-
A total of 14,254 women (mean age, 33.1 years; range, 20–50 years) who were referred to the reproductive center between January 1 and December 31, 2017, were enrolled in this study (Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure S1 available in www.besjournal.com). Based on CXR findings, 1,487 (10.4%) had signs of prior PTB and were assigned to the prior PTB group, whereas 12,767 (89.6%) were assigned to the non-PTB group. In the prior PTB group, 248 (16.7%) were excluded because of a history of anti-TB therapy, and the remaining 1,239 (83.3%) patients without such a history were assigned to the untreated prior PTB group. One patient in the untreated PTB group had a fever at 12 weeks of pregnancy and was confirmed to have acute miliary TB. Pregnancy was terminated due to spontaneous abortion.
We compared the baseline characteristics of patients in the untreated prior PTB (n = 1,239) and non-PTB (n = 12,767) groups who had received COH (Supplementary Table S1 available in www.besjournal.com). We also compared patients in the untreated prior PTB (n = 791) and non-PTB (n = 7,807) groups who had received ET (Table 1). The results of the comparative analysis for these two groups were similar (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). Patients in the untreated prior PTB group were older (34.8 ± 5.0 vs. 33.0 ± 5.0 years), had longer infertile periods (4.6 ± 4.0 vs. 4.3 ± 3.7), and had lower BMI values (22.6 ± 3.5 vs. 23.1 ± 3.8) than those in the non-PTB group (all P < 0.05; Table 1). Tubal factors were the most common cause of infertility in both groups, and the proportion of tubal factors as an infertility cause was higher in the untreated prior PTB group than in the non-PTB group. The untreated prior PTB group had lower numbers of total follicles (10.1 ± 5.4 vs. 11.1 ± 5.5), retrieved oocytes (9.3 ± 4.9 vs. 10.0 ± 5.2), and good-quality embryos per cycle compared with the non-PTB group [3.0 (1.0, 5.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0, 6.0); all P < 0.05; Table 1].
Table S1. Characteristics of the total infertile patients at baseline
Characteristics Untreated Prior-PTB Group (n = 1,239) Non-PTB Group (n = 12,767) P Value Age (years) 34.4 ± 5.2 32.9 ± 5.1 < 0.001* Body mass index, kg/m2 22.5 ± 3.6 22.9 ± 3.7 < 0.001* Duration of infertility (years) 4.8 ± 4.1 4.2 ± 3.7 < 0.001* Causes of infertility, no. (%) 0.005* Female factors Fallopian tube factor 345 (23.2) 2,312 (18.1) PCOS 133 (10.8) 1,391 (10.9) Endometriosis 18 (1.5) 179 (1.4) Mixed female factors 178 (14.4) 1,542 (12.1) Other female factors 46 (3.7) 590 (4.6) Male factors Oligospermia/asthenospermia 131 (10.6) 1,549 (12.1) Other male factors 62 (5.0) 2,312 (18.1) Mixed female and male factors 281 (22.7) 2,778 (21.8) Unexplained infertility 131 (10.6) 1,570 (12.3) COH protocol < 0.01* Ultralong GnRH agonist 125 (10.1) 1,433 (11.2) Short GnRH agonist 47 (3.8) 417 (3.3) GnRH antagonist 633 (51.1) 6,730 (52.7) Microsimulation cycle 82 (6.6) 512 (4.0) Long GnRH agonist 339 (27.4) 3,498 (27.4) Natural or other 13 (1.0) 177 (1.4) Basic hormone FSH, mIU/mL 6.3 (4.6–8.3) 6.2 (4.6–7.9) 0.024* LH, mIU/mL 3.2 (2.0–4.9) 3.3 (2.0–5.0) 0.197 E2, pg/mL 156.0 (117.0–200.0) 158.0 (119.0–203.0) 0.440 P, nmol/L 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 1.1 (0.8–1.5) 0.289 AMH, ng/mL 2.2 (1.0–4.2) 2.4 (1.1–4.5) 0.051 Total sinus follicles 10.7 ± 6.0 11.8 ± 5.9 < 0.001* No. of retrieved oocytes 11.0 ± 7.4 12.2 ± 8.2 < 0.001* Note. Mixed female factors, mixed with two or more female infertile factors. Mixed female and male factors, mixed with two or more infertile factors of both sexes.
Abbreviations: PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; BMI, body mass index; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; COH, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; E2, estradiol; P, prolactin; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.
*P < 0.05.Table 1. Characteristics of infertile patients who underwent ET cycles
Characteristics Untreated prior-PTB group (n = 791) Non-PTB group (n = 7,807) P value Age (years) 34.8 ± 5.0 33.0 ± 5.0 < 0.001a BMI, kg/m2 22.6 ± 3.5 23.1 ± 3.8 < 0.001a Duration of infertility (years) 4.6 ± 4.0 4.3 ± 3.7 0.017a Causes of infertility, no. (%) 0.081 Female factors Fallopian tube factor 185 (23.4) 1,582 (20.3) PCOS 60 (9.8) 799 (10.3) Endometriosis 10 (1.3) 108 (1.4) Mixed female factors 113 (14.3) 906 (11.6) Other female factors 20 (2.5) 241 (3.1) Male factors Oligospermia/asthenospermia 92 (11.6) 1,023 (13.1) Other male factors 39 (4.9) 512 (6.6) Mixed female and male factors 170 (21.5) 1,682 (21.5) Unexplained infertility 84 (10.6) 954 (12.2) COH protocol 0.034a Ultralong GnRH agonist 85 (10.7) 939 (12.0) Short GnRH agonist 31 (3.9) 251 (3.2) GnRH antagonist 404 (51.1) 4,119 (52.8) Microsimulation cycle 39 (4.9) 227 (2.9) Long GnRH agonist 228 (28.8) 2,225 (28.5) Natural or other 4 (0.5) 46 (0.6) Baseline hormone FSH, mIU/mL 6.3 (4.6–8.2) 6.3 (4.7–7.9) 0.328 LH, mIU/mL 3.1 (1.9–4.6) 3.2 (2.0–4.7) 0.191 E2, pg/mL 156.0 (119.0–202.0) 158.0 (120.0–203.0) 0.582 P, nmol/L 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 1.1 (0.8–1.5) 0.040a AMH, ng/mL 2.1 (1.1–3.5) 2.2 (1.1–3.9) 0.143 No. of total sinus follicles 10.1 ± 5.4 11.1 ± 5.5 < 0.001a No. of retrieved oocytes 9.3 ± 4.9 10.0 ± 5.2 < 0.001a Endometrial thickness (mm) 10.78 ± 1.71 10.74 ± 1.75 0.534 Endometrial pattern 0.095 A 702 (88.7) 6,721 (86.1) A–B 3 (0.4) 34 (0.4) B 77 (9.7) 991 (12.7) C 0 (0.0) 2 (0.0) No. of good-quality embryos per cycleb 3.0 (1.0, 5.0) 3.0 (2.0, 6.0) < 0.001a No. of embryos transferred < 0.001a 1 154 (19.6) 1,161 (15.0) 2 630 (80.4) 6,593 (85.0) Note. Mixed female factors, mixed with two or more female infertile factors. Mixed female and male factors, mixed with two or more factors of infertility of both sexes.
ET, embryo transfer; BMI, body mass index; PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; COH, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinising hormone; E2, oestradiol; P, prolactin; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.
aP < 0.05.
bEmbryos were evaluated on the third day after fertilization. All good-quality embryos were developed from two pronuclei zygotes and met the following criteria: (1) more than five blastomeres; (2) size difference of less than 20%; and (3) fragmentation of less than 50%.
Data on BMI, endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, and number of embryos transferred were missing for 80 cases, 1,418 cases, 68 cases, and 60 cases, respectively, in the general research population. -
The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the untreated prior PTB group than in the non-PTB group (31.7% vs. 38.1%, P < 0.001). The miscarriage rate was slightly higher in the prior PTB group than in the non-PTB group; however, the difference was not significant (19.1% and 15.5%, P = 0.135). Additionally, the live birth rate was significantly lower in the untreated prior PTB group than in the non-PTB group (23.8% vs. 30.6%, P < 0.001; Table 2).
Table 2. Pregnancy outcomes in the untreated prior-PTB and non-PTB groups
Pregnancy outcomes Untreated prior-PTB group Non-PTB group P value Clinical pregnancy ratea 31.7% (251/791) 38.1% (2,973/7,807) < 0.001d Miscarriage rateb 19.1% (48/251) 15.5% (462/2,973) 0.135 Live birth ratec 23.8% (186/782) 30.6% (2,375/7,768) < 0.001d Note. PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis.
aClinical pregnancy rate was defined as clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer.
bMiscarriage rate was defined as miscarriages per clinical pregnancy.
cLive birth rate was defined as live birth per embryo transfer.
dP < 0.05. -
The results indicated that age, BMI, COH protocol, endometrial thickness, and number of good-quality embryos per cycle had significant effects on the clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates (Supplementary Table S2 available in www.besjournal.com). After adjustment for these factors, the results indicated that untreated prior PTB was an independent risk factor for decreased live birth rate (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66–0.98; P = 0.028) in infertile patients (Table 3 and Supplementary Table S2). Patients with untreated prior PTB tended to have fewer clinical pregnancies and more miscarriages than non-PTB patients; nonetheless, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.119 and 0.214, respectively; Table 3 and Supplementary Table S2).
Table S2. Multivariate logistic regression analyses for pregnancy outcomes
Outcomes Variables OR (95% CI) P value Clinical pregnancy (n = 8,593) Untreated prior-PTB vs. non-PTB group 0.87 (0.72–1.04) 0.119 Age < 0.001* 31–35 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.96 (0.86–1.08) 0.492 36–40 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.59 (0.51–0.69) < 0.001* 41–45 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.25 (0.19–0.32) < 0.000* ≥ 46 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.08 (0.02–0.25) < 0.001* BMI 0.99 (0.98–1.00) 0.161 Endometrial thickness 1.08 (1.05–1.12) < 0.001* No. of good-quality embryos per cycle 1.10 (1.08–1.12) < 0.001* COH protocol < 0.001* Ultralong GnRH agonist vs. natural 1.32 (0.50–3.47) 0.578 Long GnRH agonist vs. natural 0.86 (0.32–2.35) 0.773 Short GnRH agonist vs. natural 0.82 (0.31–2.14) 0.684 GnRH antagonist vs. natural 1.10 (0.40–3.01) 0.852 Microsimulation cycle vs. natural 1.18 (0.45–3.08) 0.743 Infertile causes 0.177 Unexplained infertility vs. PCOS 1.23 (0.99–1.54) 0.068 Mixed female factors vs. PCOS 0.91 (0.72–1.15) 0.441 Mixed female and male factors vs. PCOS 1.04 (0.85–1.28) 0.715 Oligospermia/asthenospermia vs. PCOS 1.13 (0.91–1.40) 0.283 Other male factors vs. PCOS 0.95 (0.68–1.33) 0.763 Other female factors vs. PCOS 1.01 (0.78–1.31) 0.944 Fallopian tube factor vs. PCOS 1.13 (0.92–1.38) 0.263 Endometriosis 0.95 (0.60–1.50) 0.826 Miscarriage (n = 3,222) Untreated prior-PTB vs non-PTB group 1.26 (0.87–1.83) 0.214 Age < 0.001* 31–35 years vs. ≤ 30 years 1.07 (0.83–1.39) 0.596 36–40 years vs. ≤ 30 years 2.38 (1.76–3.21) < 0.001* 41–45 years vs. ≤ 30 years 5.36 (3.22–8.93) < 0.001* ≥ 46 years vs. ≤ 30 years − 0.999 BMI 1.03 (1.00–1.06) 0.048 Endometrial thickness 0.92 (0.87–0.99) 0.019* No. of good-quality embryos per cycle 0.98 (0.95–1.02) 0.365 COH Protocol 0.315 Ultralong GnRH agonist vs. natural 0.27 (0.05–1.41) 0.119 Long GnRH agonist vs. natural 0.45 (0.08–2.56) 0.370 Short GnRH agonist vs. natural 0.29 (0.06–1.50) 0.139 GnRH antagonist vs. natural 0.20 (0.03–1.21) 0.080 Microsimulation cycle vs. natural 0.29 (0.06–1.52) 0.144 Infertile causes 0.237 Unexplained infertility vs. PCOS 1.31 (0.81–2.10) 0.269 Mixed female factors vs. PCOS 1.47 (0.90–2.42) 0.128 Mixed female and male factors vs. PCOS 0.99 (0.63–1.55) 0.958 Oligospermia/asthenospermia vs. PCOS 1.05 (0.65–1.71) 0.831 Other male factors vs. PCOS 1.62 (0.83–3.15) 0.156 Other female factors vs. PCOS 1.21 (0.67–2.18) 0.523 Fallopian tube factor vs. PCOS 0.96 (0.61–1.52) 0.865 Endometriosis 1.84 (0.76–4.49) 0.178 Live birth (n = 8,545) Untreated prior-PTB vs. non-PTB group 0.80 (0.66–0.98) 0.028* Age < 0.001* 31–35 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.95 (0.84–1.07) 0.413 36–40 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.50 (0.43–0.59) < 0.001* 41–45 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.17 (0.12–0.23) < 0.001* ≥ 46 years vs. ≤ 30 years − 0.997 BMI 0.98 (0.97–1.00) 0.009* Endometrial thickness 1.11 (1.08–1.15) < 0.001* No. of good-quality embryos per cycle 1.09 (1.07–1.11) < 0.001* COH Protocol < 0.001* Ultralong GnRH agonist vs. natural 2.05 (0.59–7.15) 0.262 Long GnRH agonist vs. natural 1.16 (0.32–4.18) 0.826 Short GnRH agonist vs. natural 1.32 (0.38–4.57) 0.664 GnRH antagonist vs. natural 1.93 (0.53–6.97) 0.319 Microsimulation cycle vs. natural 1.87 (0.54–6.51) 0.324 Infertile causes 0.073 Unexplained infertility vs. PCOS 1.20 (0.95–1.53) 0.131 Mixed female factors vs. PCOS 0.86 (0.67–1.11) 0.250 Mixed female and male factors vs. PCOS 1.08 (0.86–1.35) 0.522 Oligospermia/asthenospermia vs. PCOS 1.15 (0.91–1.46) 0.237 Other male factors vs. PCOS 0.88 (0.61–1.28) 0.505 Other female factors vs. PCOS 1.01 (0.77–1.34) 0.924 Fallopian tube factor vs. PCOS 1.17 (0.93–1.46) 0.180 Endometriosis 0.93 (0.57–1.52) 0.768 Note. Abbreviations: PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; BMI, body mass index; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; COH, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.
*P < 0.05.Table 3. Multivariable logistic regression analyses for pregnancy outcomes
Variable Clinical pregnancy rate (n = 8,598) Miscarriage rate (n = 3,222) Live birth rate (n = 8,545) OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value Untreated prior PTB vs. non-PTB 0.87 (0.72–1.04) 0.119 1.26 (0.87–1.83) 0.214 0.80 (0.66–0.98) 0.028a Note. Factors were adjusted for age, BMI, infertile causes, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol, endometrial thickness, and number of good-quality embryos per cycle.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; BMI, body mass index.
aP < 0.05. -
In the UI subgroup, untreated prior PTB was shown to be a risk factor for increased miscarriage (OR, 4.19; 95% CI, 1.69–10.39; P = 0.002) and decreased live birth (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24–0.83; P = 0.011) rates (Table 4).
Table 4. Correlation analysis between untreated prior PTB revealed by chest X-ray and pregnancy outcomes in different infertile populations
Different infertile populations Clinical pregnancy rate Miscarriage rate Live birth rate n OR P value n OR P value n OR P value General research population 7,167 0.87 (0.72, 1.04) 0.119 2,703 1.26 (0.87, 1.83) 0.214 7,124 0.80 (0.66, 0.98) 0.028a Fallopian tube factor 1,459 0.75 (0.52, 1.08) 0.124 595 1.14 (0.51, 2.53) 0.753 1,445 0.68 (0.46, 1.02) 0.059 PCOS 697 1.04 (0.55, 1.94) 0.912 205 1.38 (0.36, 5.27) 0.637 693 0.81 (0.39, 1.70) 0.576 Endometriosis 101 1.10 (0.17, 6.94) 0.923 37 – 0.999 101 1.90 (0.27, 13.46) 0.520 Oligospermia/asthenospermia 1,008 0.61 (0.36, 1.01) 0.054 421 1.43 (0.43, 4.77) 0.561 1,001 0.62 (0.36, 1.08) 0.092 Unexplained infertility 915 0.73 (0.44, 1.22) 0.229 381 4.19 (1.69, 10.39) 0.002a 911 0.45 (0.24, 0.83) 0.011a Mixed female factors 779 1.13 (0.66, 1.92) 0.667 250 0.36 (0.09, 1.44) 0.148 774 1.42 (0.81, 2.51) 0.224 Mixed female and male factors 1,522 1.03 (0.70, 1.53) 0.874 548 0.99 (0.41, 2.40) 0.981 1,516 1.09 (0.71, 1.67) 0.682 Other female factors 221 2.02 (0.65, 6.24) 0.224 77 4.52 (0.62, 33.25) 0.138 219 0.75 (0.20, 2.77) 0.661 Other male factors 465 0.86 (0.38, 1.93) 0.708 189 1.28 (0.23, 6.95) 0.778 464 0.83 (0.35, 1.97) 0.680 Note. Factors were adjusted for age, BMI, and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol. OR, odds ratio; PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; BMI, body mass index. PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; aP < 0.05.
Data on BMI, endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, and number of embryos transferred were missing for 80, 1,418, 68, and 60 cases, respectively, in the general research population.
doi: 10.3967/bes2021.019
Untreated Prior Pulmonary Tuberculosis Adversely Affects Pregnancy Outcomes in Infertile Women Undergoing in vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study
-
Abstract:
Objective Prior pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) on chest X-ray (CXR) was commonly found in infertile patients receiving examinations before in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). It was unclear whether untreated PTB would affect pregnancy outcomes after IVF-ET. Method We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 14,254 infertile patients who had received IVF-ET at Peking University Third Hospital in 2017. Prior PTB was defined as the presence of signs suggestive of old or inactive PTB on CXR, with or without a clinical TB history. Patients who had prior PTB on CXR but had not received a clinical diagnosis and anti-TB therapy were included for analysis. Live birth, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates were compared between the untreated PTB and non-PTB groups. Results The untreated PTB group had significantly lower clinical pregnancy (31.7% vs. 38.1%) and live birth (23.8% vs. 30.6%) rates than the non-PTB group (both P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that untreated PTB was a risk factor for decreased live birth rate [odds ratio (OR), 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66–0.98; P = 0.028] in all patients and for increased miscarriage (OR, 4.19; 95% CI, 1.69–10.39; P = 0.002) and decreased live birth (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24–0.83; P = 0.011) rates in patients with unexplained infertility. Conclusions Untreated PTB was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes after IVF-ET, especially in patients with unexplained infertility, highlighting the clinical significance of PTB in this specific patient population. -
Key words:
- Tuberculosis /
- Embryo transfer /
- In vitro fertilization /
- Infertility /
- Pregnancy outcome
注释: -
S1. Characteristics of the total infertile patients at baseline
Characteristics Untreated Prior-PTB Group (n = 1,239) Non-PTB Group (n = 12,767) P Value Age (years) 34.4 ± 5.2 32.9 ± 5.1 < 0.001* Body mass index, kg/m2 22.5 ± 3.6 22.9 ± 3.7 < 0.001* Duration of infertility (years) 4.8 ± 4.1 4.2 ± 3.7 < 0.001* Causes of infertility, no. (%) 0.005* Female factors Fallopian tube factor 345 (23.2) 2,312 (18.1) PCOS 133 (10.8) 1,391 (10.9) Endometriosis 18 (1.5) 179 (1.4) Mixed female factors 178 (14.4) 1,542 (12.1) Other female factors 46 (3.7) 590 (4.6) Male factors Oligospermia/asthenospermia 131 (10.6) 1,549 (12.1) Other male factors 62 (5.0) 2,312 (18.1) Mixed female and male factors 281 (22.7) 2,778 (21.8) Unexplained infertility 131 (10.6) 1,570 (12.3) COH protocol < 0.01* Ultralong GnRH agonist 125 (10.1) 1,433 (11.2) Short GnRH agonist 47 (3.8) 417 (3.3) GnRH antagonist 633 (51.1) 6,730 (52.7) Microsimulation cycle 82 (6.6) 512 (4.0) Long GnRH agonist 339 (27.4) 3,498 (27.4) Natural or other 13 (1.0) 177 (1.4) Basic hormone FSH, mIU/mL 6.3 (4.6–8.3) 6.2 (4.6–7.9) 0.024* LH, mIU/mL 3.2 (2.0–4.9) 3.3 (2.0–5.0) 0.197 E2, pg/mL 156.0 (117.0–200.0) 158.0 (119.0–203.0) 0.440 P, nmol/L 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 1.1 (0.8–1.5) 0.289 AMH, ng/mL 2.2 (1.0–4.2) 2.4 (1.1–4.5) 0.051 Total sinus follicles 10.7 ± 6.0 11.8 ± 5.9 < 0.001* No. of retrieved oocytes 11.0 ± 7.4 12.2 ± 8.2 < 0.001* Note. Mixed female factors, mixed with two or more female infertile factors. Mixed female and male factors, mixed with two or more infertile factors of both sexes.
Abbreviations: PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; BMI, body mass index; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; COH, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; E2, estradiol; P, prolactin; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.
*P < 0.05.Table 1. Characteristics of infertile patients who underwent ET cycles
Characteristics Untreated prior-PTB group (n = 791) Non-PTB group (n = 7,807) P value Age (years) 34.8 ± 5.0 33.0 ± 5.0 < 0.001a BMI, kg/m2 22.6 ± 3.5 23.1 ± 3.8 < 0.001a Duration of infertility (years) 4.6 ± 4.0 4.3 ± 3.7 0.017a Causes of infertility, no. (%) 0.081 Female factors Fallopian tube factor 185 (23.4) 1,582 (20.3) PCOS 60 (9.8) 799 (10.3) Endometriosis 10 (1.3) 108 (1.4) Mixed female factors 113 (14.3) 906 (11.6) Other female factors 20 (2.5) 241 (3.1) Male factors Oligospermia/asthenospermia 92 (11.6) 1,023 (13.1) Other male factors 39 (4.9) 512 (6.6) Mixed female and male factors 170 (21.5) 1,682 (21.5) Unexplained infertility 84 (10.6) 954 (12.2) COH protocol 0.034a Ultralong GnRH agonist 85 (10.7) 939 (12.0) Short GnRH agonist 31 (3.9) 251 (3.2) GnRH antagonist 404 (51.1) 4,119 (52.8) Microsimulation cycle 39 (4.9) 227 (2.9) Long GnRH agonist 228 (28.8) 2,225 (28.5) Natural or other 4 (0.5) 46 (0.6) Baseline hormone FSH, mIU/mL 6.3 (4.6–8.2) 6.3 (4.7–7.9) 0.328 LH, mIU/mL 3.1 (1.9–4.6) 3.2 (2.0–4.7) 0.191 E2, pg/mL 156.0 (119.0–202.0) 158.0 (120.0–203.0) 0.582 P, nmol/L 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 1.1 (0.8–1.5) 0.040a AMH, ng/mL 2.1 (1.1–3.5) 2.2 (1.1–3.9) 0.143 No. of total sinus follicles 10.1 ± 5.4 11.1 ± 5.5 < 0.001a No. of retrieved oocytes 9.3 ± 4.9 10.0 ± 5.2 < 0.001a Endometrial thickness (mm) 10.78 ± 1.71 10.74 ± 1.75 0.534 Endometrial pattern 0.095 A 702 (88.7) 6,721 (86.1) A–B 3 (0.4) 34 (0.4) B 77 (9.7) 991 (12.7) C 0 (0.0) 2 (0.0) No. of good-quality embryos per cycleb 3.0 (1.0, 5.0) 3.0 (2.0, 6.0) < 0.001a No. of embryos transferred < 0.001a 1 154 (19.6) 1,161 (15.0) 2 630 (80.4) 6,593 (85.0) Note. Mixed female factors, mixed with two or more female infertile factors. Mixed female and male factors, mixed with two or more factors of infertility of both sexes.
ET, embryo transfer; BMI, body mass index; PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; COH, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinising hormone; E2, oestradiol; P, prolactin; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.
aP < 0.05.
bEmbryos were evaluated on the third day after fertilization. All good-quality embryos were developed from two pronuclei zygotes and met the following criteria: (1) more than five blastomeres; (2) size difference of less than 20%; and (3) fragmentation of less than 50%.
Data on BMI, endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, and number of embryos transferred were missing for 80 cases, 1,418 cases, 68 cases, and 60 cases, respectively, in the general research population.Table 2. Pregnancy outcomes in the untreated prior-PTB and non-PTB groups
Pregnancy outcomes Untreated prior-PTB group Non-PTB group P value Clinical pregnancy ratea 31.7% (251/791) 38.1% (2,973/7,807) < 0.001d Miscarriage rateb 19.1% (48/251) 15.5% (462/2,973) 0.135 Live birth ratec 23.8% (186/782) 30.6% (2,375/7,768) < 0.001d Note. PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis.
aClinical pregnancy rate was defined as clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer.
bMiscarriage rate was defined as miscarriages per clinical pregnancy.
cLive birth rate was defined as live birth per embryo transfer.
dP < 0.05.S2. Multivariate logistic regression analyses for pregnancy outcomes
Outcomes Variables OR (95% CI) P value Clinical pregnancy (n = 8,593) Untreated prior-PTB vs. non-PTB group 0.87 (0.72–1.04) 0.119 Age < 0.001* 31–35 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.96 (0.86–1.08) 0.492 36–40 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.59 (0.51–0.69) < 0.001* 41–45 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.25 (0.19–0.32) < 0.000* ≥ 46 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.08 (0.02–0.25) < 0.001* BMI 0.99 (0.98–1.00) 0.161 Endometrial thickness 1.08 (1.05–1.12) < 0.001* No. of good-quality embryos per cycle 1.10 (1.08–1.12) < 0.001* COH protocol < 0.001* Ultralong GnRH agonist vs. natural 1.32 (0.50–3.47) 0.578 Long GnRH agonist vs. natural 0.86 (0.32–2.35) 0.773 Short GnRH agonist vs. natural 0.82 (0.31–2.14) 0.684 GnRH antagonist vs. natural 1.10 (0.40–3.01) 0.852 Microsimulation cycle vs. natural 1.18 (0.45–3.08) 0.743 Infertile causes 0.177 Unexplained infertility vs. PCOS 1.23 (0.99–1.54) 0.068 Mixed female factors vs. PCOS 0.91 (0.72–1.15) 0.441 Mixed female and male factors vs. PCOS 1.04 (0.85–1.28) 0.715 Oligospermia/asthenospermia vs. PCOS 1.13 (0.91–1.40) 0.283 Other male factors vs. PCOS 0.95 (0.68–1.33) 0.763 Other female factors vs. PCOS 1.01 (0.78–1.31) 0.944 Fallopian tube factor vs. PCOS 1.13 (0.92–1.38) 0.263 Endometriosis 0.95 (0.60–1.50) 0.826 Miscarriage (n = 3,222) Untreated prior-PTB vs non-PTB group 1.26 (0.87–1.83) 0.214 Age < 0.001* 31–35 years vs. ≤ 30 years 1.07 (0.83–1.39) 0.596 36–40 years vs. ≤ 30 years 2.38 (1.76–3.21) < 0.001* 41–45 years vs. ≤ 30 years 5.36 (3.22–8.93) < 0.001* ≥ 46 years vs. ≤ 30 years − 0.999 BMI 1.03 (1.00–1.06) 0.048 Endometrial thickness 0.92 (0.87–0.99) 0.019* No. of good-quality embryos per cycle 0.98 (0.95–1.02) 0.365 COH Protocol 0.315 Ultralong GnRH agonist vs. natural 0.27 (0.05–1.41) 0.119 Long GnRH agonist vs. natural 0.45 (0.08–2.56) 0.370 Short GnRH agonist vs. natural 0.29 (0.06–1.50) 0.139 GnRH antagonist vs. natural 0.20 (0.03–1.21) 0.080 Microsimulation cycle vs. natural 0.29 (0.06–1.52) 0.144 Infertile causes 0.237 Unexplained infertility vs. PCOS 1.31 (0.81–2.10) 0.269 Mixed female factors vs. PCOS 1.47 (0.90–2.42) 0.128 Mixed female and male factors vs. PCOS 0.99 (0.63–1.55) 0.958 Oligospermia/asthenospermia vs. PCOS 1.05 (0.65–1.71) 0.831 Other male factors vs. PCOS 1.62 (0.83–3.15) 0.156 Other female factors vs. PCOS 1.21 (0.67–2.18) 0.523 Fallopian tube factor vs. PCOS 0.96 (0.61–1.52) 0.865 Endometriosis 1.84 (0.76–4.49) 0.178 Live birth (n = 8,545) Untreated prior-PTB vs. non-PTB group 0.80 (0.66–0.98) 0.028* Age < 0.001* 31–35 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.95 (0.84–1.07) 0.413 36–40 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.50 (0.43–0.59) < 0.001* 41–45 years vs. ≤ 30 years 0.17 (0.12–0.23) < 0.001* ≥ 46 years vs. ≤ 30 years − 0.997 BMI 0.98 (0.97–1.00) 0.009* Endometrial thickness 1.11 (1.08–1.15) < 0.001* No. of good-quality embryos per cycle 1.09 (1.07–1.11) < 0.001* COH Protocol < 0.001* Ultralong GnRH agonist vs. natural 2.05 (0.59–7.15) 0.262 Long GnRH agonist vs. natural 1.16 (0.32–4.18) 0.826 Short GnRH agonist vs. natural 1.32 (0.38–4.57) 0.664 GnRH antagonist vs. natural 1.93 (0.53–6.97) 0.319 Microsimulation cycle vs. natural 1.87 (0.54–6.51) 0.324 Infertile causes 0.073 Unexplained infertility vs. PCOS 1.20 (0.95–1.53) 0.131 Mixed female factors vs. PCOS 0.86 (0.67–1.11) 0.250 Mixed female and male factors vs. PCOS 1.08 (0.86–1.35) 0.522 Oligospermia/asthenospermia vs. PCOS 1.15 (0.91–1.46) 0.237 Other male factors vs. PCOS 0.88 (0.61–1.28) 0.505 Other female factors vs. PCOS 1.01 (0.77–1.34) 0.924 Fallopian tube factor vs. PCOS 1.17 (0.93–1.46) 0.180 Endometriosis 0.93 (0.57–1.52) 0.768 Note. Abbreviations: PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; BMI, body mass index; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; COH, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.
*P < 0.05.Table 3. Multivariable logistic regression analyses for pregnancy outcomes
Variable Clinical pregnancy rate (n = 8,598) Miscarriage rate (n = 3,222) Live birth rate (n = 8,545) OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value Untreated prior PTB vs. non-PTB 0.87 (0.72–1.04) 0.119 1.26 (0.87–1.83) 0.214 0.80 (0.66–0.98) 0.028a Note. Factors were adjusted for age, BMI, infertile causes, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol, endometrial thickness, and number of good-quality embryos per cycle.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; BMI, body mass index.
aP < 0.05.Table 4. Correlation analysis between untreated prior PTB revealed by chest X-ray and pregnancy outcomes in different infertile populations
Different infertile populations Clinical pregnancy rate Miscarriage rate Live birth rate n OR P value n OR P value n OR P value General research population 7,167 0.87 (0.72, 1.04) 0.119 2,703 1.26 (0.87, 1.83) 0.214 7,124 0.80 (0.66, 0.98) 0.028a Fallopian tube factor 1,459 0.75 (0.52, 1.08) 0.124 595 1.14 (0.51, 2.53) 0.753 1,445 0.68 (0.46, 1.02) 0.059 PCOS 697 1.04 (0.55, 1.94) 0.912 205 1.38 (0.36, 5.27) 0.637 693 0.81 (0.39, 1.70) 0.576 Endometriosis 101 1.10 (0.17, 6.94) 0.923 37 – 0.999 101 1.90 (0.27, 13.46) 0.520 Oligospermia/asthenospermia 1,008 0.61 (0.36, 1.01) 0.054 421 1.43 (0.43, 4.77) 0.561 1,001 0.62 (0.36, 1.08) 0.092 Unexplained infertility 915 0.73 (0.44, 1.22) 0.229 381 4.19 (1.69, 10.39) 0.002a 911 0.45 (0.24, 0.83) 0.011a Mixed female factors 779 1.13 (0.66, 1.92) 0.667 250 0.36 (0.09, 1.44) 0.148 774 1.42 (0.81, 2.51) 0.224 Mixed female and male factors 1,522 1.03 (0.70, 1.53) 0.874 548 0.99 (0.41, 2.40) 0.981 1,516 1.09 (0.71, 1.67) 0.682 Other female factors 221 2.02 (0.65, 6.24) 0.224 77 4.52 (0.62, 33.25) 0.138 219 0.75 (0.20, 2.77) 0.661 Other male factors 465 0.86 (0.38, 1.93) 0.708 189 1.28 (0.23, 6.95) 0.778 464 0.83 (0.35, 1.97) 0.680 Note. Factors were adjusted for age, BMI, and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol. OR, odds ratio; PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; BMI, body mass index. PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; aP < 0.05.
Data on BMI, endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, and number of embryos transferred were missing for 80, 1,418, 68, and 60 cases, respectively, in the general research population. -
[1] World Health Organization, 2020. Global TB report 2020 Available at: https://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/. [2020-12-28]. [2] Quaife M, Houben R, Allwood B, et al. Post-tuberculosis mortality and morbidity: valuing the hidden epidemic. Lancet Respir Med, 2020; 8, 332−3. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30039-4 [3] Zhao F, Zhang ZG, Ma SB, et al. Prevalence of Tuberculosis among Close Contacts of Index Cases in 27 Universities in Beijing, China, 2017-2018. Biomed Environ Sci, 2020; 33, 780−4. [4] Ou XC, Li H, Lie DX, et al. Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF, RealAmp, and CPA Tests in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biomed Environ Sci, 2019; 32, 215−9. [5] Gao L, Lu W, Bai L, et al. Latent tuberculosis infection in rural China: baseline results of a population-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis, 2015; 15, 310−9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71085-0 [6] Lam KB, Jiang CQ, Jordan RE, et al. Prior TB, smoking, and airflow obstruction: a cross-sectional analysis of the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study. Chest, 2010; 137, 593−600. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1435 [7] Thoma ME, McLain AC, Louis JF, et al. Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach. Fertil Steril, 2013; 99, 1324.e1−1331.e1. [8] Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem, 2018; 62, 2−10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012 [9] Zhou Z, Zheng D, Wu H, et al. Epidemiology of infertility in China: a population-based study. BJOG, 2018; 125, 432−41. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14966 [10] Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2015; 103, e44−e50. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.019 [11] Bhanothu V, Theophilus JP, Reddy PK, et al. Occurrence of female genital tuberculosis among infertile women: a study from a tertiary maternal health care research centre in South India. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2014; 33, 1937−49. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2164-1 [12] Dai W, Ma L, Cao Y, et al. In vitro fertilization outcome in women with endometrial tuberculosis and tubal tuberculosis. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2020; 36, 819−23. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1702639 [13] Jirge PR, Chougule SM, Keni A, et al. Latent genital tuberculosis adversely affects the ovarian reserve in infertile women. Hum Reprod, 2018; 33, 1262−9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey117 [14] Kulshrestha V, Kriplani A, Agarwal N, et al. Genital tuberculosis among infertile women and fertility outcome after antitubercular therapy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2011; 113, 229−34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.12.014 [15] Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ, Barfield WD. Monitoring health outcomes of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med, 2014; 371, 91−3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1404371 [16] World Health Organization, 2015. Tuberculosis in Women. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/191102. [2018-10-12]. [17] Piccazzo R, Paparo F, Garlaschi G. Diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) and its role in the detection of latent TB infection: a systematic review. J Rheumatol, 2014; Suppl. 91, 32−40. [18] Nachiappan AC, Rahba K, Shi X, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis: role of radiology in diagnosis and management. Radiographics, 2017; 37, 52−72. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160032 [19] Gelbaya TA, Potdar N, Jeve Y, et al. Definition and epidemiology of unexplained infertility. Obstet Gynecol, 2014; Surv 69, 109−115. [20] Wang H, Gao H, Chi H, et al. Effect of levothyroxine on miscarriage among women with normal thyroid function and thyroid autoimmunity undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2017; 318, 2190−8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18249 [21] Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol, 1996; 49, 1373−9. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3 [22] Xiao LL, Wu SY, He PP, et al. Analysis of TB screening results among applicants for immigration to the United States in Beijing. Chin J Antituberc, 2014; 36, 86−92. [23] He W, Chen BD, Lv Y, et al. Use of low-dose computed tomography to assess pulmonary tuberculosis among healthcare workers in a tuberculosis hospital. Infect Dis Poverty, 2017; 6, 68. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0274-6 [24] Mijiti P, Yuehua L, Feng X, et al. Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis in western China in 2010-11: a population-based, cross-sectional survey. Lancet Glob Health, 2016; 4, e485−e494. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30074-2 [25] Wang L, Zhang H Ruan, Y, et al. Tuberculosis prevalence in China, 1990-2010; a longitudinal analysis of national survey data. Lancet, 2014; 383, P2057−P2064. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62639-2 [26] Bhagwan SJ, Sneha J, Singh UB, et al. Effect of antitubercular therapy on endometrial function in infertile women with female genital tuberculosis. Infect Disord Drug Targets, 2016; 16, 101−8. doi: 10.2174/1871526516666151223103534 [27] Mondal SK. Histopathologic analysis of female genital tuberculosis: a fifteen-year retrospective study of 110 cases in eastern India. Turk Patoloji Derg, 2013; 29, 41−5. [28] Zhang L, Wei Z, Liu P. Factors affecting the clinical pregnancy rate in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Chin J Obstet Gynecol, 1998; 33, 727−30. [29] Chen ZJ, Liu JY, Huang HF, et al. Guideline on diagnosis of infertility. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 2019; 54, 505−11. (In Chinese [30] Millington KA, Gooding S, Hinks TS, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific cellular immune profiles suggest bacillary persistence decades after spontaneous cure in untreated tuberculosis. J Infect Dis, 2010; 202, 1685−9. doi: 10.1086/656772 [31] Wigginton JE, Kirschner D. A model to predict cell-mediated immune regulatory mechanisms during human infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol, 2001; 166, 1951−67. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.3.1951 [32] Deshpande PS, Gupta AS. Causes and prevalence of factors causing infertility in a public health facility. J Hum Reprod Sci, 2019; 12, 287−93. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_140_18 [33] Sadeghi MR. Unexplained infertility, the controversial matter in management of infertile couples. J Reprod Infertil, 2015; 16, 1−2.