] Yang J, Ou CQ, Ding Y, et al. Daily temperature and mortality: a study of distributed lag non-linear effect and effect modification in Guangzhou. Environ Health, 2012; 11, 63. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-63 [21] Saez M, Sunyer J, Castellsagué J, et al. Relationship between weather temperature and mortality: a time series analysis approach in Barcelona. Int J Epidemiol, 1995; 24, 576−82. doi: 10.1093/ije/24.3.576 [22] Wang ZW, Chen Z, Zhang LF, et al. Status of hypertension in China: results from the China hypertension survey, 2012-2015. Circulation, 2018; 137, 2344−56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032380 [23] Cao X, Tang HS, Zheng CY, et al. Association of heating fuel types with mortality and cardiovascular events among non-smokers in China. Environ Pollut, 2021; 291, 118207. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118207 [24] Tang HS, Zheng CY, Cao X, et al. Blue sky as a protective factor for cardiovascular disease. Front Public Health, 2022; 10, 1016853. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1016853 [25] Dwivedi AK, Vishwakarma D, Dubey P, et al. Air pollution and the heart: updated evidence from meta-analysis studies. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2022; 24, 1811−35. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01819-w [26] Zheng CY, Tang HS, Wang X, et al. Air pollution is associated with abnormal left ventricular diastolic function: a nationwide population-based study. BMC Public Health, 2023; 23, 1537. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16416-x [27] Joint Committee Issued Chinese Guideline for the Management of Dyslipidemia in Adults. 2016 Chinese guideline for the management of dyslipidemia in adults. Chin J Cardiol, 2016; 44, 833−53. (In Chinese) [28] Zheng CY, Tang HS, Wang X, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and cardiovascular disease in different ambient air pollution conditions: a prospective cohort study. Sci Total Environ, 2022; 831, 154872. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154872 [29] Desquilbet L, Mariotti F. Dose-response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research. Stat Med, 2010; 29, 1037−57. doi: 10.1002/sim.3841 [30] Yang BY, Zhang Y, Xu CY, et al. Effects of meteorological elements on admission rates of cerebral infarction patients with hypertensive nephropathy from nine hospitals in Changchun city, Jilin Province. Chin Med J, 2013; 126, 1934−8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20130024 [31] Panagiotakos DB, Chrysohoou C, Pitsavos C, et al. Climatological variations in daily hospital admissions for acute coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol, 2004; 94, 229−33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.04.050 [32] Laaidi K, Minier D, Osseby GV, et al. Seasonal variation in strokes incidence and the influence of the meteorological conditions. Rev Neurol, 2004; 160, 321−30. doi: 10.1016/S0035-3787(04)70907-8 [33] Kalkstein LS, Greene JS. An evaluation of climate/mortality relationships in large U. S. cities and the possible impacts of a climate change. Environ Health Perspect, 1997; 105, 84−93. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9710584 [34] Slatina E, Music M, Babic N, et al. Correlation between change in air humidity and the incidence of stroke. Mater Sociomed, 2013; 25, 242−5. doi: 10.5455/msm.2013.25.242-245 [35] Ostendorf T, Bernhard M, Hartwig T, et al. Association between rapid weather changes and incidence of chiefly cardiovascular complaints in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med, 2020; 38, 1604−10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158440 [36] Urban A, Kyselý J. Application of spatial synoptic classification in evaluating links between heat stress and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in Prague, Czech Republic. Int J Biometeorol, 2018; 62, 85−96. doi: 10.1007/s00484-015-1055-1 [37] Vaneckova P, Hart MA, Beggs PJ, et al. Synoptic analysis of heat-related mortality in Sydney, Australia, 1993-2001. Int J Biometeorol, 2008; 52, 439−51. doi: 10.1007/s00484-007-0138-z [38] Zhang WJ, Du ZC, Zhang DM, et al. Assessing the impact of humidex on HFMD in Guangdong Province and its variability across social-economic status and age groups. Sci Rep, 2016; 6, 18965. doi: 10.1038/srep18965 [39] Hajat S, Kovats RS, Lachowycz K. Heat-related and cold-related deaths in England and Wales: who is at risk?. Occup Environ Med, 2007; 64, 93−100. doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.029017 [40] Rooney C, McMichael AJ, Kovats RS, et al. Excess mortality in England and Wales, and in Greater London, during the 1995 heatwave. J Epidemiol Community Health, 1998; 52, 482−6. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.8.482 [41] Macey SM, Schneider DF. Deaths from excessive heat and excessive cold among the elderly. Gerontologist, 1993; 33, 497−500. doi: 10.1093/geront/33.4.497 [42] Stafoggia M, Forastiere F, Agostini D, et al. Vulnerability to heat-related mortality: a multicity, population-based, case-crossover analysis. Epidemiology, 2006; 17, 315−23. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000208477.36665.34 [43] Li MY, Fang W, Meng RL, et al. The comparison of mortality burden between exposure to dry-cold events and wet-cold events: a nationwide study in China. Sci Total Environ, 2023; 904, 166859. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166859 [44] Qi L, Gao Y, Yang J, et al. The burden of influenza and pneumonia mortality attributable to absolute humidity among elderly people in Chongqing, China, 2012-2018. Sci Total Environ, 2020; 716, 136682. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136682