Serum Uric Acid is Associated with the Predicted Risk of Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease in a Community-dwelling Population without Diabetes

CHENG Di DU Rui WU Xue Yan LIN Lin PENG Kui MA Li Na XU Yu XU Min CHEN Yu Hong BI Yu Fang WANG Wei Qing DAI Meng LU Jie Li

CHENG Di, DU Rui, WU Xue Yan, LIN Lin, PENG Kui, MA Li Na, XU Yu, XU Min, CHEN Yu Hong, BI Yu Fang, WANG Wei Qing, DAI Meng, LU Jie Li. Serum Uric Acid is Associated with the Predicted Risk of Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease in a Community-dwelling Population without Diabetes[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(2): 106-114. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.013
Citation: CHENG Di, DU Rui, WU Xue Yan, LIN Lin, PENG Kui, MA Li Na, XU Yu, XU Min, CHEN Yu Hong, BI Yu Fang, WANG Wei Qing, DAI Meng, LU Jie Li. Serum Uric Acid is Associated with the Predicted Risk of Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease in a Community-dwelling Population without Diabetes[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(2): 106-114. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.013

doi: 10.3967/bes2018.013
基金项目: 

the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC1305601

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81670795

the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC1304904

the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC0901201

the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC1305202

Serum Uric Acid is Associated with the Predicted Risk of Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease in a Community-dwelling Population without Diabetes

Funds: 

the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC1305601

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81670795

the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC1304904

the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC0901201

the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC1305202

More Information
    Author Bio:

    CHENG Di, female, born in 1991, Master of medicine, majoring in clinical epidemiology of diabetes

    DU Rui, female, born in 1991, Doctor of medicine, majoring in clinical epidemiology of diabetes

    WU Xue Yan, female, born in 1992, Master of medicine, major in clinical epidemiology of diabetes

    Corresponding author: DAI Meng, Tel:86-21-64749885, Fax:86-21-64749885, E-mail:daimeng926@126.comLU Jie Li, Tel:86-21-64749885, Fax:86-21-64749885, E-mail:jielilu@hotmail.com
    • 关键词:
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  
  • Figure  1.  Distribution of estimated 10-year risk for a first hard atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) event (A) and 10-year Framingham risk for coronary heart disease (B) in middle-aged and elderly Chinese adults without diabetes or CVD, stratified by sex and serum uric acid concentration groups (N = 7, 690).

    Table  1.   Characteristics of the Study Populations according to Serum Uric Acid Quartiles (N = 8, 252)

    Characteristics UA (μmol/L) P for Trend
    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
    Men
      Number/percentage, % 764 (25.0%) 762 (25.0%) 763 (25.0%) 762 (25.0%)
      Uric acid, μmol/L 258.5 (232.3-278.9) 319.8 (307.8-332.2) 371.2 (359.1-387.7) 451.5 (424.8-495.1) < 0.0001
      Age, years 58.3 ± 9.2 57.0 ± 9.2 57.6 ± 9.1 58.4 ± 9.6 0.0081
      High school education or above, % 175 (22.9%) 201 (26.4%) 193 (25.3%) 198 (26.0%) 0.72
      Current smoker, % 454 (60.0%) 419 (55.7%) 426 (56.4%) 367 (48.9%) 0.0001
      Current drinker, % 157 (20.8%) 188 (25.3%) 207 (27.5%) 223 (30.1%) 0.0001
      Physically active during leisure time, % 105 (13.7%) 94 (12.3%) 104 (13.6%) 106 (13.9%) 0.93
      BMI, kg/m2 23.9 ± 2.8 24.8 ± 3.0 25.5 ± 3.0 26.2 ± 3.0 < 0.0001
      Waist circumference, cm 81.1 ± 7.7 84.0 ± 8.3 86.2 ± 8.0 88.4 ± 8.1 < 0.0001
      SBP, mmHg 136.7 ± 18.4 138.6 ± 18.2 140.3 ± 18.6 141.1 ± 17.8 < 0.0001
      DBP, mmHg 82.0 ± 10.3 84.0 ± 9.9 85.3 ± 10.0 86.0 ± 10.0 < 0.0001
      FBG, mmol/L 5.1 ± 0.6 5.1 ± 0.6 5.1 ± 0.6 5.2 ± 0.6 0.0008
      PBG, mmol/L 6.0 ± 1.8 6.3 ± 1.8 6.4 ± 1.8 6.9 ± 1.8 < 0.0001
      HbA1c, % 5.5 (5.3-5.7) 5.5 (5.3-5.7) 5.5 (5.3-5.7) 5.6 (5.3-5.8) 0.0072
      Total cholesterol, mg/dL 4.88 ± 0.82 5.08 ± 0.96 5.11 ± 0.84 5.23 ± 0.97 < 0.0001
      Triglyceride, mg/dL 1.03 (0.77-1.41) 1.25 (0.95-1.73) 1.41 (1.02-1.98) 1.73 (1.22-2.50) < 0.0001
      HDL-C, mg/dL 1.33 ± 0.31 1.25 ± 0.30 1.22 ± 0.29 1.19 ± 0.29 < 0.0001
      LDL-C, mg/dL 2.85 ± 0.69 3.04 ± 0.76 3.06 ± 0.75 3.11 ± 0.86 < 0.0001
      HOMA-IR 0.97 (0.56-1.38) 1.23 (0.83-1.81) 1.49 (0.96-2.14) 1.67 (1.10-2.44) < 0.0001
    Women
      Number/percentage % 1301 (25.0%) 1300 (25.0%) 1301 (25.0%) 1299 (25.0%)
      Uric acid, μmol/L 183.0 (160.8-197.8) 232.30 (222.05-243.45) 277.4 (265.8-289.9) 347.8 (324.5-390.2) < 0.0001
      Age, years 54.6 ± 8.8 56.1 ± 8.3 57.5 ± 8.8 59.7 ± 8.5 < 0.0001
      High school education or above, % 295 (22.7%) 284 (21.9%) 281 (21.6%) 225 (17.3%) 0.0034
      Current smoker, % 5 (0.4%) 4 (0.3%) 6 (0.5%) 9 (0.7%) 0.50
      Current drinker, % 7 (0.6%) 9 (0.7%) 15 (1.2%) 10 (0.8%) 0.32
      Physically active during leisure time, % 161 (12.4%) 203 (15.6%) 210 (16.1%) 209 (16.1%) 0.02
      BMI, kg/m2 23.6 ± 3.0 24.4 ± 2.9 25.1 ± 3.2 26.1 ± 3.3 < 0.0001
      Waist circumference, cm 76.5 ± 8.0 79.0 ± 7.4 80.9 ± 8.2 83.7 ± 8.3 < 0.0001
      SBP, mmHg 133.6 ± 18.7 137.4 ± 19.4 139.5 ± 20.3 145.0 ± 20.3 < 0.0001
      DBP, mmHg 79.6 ± 9.9 81.0 ± 9.9 82.0 ± 10.0 83.6 ± 10.3 < 0.0001
      FBG, mmol/L 5.0 ± 0.5 5.1 ± 0.5 5.1 ± 0.6 5.2 ± 0.6 < 0.0001
      PBG, mmol/L 6.4 ± 1.5 6.7 ± 1.6 6.9 ± 1.7 7.3 ± 1.7 < 0.0001
      HbA1c, % 5.5 (5.3-5.7) 5.5 (5.3-5.7) 5.6 (5.4-5.8) 5.6 (5.4-5.9) < 0.0001
      Total cholesterol, mg/dL 5.24 ± 0.96 5.41 ± 0.90 5.45 ± 1.03 5.67 ± 1.10 < 0.0001
      Triglyceride, mg/dL 1.03 (0.78-1.41) 1.24 (0.93-1.74) 1.39 (1.03-1.90) 1.66 (1.25-2.36) < 0.0001
      HDL-C, mg/dL 1.49 ± 0.33 1.41 ± 0.30 1.36 ± 0.30 1.30 ± 0.29 < 0.0001
      LDL-C, mg/dL 3.08 ± 0.83 3.24 ± 0.80 3.29 ± 0.91 3.45 ± 0.92 < 0.0001
      HOMA-IR 1.28 (0.89-1.73) 1.46 (1.02-2.01) 1.68 (1.17-2.38) 2.02 (1.42-2.92) < 0.0001
       Note. UA, uric acid; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; PBG, postprandial blood glucose; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  2.   Association between Serum Uric Acid Concentrations and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Middle-aged and Elderly Chinese Adults without Diabetes (N = 8, 252)

    Variables UA (μmol/L) P for Trend
    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
    Obesity
      Men (n = 3, 051)
        Case percentage (%) 19 (2.49%) 37 (4.86%) 48 (6.29%) 69 (9.06%) < 0.0001
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.98 (1.13-3.47) 2.62 (1.52-4.50) 3.91 (2.33-6.56) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)* 1.00 1.88 (1.06-3.33) 2.34 (1.35-4.06) 3.42 (2.01-5.81) < 0.0001
      Women (n = 5, 201)
        Case percentage (%) 34 (2.61%) 46 (3.54%) 76 (5.84%) 155 (11.93%) < 0.0001
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.36 (0.87-2.14) 2.29 (1.52-3.47) 4.98 (3.38-7.32) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)* 1.00 1.34 (0.85-2.12) 2.04 (1.33-3.13) 4.18 (2.80-6.24) < 0.0001
    Hypertension
      Men (n = 3, 051)
        Case percentage (%) 390 (51.05%) 439 (57.61%) 464 (60.81%) 519 (68.11%) < 0.0001
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.44 (1.17-1.78) 1.60 (1.30-1.97) 2.16 (1.74-2.67) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)** 1.00 1.15 (0.92-1.43) 1.13 (0.90-1.41) 1.29 (1.02-1.63) 0.04
      Women (n = 5, 201)
        Case percentage (%) 515 (39.58%) 640 (49.23%) 721 (55.42%) 920 (70.82%) < 0.0001
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.37 (1.17-1.62) 2.86 (2.42-3.40) 1.07 (1.06-1.08) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)** 1.00 1.16 (0.98-1.38) 1.30 (1.09-1.54) 1.96 (1.63-2.36) < 0.0001
    Dyslipidemia
      Men (n = 3, 051)
        Case percentage (%) 188 (24.61%) 279 (36.61%) 330 (43.25%) 432 (56.69%) < 0.0001
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.72 (1.38-2.15) 2.32 (1.86-2.89) 4.11 (3.29-5.12) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)*** 1.00 1.49 (1.18-1.88) 1.89 (1.50-2.38) 3.16 (2.50-3.99) < 0.0001
      Women (n = 5, 201)
        Case percentage (%) 273 (20.98%) 420 (32.31%) 491 (37.74%) 689 (53.04%) < 0.0001
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.75 (1.47-2.09) 2.17 (1.82-2.58) 3.88 (3.25-4.62) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)*** 1.00 1.66 (1.39-2.00) 1.99 (1.66-2.38) 3.23 (2.68-3.88) < 0.0001
      Note. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; UA, uric acid; BMI, body mass index; *Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, HbA1c, SBP, total cholesterol. **Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, total cholesterol. ***Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, SBP. Significant data in bold.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  3.   Association between Serum Uric Acid Levels and Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-aged and Elderly Chinese Adults without Diabetes

    Variables UA (μmol/L) P for Trend
    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
    Cardiovascular diseases (n = 8, 252)
      Men (n = 3, 051)
        Case percentage (%) 42 (5.50%) 45 (5.91%) 60 (7.86%) 74 (9.71%) 0.0003
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.22 (0.78-1.89) 1.60 (1.06-2.44) 1.85 (1.24-2.77) 0.001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.16 (0.74-1.82) 1.51 (0.99-2.33) 1.67 (1.09-2.55) 0.009
      Women (n = 5, 201)
        Case percentage (%) 59 (4.53%) 78 (6.00%) 80 (6.15%) 124 (9.55%)
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.25 (0.88-1.77) 1.14 (0.80-1.62) 1.61 (1.16-2.23) 0.007
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.21 (0.84-1.72) 1.13 (0.79-1.62) 1.50 (1.06-2.12) 0.03
    Framingham risk score > 20%††† (n = 7, 690)
      Men (n = 2, 830)
        Case percentage (%) 61 (8.45%) 78 (10.88%) 105 (14.94%) 132 (19.19%) < 0.0001
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.54 (1.10-2.18) 2.14 (1.54-2.98) 2.83 (2.01-3.98) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.39 (0.92-2.12) 2.05 (1.37-3.06) 3.00 (2.00-4.50) < 0.0001
      Women (n = 4, 860)
        Case percentage (%) 6 (0.49%) 5 (0.42%) 7 (0.58%) 29 (2.39%) < 0.0001
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.39 (0.11-1.41) 1.07 (0.42-2.74) 4.73 (1.70-11.25) 0.0005
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.44 (0.10-1.83) 1.01 (0.33-1.75) 2.95 (1.08-8.43) 0.01
    ASCVD risk score ≥ 7.5%†† (n = 7, 690)
      Men (n = 2, 830)
        Case percentage (%) 484 (67.04%) 487 (67.92%) 511 (72.69%) 509 (73.98%) 0.0004
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.49 (1.11-2.00) 1.98 (1.46-2.69) 2.08 (1.52-2.84) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.52 (0.97-2.41) 1.87 (1.17-2.99) 1.93 (1.17-3.17) 0.005
      Women (n = 4, 860)
        Case percentage (%) 171 (13.77%) 190 (15.55%) 287 (23.51%) 411 (34.98%) < 0.0001
        Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.41 (0.97-2.04) 2.62 (1.83-3.74) 5.40 (3.71-7.87) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.06 (0.58-1.91) 2.48 (1.39-4.42) 4.53 (2.57-7.98) < 0.0001
       Note. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular diseases; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, SBP, total cholesterol. ††Analysis was carried out in participants ages 40-79 years old, free of CVD and diabetes (N = 7, 690) and individuals with ASCVD score ≥ 7.5% were identified as at high risks for 10-year ASCVD. †††Analysis was carried out in participants ages 40-79 years old, free of CVD and diabetes (n = 7, 690), and Framingham risk score > 20% were identified as at high risks for 10-year coronary heart disease. Significant data in bold.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table S1.   Subgroup Analysis of the Association between Serum Uric Acid Levels and Cardiovascular Diseases in Middle-Aged and Elderly Chinese Adults without Diabetes

    Variables UA (μmol/L) P for Trend
      Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
    Cardiovascular diseases (n = 8, 252)
    Age
       < 60 y (n = 5, 247) 40 (2.84%) 57 (4.07%) 36 (2.79%) 65 (5.66%) 0.002
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.33 (0.87-2.02) 0.91 (0.57-1.45) 1.72 (1.12-2.66) 0.06
      ≥ 60 y (n = 2, 641) 61 (9.28%) 66 (9.98%) 104 (13.42%) 133 (14.58%) 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.03 (0.71-1.49) 1.44 (1.02-2.02) 1.45 (1.03-2.04) 0.009
    Obesity
      No (n = 7, 768) 97 (4.82%) 112 (5.66%) 127 (6.55%) 163 (8.87%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 1.13 (0.85-1.50) 1.22 (0.92-1.62) 1.43 (1.09-1.89) 0.009
      Yes (n = 484) 4 (7.55%) 11 (13.25%) 13 (10.48%) 35 (15.63%) 0.07
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 2.05 (0.58-7.20) 1.53 (0.45-5.22) 2.13 (0.68-6.71) 0.29
    Hypertension
      No (n = 3, 644) 33 (2.84%) 33 (3.36%) 30 (3.41%) 32 (5.14%) 0.01
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 1.12 (0.68-1.86) 1.13 (0.68-1.90) 1.68 (0.99-2.85) 0.08
      Yes (n = 4, 608) 68 (7.51%) 90 (8.34%) 110 (9.28%) 166 (11.54%) 0.0003
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 1.16 (0.83-1.63) 1.18 (0.85-1.64) 1.28 (0.93-1.75) 0.15
    Dyslipidemia
      No (n = 5, 150) 75 (4.68%) 73 (5.36%) 84 (6.76%) 89 (9.47%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 1.09 (0.77-1.53) 1.27 (0.91-1.77) 1.56 (1.12-2.19) 0.006
      Yes (n = 3, 102) 26 (5.64%) 50 (7.15%) 56 (6.82%) 109 (9.72%) 0.002
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 1.27 (0.77-2.10) 1.10 (0.67-1.81) 1.28 (0.80-2.04) 0.45
    Framingham risk score > 20% (n = 7, 690)
      Age
       < 60 y (n = 5, 049) 31 (2.27%) 41 (3.05%) 63 (5.03%) 51 (4.70%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.96 (0.54-1.70) 1.75 (1.01-3.01) 1.25 (0.70-2.23) < 0.0001
      ≥ 60 y (n = 2, 641) 36 (6.04%) 42 (7.06%) 49 (7.30%) 110 (14.12%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.06 (0.63-1.79) 1.01 (0.61-1.66) 1.97 (1.23-3.15) 0.01
    Obesity
      No (n = 7, 269) 64 (3.34%) 80 (4.28%) 105 (5.79%) 147 (8.78%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 1.32 (0.87-2.00) 1.59 (1.07-2.37) 2.12 (1.43-3.14) < 0.0001
      Yes (n = 421) 3 (6.12%) 3 (4.17%) 7 (6.31%) 14 (7.41%) 0.23
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 0.59 (0.07-4.77) 0.89 (0.14-5.62) 1.13 (0.21-6.09) 0.62
    Hypertension
      No (n = 3, 516) 9 (0.80%) 8 (0.84%) 17 (2.00%) 7 (1.19%) 0.05
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 0.82 (0.28-2.38) 1.49 (0.58-3.84) 0.71 (0.23-2.20) 0.92
      Yes (n = 4, 174) 58 (6.93%) 75 (7.58%) 95 (8.84%) 154 (12.10%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 1.39 (0.90-2.17) 1.56 (1.02-2.38) 1.98 (1.31-3.00) 0.001
    Dyslipidemia
      No (n = 4, 829) 28 (1.83%) 32 (2.48%) 32 (2.76%) 30 (3.53%) 0.01
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 1.75 (0.95-3.20) 1.65 (0.90-3.04) 1.98 (1.04-3.77) 0.05
      Yes (n = 2, 861) 39 (8.97%) 51 (7.86%) 80 (10.46%) 131 (12.94%) 0.001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 0.88 (0.50-1.54) 1.25 (0.74-2.10) 1.61 (0.97-2.66) 0.01
    ASCVD risk score ≥ 7.5% (n = 7, 690)
      Age
       < 60 y (n = 5, 049) 204 (14.91%) 248 (18.45%) 279 (22.27%) 270 (24.91%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.09 (0.81-1.47) 1.26 (0.94-1.70) 1.24 (0.91-1.69) 0.11
      ≥ 60 y (n = 2, 641) 451 (75.67%) 429 (72.10%) 519 (77.35%) 650 (83.44%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.77 (0.57-1.06) 1.00 (0.73-1.37) 1.43 (1.04-1.98) 0.007
    Obesity
      No (n = 7, 269) 639 (33.21%) 644 (34.49%) 750 (41.37%) 825 (49.28%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 1.07 (0.82-1.40) 1.33 (1.02-1.73) 1.53 (1.17-2.00) 0.001
      Yes (n = 421) 19 (38.78%) 33 (45.83%) 48 (43.24%) 95 (50.26%) 0.08
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 1.84 (0.57-5.94) 1.74 (0.57-5.28) 1.19 (0.41-3.43) 0.09
    Hypertension
      No (n = 3, 516) 230 (20.41%) 203 (21.37%) 215 (25.32%) 155 (26.27%) 0.001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 1.17 (0.79-1.72) 1.17 (0.79-1.73) 0.96 (0.62-1.48) 0.97
      Yes (n = 4, 174) 425 (50.78%) 474 (47.93%) 583 (54.23%) 765 (60.09%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 1.02 (0.72-1.45) 1.18 (0.84-1.66) 1.36 (0.97-1.92) 0.04
    Dyslipidemia
      No (n = 4, 829) 469 (30.67%) 412 (31.94%) 431 (37.19%) 374 (43.95%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 1.14 (0.82-1.59) 1.14 (0.81-1.59) 1.30 (0.92-1.86) 0.17
      Yes (n = 2, 861) 186 (42.76%) 265 (40.83%) 367 (47.97%) 546 (53.95%) < 0.0001
      Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 0.81 (0.50-1.31) 1.12 (0.71-1.77) 1.17 (0.75-1.84) 0.15
       Note. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases; Multivariable model adjusted for education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, SBP, total cholesterol. ††Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, HbA1c, SBP, total cholesterol. †††Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, total cholesterol. ††††Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, SBP. Significant data in bold.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Feig DI, Kang DH, Johnson RJ. Uric Acid and Cardiovascular Risk. New Engl J Med, 2008; 359, 1811-21. doi:  10.1056/NEJMra0800885
    [2] White J, Sofat R, Hemani G, et al. Plasma urate concentration and risk of coronary heart disease:a Mendelian randomisation analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2016; 4, 327-36. doi:  10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00386-1
    [3] Herman JB, Goldbourt U. Uric acid and diabetes:observations in a population study. The Lancet, 1982; 2, 240-3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673682903245
    [4] Juraschek SP, McAdams-Demarco M, Miller ER, et al. Temporal relationship between uric acid concentration and risk of diabetes in a community-based study population. Am J Epidemiol, 2014; 179, 684-91. doi:  10.1093/aje/kwt320
    [5] Ndrepepa G, Braun S, King L, et al. Prognostic value of uric acid in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. Clini Sci, 2013; 124, 259-68. doi:  10.1042/CS20120336
    [6] Zoppini G, Targher G, Negri C, et al. Elevated Serum Uric Acid Concentrations Independently Predict Cardiovascular Mortality in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Diabetes Care, 2009; 32, 1716-20. doi:  10.2337/dc09-0625
    [7] Zoppini G, Targher G, Bonora E. The role of serum uric acid in cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic subjects:a narrative review. J Endocrinol Invest, 2011; 34, 881-6. doi:  10.1007/BF03346733
    [8] Kuwabara M, Kuwabara R, Hisatome I, et al. 'Metabolically Healthy' Obesity and Hyperuricemia Increase Risk for Hypertension and Diabetes:5-year Japanese Cohort Study. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2017; 25, 1997-2008. doi:  10.1002/oby.v25.11
    [9] Braga F, Pasqualetti S, Ferraro S, et al. Hyperuricemia as risk factor for coronary heart disease incidence and mortality in the general population:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2016; 54, 7-15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351943
    [10] Storhaug HM, Norvik JV, Toft I, et al. Uric acid is a risk factor for ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality in the general population:a gender specific analysis from The Tromsø Study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2013; 13, 15. doi:  10.1186/1471-2261-13-15
    [11] Jin M, Yang F, Yang I, et al. Uric Acid, Hyperurice-mia and Vascular Diseases. Front Biosci, 2012; 7, 656-69.
    [12] Culleton BF, Larson MG, Kannel, WB, et al. Serum uric acid and risk for cardiovascular disease and death:the Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med, 1999; 131, 7-13. doi:  10.7326/0003-4819-131-1-199907060-00003
    [13] Chou P, Lin KC, Lin HY, et al. Gender differences in the relationships of serum uric acid with fasting serum insulin and plasma glucose in patients without diabetes. J Rheumatol, 2001; 28, 571-6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1262363610002958
    [14] Tuttle KR, Short RA, Johnson RJ. Sex differences in uric acid and risk factors for coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol, 2001; 87, 1411-4. doi:  10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01566-1
    [15] Lai X, Yang L, Legare S, et al. Dose-response relationship between serum uric acid levels and risk of incident coronary heart disease in the Dongfeng-Tongji Cohort. Int J Cardiol, 2016; 224, 299-304. doi:  10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.035
    [16] Lu J, Zhang J, Du R, et al. Age at menarche is associated with the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease later in life. J Diabetes, 2017; 9, 53-60. doi:  10.1111/1753-0407.12379
    [17] Chen Y, Lu J, Huang Y, et al. Association of previous schistosome infection with diabetes and metabolic syndrome:a cross-sectional study in rural China. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2013; 98, E283-7. doi:  10.1210/jc.2012-2517
    [18] Lu J, Mu Y, Su Q, et al. Reduced Kidney Function Is Associated With Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Prevalent and Predicted Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Chinese Adults:Results From the REACTION Study. J Am Heart Assoc, 2016; 5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27451464
    [19] Lu J, Bi Y, Wang T, et al. The relationship between insulin-sensitive obesity and cardiovascular diseases in a Chinese population:results of the REACTION study. Int J Cardiol, 2014; 172, 388-94. doi:  10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.01.073
    [20] Expert Panel on Detection E. Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in A:Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel Ⅲ). JAMA, 2001; 285, 2486-97. doi:  10.1001/jama.285.19.2486
    [21] Goff DC, Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 2014; 129, S49-73. doi:  10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98
    [22] Chuang SY, Chen JH, Yeh WT, et al. Hyperuricemia and increased risk of ischemic heart disease in a large Chinese cohort. Int J Cardiol, 2012; 154, 316-21. doi:  10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.06.055
    [23] Nan H, Dong Y, Gao W, et al. Diabetes associated with a low serum uric acid level in a general Chinese population. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2007; 76, 68-74. doi:  10.1016/j.diabres.2006.07.022
    [24] Corry DB, Eslami P, Yamamoto K, et al. Uric acid stimulates vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and oxidative stress via the vascular renin-angiotensin system. J Hypertens, 2008; 26, 269-75. doi:  10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f240bf
    [25] Kanbay M, Segal M, Afsar B, et al. The role of uric acid in the pathogenesis of human cardiovascular disease. Heart, 2013; 99, 759-66. doi:  10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302535
    [26] Khosla UM, Zharikov S, Finch JL, et al. Hyperuricemia induces endothelial dysfunction. Kidney Int, 2005; 67, 1739-42. doi:  10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00273.x
    [27] Xu L, Shi Y, Zhuang S, et al. Recent advances on uric acid transporters. Oncotarget, 2017; 8, 100852-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5725069/
    [28] Rizzo M, Obradovic M, Labudovic-Borovic M, et al. Uric Acid Metabolism in Pre-hypertension and the Metabolic Syndrome. Curr Vasc Pharma, 2014; 12, 572-85. doi:  10.2174/1570161111999131205160756
  • [1] LIU Shuai, LIU Fang Chao, LI Jian Xin, HUANG Ke Yong, YANG Xue Li, CHEN Ji Chun, CAO Jie, CHEN Shu Feng, HUANG Jian Feng, SHEN Chong, LU Xiang Feng, GU Dong Feng.  Association between Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Arterial Stiffness: The China-PAR Project . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(12): 1113-1122. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.143
    [2] TANG Xu, XU Lu, MENG Ruo Gu, DU Yi Qing, LIU Shi Jun, ZHAN Si Yan, XU Tao.  Association between Serum Uric Acid and the Early Marker of Kidney Function Decline among Chinese Middle-Aged and Older Population: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(3): 231-240. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.026
    [3] HONG Le, YAN Miao Miao, ZHANG Yun Quan, WANG Kai, WANG Ya Qi, LUO Si Qi, WANG Fang.  Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease Attributable to High Temperature in 204 Countries and Territories from 1990 to 2019 . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(3): 222-230. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.025
    [4] The Writing Committee of the Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China.  Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China 2022: an Updated Summary . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36(8): 669-701. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.106
    [5] PIAO Wei, BO Ya Cong, ZHAO Li Yun, YU Dong Mei.  Status of Serum Uric Acid and Hyperuricemia among Adults in China: China Nutrition and Health Surveillance (2015) . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(10): 911-920. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.118
    [6] WANG Lu, WANG Ke, LIU Lin Jiong, ZHANG Yuan Yuan, SHU Hai Nan, WANG Kai, ZHOU Pei Xuan, ZHANG Yun Quan.  Associations of Daytime Napping with Incident Cardiovascular Diseases and Hypertension in Chinese Adults: A Nationwide Cohort Study . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(1): 22-34. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.004
    [7] The Writing Committee of the Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China.  Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China 2021: An Updated Summary . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(7): 573-603. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.079
    [8] WANG Yu Xue, ZHANG Li, LI Chun Jun, QI Xin, FAN Ya Qi, HE Jiang Shan, GUO Pei, HU Jia Lin, CHEN Shuo, NIU Yu Jie, LIU Feng, ZHANG Rong, LI Qiang, MA Shi Tao, ZHANG Mian Zhi, HONG Cheng Lin, ZHANG Min Ying.  Predicted 10-year Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Its Association with Sleep Duration among Adults in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(10): 803-813. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.109
    [9] QIU Meng Si, WANG Xian Wei, YAO Yan, GE Si Qi, LIU Hua Min, DAI Ying Chun, ZHOU Yong.  Protocol of Jidong Women Health Cohort Study: Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(2): 144-152. doi: 10.3967/bes2019.021
    [10] LI Hui Hua, HUANG Shan, LIU Xing Zhen, ZOU Da Jin.  Applying the China-PAR Risk Algorithm to Assess 10-year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Populations Receiving Routine Physical Examinations in Eastern China . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(2): 87-95. doi: 10.3967/bes2019.014
    [11] LI Lin, WANG Long, LIU Shan Shan, ZHAO Zhi Yun, LI Mian, WANG Tian Ge, XU Min, LU Jie Li, CHEN Yu Hong, WANG Shuang Yuan, DAI Meng, HOU Ya Nan, WU Xue Yan, MA Li Na, WANG Wei Qing, XU Yu, BI Yu Fang.  Association between Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition and Cardiovascular Disease Risk . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(2): 75-86. doi: 10.3967/bes2019.012
    [12] Suni Lee, Shoko Yamamoto, Yasumitsu Nishimura, Hidenori Matsuzaki, Kei Yoshitome, Tamayo Hatayama, Miho Ikeda, YU Min, Nagisa Sada, Naoko Kumagai-Takei, Takemi Otsuki.  Decrease in Serum Amyloid a Protein Levels Following Three-month Stays in Negatively Charged Particle-dominant Indoor Air Conditions . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(5): 335-342. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.044
    [13] SONG Quan Quan, NIU Jing Ping, ZHANG Shu Yu, LIANG Ting Ting, ZHOU Ji, FENG Shan Shan.  Effects of Simulated Heat Wave and Ozone on High Fat Diet ApoE Deficient Mice . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(10): 757-768. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.101
    [14] LI Jian Hong, WANG Li Min, LI Yi Chong, ZHANG Mei, WANG Lin Hong.  Prevalence of Major Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Cardiovascular Disease in Women in China:Surveillance Efforts . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2016, 29(3): 205-211. doi: 10.3967/bes2016.025
    [15] XUE Bai, TAN Ji Bin, NING Feng, SUN Jian Ping, ZHANG Ke Yi, LIU Li, WANG Shao Jie.  Association Between Serum Uric Acid and Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosed using HbA1c Criteria Among Chinese Adults in Qingdao, China . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 28(12): 884-893. doi: 10.3967/bes2015.122
    [16] FAN Jie, LI Guo Qi, LIU Jing, WANG Wei, WANG Miao, QI Yue, XIE Wu Xiang, LIU Jun, ZHAO Fan, LI Yan, ZHAO Dong.  Impact of Cardiovascular Disease Deaths on Life Expectancy in Chinese Population . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 27(3): 162-168. doi: 10.3967/bes2014.037
    [17] PENG Hao, HAN Shu Hai, LIU Hai Ying, Vasisht CHANDNI, CAI Xiao Qing, ZHANG Yong Hong.  Relationship of Inflammation and Endothelial Dysfunction with Risks to Cardiovascular Disease among People in Inner Mongolia of China . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2013, 26(10): 792-800. doi: 10.3967/bes2013.002
    [18] ZHANG Ming Liang, HOU Xu Hong, ZHU Yun Xia, LU Jun Xi, PENG Liang Pu, GU Hui Lin, JIA Wei Ping.  Metabolic Disorders Increase the Risk to Incident Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-aged and Elderly Chinese . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2012, 25(1): 38-45. doi: 10.3967/0895-3988.2012.01.006
    [19] SUN XiaoMing, LIU YeWei, WANG ZhenQuan, LI HongBing, LIU Yun, DI DuoLong.  Effect of Occupational Manganese Exposure on Uric Acid Levels in Human Urine . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2011, 24(3): 222-227. doi: 10.3967/0895-3988.2011.03.003
    [20] YUAN YuanZhi, M. Kamran IKRAM, JIANG SunFang, LIN HuanDong, REN LiMin, YAN HongMei, SHENG JianHua, CHEN XuSheng, GAO Xin.  Hyperuricemia Accompanied with Changes in the Retinal Microcirculation in a Chinese High-risk Population for Diabetes . Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2011, 24(2): 146-154. doi: 10.3967/0895-3988.2011.02.009
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表ll (4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1657
  • HTML全文浏览量:  440
  • PDF下载量:  133
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-12-22
  • 录用日期:  2018-02-07
  • 刊出日期:  2018-02-20

Serum Uric Acid is Associated with the Predicted Risk of Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease in a Community-dwelling Population without Diabetes

doi: 10.3967/bes2018.013
    基金项目:

    the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC1305601

    the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81670795

    the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC1304904

    the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC0901201

    the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFC1305202

    作者简介:

    CHENG Di, female, born in 1991, Master of medicine, majoring in clinical epidemiology of diabetes

    DU Rui, female, born in 1991, Doctor of medicine, majoring in clinical epidemiology of diabetes

    WU Xue Yan, female, born in 1992, Master of medicine, major in clinical epidemiology of diabetes

    通讯作者: DAI Meng, Tel:86-21-64749885, Fax:86-21-64749885, E-mail:daimeng926@126.comLU Jie Li, Tel:86-21-64749885, Fax:86-21-64749885, E-mail:jielilu@hotmail.com

English Abstract

CHENG Di, DU Rui, WU Xue Yan, LIN Lin, PENG Kui, MA Li Na, XU Yu, XU Min, CHEN Yu Hong, BI Yu Fang, WANG Wei Qing, DAI Meng, LU Jie Li. Serum Uric Acid is Associated with the Predicted Risk of Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease in a Community-dwelling Population without Diabetes[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(2): 106-114. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.013
Citation: CHENG Di, DU Rui, WU Xue Yan, LIN Lin, PENG Kui, MA Li Na, XU Yu, XU Min, CHEN Yu Hong, BI Yu Fang, WANG Wei Qing, DAI Meng, LU Jie Li. Serum Uric Acid is Associated with the Predicted Risk of Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease in a Community-dwelling Population without Diabetes[J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(2): 106-114. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.013
    • Serum uric acid is the catabolic end-product of human purine nucleosides, which are mainly synthesized from hypoxanthine and xanthine. An increase in serum uric acid can lead to deposition of monosodium urate crystals in tissues, such as joints, soft tissues, and renal parenchyma, which cause gout, gouty tophi, and nephropathy[1].

      The association between increased serum uric acid levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is controversial. It is unclear whether high serum uric acid level promotes or protects against the development of CVD, or if it simply acts as a passive marker of increased risk[2]. Serum uric acid levels differ in diabetics and non-diabetics, and decrease with an increased duration of diabetes[3, 4]. Moreover, previous studies have reported that elevated serum uric acid could be a risk factor for cardiometabolic diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes[5, 6]. However, the association between serum uric acid level and CVD risk in non-diabetic subjects remains controversial[7-10]. A meta-analysis showed that hyperuricemia may increase the risk for cardiovascular events, independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors[11]. In contrast, the Framingham Heart Study did not find a significant association between serum uric acid level and CVD events and mortality when diabetes status was adjusted[12].

      Gender difference exists between serum uric acid level and metabolic disorders. Serum uric acid levels in women tend to be lower than those in men, probably due to the uricosuric effect of estrogens[1]. Chou et al. reported that serum uric acid levels are more strongly associated with hyperinsulinemia and plasma glucose levels in women than in men[13]. Moreover, Tuttle et al. found that serum uric acid level is linearly related to coronary artery disease severity in women but no such relationship was observed in men[14].

      The Dongfeng-Tongji Cohort study from China reported that that higher serum uric acid levels are independently associated with a dose-response increased risk of incident coronary heart disease[15]. However, sex-specific analysis and evaluation of cardiovascular risk score were not performed in this study. Thus, evidence on the gender difference and the association between serum uric acid levels and cardiovascular risks among Chinese non-diabetics is limited at present. We investigated the association between serum uric acid level and the risk of prevalent cardiometabolic diseases, the 10-year Framingham risk for coronary heart disease, and the 10-year risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) in a large population of middle-aged and elderly Chinese adults without concurrent diabetes. The analysis was performed among men and women, respectively.

    • A population-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in Jiading district, Shanghai, China from March 2010 to August 2010. During the recruiting phase, a total of 10, 569 inhabitants aged ≥ 40 years in these 10 communities were invited by telephone or door-to-door visits to participate in this study. Among them, 10, 375 residents signed a consent form and agreed to take part in the study, with a participation rate of 98.2%. This protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ruijin Hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine[16]. All participants provided written informed consent. Individuals > 79 years (n = 260) and those missing uric acid, body mass index (BMI), blood glucose, blood pressure, and serum lipid (n = 49), or diabetes (n = 1, 814) information were excluded. Finally, 8, 252 participants were included in the current study.

    • Information about demographic characteristics, lifestyle, and medical histories was obtained from a standard questionnaire completed by trained investigators through face-to-face interviews[16]. Body weight, height, waist circumference, and blood pressure were measured by experienced nurses according to standard protocols. Smoking and drinking status was defined as 'current' if a subject had smoked cigarettes or consumed alcohol regularly in the past 6 months[17]. Physical activity at leisure time was estimated using the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Physical activity was classified as active (highest quartile) or inactive (all others)[17]. Information on CVDs was collected using an interviewer-assisted questionnaire. The question was open-ended: 'Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you have coronary heart disease, stroke, or myocardial infarction'. We grouped the CVDs (reported coronary heart disease, stroke, or myocardial infarction) in the analysis. The medical records from the relevant hospitalizations were reviewed by two physicians, who were blinded to the self-reported data, and classified the cases as definite, questionable, or misdiagnosed. Coronary heart disease was identified by hospitalization or an emergency department visit requiring treatment, and this information was verified by two physicians. The criteria for myocardial infarction included information about ischemic chest pain, cardiac enzymes, and electrocardiogram. Myocardial infarction was defined by characteristic changes in levels of troponin T and the creatine-kinase-MB isoform, symptoms of ischemic chest pain, changes in electrocardiogram results, or a combination of these. Stroke was defined as an acute fixed neurological deficit diagnosed by a physician and thought to be of vascular origin (without other origins, such as brain tumor) with signs and symptoms lasting ≥ 24 hours[18, 19].

      Blood pressure was recorded with an automated electronic device (OMRON Model HEM-752 FUZZY, Omron Co., Dalian, China) in triplicate with a 1-min interval after the subject sat for 5-min. The mean of the three readings was used for analysis. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by squared height (m2). Waist circumference was measured at the umbilical level. All participants underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, with blood samples collected at 0 and 2 h to test fasting blood glucose (FBG) and postprandial blood glucose (PBG), respectively[16]. FBG and PBG were determined by the glucose oxidase method using an autoanalyzer (Modular P800; Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Serum uric acid, fasting serum insulin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), serum alanine amino-transferase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, and creatinine were all determined by a chemiluminescence method using an autoanalyzer (Modular E170; Roche)[16]. Serum insulin levels were determined by an immunoradiometric assay (RIABEADII; Abbott, Tokyo, Japan). The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index was calculated according to the formula: HOMA-IR = fasting insulin concentration (mIU/L) × fasting plasma glucose concentration (mmol/L)/22.5[17].

    • Screened diabetes was defined as FBG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or 2-h plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L according to 1999 World Health Organization definitions[18]. Participants with self-reported diabetes or use of anti-diabetic medications were considered to have diabetes. Overweight was defined as (BMI of 25.0-29.9 kg/m2 and obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2 according to World Health Organization definitions[19]. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg, or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, or a self-reported previous diagnosis of hypertension by a physician and taking an antihypertensive medication. Dyslipidemia was defined according to the modified National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel Ⅲ as: hypercholesterolemia, total cholesterol ≥ 6.22 mmol/L (240 mg/dL), hypertriglyceridemia, triglycerides ≥ 2.26 mmol/L (200 mg/dL), high LDL-C, LDL-C ≥ 4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL), and low HDL-C, HDL-C < 1.04 mmol/L (40 mg/dL)[19].

      The Framingham risk score was calculated based on coronary risk factors, including age, sex, total cholesterol, HDL-C, SBP, and smoking habit according to the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel Ⅲ algorithm[20]. The calculated total scores were used to estimate the 10-year coronary heart disease risk in participants without previous CVD, and Framingham risk > 20% was identified as high for 10-year coronary heart disease risk[18].

      Estimated 10-year ASCVD risk score was calculated using the new Pooled Cohort Risk Assessment Equations according to the recommendation of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and an ASCVD score ≥ 7.5% was considered high risk for 10-year ASCVD in participants without previous CVD[21].

    • All statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) separately for men and women. Data are given as mean ± standard deviation (median) and interquartile range for continuous variables, or numbers (percentages) for categorical parameters. Uric acid was categorized into gender-specific quartiles. The relationships between serum uric acid with cardiometabolic risk factors, previous CVDs, 10-year coronary heart disease risk, and 10-year ASCVD risk were determined with a logistic regression models. Two sets of models were used: model 1 was adjusted for age only and model 2 was adjusted for demographic characteristics and traditional risk factors of CVDs, including age, education (high school education or above or not), current cigarette smoking (no/yes), current alcohol consumption (no/yes), MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, SBP, and total cholesterol. The results are expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

    • The study included 8, 252 participants with a mean age of 57.3 ± 9.0 years, and 36.97% were men. The mean serum uric acid level was 350.97 ± 88.42 μmol/L in men and 267.21 ± 78.24 μmol/L in women, respectively. The prevalence rates of obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were 5.87% (5.67% in men and 5.98% in women), 55.84% (59.39% in men and 53.76% in women), and 37.59% (40.28% in men and 36.01% in women). A total of 6.81% of the participants reported having CVDs, 423 (5.50%) had an increased estimated 10-year Framingham risk for coronary heart disease, and 3, 050 (39.66%) had an increased estimated 10-year risk for a first hard ASCVD event.

      The basic characteristics of the participants according to serum uric acid quartiles in men and women are shown in Table 1. Men and women with increased serum uric acid levels tended to be older, obese, and had significantly higher levels of blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, HOMA-IR, waist circumference, and a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and HDL-C levels (all P < 0.001). Men with a higher serum uric acid level had higher proportions of current smokers and current drinkers.

      Table 1.  Characteristics of the Study Populations according to Serum Uric Acid Quartiles (N = 8, 252)

      Characteristics UA (μmol/L) P for Trend
      Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
      Men
        Number/percentage, % 764 (25.0%) 762 (25.0%) 763 (25.0%) 762 (25.0%)
        Uric acid, μmol/L 258.5 (232.3-278.9) 319.8 (307.8-332.2) 371.2 (359.1-387.7) 451.5 (424.8-495.1) < 0.0001
        Age, years 58.3 ± 9.2 57.0 ± 9.2 57.6 ± 9.1 58.4 ± 9.6 0.0081
        High school education or above, % 175 (22.9%) 201 (26.4%) 193 (25.3%) 198 (26.0%) 0.72
        Current smoker, % 454 (60.0%) 419 (55.7%) 426 (56.4%) 367 (48.9%) 0.0001
        Current drinker, % 157 (20.8%) 188 (25.3%) 207 (27.5%) 223 (30.1%) 0.0001
        Physically active during leisure time, % 105 (13.7%) 94 (12.3%) 104 (13.6%) 106 (13.9%) 0.93
        BMI, kg/m2 23.9 ± 2.8 24.8 ± 3.0 25.5 ± 3.0 26.2 ± 3.0 < 0.0001
        Waist circumference, cm 81.1 ± 7.7 84.0 ± 8.3 86.2 ± 8.0 88.4 ± 8.1 < 0.0001
        SBP, mmHg 136.7 ± 18.4 138.6 ± 18.2 140.3 ± 18.6 141.1 ± 17.8 < 0.0001
        DBP, mmHg 82.0 ± 10.3 84.0 ± 9.9 85.3 ± 10.0 86.0 ± 10.0 < 0.0001
        FBG, mmol/L 5.1 ± 0.6 5.1 ± 0.6 5.1 ± 0.6 5.2 ± 0.6 0.0008
        PBG, mmol/L 6.0 ± 1.8 6.3 ± 1.8 6.4 ± 1.8 6.9 ± 1.8 < 0.0001
        HbA1c, % 5.5 (5.3-5.7) 5.5 (5.3-5.7) 5.5 (5.3-5.7) 5.6 (5.3-5.8) 0.0072
        Total cholesterol, mg/dL 4.88 ± 0.82 5.08 ± 0.96 5.11 ± 0.84 5.23 ± 0.97 < 0.0001
        Triglyceride, mg/dL 1.03 (0.77-1.41) 1.25 (0.95-1.73) 1.41 (1.02-1.98) 1.73 (1.22-2.50) < 0.0001
        HDL-C, mg/dL 1.33 ± 0.31 1.25 ± 0.30 1.22 ± 0.29 1.19 ± 0.29 < 0.0001
        LDL-C, mg/dL 2.85 ± 0.69 3.04 ± 0.76 3.06 ± 0.75 3.11 ± 0.86 < 0.0001
        HOMA-IR 0.97 (0.56-1.38) 1.23 (0.83-1.81) 1.49 (0.96-2.14) 1.67 (1.10-2.44) < 0.0001
      Women
        Number/percentage % 1301 (25.0%) 1300 (25.0%) 1301 (25.0%) 1299 (25.0%)
        Uric acid, μmol/L 183.0 (160.8-197.8) 232.30 (222.05-243.45) 277.4 (265.8-289.9) 347.8 (324.5-390.2) < 0.0001
        Age, years 54.6 ± 8.8 56.1 ± 8.3 57.5 ± 8.8 59.7 ± 8.5 < 0.0001
        High school education or above, % 295 (22.7%) 284 (21.9%) 281 (21.6%) 225 (17.3%) 0.0034
        Current smoker, % 5 (0.4%) 4 (0.3%) 6 (0.5%) 9 (0.7%) 0.50
        Current drinker, % 7 (0.6%) 9 (0.7%) 15 (1.2%) 10 (0.8%) 0.32
        Physically active during leisure time, % 161 (12.4%) 203 (15.6%) 210 (16.1%) 209 (16.1%) 0.02
        BMI, kg/m2 23.6 ± 3.0 24.4 ± 2.9 25.1 ± 3.2 26.1 ± 3.3 < 0.0001
        Waist circumference, cm 76.5 ± 8.0 79.0 ± 7.4 80.9 ± 8.2 83.7 ± 8.3 < 0.0001
        SBP, mmHg 133.6 ± 18.7 137.4 ± 19.4 139.5 ± 20.3 145.0 ± 20.3 < 0.0001
        DBP, mmHg 79.6 ± 9.9 81.0 ± 9.9 82.0 ± 10.0 83.6 ± 10.3 < 0.0001
        FBG, mmol/L 5.0 ± 0.5 5.1 ± 0.5 5.1 ± 0.6 5.2 ± 0.6 < 0.0001
        PBG, mmol/L 6.4 ± 1.5 6.7 ± 1.6 6.9 ± 1.7 7.3 ± 1.7 < 0.0001
        HbA1c, % 5.5 (5.3-5.7) 5.5 (5.3-5.7) 5.6 (5.4-5.8) 5.6 (5.4-5.9) < 0.0001
        Total cholesterol, mg/dL 5.24 ± 0.96 5.41 ± 0.90 5.45 ± 1.03 5.67 ± 1.10 < 0.0001
        Triglyceride, mg/dL 1.03 (0.78-1.41) 1.24 (0.93-1.74) 1.39 (1.03-1.90) 1.66 (1.25-2.36) < 0.0001
        HDL-C, mg/dL 1.49 ± 0.33 1.41 ± 0.30 1.36 ± 0.30 1.30 ± 0.29 < 0.0001
        LDL-C, mg/dL 3.08 ± 0.83 3.24 ± 0.80 3.29 ± 0.91 3.45 ± 0.92 < 0.0001
        HOMA-IR 1.28 (0.89-1.73) 1.46 (1.02-2.01) 1.68 (1.17-2.38) 2.02 (1.42-2.92) < 0.0001
         Note. UA, uric acid; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; PBG, postprandial blood glucose; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol.

      A multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that increased serum uric acid level was associated with an increased risk of prevalent obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in men and women (all P for trend < 0.001; Table 2).

      Table 2.  Association between Serum Uric Acid Concentrations and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Middle-aged and Elderly Chinese Adults without Diabetes (N = 8, 252)

      Variables UA (μmol/L) P for Trend
      Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
      Obesity
        Men (n = 3, 051)
          Case percentage (%) 19 (2.49%) 37 (4.86%) 48 (6.29%) 69 (9.06%) < 0.0001
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.98 (1.13-3.47) 2.62 (1.52-4.50) 3.91 (2.33-6.56) < 0.0001
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)* 1.00 1.88 (1.06-3.33) 2.34 (1.35-4.06) 3.42 (2.01-5.81) < 0.0001
        Women (n = 5, 201)
          Case percentage (%) 34 (2.61%) 46 (3.54%) 76 (5.84%) 155 (11.93%) < 0.0001
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.36 (0.87-2.14) 2.29 (1.52-3.47) 4.98 (3.38-7.32) < 0.0001
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)* 1.00 1.34 (0.85-2.12) 2.04 (1.33-3.13) 4.18 (2.80-6.24) < 0.0001
      Hypertension
        Men (n = 3, 051)
          Case percentage (%) 390 (51.05%) 439 (57.61%) 464 (60.81%) 519 (68.11%) < 0.0001
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.44 (1.17-1.78) 1.60 (1.30-1.97) 2.16 (1.74-2.67) < 0.0001
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)** 1.00 1.15 (0.92-1.43) 1.13 (0.90-1.41) 1.29 (1.02-1.63) 0.04
        Women (n = 5, 201)
          Case percentage (%) 515 (39.58%) 640 (49.23%) 721 (55.42%) 920 (70.82%) < 0.0001
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.37 (1.17-1.62) 2.86 (2.42-3.40) 1.07 (1.06-1.08) < 0.0001
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)** 1.00 1.16 (0.98-1.38) 1.30 (1.09-1.54) 1.96 (1.63-2.36) < 0.0001
      Dyslipidemia
        Men (n = 3, 051)
          Case percentage (%) 188 (24.61%) 279 (36.61%) 330 (43.25%) 432 (56.69%) < 0.0001
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.72 (1.38-2.15) 2.32 (1.86-2.89) 4.11 (3.29-5.12) < 0.0001
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)*** 1.00 1.49 (1.18-1.88) 1.89 (1.50-2.38) 3.16 (2.50-3.99) < 0.0001
        Women (n = 5, 201)
          Case percentage (%) 273 (20.98%) 420 (32.31%) 491 (37.74%) 689 (53.04%) < 0.0001
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.75 (1.47-2.09) 2.17 (1.82-2.58) 3.88 (3.25-4.62) < 0.0001
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)*** 1.00 1.66 (1.39-2.00) 1.99 (1.66-2.38) 3.23 (2.68-3.88) < 0.0001
        Note. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; UA, uric acid; BMI, body mass index; *Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, HbA1c, SBP, total cholesterol. **Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, total cholesterol. ***Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, SBP. Significant data in bold.

      The association between serum uric acid level and prevalent CVD was further evaluated. A total of 221 (7.24%) men and 341 (6.56%) women had a history of CVD, including 141 (4.64%) with coronary heart disease, 10 (0.33%) with a myocardial infarction, and 80 (2.63%) with stroke in men, and 249 (4.82%) with coronary heart disease, three (0.06%) with myocardial infarction, and 101 (1.92%) with stroke in women. Elevated serum uric acid was associated with an increased risk of prevalent CVDs. The prevalence numbers of self-reported CVDs were 42 (5.50%), 45 (5.91%), 60 (7.86%), and 74 (9.71%) in men and 59 (4.53%), 78 (6.00%), 80 (6.15%), and 124 (9.55%) in women across quartiles of serum uric acid (all P for trend < 0.001). Multivariate adjusted ORs (95% CI) of prevalent cardiovascular disease risk associated with serum uric acid were 1.00, 1.16 (0.74-1.82), 1.51 (0.99-2.33), and 1.67 (1.09-2.55; P for trend < 0.001) for men, and 1.00, 1.21 (0.84-1.72), 1.13 (0.79-1.62), and 1.50 (1.06-2.12) (P for trend < 0.001) for women, respectively, Table 3.

      Table 3.  Association between Serum Uric Acid Levels and Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-aged and Elderly Chinese Adults without Diabetes

      Variables UA (μmol/L) P for Trend
      Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
      Cardiovascular diseases (n = 8, 252)
        Men (n = 3, 051)
          Case percentage (%) 42 (5.50%) 45 (5.91%) 60 (7.86%) 74 (9.71%) 0.0003
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.22 (0.78-1.89) 1.60 (1.06-2.44) 1.85 (1.24-2.77) 0.001
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.16 (0.74-1.82) 1.51 (0.99-2.33) 1.67 (1.09-2.55) 0.009
        Women (n = 5, 201)
          Case percentage (%) 59 (4.53%) 78 (6.00%) 80 (6.15%) 124 (9.55%)
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.25 (0.88-1.77) 1.14 (0.80-1.62) 1.61 (1.16-2.23) 0.007
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.21 (0.84-1.72) 1.13 (0.79-1.62) 1.50 (1.06-2.12) 0.03
      Framingham risk score > 20%††† (n = 7, 690)
        Men (n = 2, 830)
          Case percentage (%) 61 (8.45%) 78 (10.88%) 105 (14.94%) 132 (19.19%) < 0.0001
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.54 (1.10-2.18) 2.14 (1.54-2.98) 2.83 (2.01-3.98) < 0.0001
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.39 (0.92-2.12) 2.05 (1.37-3.06) 3.00 (2.00-4.50) < 0.0001
        Women (n = 4, 860)
          Case percentage (%) 6 (0.49%) 5 (0.42%) 7 (0.58%) 29 (2.39%) < 0.0001
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.39 (0.11-1.41) 1.07 (0.42-2.74) 4.73 (1.70-11.25) 0.0005
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.44 (0.10-1.83) 1.01 (0.33-1.75) 2.95 (1.08-8.43) 0.01
      ASCVD risk score ≥ 7.5%†† (n = 7, 690)
        Men (n = 2, 830)
          Case percentage (%) 484 (67.04%) 487 (67.92%) 511 (72.69%) 509 (73.98%) 0.0004
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.49 (1.11-2.00) 1.98 (1.46-2.69) 2.08 (1.52-2.84) < 0.0001
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.52 (0.97-2.41) 1.87 (1.17-2.99) 1.93 (1.17-3.17) 0.005
        Women (n = 4, 860)
          Case percentage (%) 171 (13.77%) 190 (15.55%) 287 (23.51%) 411 (34.98%) < 0.0001
          Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.41 (0.97-2.04) 2.62 (1.83-3.74) 5.40 (3.71-7.87) < 0.0001
          Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.06 (0.58-1.91) 2.48 (1.39-4.42) 4.53 (2.57-7.98) < 0.0001
         Note. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular diseases; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, SBP, total cholesterol. ††Analysis was carried out in participants ages 40-79 years old, free of CVD and diabetes (N = 7, 690) and individuals with ASCVD score ≥ 7.5% were identified as at high risks for 10-year ASCVD. †††Analysis was carried out in participants ages 40-79 years old, free of CVD and diabetes (n = 7, 690), and Framingham risk score > 20% were identified as at high risks for 10-year coronary heart disease. Significant data in bold.

      The estimated 10-year Framingham risk for coronary heart disease and estimated 10-year risk for a first hard ASCVD event were further calculated in participants free of CVDs (n = 7, 690, Table 3; Figure 1). Men had a significantly higher risk according to the Framingham risk score and ASCVD than women. The mean Framingham risk score was 13.63% ± 7.27% in men and 3.33% ± 3.86% in women. There were 376 (13.29%) men and 47 (0.97%) women who had a 10-year Framingham risk for coronary heart disease > 20%. The mean ASCVD risk score was 13.92% ± 9.7% in men and 5.53% ± 6.78% in women. A total of 70.35% of men and 21.79% of women had ASCVD risk ≥ 7.5%.

      Figure 1.  Distribution of estimated 10-year risk for a first hard atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) event (A) and 10-year Framingham risk for coronary heart disease (B) in middle-aged and elderly Chinese adults without diabetes or CVD, stratified by sex and serum uric acid concentration groups (N = 7, 690).

      As shown in Figure 1, the distribution of the two estimated risk scores was stratified by sex and serum uric acid level. Serum uric acid was associated with increased 10-year Framingham risk for coronary heart disease and the 10-year risk for ASCVD after multivariate adjustments (P for trend < 0.001; Table 3, Figure 1) in men and women. Multivariate adjusted ORs (95% CI) of the high Framingham risk associated with serum uric acid were: 1.00, 1.39 (0.92-2.12), 2.05 (1.37-3.06), and 3.00 (2.00-4.50) in men and 1.00, 0.44 (0.10-1.83), 1.01 (0.33-1.75), and 2.95 (1.08-8.43) in women. Multivariate adjusted ORs (95% CI) of the ASCVD risk associated with serum uric acid were 1.00, 1.52 (0.97-2.41), 1.87 (1.17-2.99), 1.93 (1.17-3.17) in men and 1.00, 1.06 (0.58-1.91), 2.48 (1.39-4.42), 4.53 (2.57-7.98) in women (Table 3).

    • In the present cross-sectional study conducted among the middle-aged and elderly Chinese populations, we found that higher serum uric acid levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of prevalent cardiometabolic diseases, estimated from the 10-year Framingham risk for coronary heart disease and the 10-year risk for a first hard ASCVD event.

      Our findings about the association between serum uric acid and cardiometabolic diseases are in accordance with previous studies[2, 6, 9, 15, 22]. In a restricted generalized study of 3, 073 highly selected middle-aged male participants without diabetes or metabolic syndrome, higher serum uric acid levels were significantly associated with an increased risk for hypertension[6]. However, data on the risks of 10-year Framingham risk for coronary heart disease or 10-year risk for ASCVD are limited, especially among female counterparts. In another small study of 581 elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, higher serum uric acid level independently predicted cardiovascular mortality, but the authors did not adjust for glycemic control[23]. In this respect, the effect of gender differences and HbA1c levels on serum uric acid concentration cannot be ignored[1]. In a large middle-aged and elderly Chinese population, Lai et al. reported that higher serum uric acid level was independently associated with a dose-response increased risk for coronary heart disease[15]. However, they did not exclude patients with diabetes, who have significantly lower urate levels, and they did not perform sex-specific analyses. Sex-specific analysis is needed when investigating the association between serum uric acid level and CVD risk, because serum uric acid level is higher in men than in women of all age groups[1]. In our study, we further explored the association between serum uric acid level and coronary heart disease risk factors. The highest quartile of serum uric acid was significantly associated with an increased risk of prevalent cardiovascular diseases, compared with the lowest uric acid quartile, and predicted cardiovascular risk in participants without obesity (Table S1, available at www.besjournal.com).

      Table Table S1.  Subgroup Analysis of the Association between Serum Uric Acid Levels and Cardiovascular Diseases in Middle-Aged and Elderly Chinese Adults without Diabetes

      Variables UA (μmol/L) P for Trend
        Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
      Cardiovascular diseases (n = 8, 252)
      Age
         < 60 y (n = 5, 247) 40 (2.84%) 57 (4.07%) 36 (2.79%) 65 (5.66%) 0.002
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.33 (0.87-2.02) 0.91 (0.57-1.45) 1.72 (1.12-2.66) 0.06
        ≥ 60 y (n = 2, 641) 61 (9.28%) 66 (9.98%) 104 (13.42%) 133 (14.58%) 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.03 (0.71-1.49) 1.44 (1.02-2.02) 1.45 (1.03-2.04) 0.009
      Obesity
        No (n = 7, 768) 97 (4.82%) 112 (5.66%) 127 (6.55%) 163 (8.87%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 1.13 (0.85-1.50) 1.22 (0.92-1.62) 1.43 (1.09-1.89) 0.009
        Yes (n = 484) 4 (7.55%) 11 (13.25%) 13 (10.48%) 35 (15.63%) 0.07
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 2.05 (0.58-7.20) 1.53 (0.45-5.22) 2.13 (0.68-6.71) 0.29
      Hypertension
        No (n = 3, 644) 33 (2.84%) 33 (3.36%) 30 (3.41%) 32 (5.14%) 0.01
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 1.12 (0.68-1.86) 1.13 (0.68-1.90) 1.68 (0.99-2.85) 0.08
        Yes (n = 4, 608) 68 (7.51%) 90 (8.34%) 110 (9.28%) 166 (11.54%) 0.0003
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 1.16 (0.83-1.63) 1.18 (0.85-1.64) 1.28 (0.93-1.75) 0.15
      Dyslipidemia
        No (n = 5, 150) 75 (4.68%) 73 (5.36%) 84 (6.76%) 89 (9.47%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 1.09 (0.77-1.53) 1.27 (0.91-1.77) 1.56 (1.12-2.19) 0.006
        Yes (n = 3, 102) 26 (5.64%) 50 (7.15%) 56 (6.82%) 109 (9.72%) 0.002
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 1.27 (0.77-2.10) 1.10 (0.67-1.81) 1.28 (0.80-2.04) 0.45
      Framingham risk score > 20% (n = 7, 690)
        Age
         < 60 y (n = 5, 049) 31 (2.27%) 41 (3.05%) 63 (5.03%) 51 (4.70%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.96 (0.54-1.70) 1.75 (1.01-3.01) 1.25 (0.70-2.23) < 0.0001
        ≥ 60 y (n = 2, 641) 36 (6.04%) 42 (7.06%) 49 (7.30%) 110 (14.12%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.06 (0.63-1.79) 1.01 (0.61-1.66) 1.97 (1.23-3.15) 0.01
      Obesity
        No (n = 7, 269) 64 (3.34%) 80 (4.28%) 105 (5.79%) 147 (8.78%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 1.32 (0.87-2.00) 1.59 (1.07-2.37) 2.12 (1.43-3.14) < 0.0001
        Yes (n = 421) 3 (6.12%) 3 (4.17%) 7 (6.31%) 14 (7.41%) 0.23
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 0.59 (0.07-4.77) 0.89 (0.14-5.62) 1.13 (0.21-6.09) 0.62
      Hypertension
        No (n = 3, 516) 9 (0.80%) 8 (0.84%) 17 (2.00%) 7 (1.19%) 0.05
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 0.82 (0.28-2.38) 1.49 (0.58-3.84) 0.71 (0.23-2.20) 0.92
        Yes (n = 4, 174) 58 (6.93%) 75 (7.58%) 95 (8.84%) 154 (12.10%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 1.39 (0.90-2.17) 1.56 (1.02-2.38) 1.98 (1.31-3.00) 0.001
      Dyslipidemia
        No (n = 4, 829) 28 (1.83%) 32 (2.48%) 32 (2.76%) 30 (3.53%) 0.01
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 1.75 (0.95-3.20) 1.65 (0.90-3.04) 1.98 (1.04-3.77) 0.05
        Yes (n = 2, 861) 39 (8.97%) 51 (7.86%) 80 (10.46%) 131 (12.94%) 0.001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 0.88 (0.50-1.54) 1.25 (0.74-2.10) 1.61 (0.97-2.66) 0.01
      ASCVD risk score ≥ 7.5% (n = 7, 690)
        Age
         < 60 y (n = 5, 049) 204 (14.91%) 248 (18.45%) 279 (22.27%) 270 (24.91%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.09 (0.81-1.47) 1.26 (0.94-1.70) 1.24 (0.91-1.69) 0.11
        ≥ 60 y (n = 2, 641) 451 (75.67%) 429 (72.10%) 519 (77.35%) 650 (83.44%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.77 (0.57-1.06) 1.00 (0.73-1.37) 1.43 (1.04-1.98) 0.007
      Obesity
        No (n = 7, 269) 639 (33.21%) 644 (34.49%) 750 (41.37%) 825 (49.28%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 1.07 (0.82-1.40) 1.33 (1.02-1.73) 1.53 (1.17-2.00) 0.001
        Yes (n = 421) 19 (38.78%) 33 (45.83%) 48 (43.24%) 95 (50.26%) 0.08
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†† 1.00 1.84 (0.57-5.94) 1.74 (0.57-5.28) 1.19 (0.41-3.43) 0.09
      Hypertension
        No (n = 3, 516) 230 (20.41%) 203 (21.37%) 215 (25.32%) 155 (26.27%) 0.001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 1.17 (0.79-1.72) 1.17 (0.79-1.73) 0.96 (0.62-1.48) 0.97
        Yes (n = 4, 174) 425 (50.78%) 474 (47.93%) 583 (54.23%) 765 (60.09%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)††† 1.00 1.02 (0.72-1.45) 1.18 (0.84-1.66) 1.36 (0.97-1.92) 0.04
      Dyslipidemia
        No (n = 4, 829) 469 (30.67%) 412 (31.94%) 431 (37.19%) 374 (43.95%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 1.14 (0.82-1.59) 1.14 (0.81-1.59) 1.30 (0.92-1.86) 0.17
        Yes (n = 2, 861) 186 (42.76%) 265 (40.83%) 367 (47.97%) 546 (53.95%) < 0.0001
        Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)†††† 1.00 0.81 (0.50-1.31) 1.12 (0.71-1.77) 1.17 (0.75-1.84) 0.15
         Note. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases; Multivariable model adjusted for education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, SBP, total cholesterol. ††Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, HbA1c, SBP, total cholesterol. †††Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, total cholesterol. ††††Multivariable model adjusted for age, education attainment, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, MET-min/week, BMI, HbA1c, SBP. Significant data in bold.

      Endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress in adipocytes are two potential mechanisms underlying the association between serum uric acid and cardiovascular risk. First, serum uric acid may harm the functions of platelets and endothelium[1]. Uric acid can induce oxidative stress, leading to attenuated nitric oxide bioavailability, which can promote proliferation of vascular smooth muscle[24]. Experimental studies in rats have reported that hyperuricemia induces endothelial dysfunction and that allopurinol improves endothelial function in patients with hyperuricemia, which supports the above mechanism[1]. Uric acid induces cellular proliferation, inflammation, oxidative stress, and activation of the local renin–angiotensin system in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells[1, 25, 26]. Microvascular changes still develop when blood pressure is controlled by a diuretic[1]. Furthermore, the mechanism of uric acid transport is still not completely understood. As the function of urate transport is essential for determining serum uric acid concentrations, further studies on the functional role of a uric acid transporter will provide a novel strategy to treat hyperuricemia-associated diseases[27, 28].

      The main strength of our study was the large sample size, the exclusion of subjects with diabetes, and the gender specific analysis. Several limitations in our study should be mentioned. First, due to the cross-sectional design, no causal inferences can be drawn on the issue of serum uric acid and cardiovascular risks. Second, higher serum uric acid levels may indirectly contribute to increased cardiometabolic disease risk through a close association with established risk factors, such as older age, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, dysglycemia, and chronic kidney disease. The exact mechanisms should be further investigated. Third, our study was conducted among a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population and should be carefully interpreted in other age and ethnical populations. Lastly, the information on cardiovascular diseases was collected through self-reported data, which might lead to inevitable recall bias.

      To conclude, we found that serum uric acid was independently associated with an increased risk of obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, the 10-year Framingham risk for coronary heart disease, and the 10-year risk for ASCVD among the middle-aged and elderly Chinese population. As uric acid levels are effectively and safely modifiable with treatment, reducing serum uric acid might be preventive for cardiometabolic diseases and could be translated into large public heath gains. Further investigations are needed to confirm this association and the exact mechanisms.

    • The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

    • The authors thank the working field staff for their contributions and the participants for their cooperation.

      LU Jie Li was supported by 'Chenxing Plan' of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shuguang Program [15SG15], and Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support [20152202] from Shanghai Municipal Education Commission.

参考文献 (28)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回