-
A total of 5,440 participants were recruited as baseline from 2010 to 2011. Cognitive function was assessed by the MMSE, and retinal metrics were collected by retinal photography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography during the first follow-up period between 2012 to 2013, with 4,004 participants attending this appointment. Of these subjects, 76 and 143 did not finish the cognitive function assessment or retinal-related metrics assessment, respectively, leaving 3,785 participants in the final analysis (CI group 108, non-CI group 3,677, Figure 1).
The mean age of the participants was 53.7 years, with 2,143 (56.6%) being male. The baseline characteristics of the two groups are shown in Table 1. In the CI group, the participants were older and had a lower educational level than that of the non-CI group. The percentage of glaucoma was also higher in the CI group than in the non-CI group. The other epidemiological characteristics and medical histories were not statistically different between the two groups (Table 1).
Table 1. Basic characteristics of participants regarding the prevalence of cognitive impairment
Parameters Missing (n) CI (n = 108) Non-CI (n = 3,677) P value Age (quartile), y n = 0 57.8 (51.8, 72.6) 51.4 (45.2, 59.1) < 0.001 Male (n), % n = 0 71 (65.7) 2,072 (56.4) 0.061 Han ethnic (n), % n = 0 107 (99.1) 3,628 (98.7) 0.900 Educational level (n), % n = 0 0.0074 Illiterate 5 (4.6) 46 (1.3) elementary school 11 (10.2) 297 (8.1) middle school or above 92 (85.2) 3,334 (90.7) Smoking (n), % n = 0 38 (35.2) 1,164 (31.7) 0.463 Alcohol Drinking (n), % n = 0 13 (12.0) 530 (14.4) 0.578 Past medical history (n), % Hypertension n = 0 56 (51.9) 1,677 (45.6) 0.204 Diabetes mellitus n = 0 14 (13.0) 398 (10.8) 0.436 Dyslipidemia n = 0 49 (45.4) 1,802 (49.0) 0.495 Glaucoma n = 754 4 (4.8) 31 (1.1) 0.003 Cataract surgery n = 756 2 (2.4) 62 (2.1) 0.698 Note. CI: cognitive impairment. In the second step, we analyzed the relationship between cognitive function and the different retinal metrics. Compared with the non-CI group, the CI group had significantly thinner RNFL thickness (odds ratio (OR): 0.973, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.956–0.990). After adjustment for the relevant risk factors including age, sex, han ethnicity, educational level, smoking habit, alcohol drinking, past history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and glaucoma and cataract surgery, the difference is still valid (OR: 0.973, 95% CI: 0.953–0.994). The CRAE and AVR were not significantly different between the two groups after adjusting for the basic risk factors (Table 2).
Table 2. Adjusted odds ratios for cognitive function and different retinal metrics
Parameters Including OR 95% CI P value RNFL n = 3,332 0.973 0.956–0.990 0.002 Adjusted 0.973 0.953–0.994 0.013 CRAE n = 3,554 0.988 0.979–0.998 0.019 Adjusted 0.993 0.982–1.005 0.268 AVR n = 3,554 0.194 0.024–1.596 0.127 Adjusted 0.313 0.029–3.421 0.341 Note. Adjusted: adjusted by age, sex, han ethnicity, educational level, smoking, alcohol drinking, past history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, glaucoma and cataract surgery. OR: Odds Ratio; RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer; CI: confidence interval; CRAE: central retinal arteriolar equivalents; AVR: central retinal arteriolar equivalents /central retinal venous equivalents. To determine whether different arterial stenoses had different effects on retinal metrics for CI, we separated the participants according to their ICAS, ECAS, and PAD status. For RNFL, we showed that RNFL was significantly thinner in CI patients than in the non-ICAS and non-ECAS subgroups, with this association remaining for RNFL and CI after adjusting for risk factors shown in Table 1 (non-ICAS group: OR: 0.974, 95% CI: 0.956–0.993 for crude, OR: 0.973, 95% confidence interval: 0.950–0.996 for adjusted; non-ECAS group: OR: 0.973, 95% CI: 0.956–0.991 for crude, OR: 0.973, 95% CI: 0.953–0.994 for adjusted). Interestingly the association also existed in the PAD subgroup (OR: 0.947, 95% CI: 0.912–0.984 for crude, and OR: 0.943, 95% CI: 0.899–0.990 for adjusted). For CRAE and AVR, no significant difference was observed after adjusting for the risk factors (Figure 2 A for RNFL, B for CRAE, C for AVR).
doi: 10.3967/bes2024.020
Relationship of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Retinal Vessel Calibers with Cognitive Impairment in the Asymptomatic Polyvascular Abnormalities Population
-
Abstract:Wang Dan Dan and Zhao Xing Quan analyzed, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. Zhao Xing Quan, Wu Shou Ling and Wei Wen Bin conceived and designed the research. Wang Dan Dan handled funding. Wang An Xin and Zhang Xiao Li acquired the data and prepared tables and figures.
Objective Cognitive impairment (CI) in older individuals has a high morbidity rate worldwide, with poor diagnostic methods and susceptible population identification. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between different retinal metrics and CI in a particular population, emphasizing polyvascular status. Methods We collected information from the Asymptomatic Polyvascular Abnormalities Community Study on retinal vessel calibers, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, and cognitive function of 3,785 participants, aged 40 years or older. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between retinal metrics and cognitive function. Subgroups stratified by different vascular statuses were also analyzed. Results RNFL thickness was significantly thinner in the CI group (odds ratio: 0.973, 95% confidence interval: 0.953–0.994). In the subgroup analysis, the difference still existed in the non-intracranial arterial stenosis, non-extracranial carotid arterial stenosis, and peripheral arterial disease subgroups (P < 0.05). Conclusion A thin RNFL is associated with CI, especially in people with non-large vessel stenosis. The underlying small vessel change in RNFL and CI should be investigated in the future.
There is no competing interest in our study.
注释:1) AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS: 2) COMPETING INTERESTS: -
Figure 2. Subgroup analysis between cognitive impairment and retinal metrics based on polyvascular status.
Figure 2A for RNFL, 2B for CRAE, 2C for AVR. Adjusted: adjusted by age, sex, han ethnicity, educational level, smoking, alcohol drinking, past history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, glaucoma and cataract surgery. ICAS: intracranial arterial stenosis; ECAS: extracranial carotid arterial stenosis; PAD: peripheral arterial disease.
Table 1. Basic characteristics of participants regarding the prevalence of cognitive impairment
Parameters Missing (n) CI (n = 108) Non-CI (n = 3,677) P value Age (quartile), y n = 0 57.8 (51.8, 72.6) 51.4 (45.2, 59.1) < 0.001 Male (n), % n = 0 71 (65.7) 2,072 (56.4) 0.061 Han ethnic (n), % n = 0 107 (99.1) 3,628 (98.7) 0.900 Educational level (n), % n = 0 0.0074 Illiterate 5 (4.6) 46 (1.3) elementary school 11 (10.2) 297 (8.1) middle school or above 92 (85.2) 3,334 (90.7) Smoking (n), % n = 0 38 (35.2) 1,164 (31.7) 0.463 Alcohol Drinking (n), % n = 0 13 (12.0) 530 (14.4) 0.578 Past medical history (n), % Hypertension n = 0 56 (51.9) 1,677 (45.6) 0.204 Diabetes mellitus n = 0 14 (13.0) 398 (10.8) 0.436 Dyslipidemia n = 0 49 (45.4) 1,802 (49.0) 0.495 Glaucoma n = 754 4 (4.8) 31 (1.1) 0.003 Cataract surgery n = 756 2 (2.4) 62 (2.1) 0.698 Note. CI: cognitive impairment. Table 2. Adjusted odds ratios for cognitive function and different retinal metrics
Parameters Including OR 95% CI P value RNFL n = 3,332 0.973 0.956–0.990 0.002 Adjusted 0.973 0.953–0.994 0.013 CRAE n = 3,554 0.988 0.979–0.998 0.019 Adjusted 0.993 0.982–1.005 0.268 AVR n = 3,554 0.194 0.024–1.596 0.127 Adjusted 0.313 0.029–3.421 0.341 Note. Adjusted: adjusted by age, sex, han ethnicity, educational level, smoking, alcohol drinking, past history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, glaucoma and cataract surgery. OR: Odds Ratio; RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer; CI: confidence interval; CRAE: central retinal arteriolar equivalents; AVR: central retinal arteriolar equivalents /central retinal venous equivalents. -
[1] GBD 2016 Dementia Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol, 2019; 18, 88−106. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30403-4 [2] Wu YT, Ali GC, Guerchet M, et al. Prevalence of dementia in mainland China, Hong Kong and taiwan: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol, 2018; 47, 709−19. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy007 [3] McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the national institute on aging-alzheimer's association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for alzheimer's disease. Alzheim Dement, 2011; 7, 263−9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 [4] McConathy J, Sheline YI. Imaging biomarkers associated with cognitive decline: a review. Biol Psychiatry, 2015; 77, 685−92. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.08.024 [5] Kulic L, Unschuld PG. Recent advances in cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for the detection of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Curr Opin Neurol, 2016; 29, 749−55. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000399 [6] Kim HM, Han JW, Park YJ, et al. Association between retinal layer thickness and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2022; 140, 683−90. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.1563 [7] Noah AM, Almghairbi D, Moppett IK. Optical coherence tomography in mild cognitive impairment - systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2020; 196, 106036. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106036 [8] Chan VTT, Sun ZH, Tang SM, et al. Spectral-domain oct measurements in alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology, 2019; 126, 497−510. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.009 [9] Lian TH, Jin Z, Qu YZ, et al. The relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and clinical symptoms of alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci, 2021; 12, 584244. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.584244 [10] Hughes AD, Falaschetti E, Witt N, et al. Association of retinopathy and retinal microvascular abnormalities with stroke and cerebrovascular disease. Stroke, 2016; 47, 2862−4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014998 [11] István L, Czakó C, Élő Á, et al. Imaging retinal microvascular manifestations of carotid artery disease in older adults: from diagnosis of ocular complications to understanding microvascular contributions to cognitive impairment. Geroscience, 2021; 43, 1703−23. doi: 10.1007/s11357-021-00392-4 [12] Foster PJ, Atan D, Khawaja A, et al. Cohort profile: rationale and methods of uk biobank repeat imaging study eye measures to study dementia. BMJ Open, 2023; 13, e069258. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069258 [13] Hilal S, Cheung CY, Wong TY, et al. Retinal parameters, cortical cerebral microinfarcts, and their interaction with cognitive impairment. Int J Stroke, 2023; 18, 70−7. doi: 10.1177/17474930221097737 [14] Zhou Y, Li Y, Xu L, et al. Asymptomatic polyvascular abnormalities in community (APAC) study in China: objectives, design and baseline characteristics. PLoS One, 2013; 8, e84685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084685 [15] Wang DD, Li Y, Zhou Y, et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. A community-based, observational study. PLoS One, 2017; 12, e0177277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177277 [16] Wong KS, Huang YN, Yang HB, et al. A door-to-door survey of intracranial atherosclerosis in Liangbei county, China. Neurology, 2007; 68, 2031−4. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000264426.63544.ee [17] Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and doppler US diagnosis--society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology, 2003; 229, 340–6. [18] Greenland P, Abrams J, Aurigemma GP, et al. Prevention conference v: beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention: noninvasive tests of atherosclerotic burden: writing Group III. Circulation, 2000; 101, E16−22. [19] Zhang Q, Wang DD, Wang AX, et al. Relationship of ideal cardiovascular health metrics with retinal vessel calibers and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2018; 18, 187. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0922-1 [20] Zhang N, Yang Y, Wang A, et al. Association of ideal cardiovascular health metrics and cognitive functioning: the apac study. Eur J Neurol, 2016; 23, 1447−54. doi: 10.1111/ene.13056 [21] Li HZ, Jia JP, Yang ZQ. Mini-mental state examination in elderly chinese: a population-based normative study. J Alzheimers Dis, 2016; 53, 487−96. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160119 [22] Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res, 1975; 12, 189−98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 [23] Mitchell AJ. A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the mini-mental state examination in the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. J Psychiatr Res, 2009; 43, 411−31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.04.014 [24] Yatsuya H, Folsom AR, Wong TY, et al. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and risk of lacunar stroke: atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Stroke, 2010; 41, 1349−55. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.580837 [25] Wang DD, Li Y, Wang CX, et al. Localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects and stroke. Stroke, 2014; 45, 1651−6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004629 [26] Petzold A, Balcer LJ, Calabresi PA, et al. Retinal layer segmentation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol, 2017; 16, 797−812. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30278-8 [27] Chrysou A, Jansonius NM, Van Laar T. Retinal layers in parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography studies. Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 2019; 64, 40−9. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.04.023 [28] Chang ZH, Xie F, Li HL, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and associations with cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. front Aging Neurosci, 2022; 14, 832768. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.832768 [29] Arnould L, Guillemin M, Seydou A, et al. Association between the retinal vascular network and retinal nerve fiber layer in the elderly: the montrachet study. PLoS One, 2020; 15, e0241055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241055 [30] Chua SYL, Lascaratos G, Atan D, et al. Relationships between retinal layer thickness and brain volumes in the uk biobank cohort. Eur J Neurol, 2021; 28, 1490−8. doi: 10.1111/ene.14706 [31] Lee MJ, Abraham AG, Swenor BK, et al. Application of optical coherence tomography in the detection and classification of cognitive decline. J Curr Glaucoma Pract, 2018; 12, 10−8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1238 [32] Van De Kreeke JA, Nguyen HT, Konijnenberg E, et al. Longitudinal retinal layer changes in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Acta Ophthalmol, 2021; 99, 538−44. doi: 10.1111/aos.14640 [33] Ge YJ, Xu W, Ou YN, et al. Retinal biomarkers in alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev, 2021; 69, 101361. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101361 [34] Raz L, Knoefel J, Bhaskar K. The neuropathology and cerebrovascular mechanisms of dementia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2016; 36, 172−86. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.164 [35] Kara B, Gordon MN, Gifani M, et al. Vascular and nonvascular mechanisms of cognitive impairment and dementia. Clin Geriatr Med, 2023; 39, 109−22. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2022.07.006 [36] Yang Q, Wei XB, Deng B, et al. Cerebral small vessel disease alters neurovascular unit regulation of microcirculation integrity involved in vascular cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Dis, 2022; 170, 105750. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105750 [37] Bell RD, Winkler EA, Sagare AP, et al. Pericytes control key neurovascular functions and neuronal phenotype in the adult brain and during brain aging. Neuron, 2010; 68, 409−27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.043 [38] Hao XL, Zhang WW, Jiao B, et al. Correlation between retinal structure and brain multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci, 2023; 15, 1088829. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1088829 [39] O'Bryhim BE, Lin JB, Van Stavern GP, et al. OCT angiography findings in preclinical alzheimer's disease: 3-year follow-up. Ophthalmology, 2021; 128, 1489−91. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.02.016 [40] O'Bryhim BE, Apte RS, Kung N, et al. Association of preclinical alzheimer disease with optical coherence tomographic angiography findings. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2018; 136, 1242−8. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3556