-
A total of 9723 research subjects were included in the final data analysis. Of these subjects, 7718 were ≤ 50 years old (79.4%), and 2005 subjects (20.6%) were > 50 years old. There were 4722 male subjects (48.6%) and 5001 female participants (51.4%). The survey results revealed that the education level of 6,835 participants (70.3%) was primary school or below, and a total of 8,164 participants (84.0%) were married. The prevalence rates of hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and risk factor aggregation were 28.5%, 32.5%, 8.8%, 34.0%, and 30.1%, respectively. The BMI, WC, SBP, DBP, TC, TG, LDL-C, and FPG of subjects with cardiometabolic risk factors were significantly higher than that of subjects without cardiometabolic risk factors (all P < 0.001) (Table 1). The NDVI500-m range was 0.15–0.37. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed across the buffer ranges of the NDVI, and the Spearman correlation coefficients ranged from 0.688 to 0.944 across the buffer ranges of the NDVI (Table S1).
Table 1. Basic characteristics of the participants according to the cardiometabolic risk factors.
Variables Total(n = 9723) Cardiometabolic risk factors
(n = 6101)Non-cardiometabolic risk
factors (n = 3622)P value Age, N (%) < 0.001 ≤ 50 years 7718 (79.4) 4446 (72.9) 3272 (90.3) > 50 years 2005 (20.6) 1655 (27.1) 350 (9.7) Sex, N (%) < 0.001 Men 4722 (48.6) 3054 (50.1) 1668 (46.1) Women 5001 (51.4) 3047 (49.9) 1954 (53.9) Education level, N (%) < 0.001 Elementary school or below 6835 (70.3) 4568 (74.9) 2267 (62.6) Junior high school and above 2888 (29.7) 1533 (25.1) 1355 (37.4) Marital status, N (%) < 0.001 Windowed/single/divorced/separated 1559 (16.0) 860 (14.1) 699 (19.3) Married 8164 (84.0) 5241 (85.9) 2923 (80.7) Physical activity, N (%) 0.854 Low 7149 (73.5) 4482 (73.5) 2667 (73.6) High 2574 (26.5) 1619 (26.5) 955 (26.4) BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD 26.3 ± 5.0 28.1 ± 5.1 23.1 ± 2.7 < 0.001 WC (cm), mean ± SD 92.4 ± 14.6 96.6 ± 14.2 85.3 ± 12.2 < 0.001 SBP (mmHg), mean ± SD 129.3 ± 20.6 136.0 ± 21.8 117.8 ± 11.5 < 0.001 DBP (mmHg), mean ± SD 75.0 ± 12.5 78.2 ± 13.1 69.6 ± 9.0 < 0.001 FPG (mmol/L), median ± IQR 4.75 ± 1.20 4.88 ± 1.30 4.60 ± 1.00 < 0.001 TC (mmol/L), median ± IQR 4.61 ± 1.43 4.87 ± 1.53 4.25 ± 1.15 < 0.001 TG (mmol/L), median ± IQR 1.38 ± 1.20 1.72 ± 1.57 1.06 ± 0.70 < 0.001 LDL-C (mmol/L), median ± IQR 2.53 ± 1.16 2.70 ± 1.20 2.33 ± 0.99 < 0.001 HDL-C(mmol/L), median ± IQR 1.39 ± 0.68 1.33 ± 0.67 1.48 ± 0.71 < 0.001 NDVI250-m, mean ± SD 0.25 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.06 0.25 ± 0.06 < 0.001 NDVI500-m, mean ± SD 0.28 ± 0.06 0.27 ± 0.06 0.28 ± 0.06 < 0.001 NDVI1000-m, mean ± SD 0.31 ± 0.05 0.30 ± 0.05 0.31 ± 0.05 < 0.001 Note. BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index. -
Figure 2 shows the association of the different buffer ranges of the NDVI with cardiometabolic risk factors. After adjusting for age, sex, education, and marital status (Model 2), for each interquartile range (IQR) increase of NDVI500-m, the risk of hypertension was reduced by 10.3% (OR = 0.897, 95% CI = 0.836–0.962), the risk of obesity was reduced by 20.5% (OR = 0.795, 95% CI = 0.695–0.910), the risk of type 2 diabetes was reduced by 15.1% (OR = 0.849, 95% CI = 0.740–0.974), the risk of dyslipidemia was reduced by 10.5% (OR = 0.895, 95% CI = 0.825–0.971), and the risk factor aggregation was reduced by 20.4% (OR = 0.796, 95% CI = 0.716–0.885). After further adjustments for the district levels of GDP and population density, the association of NDVI500-m with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia was not statistically significant. However, after additional adjustment for the district levels of population density and GDP, NDVI250-m still had a significant protective effect against hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, and risk factor aggregation. Furthermore, NDVI1000-m was only associated with hypertension and risk factor aggregation in Models 1 and 2 (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Association of residential greenness (per IQR increase) with cardiometabolic risk factors. Note. IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index. Model 1: Crude model; Model 2: With adjustments for age, sex, education level, and marital status; Model 3: Model 2 + district level of GDP and district level of population density.
Figure 2. Association of residential greenness (per IQR increase) with cardiometabolic risk factors, stratified by age, sex, education level, and marital status.
The Q2–Q4 quantiles had a significant protective effect against hypertension and risk factor aggregation (P values for trend < 0.05) when the Q1 quantile of NDVI500-m was used as reference (Table S2). Sensitivity analysis found that after further adjustment for smoking, drinking, and family history of cardiometabolic risk factors, the association between NDVI500-m and each cardiometabolic risk factor remained significant (Table S3). NDVI500-m has a significant protective effect against isolated systolic hypertension and obesity (diagnosed based on body fat percentage) (Table S4).
-
To further explore the potential association between residential greenness and cardiometabolic risk factors, we conducted stratified analyses according to age, sex, education level, and marital status (Figure 2). The results revealed a significant interaction between NDVI500-m and sex in the occurrence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and risk factor aggregation (P for interaction was 0.027, 0.005, and 0.030, respectively). The results also indicated the stronger protective effect of residential greenness against type 2 diabetes among people with a higher education level (P for interaction = 0.022). However, we did not find any interaction for the other subgroups (all P values > 0.05).
-
The mediation analysis results showed that PM10 mediated the associations between NDVI500-m and obesity, dyslipidemia, and risk factor aggregation by 8.7%, 9.2%, and 5.4%, respectively. Physical activity accounted for 1.9% of the association between NDVI500-m and dyslipidemia. However, no mediating effect of PM1 and PM2.5 was observed (Table 2).
Table 2. Mediation of association between NDVI500-m and cardiometabolic risk factors by air pollutants and physical activity.
Cardiometabolic risk factors Potential mediators β (95% CI) Indirect/Total effects (%) P value Hypertension PM1 0.018 (−0.038 to 0.070) − 0.500 PM2.5 −0.004 (−0.038 to 0.030) 1.2 0.830 PM10 0.011 (0.000 to 0.020) − 0.054 Physical activity −0.001(−0.006 to 0.000) 0.4 0.500 Obesity PM1 0.164 (0.135 to 0.190) − < 0.001 PM2.5 0.114 (0.089 to 0.140) − < 0.001 PM10 −0.044 (−0.059 to -0.030) 8.7 < 0.001 Physical activity 0.009 (0.004 to 0.010) − < 0.001 Type 2 diabetes PM1 0.109 (0.043 to 0.180) − < 0.001 PM2.5 0.031 (−0.001 to 0.070) − 0.064 PM10 −0.008 (−0.017 to 0.000) 5.6 0.100 Physical activity 0.005 (0.002 to 0.010) − 0.002 Dyslipidemia PM1 −0.018 (−0.077 to 0.040) 5.0 0.530 PM2.5 0.002 (−0.034 to 0.040) − 0.960 PM10 −0.032 (−0.047 to -0.020) 9.2 < 0.001 Physical activity −0.007 (−0.013 to 0.000) 1.9 0.004 Risk factor aggregation PM1 0.117 (0.076 to 0.150) − < 0.001 PM2.5 0.066 (0.036 to 0.090) − < 0.001 PM10 −0.026 (−0.038 to -0.010) 5.4 < 0.001 Physical activity 0.004 (0.000 to 0.010) − 0.046 Note. NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index; PM1, submicron particulate matter; PM2.5, fine particulate matter; PM10, inhalable particulate matter. The associations were adjusted for age, sex, education level, and marital status -
In this large cross-sectional study, we found that higher residential greenness was associated with a lower prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors, and the results were generally stable after several sensitivity analyses. Additionally, the stratified analysis found that the association between residential greenness and hypertension, dyslipidemia, and risk factor aggregation was greater in males, while the association between residential greenness and diabetes was greater in subjects with higher education levels. This study suggests that increasing green space around residences may be an effective measure for the prevention of cardiometabolic risk factors.
Although previous epidemiological studies have explored associations between residential greenness and cardiometabolic risk factors, their results have not been entirely consistent. Some researchers found residential greenness to have a protective effect against several cardiometabolic risk factors, including hypertension[12–14], obesity[15–17], type 2 diabetes[18], and dyslipidemia[19, 20]. Two studies focusing on metabolic syndrome[37, 38] also produced positive conclusions. In contrast, Iyer et al.[22] did not observe any association between greenness and hypertension or cholesterol in sub-Saharan Africa, and Markevych et al.[23] did not find an association between greenness and blood lipids in children aged 10–15 years in Germany. In addition, most studies were conducted in urban areas with relatively high economic levels. Therefore, their evidence may not necessarily apply to rural residents with a unique dietary structure and lifestyle in Xinjiang. Our study fills this gap regarding economically underdeveloped regions. We found higher residential greenness to have a protective effect against the four cardiometabolic risk factors mentioned above and the aggregation of risk factors in rural Xinjiang.
We found that residential greenness had the strongest protective effect against obesity among the cardiometabolic risk factors of hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia. It is likely that residents with more greenery around their homes tend to be more willing to engage in physical activity, which contributes to better weight control. Although the underlying mechanism of greenness on cardiometabolic risk factors has not been fully elucidated, several potential biological pathways have been suggested. First, a study based on a United States population[39] suggested that residential greenness was associated with decreased levels of sympathetic activation, reduction in oxidative stress, and increased angiogenesis. All three are beneficial for improving cardiovascular system biomarkers. Second, multiple studies [40–42] have concluded that long-term exposure to air pollution is associated with higher cardiovascular risk. Additionally, both Dadvand et al.[21] and Yeager et al.[43] proposed that residential greenness can promote health by encouraging physical activity, improving air quality, and reducing psychological stress. In the present study, we found that PM10 accounted for 5.4%–9.2% of the association between residential greenness and obesity, dyslipidemia, and risk factor aggregation. Physical activity mediated the association between NDVI500-m and dyslipidemia by 1.9%. The study did not find PM1 and PM2.5 to have a mediating effect, but this may be due to the limited scope of the study area and the limited value range of PM1 and PM2.5. Furthermore, the data on psychological stress, social interaction, and noise were not included in this study, although they could be potential moderators. Therefore, larger mechanistic studies should be conducted to further explore the underlying mechanisms.
In the present study, the stratified analyses showed that the associations of residential greenness with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and risk factor aggression were influenced by sex, with stronger associations being found among males. This result is inconsistent with the study conducted by Yang et al.[12, 19] among urban residents in Northeast China. Furthermore, we also found that the association between residential greenness and type 2 diabetes was influenced by education level, with a stronger association being found among the more educated participants. A study on residential greenness and sleep quality in rural Henan generated conclusions consistent with ours in that the benefits of residential greenness were greater among male and more educated participants[44]. In this study, in the context where rural residents in the area make a living by growing cotton, food, and fruits, men as the main labor force in agriculture may have a greater likelihood to benefit from green spaces. In addition, previous studies found that the metabolic status of women in the rural areas of Xinjiang was worse than that of men[45, 46], and the cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors of women varied from that of men[47]. Hence, higher residential greenness has a greater protective effect on men. Regarding the residents with higher levels of education, they were more aware of the impact of the environment on health and were therefore more likely to live in locations with more vegetation and thus benefit from green spaces around their homes.
This study explored the associations between residential greenness and cardiometabolic risk factors based on a large-scale population located in the rural areas of Xinjiang. Thus, it provided a certain theoretical basis and data support for the prevention of cardiometabolic-related diseases in residents. To ensure the quality of the research, the questionnaire surveys, physical examinations, and biochemical indicators were subject to strict quality control. However, this study has some limitations. First, as this study was a cross-sectional study, we were only able to report associations and had limited ability to infer causal associations. The 51st Regiment of the Third Division of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps was chosen as the research site. However, Xinjiang is vast, and diet, lifestyle, and environment vary by region. Therefore, the conclusions of this study need to be extrapolated to other regions with caution. Second, our assessment of residential greenness is static and subjects may have traveled elsewhere, so an assessment of active space buffers may be more precise. Moreover, as our estimates of residential greenness were based on neighborhood/company rather than individual levels, some subjects may have been misclassified. However, this misclassification is random and tends toward the null hypothesis[48]. Therefore, the association may be stronger if the greenness is assessed based on individual levels. Finally, although we adjusted for some confounding factors, some potential covariate information could not be obtained, such as noise level and psychological stress. Future studies with more rigorous designs and larger prospective cohort studies are needed to elucidate this association.
doi: 10.3967/bes2024.085
Association Between Residential Greenness and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors among Adults in Rural Xinjiang, China: A Cross-sectional Study
-
Abstract:
Objective This study aimed to explore the relationships between residential greenness and cardiometabolic risk factors among rural adults in Xinjiang and thus provide a theoretical basis and data support for improving the health of residents in this region. Methods We recruited 9,723 adult rural residents from the 51st Regiment of the Third Division of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps in September 2016. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was used to estimate residential greenness. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used to examine the association between residential greenness and cardiometabolic risk factors. Results Higher residential greenness was associated with lower cardiometabolic risk factor prevalence. After adjustments were made for age, sex, education, and marital status, for each interquartile range (IQR) increase of NDVI500-m, the risk of hypertension was reduced by 10.3% (OR = 0.897, 95% CI = 0.836–0.962), the risk of obesity by 20.5% (OR = 0.795, 95% CI = 0.695–0.910), the risk of type 2 diabetes by 15.1% (OR = 0.849, 95% CI = 0.740–0.974), and the risk of dyslipidemia by 10.5% (OR = 0.895, 95% CI = 0.825–0.971). Risk factor aggregation was reduced by 20.4% (OR = 0.796, 95% CI = 0.716–0.885) for the same. Stratified analysis showed that NDVI500-m was associated more strongly with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and risk factor aggregation among male participants. The association of NDVI500-m with type 2 diabetes was stronger among participants with a higher education level. PM10 and physical activity mediated 1.9%–9.2% of the associations between NDVI500-m and obesity, dyslipidemia, and risk factor aggregation. Conclusion Higher residential greenness has a protective effect against cardiometabolic risk factors among rural residents in Xinjiang. Increasing the area of green space around residences is an effective measure to reduce the burden of cardiometabolic-related diseases among rural residents in Xinjiang. -
Key words:
- Green space /
- Cardiometabolic risk factors /
- Cross-sectional study /
- Rural adults
注释: -
Figure 1. Association of residential greenness (per IQR increase) with cardiometabolic risk factors. Note. IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index. Model 1: Crude model; Model 2: With adjustments for age, sex, education level, and marital status; Model 3: Model 2 + district level of GDP and district level of population density.
Figure 2. Association of residential greenness (per IQR increase) with cardiometabolic risk factors, stratified by age, sex, education level, and marital status.
Note. IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index. The associations were adjusted for age, sex, education level, and marital status (unless stratified by the respective factor).
Table 1. Basic characteristics of the participants according to the cardiometabolic risk factors.
Variables Total(n = 9723) Cardiometabolic risk factors
(n = 6101)Non-cardiometabolic risk
factors (n = 3622)P value Age, N (%) < 0.001 ≤ 50 years 7718 (79.4) 4446 (72.9) 3272 (90.3) > 50 years 2005 (20.6) 1655 (27.1) 350 (9.7) Sex, N (%) < 0.001 Men 4722 (48.6) 3054 (50.1) 1668 (46.1) Women 5001 (51.4) 3047 (49.9) 1954 (53.9) Education level, N (%) < 0.001 Elementary school or below 6835 (70.3) 4568 (74.9) 2267 (62.6) Junior high school and above 2888 (29.7) 1533 (25.1) 1355 (37.4) Marital status, N (%) < 0.001 Windowed/single/divorced/separated 1559 (16.0) 860 (14.1) 699 (19.3) Married 8164 (84.0) 5241 (85.9) 2923 (80.7) Physical activity, N (%) 0.854 Low 7149 (73.5) 4482 (73.5) 2667 (73.6) High 2574 (26.5) 1619 (26.5) 955 (26.4) BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD 26.3 ± 5.0 28.1 ± 5.1 23.1 ± 2.7 < 0.001 WC (cm), mean ± SD 92.4 ± 14.6 96.6 ± 14.2 85.3 ± 12.2 < 0.001 SBP (mmHg), mean ± SD 129.3 ± 20.6 136.0 ± 21.8 117.8 ± 11.5 < 0.001 DBP (mmHg), mean ± SD 75.0 ± 12.5 78.2 ± 13.1 69.6 ± 9.0 < 0.001 FPG (mmol/L), median ± IQR 4.75 ± 1.20 4.88 ± 1.30 4.60 ± 1.00 < 0.001 TC (mmol/L), median ± IQR 4.61 ± 1.43 4.87 ± 1.53 4.25 ± 1.15 < 0.001 TG (mmol/L), median ± IQR 1.38 ± 1.20 1.72 ± 1.57 1.06 ± 0.70 < 0.001 LDL-C (mmol/L), median ± IQR 2.53 ± 1.16 2.70 ± 1.20 2.33 ± 0.99 < 0.001 HDL-C(mmol/L), median ± IQR 1.39 ± 0.68 1.33 ± 0.67 1.48 ± 0.71 < 0.001 NDVI250-m, mean ± SD 0.25 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.06 0.25 ± 0.06 < 0.001 NDVI500-m, mean ± SD 0.28 ± 0.06 0.27 ± 0.06 0.28 ± 0.06 < 0.001 NDVI1000-m, mean ± SD 0.31 ± 0.05 0.30 ± 0.05 0.31 ± 0.05 < 0.001 Note. BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index. Table 2. Mediation of association between NDVI500-m and cardiometabolic risk factors by air pollutants and physical activity.
Cardiometabolic risk factors Potential mediators β (95% CI) Indirect/Total effects (%) P value Hypertension PM1 0.018 (−0.038 to 0.070) − 0.500 PM2.5 −0.004 (−0.038 to 0.030) 1.2 0.830 PM10 0.011 (0.000 to 0.020) − 0.054 Physical activity −0.001(−0.006 to 0.000) 0.4 0.500 Obesity PM1 0.164 (0.135 to 0.190) − < 0.001 PM2.5 0.114 (0.089 to 0.140) − < 0.001 PM10 −0.044 (−0.059 to -0.030) 8.7 < 0.001 Physical activity 0.009 (0.004 to 0.010) − < 0.001 Type 2 diabetes PM1 0.109 (0.043 to 0.180) − < 0.001 PM2.5 0.031 (−0.001 to 0.070) − 0.064 PM10 −0.008 (−0.017 to 0.000) 5.6 0.100 Physical activity 0.005 (0.002 to 0.010) − 0.002 Dyslipidemia PM1 −0.018 (−0.077 to 0.040) 5.0 0.530 PM2.5 0.002 (−0.034 to 0.040) − 0.960 PM10 −0.032 (−0.047 to -0.020) 9.2 < 0.001 Physical activity −0.007 (−0.013 to 0.000) 1.9 0.004 Risk factor aggregation PM1 0.117 (0.076 to 0.150) − < 0.001 PM2.5 0.066 (0.036 to 0.090) − < 0.001 PM10 −0.026 (−0.038 to -0.010) 5.4 < 0.001 Physical activity 0.004 (0.000 to 0.010) − 0.046 Note. NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index; PM1, submicron particulate matter; PM2.5, fine particulate matter; PM10, inhalable particulate matter. The associations were adjusted for age, sex, education level, and marital status -
[1] GBD 2013 Risk Factors Collaborators, Forouzanfar MH, Alexander L, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet, 2015; 386, 2287−323. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00128-2 [2] Ralston J, Nugent R. Toward a broader response to cardiometabolic disease. Nat Med, 2019; 25, 1644−6. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0642-9 [3] The Writing Committee of the Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China. Report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2021: An updated summary. Biomed Environ Sci, 2022; 35, 573−603. [4] Wang ZW, Chen Z, Zhang LF, et al. Status of hypertension in China: results from the China hypertension survey, 2012-2015. Circulation, 2018; 137, 2344−56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032380 [5] Wang LM, Zhou B, Zhao ZP, et al. Body-mass index and obesity in urban and rural China: findings from consecutive nationally representative surveys during 2004-18. Lancet, 2021; 398, 53−63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00798-4 [6] Wang LM, Peng W, Zhao ZP, et al. Prevalence and Treatment of Diabetes in China, 2013-2018. JAMA, 2021; 326, 2498−506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22208 [7] Pan L, Yang ZH, Wu Y, et al. The prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of dyslipidemia among adults in China. Atherosclerosis, 2016; 248, 2−9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.02.006 [8] Oparil S, Acelajado MC, Bakris GL, et al. Hypertension. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2018; 4, 18014. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.14 [9] Haslam DW, James WPT. Obesity. Lancet, 2005; 366, 1197−209. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67483-1 [10] Chatterjee S, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet, 2017; 389, 2239−51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30058-2 [11] Kopin L, Lowenstein CJ. Dyslipidemia. Ann Intern Med, 2017; 167, ITC81−96. doi: 10.7326/AITC201712050 [12] Yang BY, Markevych I, Bloom MS, et al. Community greenness, blood pressure, and hypertension in urban dwellers: The 33 Communities Chinese Health Study. Environ Int, 2019; 126, 727−34. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.068 [13] Dzhambov AM, Markevych I, Lercher P. Greenspace seems protective of both high and low blood pressure among residents of an Alpine valley. Environ Int, 2018; 121, 443−52. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.044 [14] Xiao X, Yang BY, Hu LW, et al. Greenness around schools associated with lower risk of hypertension among children: Findings from the Seven Northeastern Cities Study in China. Environ Pollut, 2020; 256, 113422. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113422 [15] Sarkar C. Residential greenness and adiposity: Findings from the UK Biobank. Environ Int, 2017; 106, 1−10. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.05.016 [16] Anza-Ramirez C, Lazo M, Zafra-Tanaka JH, et al. The urban built environment and adult BMI, obesity, and diabetes in Latin American cities. Nat Commun, 2022; 13, 7977. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35648-w [17] Huang WZ, Yang BY, Yu HY, et al. Association between community greenness and obesity in urban-dwelling Chinese adults. Sci Total Environ, 2020; 702, 135040. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135040 [18] Sørensen M, Poulsen AH, Hvidtfeldt UA, et al. Air pollution, road traffic noise and lack of greenness and risk of type 2 diabetes: A multi-exposure prospective study covering Denmark. Environ Int, 2022; 170, 107570. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107570 [19] Yang BY, Markevych I, Heinrich J, et al. Residential greenness and blood lipids in urban-dwelling adults: The 33 communities Chinese health study. Environ Pollut, 2019; 250, 14−22. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.128 [20] Fan SJ, Yang BY, Xue ZX, et al. Associations between residential greenness and blood lipids in Chinese Uyghur adults. Environ Int, 2020; 142, 105903. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105903 [21] Dadvand P, Bartoll X, Basagaña X, et al. Green spaces and General Health: Roles of mental health status, social support, and physical activity. Environ Int, 2016; 91, 161−7. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.029 [22] Iyer HS, James P, Valeri L, et al. Neighborhood greenness and burden of non-communicable diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa: A multi-country cross-sectional study. Environ Res, 2021; 196, 110397. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110397 [23] Markevych I, Standl M, Sugiri D, et al. Residential greenness and blood lipids in children: A longitudinal analysis in GINIplus and LISAplus. Environ Res, 2016; 151, 168−73. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.037 [24] Samoli E, Stergiopoulou A, Santana P, et al. Spatial variability in air pollution exposure in relation to socioeconomic indicators in nine European metropolitan areas: A study on environmental inequality. Environ Pollut, 2019; 249, 345−53. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.050 [25] Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension, 2003; 42, 1206−52. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2 [26] Zhou BF, Cooperative Meta-Analysis Group of the Working Group on Obesity in China. Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in Chinese adults--study on optimal cut-off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci, 2002; 15, 83-96. [27] Chinese Diabetes Society. Guidelines for the prevention and control of type 2 diabetes in China (2017 Edition). Chin J Practical Intern Med, 2018; 38, 292−344. (In Chinese [28] Zhu JR, Gao RL, Zhao SP, et al. 2016 Chinese guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia in adults. J Geriatr Cardiol, 2018; 15, 1−29. [29] Tucker CJ. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ, 1979; 8, 127−50. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0 [30] Zhao NZ, Liu Y, Cao GF, et al. Forecasting China’s GDP at the pixel level using nighttime lights time series and population images. GISci Remote Sens, 2017; 54, 407−25. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2016.1276705 [31] Wei J, Li ZQ, Guo JP, et al. Satellite-derived 1-km-resolution PM1 concentrations from 2014 to 2018 across China. Environ Sci Technol, 2019; 53, 13265−74. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03258 [32] Wei J, Li ZQ, Cribb M, et al. Improved 1 km resolution PM2.5 estimates across China using enhanced space–time extremely randomized trees. Atmos Chem Phys, 2020; 20, 3273−89. doi: 10.5194/acp-20-3273-2020 [33] Wei J, Li ZQ, Lyapustin A, et al. Reconstructing 1-km-resolution high-quality PM2.5 data records from 2000 to 2018 in China: spatiotemporal variations and policy implications. Remote Sens Environ, 2021; 252, 112136. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112136 [34] Wei J, Li ZQ, Xue WH, et al. The ChinaHighPM10 dataset: generation, validation, and spatiotemporal variations from 2015 to 2019 across China. Environ Int, 2021; 146, 106290. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106290 [35] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking among adults--United States, 1992, and changes in definition of smoking. JAMA, 1994; 272, 14-6. [36] Sun K, Ren M, Liu D, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk of metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Clin Nutr, 2014; 33, 596−602. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.003 [37] Yang BY, Liu KK, Markevych I, et al. Association between residential greenness and metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults. Environ Int, 2020; 135, 105388. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105388 [38] De Keijzer C, Basagaña X, Tonne C, et al. Long-term exposure to greenspace and metabolic syndrome: A Whitehall II study. Environ Pollut, 2019; 255, 113231. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113231 [39] Yeager R, Riggs DW, DeJarnett N, et al. Association between residential greenness and cardiovascular disease risk. J Am Heart Assoc, 2018; 7, e009117. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009117 [40] Liu LJ, Zhang YY, Yang ZM, et al. Long-term exposure to fine particulate constituents and cardiovascular diseases in Chinese adults. J Hazard Mater, 2021; 416, 126051. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126051 [41] Alexeeff SE, Deosaransingh K, Van Den Eeden S, et al. Association of long-term exposure to particulate air pollution with cardiovascular events in California. JAMA Netw Open, 2023; 6, e230561. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0561 [42] Yang BY, Guo YM, Markevych I, et al. Association of long-term exposure to ambient air pollutants with risk factors for cardiovascular disease in China. JAMA Netw Open, 2019; 2, e190318. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0318 [43] Yeager RA, Smith TR, Bhatnagar A. Green environments and cardiovascular health. Trends Cardiovasc Med, 2020; 30, 241−6. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.06.005 [44] Xie YY, Xiang H, Di N, et al. Association between residential greenness and sleep quality in Chinese rural population. Environ Int, 2020; 145, 106100. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106100 [45] He J, Guo SX, Liu JM, et al. Ethnic differences in prevalence of general obesity and abdominal obesity among low-income rural Kazakh and Uyghur adults in far western China and implications in preventive public health. PLoS One, 2014; 9, e106723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106723 [46] Qiao TT, Luo T, Pei HL, et al. Association between abdominal obesity indices and risk of cardiovascular events in Chinese populations with type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2022; 21, 225. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01670-x [47] Appelman Y, Van Rijn BB, Haaf MET, et al. Sex differences in cardiovascular risk factors and disease prevention. Atherosclerosis, 2015; 241, 211−8. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.01.027 [48] Hutcheon JA, Chiolero A, Hanley JA. Random measurement error and regression dilution bias. BMJ, 2010; 340, c2289. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2289